EAKINS VS RF4 trinocular microscope comparison 

i love the way you got to the point right off the bat. hey, dont buy this. a lot of reviewers save that to the end, for viewer retention, but your idea is hey, i dont want ANYONE to get the idea im recommending this thing. very considerate and PRACTICAL, just like everything you do. have a great one!!

Nice. Covering repair tools themselves. I like these kind of videos.

Thank you for making a video on the RF4 microscope. I've been looking for a review for months.

ok, I needed exactly this. Eakins has this new design too.

Need more videos like this, thanks

I'm looking for a trinocular microscope, thank you for making this review

I'm using the black eakins for 3 years and i'm really happy with it ^^

thanks a lot dude , it was the right video on the right time , i was going to buy one of those microscopes , now i think i'll go for the mechanic MOS300-B11 , thank you very much

Thanks for your ethics.👍

Thank you.. For saving our money

I don't know if I provoked this video, but thanks for the information. No matter what the video is, I learn something useful every time. 👍

Good review 👍🏻👨🏻

Good work 💯👏

You just saved me from wasting money on RF4

ive been eyeing a microscope like this for examining mineral specimens.

I confirm what you say. I didn’t saw any review before I bought mine and all is true

Muito boa 🎉

What is the reason for two eyepieces, will the depth vision be better than if you had a monitor to look at?

Well I totally agree with you / I bought Kaisi 350S which I faced the same concern but I used to it and it is lot cheaper than AMtech and better than RF4. It is what it is man

Would love to see your current microscope and camera set up :)

I have mechanic mc75t. Very popular in India for mobile repair. I wonder how it will compare to more expensive ones

Nice toy

When you looked through that RF4 without a barlow lense, did you notice the components/subject appears way too tall? Like everything that is small looks deeper and taller than it should be. Is that normal? does it happen on the other model Eakins oem? When attaching the barlow lense this problem seems to get corrected. This is happening on my new RF4 RF6565PRO head.

Bro why waste time on these when you can pickup the sweetest of them all! The NorthridgeFix Microscope! Have you heard? They are in stock and ready to ship today! If your order comes in this morning it will likely go out today! 🤣

you just saved me 200 cdn. I have the same eakins as yours and my problem for is when putting the 0.5 lens its way to high for me to work, Thought this one will give me 2 centimeters less in Hight

hi guys my gpu doesnt show display , but turning on and i checked and ram and changed cmos battery , hdmi cable is working well. can anyone help

did you buy em at Northridgefix ? ;3

i use rf4 blower, pretty good and cheap, but for microscope buy from company that fokus at making microscope or other lens related product

I've just bought the rf4. It's really good. The one I have is identical to the eakins and very heavy. Maybe you have a lower standard model or a copy of a copy? :)

The double vision might not be the same for everyone. It sounds like the microscope has prismatic issues (or the user has poor accommodation/vergence flexibility). A lot of microscopes are set up for optical, infinity viewing but most people (especially young people) will naturally try to converge their eyes for a perceived close target. A bit like magic eye puzzles: some people can easily dissociate their convergence/accommodation, others can't...

looks like you got some faulty microscope. Try to test this unit with a coin. Place the coin so that it is completely within the sight of one eyepiece. Then look through another eyepiece and compare the area of the coin that is visible. There shouldn't be much difference, ideally the area occupied by the coin in the field of view should be identical for both eyepieces. If the difference is noticeable, then the optical axes are out of alignment and the microscope requires adjustment.

I'd recommend a Mantis, but those have no tri heads afaik.

Just playing devil's advocate here but have you considered that it is a problem that only you could have? I mean have you put anyone else to try and see if this microscope works for their eyes?

hey bro rf 4 is a copy of soptop szn71 , which im assuming they failed hard at ... if you want best microscope of Chinese one buy soptop szn71 . expensive buy worth the price can do iphone cpu jumpers etc

What store on aliexpress did you buy your eakins microscope ?

Send those to Alex as a present anonymously. LMAO

I bought an RF4 recently and they shipped it in an unpadded box with almost nothing to protect it all the way from China. When I opened it the mirrors were completely loose and badly cracked in the bottom of the package and the head was broken almost in half. The gearing was also screwed up. I took it apart, realigned it and then glued the mirrors back into place and while it was a gigantic pain in the ass, it does now actually work pretty well. Compared to my Amscope trinocular head the eye piece quality isn't obviously different (or at least I didn't notice anything obvious worse), although the build quality is much cheaper/fragile. I do not see the same problems you mention (at least now that I've rebuilt it), so I think yours might have been only less damaged than mine and something inside is out of alignment. If you want to open it up, you might be able to fix it. That said, from my point of view packaging it like they did was just crazy. It is a microscope, and one made of plastic no less. They need to charge a few dollars more and package it in a way that it'll survive shipping.

May ee chai naaah

Designed by a DEI hire? I hope you sent it back with a note.

The double vision has nothing to do with the angle of the eyepieces. The problem is with the lenses at the bottom that needs adjustment.

Those two are so called "stereo optical microscopes" they are intended to provide a stereoscopic and slightly magnified picture. Not all of the microscopes are stereoscopic, but for microelectronics rebuild works stereoscopic ones are commonly used. There are basically two common optical schemas for building stereo microscope : the Grinu and the Abbe. They are different in manner how they organise optical flow. The one where optical channels are inclied - seems to be Grinu, the second one seems to be Abbe. Abbe microscopes sometimes perfomrs better, especcially with trinocular and digital camera attached. The propoblems You are desribing with bad parallax could be just the cause of this particular microscope is poorly made...

just bough rf4 6565pro and its not feel like ur review

I hate using these type of microscope,for me works direct hdmi lenses conected to monitor,i can sit normaly and watch the monitor completly free,at the beginning its a little 😊😊😊hard but with time you get used to it

If you have double image probably microscope need adjusting (maybe it was bushet at shipping). I have AmScope 7X-45X Simul-Focal small focus lost appear on ends of zooming range (it usual case for low price microscopes).

That's what you get for not buying NF microscope combined with NF Anti-glare light. 🤣🤣

we should instead call nvidia to get you some extra robo arms so you can repair more GPU's

Is it free to join your discord server?

Trinocular ?? Do a lot of repair techs have 3 eyes 🤣

Vevor Microscope is cheaper and better

Who has designed this trash