Тёмный

Is Calvinism unfair? - KingdomCraft 

Redeemed Zoomer
Подписаться 424 тыс.
Просмотров 40 тыс.
50% 1

Find a historic Protestant church:
www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edi...
Find a moderate Mainline Protestant church to revive:
www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edi...
Join the Reconquista discord: / discord
(Note: PLEASE only join if you are part of one of these mainline denominations: PCUSA, ELCA, UMC, RCA, UCC or the Episcopal Church)

Опубликовано:

 

11 июл 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,1 тыс.   
@RockiestRock
@RockiestRock 11 месяцев назад
Fortunately I have the free will to reject Calvinism
@socalkook370
@socalkook370 11 месяцев назад
According to Calvin, God determined that you, among the majority of Christians, will reject the truth about God because God wishes it. Because it totally makes sense that God shows most of his children the truth only to hide it again, apparently.
@innadesertDOTjpg
@innadesertDOTjpg 11 месяцев назад
Got me chucklin rn
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@socalkook370 Calvin didn't believe that a single Christian or child of God will ever reject the truth. He believed that once a person repents and believes in Christ, he is forever held in the love of God and can never be separated from it by anything in all of creation.
@iamjohnfarlow
@iamjohnfarlow 11 месяцев назад
@@BenjaminAnderson21 It is a wrong belief.
@socalkook370
@socalkook370 11 месяцев назад
​@@BenjaminAnderson21 If Calvin's deterministic view of God is truth, and no child of God will ever reject the truth about God, how do you explain the fact that the vast majority of professing Christians reject this "truth" about God? Are you suggesting that anyone who does not agree with everything Calvin taught is not actually a Christian and therefore not elect?
@SoicBR
@SoicBR 11 месяцев назад
"I'll put the verse on screen" *[proceeds by forgetting to put the verse on the screen]*
@zackallen7781
@zackallen7781 11 месяцев назад
It was predestined
@SoicBR
@SoicBR 11 месяцев назад
@@zackallen7781 Of course it was
@TemplarTim
@TemplarTim 4 месяца назад
Twice!
@argeon6969
@argeon6969 11 месяцев назад
John Calvin: "Finally I found diamonds! 🥰" *forgets about the lava* John Calvin: "Hold my tulips, I'm about to reform the church 😡"
@purify1512
@purify1512 11 месяцев назад
Aaaaa... Here come the popey no spinach left the faking kalvin has eat it alll.. There you go Mr popey look. 50℅ scripture, 100℅ traditional. Unfailable popey you r genious 150 ℅ authority. While kalvin have exactly 100℅.
@billotron5521
@billotron5521 10 месяцев назад
💀
@CreepyEnderPig
@CreepyEnderPig 11 месяцев назад
As a person from the south who's been to more baptist churches then I could count, I can confirm that your baptist impersonation is acurerate.
@TheDragonSeer
@TheDragonSeer 10 месяцев назад
I found it cringey, but you do you.
@conneraldeqn9751
@conneraldeqn9751 11 месяцев назад
Losing those diamonds was a canon event Also shoutout to fellow lutherans🙏
@BIoomingOnion
@BIoomingOnion 11 месяцев назад
Really enjoying this so far even as a non-Calvinist but wasting that glass at 9:01 was the worst thing I’ve seen on this channel.
@CaptainX2012
@CaptainX2012 11 месяцев назад
I felt so much pain
@theintelligentmilkjug944
@theintelligentmilkjug944 11 месяцев назад
He was predestined to do that
@Chicky_Lumps
@Chicky_Lumps 11 месяцев назад
That heartbreaking moment when you conveniently need glass panes in a multiple of 16, and misplace one before having Silk Touch.
@yeetoburrito9972
@yeetoburrito9972 10 месяцев назад
Just an example of total depravity in action 😔
@Young_Christian7
@Young_Christian7 10 месяцев назад
​@@theintelligentmilkjug944exactly what I was gonna say
@9box906
@9box906 11 месяцев назад
The issue I keep running into with Calvinism is what it says about God's nature: Calvinism seems to say that God wants to save some people and not others, but 1 Timothy 2:3-4 says that God wants everyone to be saved and to know the truth.
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
He wants everyone to be saved but that doesn’t mean he will, it wouldn’t be correct to save everyone because there would be no point in being a Christian, if he didn’t save anybody he wouldn’t be a gracious God.
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 11 месяцев назад
@@cormundum_o "it wouldn’t be correct to save everyone because there would be no point in being a Christian." That is literally the argument the older son made in the parable of the prodigal son. God shouldn't send people to hell so we can be more 'special' as christians
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
@@briandiehl9257 No, the point of being a Christian is following God which includes following his commandments, if he saved everyone there would be no point in following his commandments because “I’m going to heaven anyways just like everyone else”. While when he saves only the elect there is much more of a motivation to keep his commandments because you don’t deserve grace but he gave it to you while he could’ve given you what you deserve like other people. You would want to keep his commandments because he saved you from hell just like you would want to pay a life guard or do a favor for him when he saves you from drowning. This would not apply to the opposite since there is no concept of “deserving” if everyone is saved.
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 11 месяцев назад
@@cormundum_o *" if he saved everyone there would be no point in following his commandments."* That is blatantly false. Why does other people going to heaven negate your will to follow God's commandments? God saving others should motivate you even more to want to follow God's commands. Again this is exactly what the older brother. *"You would want to keep his commandments because he saved you from hell just like you would want to pay a life guard or do a favor for him when he saves you from drowning" * I wouldn't want to pay a life guard if he purposely let everyone else drown.
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
@@briandiehl9257 You have a good point, but if everyone went to heaven he wouldn’t be a just God because he wouldn’t be giving anyone what they deserve
@joedan5366
@joedan5366 11 месяцев назад
Me: so your calavanist A calavinist: yes Me: I am so sorry for you A calavanist: why Me: you had no choice
@barryallen119
@barryallen119 11 месяцев назад
*Calvinist. Dudes name was Calvin
@timothysullivan1669
@timothysullivan1669 11 месяцев назад
It’s fine, he was predestined to make that mistake. Can you really hold him accountable for it?
@tylerbuckner3750
@tylerbuckner3750 11 месяцев назад
No Calvinist has ever taught that man “has no choice”. I mean, at least learn about what you’re criticizing before misrepresenting it.
@joedan5366
@joedan5366 11 месяцев назад
@tylerbuckner3750 I intended this as a joke But since you wanna get theological ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_Q4Z66lF2CA.html Irresistible grace removes your choice from the equation so does unconditional election
@yunaru3643
@yunaru3643 11 месяцев назад
​@@tylerbuckner3750that's what predestination in calvinism is, though. Singular predestination does allow free will, but double predestination does not.
@andre_lluis
@andre_lluis 11 месяцев назад
Fun fact: Zoomer never did this video before just because he couldn't find a "diamond right above a notorious pool of lava" situation
@dariusg7044
@dariusg7044 11 месяцев назад
Man I remember when I was a Calvinist and I really thought this made sense
@dariusg7044
@dariusg7044 11 месяцев назад
9:30 How are they the ones who are getting the fair/just treatment, if they were literally pre-programmed before birth to sin? They couldn't do otherwise, by ur own admission they don't have free will.
@jaxonspage4514
@jaxonspage4514 11 месяцев назад
@@dariusg7044 We have a will that is able to make legitimate choices but desires sin and therefore will not choose God. Our wills are free to sin but not free from sin: able to desire to choose God. Read Edwards' freedom of the will because he distinguishes natural ability to believe vs moral ability to believe from the scriptures
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@dariusg7044 To say we were programmed to sin implies that there is design to our sinfulness. But sin isn't design, it is the corruption of design.
@pipinfresh
@pipinfresh 11 месяцев назад
@@dariusg7044 Calvinism doesn't remove moral responsibility from human action. This is a misunderstanding of Calvinism. We are not predestined to sin we are in bondage to sin because of Adam's sin and the fall. God is not the author of sin.
@JosiahTheSiah
@JosiahTheSiah 11 месяцев назад
@@pipinfresh But I thought the choosing happened before the foundation of the world? Which would mean...before Adam sinned.
@King_Immanuel
@King_Immanuel 11 месяцев назад
wasted a diamond just for the intro 😢
@taylorwickham
@taylorwickham 9 месяцев назад
My problem with Clavinism is that it implies that God creates people for the express purpose of going to hell. That doesn't seem like something an omnibenevolent God would do.
@lesliecuff2079
@lesliecuff2079 4 месяца назад
Great comment.
@thebrickaniac
@thebrickaniac 11 месяцев назад
Across the Spiderverse is basically the Calvinism movie
@lefebre27
@lefebre27 11 месяцев назад
More like the Molinist
@zuffin1864
@zuffin1864 8 месяцев назад
Except instead of God Creating the earth he created the spider-person creating sequence, that can never be broken 😂
@bastiwmr
@bastiwmr 11 месяцев назад
Things I looked up: 2:16 The acronym TULIP states the five essential doctrines of total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints 3:23 Provisionism claims that anyone can be saved. It rejects the idea that only a select few are chosen for salvation. 4:42 John Calvin (1509-1564) was a French theologian and pastor known for developing Calvinism, a system of Christian theology emphasizing predestination and God's absolute sovereignty in salvation. His teachings have influenced Congregational, Reformed, and Presbyterian churches globally. 4:48 Augustine of Hippo (354-430) was a Berber theologian, philosopher, and bishop of Hippo Regius in Roman North Africa. His writings greatly influenced Western philosophy and Christianity, making him a significant Church Father in the Patristic Period. 7:10 “I the Lord do not change. So you, the descendants of Jacob, are not destroyed. (Malachi 3:6) 10:12 Blessed is he whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the LORD does not count against him and in whose spirit is no deceit. (Psalm 32,1-2) 11:19 Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. (Matthew 7:7) 12:50 Calvin's Geneva Catechism is a Reformed catechism (a manual of religious teachings) developed by John Calvin in 1541. It served as a guide for teaching the principles of the Reformed faith. The catechism was widely used by Reformed churches in Europe. 14:40 Paul Washer (*1961) is an American preacher and missionary. 18:11 From birth I have relied on you; you brought me forth from my mother's womb. I will ever praise you. (Psalm 71,6)
@yeetoburrito9972
@yeetoburrito9972 10 месяцев назад
Thanks for this! Especially that Psalm 71 reference, I was gonna say Psalm 22 and 23 have nothing to do with infant faith 😂
@FirstnameLastname-yk2js
@FirstnameLastname-yk2js 5 месяцев назад
Calvin was also a Tyrant that had people killed for not converting to Calvinism
@bastiwmr
@bastiwmr 5 месяцев назад
@@FirstnameLastname-yk2js Cool
@eclipsesonic
@eclipsesonic 11 месяцев назад
Revelation 22:17 - "Let the one WHO DESIRES take the water of life freely." I think that speaks to human free will in regards to salvation, with God's help and drawing of course (John 6:44), but we can choose to reject God's calling or drawing of the Holy Spirit and because of that, I believe these passages I'm about to cite totally destroy the doctrine of irresistible grace: "The Lord, the God of their fathers, sent persistently to them by his messengers, because he had compassion on his people and on his dwelling place; but they kept mocking the messengers of God, despising his words, and scoffing at his prophets, till the wrath of the Lord rose against his people, till there was no remedy." - 2 Chronicles 36:15-16 I spread out my hands all the day to a rebellious people, who walk in a way that is not good, following their own devices" - Isaiah 65:2 (Quoted in Romans 10:21) "I will destine you to the sword, and all of you shall bow down to the slaughter; because, when I called, you did not answer, when I spoke, you did not listen, but you did what was evil in my eyes, and CHOSE what I did not delight in.” - Isaiah 65:12 "I also will choose affliction for them, and bring their fears upon them; because, when I called, no one answered, when I spoke they did not listen; but they did what was evil in my eyes, and CHOSE that in which I did not delight.” - Isaiah 66:4 "Because I have called and you refused to listen, have stretched out my hand and no one has heeded." - Proverbs 1:24 "And now, because you have done all these things, says the Lord, and when I spoke to you persistently you did not listen, and when I called you, you did not answer." - Jeremiah 7:13 "You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you." - Acts 7:51 We harden our own hearts. God only hardens people's heart because they themselves have already hardened their own hearts as a self-induced state. I love my Calvinist brothers and sisters in the Lord, but I do disagree with you on this particular topic.
