@@Nelsonlorenzox you may want to take down your comment because every other race after the first one was won by Dodge...And it’s obvious that the Charger in the beginning didn’t have a good launch at all so the Camaro benefited from that.
All Hellcats will put down 10s easy. If you see a Hellcat and it's not getting at least 10.90s, they ain't good drivers. If that Corvette gaps a hellcat, that Corvette ain't stock. "Good shifting from the Vette driver" you say? You're delusional. There is no stock Vette getting past 11.70s. A stock gen 1 Viper with NITTO tires on, will get 11.90s. The Gen 1 only has 500HP. Corvettes are slow, and they suck. They are the American car that's supposed to be shat on, but it seems people like shitty cars, rather than the best ones.
They added smoke show haven't seen one irl but looks good in picture's. I got the metallic dark gray it not bad, the new hellraisin and gold rush looks nice tho
Well the zl1 is a lot faster off the line because of how much pure power the hellcat has and weight so if the tires weren't spinning easily would of beat the zl1, but it is a 1le to so odds are greater in the zl1s favor
@@Temp--th4ct the 1st charger hellcat driver took almost a second to even step on the gas after the green light so of course the odds are in the zl1’s favor
ZL1 1LE 10 Speed is a rocket launcher by NASA Still Champion 🏆 is coming LT5 ZL1 1LE 2022 Dodge Ford Mustang boats will be die both I love my ZL1 1LE 10 Speed I smoke so many Dodge SRT Hellcats or Red Eye piece of shit 2 months ago Ford Mustang GT500 crappy slow boat
can you camero fan girls stop making fun of the charger's weight now like y'all still lose. maybe you should put some actual muscle in your cars and they'd gain respect
@@kvngthethird you clearly don't know what you're talking about, yeah the Charger Hellcat is about 400 pounds heavier than the ZL1, but the power to weight ratio is practically identical, and the Hellcat Challenger actually has a better ratio. So if you think the Camaro is fast, then you should think Challengers and Chargers are too.
@@treyroberts8124 you clearly just like everyone else whe believe hellcats are so fast i like them I just know that if a m2 with a tune can beat it like nothing what do you expect or maybe you’ve never really seen them in action up and close or probably only seen it run against something slow
You can generally tell who will win by 2 factors. First is who properly burns the tires for a better grip. (Most of the ZL1 drivers failed) and second who gets off they line quicker. None of these races truly showed me which car is faster in the 1/4. Need a good race where they both properly get the tires sticky and jump the line at the same time.
Stop, stop, stop with the multiple angle, jumping around shots of a race. Pick an angle, show the race in it's entirety, then show it again from the other angle. NO ONE wants to see the start of the race 3 times from 3 different angles before seeing the whole race. It's annoying and no one likes it. Just. STOP.
Lol "no one wants to see the start of the race 3 times" you say? Some of the most popular cars comparison channels have 1/4 miles races that last 2 minutes, and at the end it takes the cars 13secs to cover that distance. And guess what? They have subscribers in the millions. So your comment really doesn't hold much weight here. You should've said "I don't want"
@@tord7798 Eh, not mad at Cars. I actually really like the channel, mostly because he shows the races quickly and efficiently. I just don't like when they occasionally show the start of the race to half track 2 or 3 times from different angles before showing the whole race. Its down right annoying to me and stains an otherwise fantastic channel.
@@rigorousrangel6394 Yep agree. Those channels that milk 12 minute videos from a 12 second race annoying.Thats why I like Cars. He gets to the point. Most of the time
Yes I love this comment about how dodges can’t turn corners like all of us are playing need for speed doing circuit races. Mostly all fucking races are relatively straight line races unless your on a track of any sorts which most people don’t race tracks not because the car but because they are bad at racing on track it’s like street ball compared to organized basketball
@@The_Chocalate_One relax, it's a joke. Lol, while it may not compare to say, a hellcat, I have an '05 sebring (2.4l i4) of which isnt quick in a straight line, but damn can it hug corners on a windy road. I'd love to take her to a road course and see what kind of times I can pull. :)
Even though it's a joke, look up Wesley motorsports on Instagram. They have a track focused red eye with minimal suspension mods and a big wing. It beats 300k supercars around tracks. The guy that drove it in pikes peak for the first time with the car, finished 3rd in his class 11th overall.
For everyone moaning about "sleepy" drivers making the runs worthless: The time you see at the end of a run is the elapsed time. Your reaction time has no effect whatsoever on your elapsed time. Let's say you have two identical cars with two identical drivers. Driver A has a flawless reaction time and launches right after the light turns green, getting an ET of 11.000. Driver B sits at the light, checking his text messages and picking his nose. 30 seconds go by. Suddenly, Driver B realizes he is in a race and launches. He makes an identical pass to Driver A and gets an ET of 11.000. Your elapsed time only starts being recorded when you launch and break the laser beam. How long you wait before doing that makes no difference. Obviously, Driver A won the race because his total package (elapsed time + reaction time) is 30 seconds quicker than Driver B's. However, given that this isn't a bracket racing tournament and we are only interested in seeing which car made the quickest pass, ET is all that matters, and RT is irrelevant.
@@markwarren7959 they're new at drag racing? People can't try? It's for fun isn't it? Or...maybe they didn't give two shits who was next to them and wanted to see what E.T. they would get and the win didn't matter.
Why n the hell do people buy present era muscle cars that a 12 yr old can drive, and the ADULTS CAN'T DRIVE THEM??? Back n 60s, they woulda been laughed off the road/strip!!!
Now that's the way it's supposed to be GM products. Should get the crab beat out of them every time they race cars they are pieces of krapp. Made by government motor company. That manufactures great manufactured krapp. You like that 1 don't you I do. I cannot stand GMC for nothing you could not give me one of them pieces of krapp. I tried One. One time and I will never ever go back to A GM product.
I'd prefer a blower over a sucker anyday. By time the sucker produces any noticeable power the blown ls is already crossing the line 🤷♂️. But to each his own. Put a blower on a 8000 lbs yukon xl Then put a turbo on same gen truck. Blower out performs EVERY time
Remember what Adrian said “He’s like an old lion, and he’s mad because this handsome young stud came along, and now he’s threatened” Is that what this is really about? Are u threatened by me? :)
They're both really great cars for what they are but they're not Hella Fast like an Exotic Car would be. So, with that being said. As a broke man I would still buy me a Charger lmao 😂 and a Camaro if I could they look cool 😎
True as heck! Hellcats look decently aggressive, but holy crap does the ZL1 look like a possessed devil ready to eat you up! ZL1 has to be one of the most aggressive and down right badass stock vehicles on the market period!
@@takerfan4ever Well it's not that, but they should've done more sharp angles or extra things done to the body on Hellcat models. Like it'd make sense, a Hellcat, sharp and claw shaped, but no the car looks not too much different from a GT model
That would not a happen if there was a ford. Next to that Camaro. GM makes the worst manufacture cars and trucks out there. And I cannot believe that h*** cat did not be that piece of shit. Camaro. That's pretty sad.
