Karen Read Trial: Jurors came back with questions for the judge 

And let a drunk nasty entitled Karen get away with murder? You are in jeopardy of being brainwashed. 😱

That’s exactly why people are invested in this case. If they can convict Karen with zero evidence any of us could be in the same position and that’s what’s scary. Watched the whole trial, unbiased. Honestly I leaned towards a drunken accident going into it. Now I say- not guilty. There’s no evidence she hit him at all.

@@dontmindme633 where is the evidence that John died any other way?

@@AmandaPanda-nq1do the burden of proof is on the state. She doesn’t have to prove an alternative. They have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she hit him with her car, and the experts testified it was not a vehicle that killed him. That it was more like a fall on his head or blow to the head, but they don’t know. And it’s sad but his family may never know what really happened to him.

​@AmandaPanda-nq1do The state is the on making the claim that Karen Read killed O'Keefe. Therefore, it is their burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she committed the act.

They are all friends the witnesses and the jurors

@@hedykarim3614lol The jurors are in on it too?

@@hedykarim3614Wow, you know who the jurors are?

😂

❎😂😎

Charge everyone in the house as accomplices to 2nd degree M. and we will figure it out real quick. That won't happen though because these are not regular citizens, These are whole families with qualified immunity.....😢

They’re just trolls who don’t have an intelligent comment- they name call then disappear

Sure you have.

Same nut jobs do the same thing to Trump.

Probably not, it’s the “good ole boys” club.

Sharon, I agree non at all just pure lies from KR, if she gets off her she’ll live a miserable existence bcuz ppl will be sneering and talking behind their hands, she’ll never have no choice but to change locations and possibly identity, in life what’s goes around comes around and when you do genuine good you will reap the rewards

The problem is even if you think that the Commonwealth hasn’t proven beyond reasonable doubt, that she is guilty. Again, where are the wounds on his body if he was thrown from a car that was traveling in reverse at 24 miles an hour…in snow?

Its the believe all women mob here .

she remembered the day after.I Hit him...I Hit Him.....guilty 💯👍

Don’t t you know , the dog did it , he skipped town , gone , FLED nowhere to be found . ……😂 🤦🏾‍♀️ Absolutely guilty

Blackout or brownout, alcoholic perhaps 🤔

white women can do no wrong lool

She's not locked up dummy.

First this is in Dedham at the court house. Two of our main hospitals are under construction so ambulances need to travel to the next town. Dedham is a safe, quiet, beautiful suburban town.

why?

I’d be shocked from Hove if it wasn’t. ✌🏻

@@Richie8a8y just down the road from you in shoreham 🫡

The FBI says differently. The Evidence said different! You not from Canada you live in Canton your IP address says Mass

I agree with alot of your comment...I think she was one of many involved including officers

I'm from Canada as well and it's clear to me you have a high school education no more than grade 11.

@@pistolpete8231 I forget I’m 85

​@pistolpete8231 , I have to agree with you, lol. Anyway, I'm a former DTF of 2.5 years in Missouri, and I can tell right now, the motor vehicle did not leave those bite marks.

lololololol - small brain I assume

@Shooter2314 Yes Read freaks

If he wasn’t hit you must acquit and the car didn’t cause those injuries😢

What makes you think guilty?

@@maryburr3145 Her own words

How so?

@@AllensStories Watch the trial, that's how!

Anyone who has watched the entire trial and still think Karen Read is guilty is an idiot. The laws of physics show the John's injuries could NOT be caused by Karen's SUV. John's body being projected 30 feet from an impact on the arm? Inconsistent with reality. That type of impact on John's arm but John's arms show ZERO fractures? Inconsistent with reality. The dent and broken tail-light being separated with no damage in areas between them? Inconsistent with reality. John's scratch injuries coming from a broken tail-light? No, looks more consistent with injuries from a "large dog". The Albert's and Canton's "finest" have been covering up their crimes, but they failed their science courses.

@@emm2960 You obviously didn't watch the trial. Or you did but you're too stupid to understand basic physics

@@emm2960small penis?

You clearly do by commenting

You don't have to care, but someday, you may be falsely accused and placed on trial.