@jayy7842
@jayy7842 11 месяцев назад
He infact, did not "put the verse on the screen"
@redeemedzoomer6053
@redeemedzoomer6053 11 месяцев назад
I did not. Evidence of original sin and total depravity (it corrupts my memory)
@planteruines5619
@planteruines5619 3 месяца назад
​@@redeemedzoomer6053og sin yes , total depravity , not so much
@mrladmanny
@mrladmanny 2 месяца назад
​@redeemedzoomer6053 Don't worry, it was predestined to happen it's not your fault
@Albanian_crusader
@Albanian_crusader 28 дней назад
He was predestinated to forget about it
@IDONTKNOW1072
@IDONTKNOW1072 11 месяцев назад
Calvinism is unfair. John Calvin is in there. Standing at the procession. Plotting his oppression.
@Jando859_
@Jando859_ 11 месяцев назад
I see what you did there 😂
@charlespascual7518
@charlespascual7518 6 месяцев назад
Spongebob taking down Calvinism
@huntervii6573
@huntervii6573 Месяц назад
@charlespascual7518 Probably more like Squidward telling SpongeBob to yell it at people
@Jhd306ck
@Jhd306ck 13 дней назад
Underrated Comment
@cheechcypher
@cheechcypher 11 месяцев назад
My thing is, if God wants everyone to be saved but we can’t come to Him on our own, why wouldn’t He predestine everyone to come to Christ and be saved?
@cheechcypher
@cheechcypher 11 месяцев назад
@@niels499 One of, if not the only reason, Jesus hasn’t come down yet is because he’s being patient and waiting for us Christians to help bring everyone to Christ. If He doesn’t want everyone to be saved than there would be no point in waiting. Also, if He is electing people what’s the point of existing on earth?
@socalkook370
@socalkook370 11 месяцев назад
Excellent question. This gets into the "two wills of God" idea. According to many calvinists, God has one will that desires one thing, but another that decrees something else. Apparently we are supposed to just accept this logical inconsistency, rather than question if God is a capricious entity with a personality disorder.
@cheechcypher
@cheechcypher 11 месяцев назад
@@niels499 and if He didn’t want everyone to be saved that would be like Him making people just to go to hell.
@cheechcypher
@cheechcypher 11 месяцев назад
@@socalkook370 I did not say that. God definitely does not have mood swings. I just feel that if He’s electing people and not electing others there’s no point in living on earth.
@socalkook370
@socalkook370 11 месяцев назад
@@cheechcypher Correct, God does not have mood swings. I'm telling you how calvinists respond to the verses that suggest that God wants all to be saved, while (according to Calvin) simultaneously not wanting them to be saved and refusing to save them. I'm not a calvinist, and this is one of the reasons why. If man has free will, it makes total sense that God is distraught that some won't turn to him. However, if determinism is true, it is illogical that God could possibly be upset at something that he decreed. It's more likely that you could wrap your own Christmas present and then be surprised when you open it.
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 11 месяцев назад
I’ve been fighting Calvinism for the past year ever since a class debate. Our teacher was a Calvinist and let a side that didn’t even believe what they were saying, broke the debate rules, and went against the Bible in an argument win just to fuel his narrative. As much as the Bible speaks on being chosen, it also speaks on accepting Jesus, repenting and letting God into our heart. I also believe Calvinism is an arrogant way of thinking. What makes you worth saving when billions of others burn in the flames of hell for something out of their control? I believe that we all deserve hell and that salvation is by God’s grace, but I would never think that God’s grace is limited because of that. And suppose I was not “chosen”, then what is the point of my existence? Why should I not kill myself then and there if I’m going to the same destination? What is the meaning of life if we have no free will? God would not put people on this earth for no reason. And where is the line drawn to what’s in our control and what isn’t? If free will isn’t truly real, then neither is accountability. We are God’s children, not God’s puppets. Having free will does not contradict his planning, we have free will because he allows us autonomy. Take the Tower of Babel for example, that was human’s folly, but God still gave consequence. Same with Adam and Eve, and Sodom and Gomorrah. That was our vice and God’s intervention, however we still made our decision. I could probably keep writing but I’m gonna go to bed now.
@Mic1904
@Mic1904 11 месяцев назад
_"I also believe Calvinism is an arrogant way of thinking. What makes you worth saving when billions of others burn in the flames of hell for something out of their control? I believe that we all deserve hell and that salvation is by God’s grace, but I would never think that God’s grace is limited because of that."_ You ask, 'What makes you worth saving when billions of others burn in hell'. Yet you believe that some people through their own freewill will choose Jesus and be saved. How is it less 'arrogant' to assume that some people will actually gain salvation through their own human action of accepting Jesus? You've claimed that God choosing humans to save is somehow arrogant on the part of those humans... yet your alternative is that those humans themselves played a part in whether they were saved or not. And you don't think THAT is arrogant, that the humans themselves were involved in choosing their own salvation?
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 11 месяцев назад
@@Mic1904 In Calvinism, those who are “unchosen” are basically lambs to the slaughter by God. That completely contradicts anything in the Bible that talks about sharing the Gospel, or us repenting and letting God into our hearts, which are crucial in our religion. God is fair and God is just, but the idea that humans have no God-given free will denies us any real reason for living. What is the point to existence if you truly cannot come to God and spread the gospel? Do you really believe that God put them on this earth just to revel in sin and then burn in hell?
@Mic1904
@Mic1904 11 месяцев назад
​@@gwynn2165 Very well: please describe your version of Christianity, where an omniscient God creates beings with full knowledge of their ultimate destination (including Hell), but isn't ultimately responsible for allowing them to be created for this destination. What many fail to realise is: the discomfort they have with the logical implications of 'Calvinism' are uncomfortable implications of Christianity that they have to face one way or another.
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 11 месяцев назад
@@Mic1904 In no way did that answer my question or refute anything I’ve said. The problem with Calvinists isn’t that they view things differently, but the fact that for all the points they make there is just as much support for arguments against it, and they never care to actually refute points made. You asked me to define Christianity, well all Christians are united under the Nicene Creed meaning that we believe in 1 God 3 Persons, and in the divine nature of Jesus Christ being sent down paying the price for our sins. I don’t believe Jesus Christ only saved some of sinners. For the wages of sin is death, but in Christ we have received eternal life. Romans 10:9 gives direct instructions on how to accept salvation from God. John 3:16 “who so ever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” Even with this being said, Salvation is through Christ alone and we are made clean by Jesus. We are not saved through works but by faith in God.
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 10 месяцев назад
@@TheChildrensTeethAreSetOnEdge it seems like you misunderstand. Even in my belief we are still dead in our own sin and saved by God’s grace. Relating my statements to Pelagius is just incorrect and a straw man argument. In Pelagianism he believes that the original sin in the garden of Eden *did not taint human nature* thus we still hold the ability to achieve perfection. We were not debating anything related to that nor did I ever say anything of the sort. Never will we meet the means of perfection and nothing is done by acts but by God’s *grace*. We fall on our own because we are all sinful and are given the gift of eternal life through Christ. The issue with your argument is that you debate things that we both agree on. Sin is unavoidable, we are only saved through Christ alone and not by actions, and God is the ultimate authority. I’m looking at this from the angle also of average life. Why do we put modern day criminals in prison? Because their actions show them as a potential threat, and they need to be held accountable to learn. Which isn’t possible in the concept that posses absolutely no free will. People seem not to like answering this question and so I’m separating it from the rest of what I have written. I don’t want to see a post if it doesn’t have some form of an answer. What is the point of life if we have no free will specifically for those whom are not chosen by God to be saved, why do we blame people for their actions and why spread the gospel?
@ebercondrell6603
@ebercondrell6603 11 месяцев назад
As a non-calvinist I appreciate your level representation of the issue. So many reformed baptist types get so up in arms about it and demand that we all submit to the truth of tulip. I like Gavin Ortlund's emphasis on the "both/and" relationship between God's sovereignty and man's responsibility. Whatever we emphasize, the truth remains that God saves who he wills according to his mercy, and all of those people will have faith.
@lukaspersson4051
@lukaspersson4051 11 месяцев назад
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. That wouldn’t make sense if God predestines people to go to hell and we don’t have free will anymore. If we didn’t have free will he would predestine everyone to go to heaven because he doesn’t want anyone to perish. He knows who will be saved but we choose to get saved or not and God tests us to see if we keep our faith
@kriegjaeger
@kriegjaeger 11 месяцев назад
Also consider hardening hearts. Multiple occasions God had to harden the heart of people to prevent them from accepting him. That's the opposite of election and if we accept Calvinism it's less choosing people and more damning those who WOULD have repented.
