21-year-old Jordan Brown talks for the first time about going to jail as a boy for a crime he says he didn't commit in an interview with ABC News' Juju Chang.
Solution: Lie detector test combined with truth serum. Stop discrediting science and technology when it comes to lie detection and truth extrapolation.
@@inconvenientexistenlism Lie detectors aren't science, though. The only people who advocate for lie detector tests as being useful are people trying to sell lie detector machines. The reason why they're inadmissible in a courtoom is because they're psuedoscientific garbage, and the results are entirely subjective. There are thousands of different things that can affect the outcome that have nothing whatsoever to do with the truthfulness of the person being tested. Truth serum is a problem for a couple of reasons; one, a person cannot be compelled to testify against themselves and so the argument could be made that using truth serum is unconstitutional at face value. However, that's moot because truth serum DOESN'T MAKE PEOPLE TELL THE TRUTH. What it does is make a subject very easy to coerce; their memory becomes very malleable and open to manipulation. Therefore it's actually WORSE than a lie detector, because it can makes it very easy to confess to things that they didn't do but it even becomes possibly to convince them that they did do it. If you're going to make appeals to science and technology, please read up on the actual science and technology behind these things. They don't work like they do in James Bond movies.
@@seraphinaaizen6278 Lie detectors may not be 100% true, but it's shown to be at least 70% true. 70% is still better than nothing, and better than greedy lawyers and HE SAID or SHE SAID as lame evidence. Combined that lie detector with the subject using truth serum in a courtroom is a far superior way of conducting interrogation. Lie detectors are used by government agencies to conduct background and honesty tests of applicants, and if it's good enough for these government agencies, there is merit. Of course, annoying human activists and criminal-loving sycophants are going to use whatever emotional excuse that could have saved an innocence or quickly prosecuted a guilty. Is truth serum and lie detector all unpopular and unorthodox, perhaps, but it's far better than what we have now of weak "witch accusation." Thankfully, the world is getting better with increasing surveillance as deterrent against criminals...then again annoying human right activists and greedy lawyers will use more lame human aka criminal rights to fight against these advancements as threats to their purpose and profession.
@@inconvenientexistenlism "it's shown to be at least 70% true" I'm going to need to see a citation for that, because I don't believe that to be the case at all. However, it's worth noting that even if that's true, that means there's a 30% chance of it NOT being true. Are you alright with approximately 1 in 3 people being convicted based on lie detector evidence actually being innocent? "Lie detectors are used by government agencies to conduct background and honesty tests of applicants" Yes, and it's considered a MASSIVE problem that law makers have repeatedly tried to address and law enforcement agencies refuse to even look at despite all of the evidence indicating that they're not reliable. Pointing out a mistake in law enforcement is not a good argument for castrating the criminal justice system by using pseudoscience that would ABSOLUTELY send innocent people to prison if it was used in the way you are advocating. "Is truth serum and lie detector all unpopular and unorthodox, perhaps" It's not about whether it's unpopular or unorthodox. It's the fact that it DOESN'T WORK. The only thing you're going to get from using lie detector tests and 'truth serum' in a court room are a whole lot of wrongful convictions, which is exactly why they're NOT used in the way you're advocating.
@@hadarazizian2416 So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
So is there supposed to be some random person out there who just walked into someone's house and killed a pregnant woman execution style with a shotgun?
So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
@@patrickburton1401 they said the 4 year old kept changing the story... didn’t have any blood on his clothing he wore to school! Would have had to clean everything spotless in the span of and I quote 160 seconds. They found no blood at the end of the barrel of the gun
@@thefantasticnerd6076 it was the 7 year old but you are absolutely right her story changed multiple times because they fed her lies and told her what to say
Imagine losing your stepmom when you're 11, and then have the cops telling you it's you're fault and they're gonna put you behind bars. Poor kid must be traumatized...
dont forget US has the worst jails out of all the first world contries in the world... imagine being sent to that living hell as an 11 year old kid. when i was 11 i was still dragging my pillow around the house as it was my teddy.
What was the murder weapon? Who had access to it? Fingerprints? Gun residue? What was the loud "bang" the little girl heard? When was that? Who could shoot the woman without the little girl seeing or hearing? Questions, I have. Someone murdered her.
@@TheFreemanuk please explain the 'autistic' remark. Is this what people are calling others now? I have an autistic daughter and really don't appreciate how rude and mostly ignorant this is. Please don't reply to others if this is all you have to say. No substance. You need to be educated.