@TheSwiftCreek2
@TheSwiftCreek2 11 месяцев назад
It does make sense. Everyone who is chosen may not even have been born yet. God will keep the devil at bay until He has brought all of His children to the fold.
@libatonvhs
@libatonvhs 8 месяцев назад
For He saith to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.” 16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God who showeth mercy. 17 For the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh, “Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show My power in thee, and that My name might be declared throughout all the earth.” 18 Therefore hath He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will, He hardeneth. 19 Thou wilt say then unto me, “Why doth He yet find fault, for who hath resisted His will?” 20 But nay, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, “Why hast thou made me thus?” 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel unto honor and another unto dishonor?
@kriegjaeger
@kriegjaeger 8 месяцев назад
@@libatonvhs A good reference, though I would also point out regarding Pharaoh that only once does it say God Hardened his heart. The other times it only states Pharaoh hardened his heart. So it would appear that Pharaoh did reject God of his own will before God hardened his heart. Another example is Christ explained he taught in parables so the people would NOT accept him at that time and to fulfill prophecy. Once that was fulfilled and he was enthroned, those people It would seem were free to follow him. In light of this it doesn't seem to entail the Calvinistic view that people cannot come to him. If NO ONE could come to him, blinding or hardening temporarily would not be necessary.
@libatonvhs
@libatonvhs 8 месяцев назад
@@kriegjaeger Fair enough, I'm actually not Calvinist, just thought it's important to keep this passage in mind when discussing this
@andreasm5770
@andreasm5770 11 месяцев назад
"It's not unfair because some people get what they deserve and some people get better than they deserve." Do you really not see the problem here?
@yeetusvanitas9800
@yeetusvanitas9800 11 месяцев назад
I don’t think that’s what he’s saying. 9:37 he says the part about fair and better than fair, and in the next sentence he says that he supposes you can call it unfair, but certainly not unjust. The problem here is using different definitions of what constitutes “fair”. Zoomer’s argument is that we don’t actually *want* things to be fair, because if things were fair then we would all lose out because nobody deserves salvation. Unfair, maybe, but certainly not unjust. I think everyone, including Zoomer, should be more clear about fair vs just.
@andreasm5770
@andreasm5770 11 месяцев назад
@@yeetusvanitas9800 10 people are charged with murder. They get sentenced to life imprisonment. But the judge is merciful and decides that 3 of them can be set free - not of any merit of their own, but simply because he chooses those 3. The other 7 complain to him, saying it's unfair: the 3 that were set free are no less guilty than the 7 in jail. But the judge tells them that they have no right to complain because "they got what they deserved." But the prisoners are right because, by making this decision, the judge is creating a precedent that murderers can be freed. So it's inconsistent to apply it to those 3 but not to all 10 - thus it is unfair. Because justice is not really just if the judge actively discriminates without any known criteria: the 7 couldn't have done anything to get what the 3 got, and the 3 didn't do anything to earn the freedom they got. There is a double standard; therefore, this is unfair - or unjust, if you will (same thing). "Fair" and "just" are synonyms, so there's no substance to him using these words distinctly if he doesn't define what the distinction is.
@danilomenoli
@danilomenoli 5 месяцев назад
So you say God is unjust because before Jacob and Esau were born, God decided He was going to bless Jacob and his descendancy and not be with Esau's descendancy, before both were able to do good or bad deeds, and Jacob did a lot of bad deeds and still was blessed by the Lord.
@HarrisonLusk
@HarrisonLusk 11 месяцев назад
calvinism isn't unfair, it's unbiblical.
@storba3860
@storba3860 9 месяцев назад
​@drakejuice9384 1) The atonement serves no purpose if God has already decided who will be saved and He did it before the world began. Nor does sharing the Gospel make any sense if conversion is incompatible with human will. 2) There are no Jewish scholars who believe in predestination and they have half the Bible. Surely the OT would have at least alluded to it and the closest we get is "The Lord hath made all things for Himself" which is from a book of poetry so predestination is a very poor exegesis of the text. 3) God has never regenerated people in the absence of someone sharing the Gospel. You have to hear it first ergo humans play a part in the salvation of themselves and others. 4) It turns God into a hypocrite. 5) "He is the atoning sacrifice. Not just for our (Christians) sins but for the sins of the whole world."
@storba3860
@storba3860 9 месяцев назад
@drakejuice9384 Okay. I'll go point by point. Total Depravity: "God saw what He had made and saw that it was good." "Love your neighbor AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF." "God made man in His own image." "Never grow tired of doing good." "Faith without works is dead." Unconditional Election: "Not all who cry out to me 'Lord, Lord!' will enter into the Kingdom." "False teachers will sell out the master who bought them." "Many are called but few are chosen." Limited Atonement: First you would have to actually prove this point since even Augustinian predestination doesn't accept this point. Augustine rejected PSA altogether and opted for moral influence (Jesus died to prove His teachings true and only by following His example can we be saved) but putting that aside there are countless verses that say the atonement was universal but only can be guaranteed for those who believe. For the nonbeliever it's basically a crapshoot. Irresistible Grace: We don't even need a Bible if God does all the work. We'd just be programmed to know what He wants. Perseverance of the Saints: "Sort out your own salvation with fear and trembling." Plus the fact Paul's letters were aimed at those who already believe (i.e: the elect).
@lordjared2572
@lordjared2572 8 месяцев назад
⁠@@storba3860thank you for the sound arguments, the elemental spirits of the world, and the empty philosophy which one who submits to the teaching of the Word will by no means agree with
@storba3860
@storba3860 8 месяцев назад
@@lordjared2572 Elemental spirits?
@biggusdickus2691
@biggusdickus2691 6 месяцев назад
@@storba3860: [The atonement serves no purpose if God has already decided who will be saved and He did it before the world began. Nor does sharing the Gospel make any sense if conversion is incompatible with human will.] In his second letter to Timothy, Paul exclaimed “I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ…” (2 Timothy 2:10). When one correctly understands that God has not only elected certain individuals to salvation but ALSO has ordained the means of salvation-the preaching of the gospel (Romans 1:16; Romans 10:14-17)-it empowers the spreading of the gospel message and the call to evangelism. It overcomes the fear of failure when sharing the gospel and empowers people to remain faithful to the message in times of great persecution. They know that the power lies in the gospel message and God’s sovereign election, not in their own feeble presentation.
@PurpleNoir
@PurpleNoir 11 месяцев назад
Calvinism has always been a very interesting and kinda frustrating theory, nice to see to you tackle it.
@EricSmyth4Christ
@EricSmyth4Christ 10 месяцев назад
It's brutal
@finalbossoftheinternet6002
@finalbossoftheinternet6002 11 месяцев назад
I was predestined to think Calvinism is false and the Roman Catholic Church is the one true Church
@leaderofthebunch-deadbeat7716
@leaderofthebunch-deadbeat7716 11 месяцев назад
Same
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 11 месяцев назад
I’m not Catholic but I love this comment. If we have no free will in our salvation then how are we to be held accountable for our actions?
@ryanchain9746
@ryanchain9746 11 месяцев назад
instead you should’ve believed both were false lmao
@gwynn2165
@gwynn2165 11 месяцев назад
@@ryanchain9746 Ay man is ur pfp Ross Geller
@josephbrandenburg4373
@josephbrandenburg4373 11 месяцев назад
kinda wondering if the same is true, myself. I like a lot of things Catholics have to say, but I'm still too weirded out by the Mary stuff and the saints, and I think I belive in OSAS (Once Saved, Always Saved).
@CharlesFromHenryTheStickman
@CharlesFromHenryTheStickman 11 месяцев назад
9:13 Pink sheep spotted which has a 0.164% chance to spawn.
@georgebotha6861
@georgebotha6861 11 месяцев назад
Twas predestined
@Albanian_crusader
@Albanian_crusader 28 дней назад
It was predestined to spawn
@jhoughjr1
@jhoughjr1 11 месяцев назад
I'd say yes it is unfair to deprive us of the will god obviously gave us to use. It literally breaks all my theology to deny free will.
@iamjohnfarlow
@iamjohnfarlow 11 месяцев назад
Completely agree, why even bother being a Christian if it’s already been decided you will or won’t be saved?
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 11 месяцев назад
In Christian theology, it was Adam who deprived us of the will, not God. The issue rather is that the promise of salvation is dependent upon the will being freed to respond. If it's a real offer, then humans must receive the grace to be able to accept that offer.
@jaxonspage4514
@jaxonspage4514 11 месяцев назад
@@iamjohnfarlow God uses human choices to enact his will (like evangelism) and he's called us to do so. God promises all who call on the name of Christ will be saved but God's grace directs our still existent wills to do so
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
It is possible that your theology(and mine) could be wrong, no?
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
@@iamjohnfarlowIf you were saved you would be a Christian, if you were not saved you wouldn’t be one.
@davidw2417
@davidw2417 11 месяцев назад
Creating conscious creatures just to eventually torture them forever seems pretty evil to me tbh. Yes, the argument is that we cannot truly understand how great of a sin it is that Adam ate the apple and that we can't hope to understand God's cosmic justice - but that strikes me as deeply unfair and evil still. We kill ants or other insects because they annoy us - but we don't torture ants by slowly ripping their legs off one by one, as that is obviously cruel and evil. Extend that to God damning lesser creatures to an eternity of torture - how is that fair, just because we are incapable of understanding why it's happening to us? Why would God create souls only to eternally condemn them to torture forever? What about a baby living with an uncontacted Amazon tribe that dies during childbirth - torturing a baby forever for something it couldn't possibly help to know or comprehend strikes me as supremely evil, and I can't reconcile a way around that. What are your thoughts on this?
@attila4585
@attila4585 11 месяцев назад
You are right, if God does exist, than He is either not infinitely just and condemns people to hell forever (which I do not believe) or He is infinitely just and reconciles and saves all. Claiming otherwise is denying the victory of Jesus over death
@tobiasbourne9073
@tobiasbourne9073 11 месяцев назад
​@attila4585 Yeah predestination seems illogical considering what Christ did for us
@GenZRemnant9748
@GenZRemnant9748 11 месяцев назад
Ignoring predestination and Calvinism for a minute. Who are you a sinner to question God. The god of all that was, is and is to come God has sole authority to determine what is moral and immoral. If he says hell is a moral punishment than it is. The truth is that when you put your morality above Gods you rebel against him.
@attila4585
@attila4585 11 месяцев назад
@@GenZRemnant9748And who are you to claim to understand God, and limit his mercy?
@davidw2417
@davidw2417 11 месяцев назад
@@GenZRemnant9748 would you tell that to the baby in hell?
@cheekylemon9441
@cheekylemon9441 11 месяцев назад
I think the music you composed and put in your videos is very beautiful, I hope you keep including it!
@legodavid9260
@legodavid9260 11 месяцев назад
My main problem with Calvisim is that while some verses in the Bible seem to teach "Predestination" on the surface, the vast majority of the Bibical narrative clearly shows that free will post-Adam clearly still exists. And not only that, but the idea of Predestination creates a tone of implications that are directly debunked by the Bible itself. If Predestination is true, then by definition, God doesn't love everyone, and by his own choice doesn't want everyone to be saved. This directly contradicts a a couple of verses that clearly teach the opposite: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." - John 3:16 "The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance." - 2 Peter 3:9 "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, declares the Lord God, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?" Ezekiel 18:23 "This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." 1 Timothy 2:3‭-‬4 "For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Lord God; so turn, and live.” Ezekiel 18:32 "For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people." Titus 2:11 "Say to them, As I live, declares the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live; turn back, turn back from your evil ways, for why will you die, O house of Israel?" Ezekiel 33:11 In light of all those verses, then I think we can safely conclude that Predestination is not true. When the Bible talks about "Election" it actually talks about is election of certain people as representatives of the truth of God. Not election for salvation.
@Jando859_
@Jando859_ 11 месяцев назад
YESSS!!! Someone that finally understands me!!!!! We have the same issue with Calvinism.
@ogloc6308
@ogloc6308 11 месяцев назад
I agree with a lot of your points but to conclude that “predestination is not true” is not a viable conclusion. Predestination is in the bible several times whether you like it or not. Predestination is not really up for debate imo, its how we’re predestined that is the question. Most arguments come down to either “God predestines us based on His foreknowledge of our choice to believe” or “God predestines us according to His will alone and He has predetermined who will believe and who won’t”.
@ICantThinkOfAFunnyHandle
@ICantThinkOfAFunnyHandle 11 месяцев назад
Predestination doesn't mean that there are humans God doesn't love so much as there are humans who reject God's love. For predestination itself it's a natural logical conclusion that God (who is all-knowing and isn't constrained by time) would know the choices that we are eventually going to make. Humans have free will in the moment sure, but God already knows what you're going to choose.
@improbablepebble8549
@improbablepebble8549 4 месяца назад
​​@@ICantThinkOfAFunnyHandle That sounds like it's just foreknowledge instead of predestination
@ICantThinkOfAFunnyHandle
@ICantThinkOfAFunnyHandle 4 месяца назад
@@improbablepebble8549Foreknowledge implies that God is unable to affect the events of the future. This would mean that God is not omnipotent, which is heresy because it contradicts the bible
@GenZRemnant9748
@GenZRemnant9748 11 месяцев назад
THIS WAS A GOOD VIDEO! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK RZ!
@jtraptor7776
@jtraptor7776 11 месяцев назад
Angee comment lols
@atticusbeachy3707
@atticusbeachy3707 11 месяцев назад
Calvinists - "We oppose abortion, but not because they're killing innocents."
@TheSwiftCreek2
@TheSwiftCreek2 11 месяцев назад
We oppose abortion because God is the giver of value. And He values human life. And He teaches (and commands) us to do the same. As we follow Him, His value system becomes our value system. Philippians 1:6 talks about God being faithful to complete the work He began in us.
@Mic1904
@Mic1904 11 месяцев назад
Actually yes, that is accurate. I've never remotely understood the idea of 'innocence' as a pro-life argument, as it doesn't work on any level
@atticusbeachy3707
@atticusbeachy3707 11 месяцев назад
@@Mic1904 Killing an innocent person seems worse than killing a totally depraved person. You disagree?
@Mic1904
@Mic1904 11 месяцев назад
​@@atticusbeachy3707 Yes, I absolutely disagree. I don't think that at all. Where does Scripture suggest it would be less worse to kill a totally depraved person? The killing/murder of a human being has never ever been, as far as I can see from Scripture, based in any way on what that person is like morally. Killing a scoudral is as sinful as killing a saint. If you can find a moral argument from Scripture that says otherwise, feel free to educate me, I'd be keen to hear more. (Note, that I'm talking about murdering a person - not the different moral question of whether it's permissible for the state to execute a person for a crime).
@Chicky_Lumps
@Chicky_Lumps 11 месяцев назад
I'm not Calvinist but this is a poor argument.
@thedemon0843
@thedemon0843 11 месяцев назад
I don’t get how us Catholics are considered the self-hating guilt-ridden branch of Christianity whilst the Calvinists outright say we all deserve Hell no matter how good of a person we are.
@peterubbels2385
@peterubbels2385 11 месяцев назад
We just understand the severity of sin unlike the people who say salvation is a lottery (Calvin) or we can be as degenarete as we want (Luther)
@reaganmorris7903
@reaganmorris7903 11 месяцев назад
Actually, that's a Catholic teaching too: "Our justification comes from the grace of God. Grace is favor, the free and undeserved help that God gives us to respond to his call to become children of God, adoptive sons, partakers of the divine nature and of eternal life." (Paragraph 1 of Section 2 of Article 2 of Chapter Three of Section One of Part Three of the Catechism of the Catholic church.)
@thedemon0843
@thedemon0843 11 месяцев назад
@@reaganmorris7903 There is a difference between saying we deserve salvation and we deserve eternal torture. What we deserve is to cease to exist after death.
@cptndec
@cptndec 2 дня назад
That’s the literal basics of all Christianity including Catholicism. Nobody is “good”, we’re all sinners and deserve hell.
@ChristianityExplained
@ChristianityExplained 11 месяцев назад
What did I just walked into? The other day, I watched a video of yours that gives each denomination a grade tier. I'm Charismatic and loved your presentation! Well done! Thought I found another Christian RU-vidr. Today, I saw the nicely done thumbnail and thought, "What is this? Minecraft and Christianity???" I started the video and then saw the channel name. Very talented. Keep up the good work. Who says learning can't be fun? :0😂
@jonathannerz1696
@jonathannerz1696 11 месяцев назад
I consider myself a 3-pointer, and I believe Calvinists are just as Christian as us Baptists, but I still regard limited atonement as absolute heresy.
@adjustedbrass7551
@adjustedbrass7551 11 месяцев назад
So you're a universalist then?
@toddthacker8258
@toddthacker8258 11 месяцев назад
​@@adjustedbrass7551Opposing limited atonement doesn't equal universalism. God offers his grace to all, but only those who come to him are saved.
@adjustedbrass7551
@adjustedbrass7551 11 месяцев назад
@@toddthacker8258 so it's.... limited
@toddthacker8258
@toddthacker8258 11 месяцев назад
@@adjustedbrass7551 No. Limited atonement means that God limits the population to which he offers atonement.
@toddthacker8258
@toddthacker8258 11 месяцев назад
@O2N_ God would be fully just in sending us all to hell. My issue is that justice is not God's only quality; he is also love. And the Calvinist approach (where God predestines the majority of his creatures to hell) doesn't really do justice to that aspect of God's character.
@dutch_asocialite
@dutch_asocialite 11 месяцев назад
It's curious how Calvin says Calvinists shouldn't wonder (or worry) if they're elect, because that's very similar to fate's operation in Hirohiko Araki's stories. Essentially, all the villains in the story have a power that attempts to (or succeeds in) circumventing fate - from simply stopping time to temporarily removing the user from the effects of fate - often due to a desire to rise above the world and control their destinies, yet the heroes - even though they may know for certain that they will perish in their quest for justice - don't worry themselves about what's to come, as fate has repeatedly shown to favour the just. I'm not sure how to link this back to the video, but it's a neat thought.
@pentiumdeusex-machina4645
@pentiumdeusex-machina4645 11 месяцев назад
JoCa's Bizarre Theology: Predestination is Unbreakable
@Robdavis1990
@Robdavis1990 11 месяцев назад
This is a very underrated comment
@LuisOrtiz-gt5cw
@LuisOrtiz-gt5cw 8 месяцев назад
bro related jojo to theology 💀
@lanceuppercut_
@lanceuppercut_ 8 месяцев назад
I keep seeing your comments
@internetdinosaur8810
@internetdinosaur8810 8 месяцев назад
Wait where did Calvin state that? I've yet to read that.
@willis6234
@willis6234 11 месяцев назад
It has helped me quite a bit to think of Calvinism along narrative lines, in so far as if you picture any fictional character that you've ever read, that character simultaneously executes his will and the authors will. It's not at all a violation of a written character to be written, because he cannot exist any other way! Furthermore, a good author understands the character he is attempting to write, and the narrative purpose of said character. Therefore, everything that the author writes, is within the nature of the character, and everything the character thinks, wants, or does has been written by the author.
@samueldimmock694
@samueldimmock694 8 месяцев назад
Yeah, I've never really seen the disagreement between free will and predestination, and this is a very good way of explaining why.
@franciscolucasdesouza8359
@franciscolucasdesouza8359 10 дней назад
you made this even worse. characters, even analogously, are deprived of any will at all. you can´t borrow moral similarities between real persons and fictional ones precisely because of that .
@willis6234
@willis6234 10 дней назад
@@franciscolucasdesouza8359 Look, all I'm saying is you choose according to your choices, but you don't get to choose your choices. If you want to attribute any objective meaning to existence at all, then someone is giving you those choices as well as your faculties for choosing. Otherwise, it boils down to what you subjectively make of it, and nobody is wrong or right for whatever they decide. In essence, either either all creation has designed purpose, or it doesn't. There isn't some middle ground where God can create something that then supercedes his ability to affect it. If he did, that thing is now God.
@franciscolucasdesouza8359
@franciscolucasdesouza8359 9 дней назад
@@willis6234 I have to disagree with you. One can make his own choices freely and still be judged by some moral standard. If you freely choose to act one way, you as free moral agent will be judged by those actions according to christian moral standards. God creates the existence in some way that both moral stardards and genuinely moral choises that are free can exist at the same time.
@dustintaber
@dustintaber 4 месяца назад
There was a moment in this video that I waswas brought to tears and I just had to say, “I love you God.” He is working through you, my guy. Your theology makes sense and now I’m starting to think I might be Calvinist. God bless you, Redeemed Zoomer!
@iamjohnfarlow
@iamjohnfarlow 11 месяцев назад
If it’s already been decided where I’ll go when I die and there is nothing I can do to change it shouldn’t I just live my life however I want. After all if I’m going to Heaven no matter what I do, I’ll just come to Christ on my deathbed and be forgiven because I’m part of the elect. If I’m going to Hell I might as well enjoy the temporary pleasures in this life seen as the most merciful being in existence only died for the sins of some people and not all people.
@edim108
@edim108 4 месяца назад
Part of the argument is that if you are elect, one in Christ and all that you wouldn't want to sin in the first place bc no one who accepts the truth would want to intentionally stray from it. It's the opposite of "salvation through works", sort of "works from salvation" if you will.
@iamjohnfarlow
@iamjohnfarlow 4 месяца назад
@@edim108 There are saved people in the Bible who did knowingly and willingly sin and even ones who intentionally stray from the truth, so that’s not a good explanation, for me at least. I like what you said about works from salvation however, more Christians ought to understand that “salvation through works” being false doesn’t mean there aren’t works.
@harrygarris6921
@harrygarris6921 11 месяцев назад
The problem with Calvinism is you have to somehow affirm God’s will as the sole determinant in the fate of men, but you can’t go all the way and accept strict determinism to be true. Because if determinism is true then God causes evil and you quickly fall into heresy. All I can say for people who are willing to go through the mental gymnastics it takes to affirm calvinism while rejecting determinism is… good luck man. I haven’t heard a logically sound argument for that particular theological system yet and I’ve listened to a whole lot of them.
@Justin-yn5py
@Justin-yn5py 11 месяцев назад
Bingo, Calvinism logically makes God the author of evil. Adam could not have chosen to not eat the apple
@Lemon-pf3pm
@Lemon-pf3pm 11 месяцев назад
For me, determinism in Christianity is merely testimony to not having the ability to unify verses that speak of a decision and verses that speak of a foreknowledge without presenting one as an illusion under the other. It is always necessary to choose the simplest that is compatible with all the facts. When God speaks of regret, one knows that the immutability of God consists of having a fixed character (spoken within time), and merely performing a single spontaneous act in which all other behaviors are included (spoken outside of time). One does not conclude that God would not regret something in reality, not that when He speaks of an emotion He means something else, but that the regret does not represent a change in His person and He already knew about it when He created man (and He created us anyway). A reasonable being does something that is good/rational to do even if it knows that it has to go through negative emotions because of it one day. God knew that even if He sees people in pain and (thus) regrets making them in a moment, in the end it was worth it. Love is wanting the best for the object of love. To see its happiness as one's own and to see its suffering as one's own. If God does not save some He could save, love is not His dominant motive. It stays either unfair or unloving, even if He in some sense has all right to do so. If He has the ability to not do so, He does not what would be loving. There must be metaphysical rules for it, which one can bring in via free will, but hard determinism does not come around it. If God a) programmed who gets saved and who not, b) had full control who to create and how many people to create and c) is unbound by metaphysical laws (laws of His own nature/laws that are just a product of what and how He is) such as having to give people free will, He, in fact, would not be a loving God. It's not that we all sinned in Adam and Eve but that a mechanical reaction of this first sin was the corruption of all of nature. We are born in an unfair world where we can become sick and where we are born removed from God because of this mechanical reaction of sin, something He could not remove without breaking order and creating chaos (something impossible?) God is the loving and fair one who still tries to reach us.
@socalkook370
@socalkook370 11 месяцев назад
Great explanation. Determinism really brings into question whether the wicked are actually responsible for their sins. Romans 1:20 says man is without excuse, but if God designed a person to be unable to accept the gospel, that's not just an excuse, that's a hard reason.
@christopherponsford8385
@christopherponsford8385 11 месяцев назад
This was well composed. It really depends on which Calvinists you’re talking to, ultimately. Some of them are hard-line theological determinists, but some are compatibilists. To be fair, I think that Calvinism has its logical conclusion towards iron-clad determinism, and thus I find the theological determinist Calvinists to be the most intellectually honest and consistent. Anything remotely compatibilist regarding free-will and Gods sovereignty is just so close to the original Catholic position of predestination as to be effectively a difference in mere semantics alone, and begs the question as to what the controversy even is: namely, to retain as much theologically as can be maintained with Church fathers like Augustine and Aquinas, while theologically circumventing the authority of the capital C Church. Calvinsim can be easily understood from my pov to be an exercise in theological gerrymandering.
@joaovitormatos8147
@joaovitormatos8147 11 месяцев назад
Guy says we should all be burning in hell and follows with "that's the beauty of calvinism"
@Rambling-Thomas
@Rambling-Thomas 11 месяцев назад
The Bible does say we have all sinned, no one is righteous, no not one. Are you implying someone does not need Jesus and God's grace to be saved?
@Testimony_Of_JTF
@Testimony_Of_JTF 11 месяцев назад
@@Rambling-Thomas What about Enoch? He was sent to heaven before Christ's sacrifice.
@Rambling-Thomas
@Rambling-Thomas 11 месяцев назад
@Testimony_Of_JTF So you're saying Jesus did not have to die on the cross to save us? Was his sacrifice unnecessary? Surely not. What is your view on what happened to all other people who died before the cross event?
@Testimony_Of_JTF
@Testimony_Of_JTF 11 месяцев назад
@@Rambling-Thomas It was necessary for us who have sinned but if God just abducted someone they should be good. The Harrowing of hell happened and all, so yeah. Enoch took place millenia before Christ went to hell so...
@Rambling-Thomas
@Rambling-Thomas 11 месяцев назад
@Testimony_Of_JTF Enoch is a very interesting anomaly I will admit, I'll have to do some reading on him and see what others thought about him. Enoch was incredibly early in salvation history, the law wasn't even given at that point.
@cheekylemon9441
@cheekylemon9441 11 месяцев назад
Not a wierd channel, a great channel!
@believein1
@believein1 11 месяцев назад
Calvinism is wholly unbiblical. Anyone who studies the Bible for themselves in context without wearing Calvinist lenses while doing so can see this easily.
@kingarth0r
@kingarth0r 11 месяцев назад
IM NOT MAD I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW KEEP UP WITH THE GOOD CONTENT
@CeltickenderPlayz
@CeltickenderPlayz 11 месяцев назад
YOOOOO
@unexpectediteminthebaggingarea
@unexpectediteminthebaggingarea 11 месяцев назад
Calvinism is unfair! Mr Knox is in there! Standing after the session! Plotting his confession!
@Gingermaas
@Gingermaas 11 месяцев назад
Underrated comment right here.
@electronic9194
@electronic9194 11 месяцев назад
Hey man wanna just say thanks for explaining predestination, Ive been asking for a while and you provided a pretty good way of seeing it with the fact that us going to hell is fair
@grant2707
@grant2707 11 месяцев назад
Can a calvinist explain how salvation isn't an illusion if we are predestined to have faith? If you're never in danger to go to hell then how can you ever be saved from a nonexistent danger?
@CashFreedman
@CashFreedman 11 месяцев назад
Yeah it doesn't make much sense but at least it acknowledges our sinfulness.
@grant2707
@grant2707 11 месяцев назад
@@CashFreedman The free will approach acknowledges this too? At least it removes God's involvement in human actions and blames the individual when they sin. Salvation without free will makes no sense, Salvation to those who willingly sin is the only logical approach. Also. Faith cannot be a work. Throughout the Bible these two concepts are opposed or complimented, but never equated.
@danilomenoli
@danilomenoli 5 месяцев назад
So you don't love God with all your heart you are just afraid of being sent to hell, is that what are you saying? The Lord Himself said "And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand." but still you want to feel like you are co-responsible by your own redemption by praying the rosary, doing good deeds or whatever think you can do. Jesus Christ did you even listen to the video or you jumped directly to the comments to write this?
@grant2707
@grant2707 5 месяцев назад
@@danilomenoli Look man, no need to be so aggressive. I'm actually rather on the fence on this issue so you have the opportunity to convince me. If we are totally depraved, then how is there such thing as grace? How can someone receive grace if they had no opportunity to do otherwise? How can God "forgive" is if we had no choice to do otherwise. I think the calvinist approach inadvertently gives God the blame for sin. Again, I can be wrong (i'm trying to understand the truth).
@Nathan-GB
@Nathan-GB 11 месяцев назад
The best explanation of the doctrine of election I’ve ever heard is this: Imagine a wide open door, and above it there’s a sign in big bold letters that says “come in, and have your sins forgiven. Receive full pardon from the king!” Some people walk in, others do not. On the opposite side of the door, it says “Chosen from the foundation of the world”
@Lemon-pf3pm
@Lemon-pf3pm 11 месяцев назад
So the king decided who got in and who not? It is Him in the case of Christianity who layed the foundation of the world after all.
@goodkitty4976
@goodkitty4976 11 месяцев назад
I see it as those who are called will be saved and those who aren't predestined never feel the urge to trust christ
@harrygarris6921
@harrygarris6921 11 месяцев назад
That’s not the Calvinist doctrine of election, that’s more like the Lutheran one. In Calvinism the door only appears for the elect, for the non elect there is no door to walk through.
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@harrygarris6921 This is false. Calvinists and Lutherans essentially believe the same thing about predestination, Lutherans just don't accept that it logically follows that people who aren't predestined to walk through the door are thus predestined not to.
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@harrygarris6921 Calvin absolutely believed that salvation is offered to all. Limited atonement makes it sound like some people will want to be saved but will be denied forgiveness because they aren't elect--but this is not what Calvin believed. According to Calvinists (actual Calvinists, not hyper-"Calvinists,") Jesus died for every single person who has a will to repent and turn to him, and didn't die for anyone who rejects him.
@timboslice980
@timboslice980 11 месяцев назад
I was a calvinist for over 10 years. I held on as long as I could but the points just fail when you see them against scripture. The funniest video on YT is Idol killer: paul washer totally depraved babies. I haven't laughed like that in a long time!
@redeemedzoomer6053
@redeemedzoomer6053 11 месяцев назад
Where you a real Calvinist (Presbyterian) or just a Reformed Baptist lol
@timboslice980
@timboslice980 11 месяцев назад
@redeemedzoomer6053 Yeah went to presby church. It's the only calvinist church in my county. However I will say they never really preached on the 5 points besides unconditional election and irresistible grace. They're focus was preaching the gospel in hopes that Christ's sheep would hear the shepherds call. I did listen to reformed baptists though since they're all over the net. I know you don't see them as truly calvinist and I somewhat agree.... I know they came from baptists not Dutch reformed or Presbyterian. I had no idea that Calvin believed in some of the Marian doctrines until after I left that theology.... if I had known I may have come out of it faster. I know that sounds a little contradictory as a catholic but now I don't believe in sola scriptura but then I did. I probably would've questioned Calvin's commitment to SS. I agree with you that presbys are the nerds of the faith.... reformed pub on FB is awesome! I had a good friend that brought me to his church. I was shocked at how little they got into theology though. Not all presbys are nerds I guess, there was one guy named Jerry who was pretty smart. He had some disagreement with the pastor and left the church. He doesn't go to any church now but still shares calvinist videos online. Anyway I love your videos. I watch them all!
@peterubbels2385
@peterubbels2385 11 месяцев назад
​@@redeemedzoomer6053 'real calvinist" your love for the presbytarian church is borderline idolatry haha Love your videos, and I want to thank you since some explanatory videos of you helped me come to faith. (I am a Catholic catechumen) This may sound strange given the context above but I truelly think you are doing the Lords work with what you are doing and that if you keep serving his will, you will achieve great things. Maybe after the reconquista bring Protestantism in communion with rome? No? It was worth a try
@jacksonkuzmic
@jacksonkuzmic 11 месяцев назад
@@peterubbels2385as a catholic I approve this message
@AmillennialMillenial
@AmillennialMillenial 11 месяцев назад
If you listen to Paul washer enough, basically every couple years you’ll realize that you weren’t really saved before. I don’t know if he does all the time, but I’ve heard him address the “young people” about how they need to make sure they’re regenerate, while also commending the older people because they are probably ready to die for Christ. As if American boomers have had to cling to faith through intense persecution.
@gothwrangler8097
@gothwrangler8097 11 месяцев назад
Thank you for making these videos. They have really helped me understand other dominations of Christianity. I'm non domominal, but that's because idk where i fall within the dominations
@bikesrcool_1958
@bikesrcool_1958 11 месяцев назад
Find out the theology stuff, discuss with other Christian’s. Make your opinions, but NEVER forget… difference in theology doesn’t make someone non Christian. You are still brothers. Jesus is still our savior and God, and rose.
@rooderoo12
@rooderoo12 11 месяцев назад
Great explanation again of a very difficult subject. I'm Dutch (Christian) Reformed and I never hear people talk about this stuff.
@chaditionalist5698
@chaditionalist5698 11 месяцев назад
It doesn't sit right with me that an infinitely merciful God can offer His salvation to any less than every single human, or that a God of infinite love who wants the best for us would want anyone to go to hell "just because" I also think that Calvinism cheapens the relationship between God and those who are saved - what does it mean to have a relationship with God and love Him if we're incapable of doing anything different? However interesting video as always, God bless you brother
@Athan_In_Christ
@Athan_In_Christ 11 месяцев назад
He does because we don't even deserve the salvation. We are His creation, meaning realistically he could do whatever he wanted with us and it would be righteous because we are fully his property. It is by His Grace that we can be saved and by His Justice that we are condemned. Also, the fact that we can actually love God is only because of Him. You could say that's unfair because he's forcing us to love Him but would it be unfair for someone to force someone out of a burning house because that's their own will?
@sonicgeeksquad4g106
@sonicgeeksquad4g106 11 месяцев назад
​@@Athan_In_Christ We all deserve hell. God providing salvation to a minority is loving, but wouldn't it be even more loving to provide salvation to all of His image-bearers?
@Athan_In_Christ
@Athan_In_Christ 11 месяцев назад
@@sonicgeeksquad4g106 Because the remaining of us going to Hell show him being Just. He's loving and merciful in that he saves at all but also Just in that he condemns the remaining. And if you are wondering, "well why does he destroy this person and not this person" remember Romans 9 21 tells us the Potter has the right to "save" some of his pots and destroy the others as he pleases. Or, use some for special purposes and others for common purposes, as stated in the verse
@sonicgeeksquad4g106
@sonicgeeksquad4g106 11 месяцев назад
@@Athan_In_Christ So the cross wasn’t a good enough expression of God’s justice? God does have the right to save whomever He pleases. It is His will to save all who put their faith in Christ. It still would technically be more loving to provide salvation to all, especially considering God desires all to be saved.
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 11 месяцев назад
@@sonicgeeksquad4g106 "It still would technically be more loving to provide salvation to all, especially considering God desires all to be saved." I think that is a pretty compelling reason to believe he does
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
You’re ignoring Calvinism’s embrace of determinism. That’s the real point of contention. What humanity deserves because of sin is wholly irrelevant if God Himself is the sole antecedent cause of every human sin. It is outside of a perfect being’s nature to judge, punish, or reward people based on things that they cannot control. This is an obvious truth. It’s also why things like racism and sexism are wrong.
@pipinfresh
@pipinfresh 11 месяцев назад
This is not Calvinism. Historic Calvinism is not deterministic and the historic Calvinist creeds and confessions are not determinist, and personally I don't believe Calvin neas determinist himself. Calvinism teaches that people have a will and free agency but that will has been corrupted by sin and is in bondage to sin. Therefore we are unable to save ourselves. Calvinism states that God is not the author of sin and all humans are morally responsible for their our sin. The Westminster Confession says this, as follows: God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass, (Eph 1:11; Rom 11:33; Hbr 6:17; Rom 9:15; Rom 9:18): yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, (Jam 1:13; Jam 1:17; 1Jo 1:5); nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established, (Act 2:23; Mat 17:12; Act 4:27-28; Jhn 19:11; Pro 16:33). A lot of people completely misunderstand Calvinism as complete and total determination but that's not the case. Sure they are some hyper Calvinists that believe that but they are not in line with what Calvin taught and believe or with historic Calvinism.
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
@@pipinfresh Calvin was in fact a determinist. “First, the eternal predestination of God, by which before the fall of Adam He decreed what should take place concerning the whole human race and every individual, was fixed and determined.” -John Calvin, Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God, p.121
@pipinfresh
@pipinfresh 11 месяцев назад
@@TheOtherCaleb I think you are confusing determinism with fatalism which is what most people do, when most people say determinism they actually mean fatalism. That's what I was arguing against in my response. It's important to understand what words mean and why they are used. Calvin didn't mean determinism in the same way it's commonly understood by many today. Determinism means causality. God's causality and His divine decree preordains all things but that doesn't remove free agency and moral responsibility from all humans. God creating the world was determinism because it comes from the decree of God and He is the causality of the creation, therefore creation is determinist in nature. Fatalism is where everything is 100% inevitably fixed with zero deviation. Look at it this way. God's sovereignty over all of creation is 100% deterministic yet our creaturely will is not 100% fatalistic. They are compatible with each other.
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
@@pipinfresh If God has determined all things, without even a single rouge molecule, then there, by definition, cannot be any form of deviation from such determinations in reality…. Hence fatalism (under your working definition)
@iltonnotattico6231
@iltonnotattico6231 10 месяцев назад
​@@pipinfresh if you are not responsible for trying your best to follows God's commandments and not sin because God chose you to do that, then you cannot be held responsible for living a life purely of sin and denying God because you had no other choice
@tomcaldwell5750
@tomcaldwell5750 7 месяцев назад
Thank you this enjoyable video!
@TheInvshika
@TheInvshika 10 месяцев назад
The trouble with predestination for me is, why would someone convert to Christianity if God has already chosen whether they’re elect?
@Jando859_
@Jando859_ 11 месяцев назад
Some Calvinists and reformers say if a true believer deletes themselves, they will be saved. Because of predestination. This is SCARY.
@ihiohoh2708
@ihiohoh2708 5 месяцев назад
First off, they aren't saved because they "deleted," but because they believed. Second, that is murder. Murder does not forfeit your salvation. If you believe that then I suppose you think King David went to Hell. So no that is not scary. Believing is what gives us righteousness, not our actions. _And [Abraham] believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness._ *Genesis 15:6*
@CliffCardi
@CliffCardi 11 месяцев назад
Virgin Calvin vs Chad Luther
@XxZekeKnightxX
@XxZekeKnightxX 11 месяцев назад
I feel like you responded to my comment about Calvinism earlier, even if not directly. Fully explained, the predestination bit doesn't sound as anxiety-inducing or as random as it appears at first. It both makes sense and seems biblical up to a point. Mostly agree. The point where I find fault is the circular logic of if a person wants to be saved, wants Christ, then that person was already elect to begin with. Especially since we find a number of times during Christ's earthly ministry where the faith of a person shifted the situation, faith moves the heart of God. I think of Mary having Jesus turn water into wine, even when Jesus stated that it wasn't His time yet to perform miracles. But He obeyed His mother. There was also the woman with the issue of blood, who had the faith to reach out to touch the end of His garment and was healed, and Jesus did not expect it. "Who touched me?" "I perceived power flowing from me." I do agree, we cannot come to Christ on our own and we all deserve damnation, which is what the Cross is for. Christ dying on the Cross made the way for us to come to Him, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man can come before the Father except through Me." However, to reject the Cross, which I believe 2 Corinthians talks about this, means that there is nothing stopping a person from being damned, it's the Cross or hell. Hint: choose the Cross. This might come down to a matter of semantics. Funny enough, since I was raised in church and dedicated as a baby, I legit thought that I was a Christian from birth, but I was told that was not the case and had to "get saved" at 11, and got baptized not long afterward. (This was at a Church of God of Prophecy I grew up with) People have this idea of getting baptized more than once when "rededicating their faith", but I never really understood or agreed with that. I always had the belief that one only needs to be baptized once, it's totally unnecessary to have it done multiple times. I don't have a "salvation story" because of the fact that I was raised in church, and have always disliked the pressure to have one coming from many circles. It really undervalues raising one's children in church in my humble opinion, when raising them in church is exactly what we should be doing. It's not about who has the better testimony, it's about glorifying God and reaching out to the lost. I don't know if I sound Baptist or something, but the church my family and I now go to is a church that split off from Assemblies of God, and we're a very unique bunch.
@justinlovesjesus
@justinlovesjesus 11 месяцев назад
Man I love you redeemed zoomer. I’m an 18 year old Christian from Florida. You’re an inspiration my man, praise Jesus Christ . You’re advice is so good. I need to stop looking to myself and start looking to the Savior and the promises of God. Thank you🙂
@GAF2234
@GAF2234 11 месяцев назад
When you realise its all man made fairytale, what a waste of time
@evan7391
@evan7391 11 месяцев назад
​@@GAF2234 your ignorance of a language and presuppositions that you cannot understand doesn't make a worldview "a man made fairytale".
@GAF2234
@GAF2234 11 месяцев назад
@@evan7391 Man made god, that's what I'm pointing idiot
@user-jc2vl7of2z
@user-jc2vl7of2z 11 месяцев назад
Love your comments and videos. You were however really struggling for words throughout this one. Maybe it's time for a rethink on Calvinism.
@davidfitzpatrick6535
@davidfitzpatrick6535 11 месяцев назад
See TBH I feel like Calvinists (and Redeemed Zoomer please forgive me for this) dont focus on the love of God and how by grace God saves us because he loves us not because we're destined to "fill a Christian quota" if u will. And because God loves us he gives us a choice to accept or rejecct him because if he didn't he wouldnt be a loving God. Again I grew up in the Free Methodist tradition and still consider myself a Methodist theologically speaking so I do believe that humanity has free will.
@redeemedzoomer6053
@redeemedzoomer6053 11 месяцев назад
I have respect for Methodists and their Arminian tradition. I don't consider Calvinism vs Arminianism an issue of orthodoxy vs heresy
@davidfitzpatrick6535
@davidfitzpatrick6535 11 месяцев назад
@@redeemedzoomer6053 fair enough. I actually have a couple friends that are calvinists and trust me we love to debate free will vs "God's will" if u will.
@CashFreedman
@CashFreedman 11 месяцев назад
What're your thoughts on philosopher/ theologian Soren Kierkegaard?
@henriquegabrielwuchrynmart4865
@henriquegabrielwuchrynmart4865 4 месяца назад
THE LAST WINDOW PATTERN WAS INVERTED and it hurts. But great video! You always discuss christian topics with grace and respect, i am loving your channel!
@deion312
@deion312 11 месяцев назад
Anybody else a Leighton flowers fan and a redeemed Zoomer fan?
@JuanmaB24
@JuanmaB24 11 месяцев назад
I thought I was the only one😅
@eclipsesonic
@eclipsesonic 11 месяцев назад
Same here! I love the content that Redeemed Zoomer has done and his zeal for the Bible, Theology and Church History (which I'm really into too), but I'm in much more agreement with Leighton Flowers view of free will and salvation than I am with the Calvinist side.
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno 11 месяцев назад
Fifth century Christian: "Anybody else a Pelagius fan and an Augustine fan?"
@endygonewild2899
@endygonewild2899 11 месяцев назад
I am too
@billylindsey3678
@billylindsey3678 11 месяцев назад
Yep me too. Fan of both
@Testimony_Of_JTF
@Testimony_Of_JTF 11 месяцев назад
How do people unironically believe this
@Testimony_Of_JTF
@Testimony_Of_JTF 11 месяцев назад
ALSO NO I'M NOT MAD
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 11 месяцев назад
I don't know, but the comments are just going off on him
@matthewlucas3905
@matthewlucas3905 9 месяцев назад
@Redeemed Zoomer - do you have any in depth videos about hermeneutics? Or could you make one please? That would be awesome. I have a hard time understanding covenant theology but want to, so that I may see if I believe that perspective. Psalms 22:9-10 (the infant faith you spoke of)
@mastermousemice6940
@mastermousemice6940 11 месяцев назад
You may not be committing a Christian heresy with your Protestantism, but you are certainly committing a Minecraft heresy by allowing those random floating blocks to remain.
@LadyJadeicorn
@LadyJadeicorn 11 месяцев назад
I really appreciate this video. I converted to Christianity in January of this year, got saved in February, and baptized in March. Since I converted, I’ve been going to the non-denominational church I went to as a kid. I love that church, but the way they speak on salvation has had me worried on and off for months that I’m not saved. The concept you spoke of about how you look at your baptism as an objective means of salvation has really helped clear my conscious. I also really like and appreciate the logical and philosophical way of looking at theology and scripture. You have planted a Calvinist seed in my mind 🌱 thanks for the video
@redeemedzoomer6053
@redeemedzoomer6053 11 месяцев назад
thank you, God bless! Now, just become Presbyterian ;)
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
All Christians believe in predestination. Calvinism just includes a certain take on Augustine’s take on predestination.
@TheSwiftCreek2
@TheSwiftCreek2 11 месяцев назад
Actually, I've know a lot of them that don't. The good thing is we don't have to have all of our theology be right for God to accept us. That's especially fortunate for those of us who think we have it more right than everyone else.
@ebeleingram8048
@ebeleingram8048 11 месяцев назад
You're wrong. All Christians believes God knows the future. Only Calvanist are arrogant enough to believe there is no free will and God only chooses certain people to believe the Bible. It completely undermines the necessity for doing good in the world which something he's adamant about.
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
@@ebeleingram8048 Predestination is in the Bible my friend. I’m not a Calvinist mind you.
@filiplisowski5619
@filiplisowski5619 11 месяцев назад
Roman Catholic here, thanks for the video! I was wondering, how does the Calvinist view of predestination deal with 1Tm 2, 4? God bless!
@TheVoiceOfTruth.
@TheVoiceOfTruth. 6 месяцев назад
Good point but how can you do with Romans 9: 22 literally saying if God wanted to he could make a vessel/human prepared for his wrath
@War_maN333
@War_maN333 11 месяцев назад
YOUR LATIN COULD SEE SOME IMPROVEMENT
@au8363
@au8363 11 месяцев назад
Why doesn’t God give everyone irresistible Grace
@Dave_OGG
@Dave_OGG 11 месяцев назад
Why did He make people knowing they would reject Him?
@RamonIsHim
@RamonIsHim 11 месяцев назад
Calvinists believe that people being damned is just a Canon event
@CosmicCrowMC
@CosmicCrowMC 11 месяцев назад
The way I've always thought about free will and predestination is that it's our ignorance of the future that convicts us. Even if we are predestined to either accept the sacrifice of Jesus or not, we have no way of knowing who is predestined for salvation and who is not. The ability to pose the question "Is predestination fair?" shows that in your life, you have had the opportunity to know, accept, and love God, and make what is -- from your limited perspective -- a personal choice. Evangelism is important for this very reason: those who have had no physical way of knowing Jesus cannot make a choice as we can beyond spiritual intervention, which God can choose to do or not to do as he has also chosen who has had the opportunity to hear the good news from birth. As you mentioned, it's a hard pill to swallow, but once I accepted that God's will always comes first and that, in his will, he gave me the abilities (and limitations!) to come to my own decision about him, I was able to set aside my notion of what is fair and instead embrace what God is willing to do for me and others.
@litigioussociety4249
@litigioussociety4249 11 месяцев назад
Your version of God would be unjust, unless he's not omnipotent. God desires all people to be saved, and come to the knowledge of truth. If the determining factor for whether someone comes to call upon the Lord to be saved is God, and God has the ability to make everyone do that, but chooses some people not to come to him, then that is unjust. It's akin to a father giving an inheritance to his children, but only if they have a special ticket, and the father only gives some of his kids that ticket, but has infinite tickets to give. It makes no sense to distribute the inheritance, but not the means of redeeming the inheritance. Maybe you or other Calvinists believe there is something greater than God that determines who he saves, which certainly does not seem biblical, unless that's your interpretation of Wisdom.
@TheSwiftCreek2
@TheSwiftCreek2 11 месяцев назад
You could tell God that. Not advised. Man's philosophy will never beat God's Word. His Word remains forever. As long as we think we're competent to judge God we will fail.
@litigioussociety4249
@litigioussociety4249 11 месяцев назад
@@TheSwiftCreek2 I have faith in God based on what he's done and said. Most people would say it was inspired when he wrote, God desires all people to be saved. I haven't heard anyone claim that's not inspired. I think it's pretty clear that the bible says you must trust in God (have faith,) call upon him, and endure to the end to be saved. The Calvinsist view would interpret that as God will cause you to trust in him, he will cause you to call on him, and some Calvinists would say once you do that you are guaranteed to be saved. I think it's just a complete rejection of the Parable of the Sower where there's no indication that God makes one fertile soil, or God makes the seed grow.
@SerendipitousProvidence
@SerendipitousProvidence 10 месяцев назад
​@@litigioussociety4249 Well put. Not to mention God seems double-minded and schizophrenic on top of being unfair. It's like God is somehow mad and angry at people for what they are Intrinsically unable to do; accept Christ's grace. It's not too different and strange from me beating the living daylights out of my, suppose, deaf dog for not hearkening unto my verbal commands, despite knowing its condition, and in spite of having the ability to heal its deafness and make it obey me.
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5 11 месяцев назад
As R.C. Sproul says in “Chosen By God”-I’m summarizing-“Some receive justice. Some receive mercy. But no one receives injustice.”
@thecossackcrusaderofholybr8448
@thecossackcrusaderofholybr8448 11 месяцев назад
They both commit sin yet one group gets punished the other doesn't. Its like God having favorites.
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5 11 месяцев назад
@@thecossackcrusaderofholybr8448 One is punished for their sin. Jesus is punished for the others’ sin. Justice is served in both cases. To quote the Christian rapper Flame: “Seek him (Jesus) now, you can know him as savior. Seek him later, you’ll know him as judge.”
@yunaru3643
@yunaru3643 11 месяцев назад
​@@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5imagine being a baby that is predestined to go to hell
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5
@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5 11 месяцев назад
@@yunaru3643 There’s no guarantee that babies who die go to hell. For all we know, God could save all babies who die. Romans 9:14-15 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”
@yunaru3643
@yunaru3643 11 месяцев назад
@@AllYourBaseAreBelongToU5 I thought Calvinists believe in limited atonement? If all babies are saved, even without baptism, it's not very limited, is it?
@mccoyyoung3643
@mccoyyoung3643 11 месяцев назад
As a non-Calvinist I think RC Sproul did a really great job explaining how Calvinism is not unfair in his What is Reformed Theology lectures. I wish people on my side would stop using that objection. We should just use Scripture to make our point. Good stuff!
@TheOtherCaleb
@TheOtherCaleb 11 месяцев назад
The reason why Calvinism is unfair is because of its determinism. What humanity deserves because of sin is wholly irrelevant if God Himself was the sole antecedent cause of every human sin. It is outside of a perfect being’s nature to judge, punish, or reward based on things that people cannot control. This is an obvious truth. It’s also why things like racism and sexism are wrong.
@robertallan8035
@robertallan8035 11 месяцев назад
@@TheOtherCaleb
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@TheOtherCaleb God doesn't cause sin. It happens by his allowance and his providential will, yes, but that's not the same as him "forcing people to sin." Providence isn't something that exists within the universe. It is above it and apart from it. The fact that people can't control who they are is irrelevant to whether or not they are responsible for their actions. I can't control what desires and circumstances lead to my choices, but that doesn't make me a mindless robot. I still have moral agency and moral responsibility.
@Lemon-pf3pm
@Lemon-pf3pm 11 месяцев назад
​@@BenjaminAnderson21It's not about moral responsibility. If God a) programmed who gets saved and who not, b) had full control who to create and how many people to create and c) is unbound by metaphysical laws (laws of His own nature/laws that are just a product of what and how He is) such as having to give people free will, He, in fact, would not be a loving God. He would really design some people to go to Hell, which is not the case with every other Christian understanding of God. That Gods design who will sin and who not comes from another dimension is really not important, it is still His design which leads us, in the end, to Him or not to Him. Input and output: His decision is the cause of who gets to hell and not our own. We just play our part in His show, a show written so some get the bad ending. Our own will is an illusion preset by His decision.
@BenjaminAnderson21
@BenjaminAnderson21 11 месяцев назад
@@Lemon-pf3pm God does not program anyone to reject him. They choose to reject him. Calvin affirms this, and most people who believe in predestination do as well.
@Lucas-wk3nr
@Lucas-wk3nr 11 месяцев назад
Hey, can you do a video explain premill, amill, and postmill which one you are and why?
@Bannanaju007
@Bannanaju007 11 месяцев назад
God Bless you all Amen
@joelrobertsonmusic
@joelrobertsonmusic 11 месяцев назад
I vote that Zoomer and Kyle make a podcast together where they just discuss these topics. I would love that. And so would RU-vid.
@redeemedzoomer6053
@redeemedzoomer6053 11 месяцев назад
we are indeed doing that. I've spoken to Kyle
@joelrobertsonmusic
@joelrobertsonmusic 11 месяцев назад
@@redeemedzoomer6053 letsss goo
@DeformedTheology
@DeformedTheology 11 месяцев назад
@@redeemedzoomer6053 Very good!
@SavingSoulsMinistries
@SavingSoulsMinistries 11 месяцев назад
Proverbs 16:4 “The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.”
@X_mano
@X_mano 11 месяцев назад
Who else wait for the verses he quote to appear on the screen. I don't think it is intentional thou, inciting video!!!
@krisandketo
@krisandketo 11 месяцев назад
Great vid. Thanks.
@residuejunkie4321
@residuejunkie4321 11 месяцев назад
Amen!😊
@Nathan-GB
@Nathan-GB 11 месяцев назад
Nah. God doesn’t owe salvation to anyone. If even one person was saved, it would be an unbelievably profound act of grace. The fact that there are potentially billions (or trillions, who knows) of people throughout history who are God’s elect shows the extent of the remarkable and wonderful grace of our God. Praise the Lord!
@gideonwiley8961
@gideonwiley8961 11 месяцев назад
I would actually disagree. While he doesn’t “owe” in a legal sense, aince we cannot exchange anything for his good will, we are his children, and all parents have special duties towards their children. Because he is all powerful, he can accomplish these, and because he is all good, he is the best parent, creator, and lord. There is no reason why all will not be saved.
@Athan_In_Christ
@Athan_In_Christ 11 месяцев назад
@@gideonwiley8961 Romans 9:21 "The potter can make anything he wants to make. He can use the same clay to make one thing for special use and another thing for daily use." He has no special duties or things he has to do for us. It is by His Grace we are saved and his Justice that we are condemned
@gideonwiley8961
@gideonwiley8961 11 месяцев назад
@@Athan_In_Christ so a creator has no responsibilities to his creation? If the argument is “God is powerful enough to do anything he wants with us,” then I agree. But that doesn’t make it right for him to neglect the salvation of his creation if he can save them.
@hilohilo9539
@hilohilo9539 11 месяцев назад
@@gideonwiley8961 Are you a universalist?
@gideonwiley8961
@gideonwiley8961 11 месяцев назад
@@hilohilo9539 honestly I’m not sure, but at the very least I’m a hopeful universalist. I really hope all will be redeemed, and I don’t think it’s outside Gods ability to do so.
@cooperstephens147
@cooperstephens147 11 месяцев назад
As an evangelical Southern Baptist, I still don’t understand how anyone can claim that Baptism is necessary for salvation. If that were true, then what about the thief on the cross, who Christ, Himself, says will be with Him in paradise. It also fails to account for deathbed conversions. If someone came to Christ before their death and as such were unable to be Baptized, they would go to Hell if this teaching about Baptism was true. Furthermore, claiming that the act of Baptism confers the promise of salvation on you would seem to contradict salvation by faith *ALONE* because you’ve now added works. Is Baptism necessary for obedience? Yes. Is it necessary for salvation? It can’t be.
@EXTREMEKIWI115
@EXTREMEKIWI115 11 месяцев назад
This video was such a relief. In all honesty, I avoided this video for a bit. But now I see that it is mainly the Reformed Tradition's interpretation of the covenant with Adam that leads them to such conclusions on predestination. This is so much more understandable, and I can respect disagreeing with this view of Genesis as a lot of people disagree on Genesis. Before this video, I had assumed much worse things. But now I see that the disagreement is based on a rationalization of Genesis, rather than being fabricated out of some other strange, completely unBiblical philosophy. This, I can tolerate with much more ease.
@constantinopleisGreek
@constantinopleisGreek 11 месяцев назад
I AM MAD CANT YOU SEE I AM MAD???EVEN THOUGH THIS VIDEO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME BECAUSE I AM ORTHODOX
@CrippieMannster
@CrippieMannster 11 месяцев назад
So… in Calvinism Christ didn’t die for everyone’s sins?
@yunaru3643
@yunaru3643 11 месяцев назад
No, in Calvinism Jesus dies for the elect's sins
@CrippieMannster
@CrippieMannster 11 месяцев назад
@@yunaru3643 that’s the most satanic garbage I have ever heard. How can people actually believe this?
@ihiohoh2708
@ihiohoh2708 5 месяцев назад
In Calvinism, God loves all of fallen humanity. (John 3:16) The logic is that even though that is true, and that the atonement is sufficient for all, the intent behind the atonement was not for the *individual* sins of the nonelect since that would mean Jesus atoned for their sins but they're being punished anyway. "Double Jeopardy" so to speak.
@antesemitic8668
@antesemitic8668 11 месяцев назад
Can you make video about why theonomy is biblical or unbiblical? That would be interesting in my opinion.
@theintelligentmilkjug944
@theintelligentmilkjug944 11 месяцев назад
Yes, thanks for watching.
@TheRoark
@TheRoark 11 месяцев назад
Zoomer represent the origins of reformed baptist theology correctly in one video challenge: impossble.
@josephbrandenburg4373
@josephbrandenburg4373 11 месяцев назад
Most of this video fails to deal with the central question “Is Calvinism fair” in order to rehash the reasons why Calvinism is _true_ regardless of whether it is fair or not. So I have a few questions I’d like you to ponder, Reformed Zoomer, if you read this. 1) How can you fit Calvinism into the analagous language of the Bible? Remember, when God gives us analogies, it is not because we could understand it better in more literal language - rather, the analogy is the highest form of understanding because the analogy is what is found in God’s word. God created our bodies and our world in light of these analogies he was making. God is a father - and human fatherhood is rather an analogy for God than the other way around. So, simply put, how can you say Calvinism fits into the spousal and fatherhood images of God - that Christ is like a bridegroom and God is like an adoptive father? 2) You’ve used many phrases which, rather than giving good reason to believe in Calvinism, in reality, reveal the reasons you are attracted to it: "Calvinism has the strongest doctrine of sin", "This is the most God-centered theology", etc. . But do you think these ideas are also true of these statements: “Calvinism has the strongest doctrine of mercy.” “Calvinism has the most loving portayel of God.”? 3) How do you explain the choice of God to save some and not others? Why did he choose to leave some out? Doesn’t this contradict what Jesus taught about the Good Samaritan? I would like it if you could focus on these questions. I’m pleased that you name-dropped Leighton Flowers in this video. I’m especially pleased that you aren’t throwing any of us “Arminians” out of the kingdom. However, I hope you’ll consider our ideas more carefully- because I think you’re missing out on a more full understandign of just how great and overwhelming Christ’s love is for you, and for all the people who, in your view, are “reprobate” :D I know you desire their salvation. God does, too. A house divided against itself cannot stand; there are no “two wills” in God. Finally, I’m almost happier that you’ve come to fully embrace the erroneous theology in the Presbyterian church (the same theology that drove me away and brought me, for now, to a Methodist church.), because otherwise you wouldn’t stay to try and restore the church from within. Perhaps it’s better for you to stay _wrong_ since you’re doing good things with it. That being said, I wish you would stop making videos about it if you aren’t willing to deal with the really hard challenges!
@franciscolucasdesouza8359
@franciscolucasdesouza8359 10 дней назад
I like the theology of methodist churches. did they become progressive or are they still conservatives?
@CaptainX2012
@CaptainX2012 11 месяцев назад
The chat was one of the highlights of this video
@davidconstine1859
@davidconstine1859 11 месяцев назад
please do a video on Old Testament historicity im very curious what you believe
@Asteros1453
@Asteros1453 11 месяцев назад
Bro got the autistic special interest in christianity, good work!
@JosiahTheSiah
@JosiahTheSiah 11 месяцев назад
Calvinistic soteriology is like a mess of cables. When you have the "elect" getting anxious about whether or not they or their loved ones are "elect," you know you've got a problem on your hands. It's easy to point out how Baptist understanding of salvation is very individualistic, but that's exactly where Calvinistic election _drives you._
@timmacleod1944
@timmacleod1944 11 месяцев назад
The way you struggled to explain your belifes and the mental loopholes you had to jump through to confirm this falible theology is astonishing
@cormundum_o
@cormundum_o 11 месяцев назад
Video about the Sparkle Creed?
Далее
Can women be pastors? - KingdomCraft
25:00
Просмотров 48 тыс.
Calvinism Insults God
18:29
Просмотров 63 тыс.
Why I'm Not a Muslim
32:46
Просмотров 172 тыс.
What is a Reformed Baptist?
5:01
Просмотров 22 тыс.
Why Sola Scriptura is true - KingdomCraft
24:06
Просмотров 73 тыс.
Calvinism vs. Arminianism - which view is correct?
4:19
The most popular religion today - KingdomCraft
24:06
Просмотров 39 тыс.
Why the Rapture isn't Biblical - KingdomCraft
25:04
Просмотров 74 тыс.
3 Reasons I’m Not Mormon
25:23
Просмотров 77 тыс.
KingdomCraft: Are Catholics Christian?
20:27
Просмотров 49 тыс.