“What do you see in this mugshot?” Cop: “l see a murderer, that's why there's a mugshot.” This made me so angry, imagine how many people are wrongly convicted because police simply can't fathom that the justice system made a mistake
So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
If he's like that today, can you imagine how horrible and mean these grown men cops were to little 11 year old Jordan? As a mother myself, the thought makes me so mad and scared for my child if he had been in that kind of position!!!
Red button: A 11 year old Blue button: A psycho ex that threatened to kill both the victim and her family along with both her new husband and her kids, seen around the crime scene by the accused , drives a black truck and has a restraining order. The cops: * pushes red button *
And the police say the ex could not possibly have done it because there was undisturbed snow on his truck showing it had not been driven. Doesn't know how to drive any other vehicle?
But he had an alibi and passed a lie detector test. The sister said she heard a loud boom. It's possible, because he had means and motive. He knows he got away with murder. If he were my race, he would be rottening in jail.
@@eleanorhardy683 the sister changed her story significantly (far more than the boy) and was 7 f*cking years old with trauma over the death of her mother and an over-active imagination. Ever dealt with a child in your life? Ever study psychology? This is 100% not a race thing, either. Just because minorities are disproportionately arrested/convicted/imprisoned, doesn't mean this white kid deserves it. *Cannot physically roll eyes any harder* If you look into the whole story it is blatantly obvious this kid was innocent, cops were incompetent/negligent.
"I see a murderer. That's why there's a mug shot." Now I get it. A mug shot means you're guilty. Cops never take a photo of an innocent person. That never happens. Much appreciate the clarification.
This happened about a mile down the road from where I lived In Wampum, PA. I was only 18 at the time and saw this in the conference room at work while I was on break and couldn't believe it. My mom knew his parents. Our little country town without a single red light was thrown into this national headline. I'm happy it got overturned, that kid didn't do it. Many people in our area are convinced it was his step mother's ex boyfriend whom she had a restraining order against for threatening her and her family's life. That's the direction I lean personally.
The ex had a solid alibi and wasn't in the area. all evidence points to the kid. There were even workers outside the home that day. none of them saw anyone around the home but the kids and the family.
@Danial compton what was the ex's solid alibi? I only heard that it was due to having snow on his truck. I could be missing more information but I'm curious what his actual alibi is. He also just found out the daughter he thought was his, wasn't his.
police chief: We need to arrest someone for the murder so we don't need to do more work. Cop: Let's arrest the kid police chief: Great idea, you get a raise!
So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
@@patrickburton1401 Do you have kids of your own? My kids can’t do the simplest task without causing a mess or being unorganized. You really think this kid killed a person and cleaned up the entire crime scene… Brain, blood, skull fragments and there was no evidence left on him? The family were regular shooters… It makes sense that he had gunpowder residue on his hands. There was no evidence on his clothing whatsoever. Kid is totally innocent.
who would shoot a sleeping pregnant lady? no one else but a 11 year old with a gun, already trained to hunt and kill animals. a 11 year old who threatened his fathers fiance before. a 11 year old who probably is jealous of his soon to be brother cause he was asked to change room downstairs and leave his current bigger room uptairs next to his parent his sister said he saw his brother throw away the shotgun shell just after leaving the house the shotgun shell that the police found on the path to their school and the police also found gunpowder residue on him. please don't let him get away with it. look at his eyes. eye of a killer. a person with no sympathy.
@@FuZe. yes it really does not mean that. but it sure helps having a shotgun as a present and experience in killing large animals for fun. especially for a 11 year old kid who is still confused about right and wrong. but is already being exposed to killing and seeing blood splatter and definitely smiling after the kill.
“What do you see in this mugshot?” Cop: “l see a murderer.” Really! That’s what you see looking at that mugshot! Tells you when the mind is already made up...
I don’t think he did it tbh because they siad there was “gun rosado” on his clothe maybe because there was a gun shooting plus the killer can use Jordan’s gun and if he shot somewon in the head there would be mass amount of blood on his clothe and none sounds odd even if he did shoot her before he went to school strange am I right
The police treat you like you're guilty. You have to try to prove your innocence. If you are ever arrested or questioned over anything, it's best to have a lawyer present so they can't twist your words. A lot of people think if they're innocent, the police will know, and justice will prevail. The best thing you can do is cover your ass.
Lmao... So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
@@han6061 and the worst is that they gave him 0 dollars... at least shouldn't they give him some hundred thousands if not millions for the lost years of his life? imagine that he was an orphan and they did that to him.. after prison he will just be homeless.. what a shitty system in the US :/
Right? It's innocent until proven guilty, but apparently all you have to do is arrest someone and take their picture in order to prove they're a murderer. Smh
@@kalifee Was there any mention of gunpowder residue on the boy? Or his clothes? Was the shotgun tested for finger prints? Did the dorky cops check for foot prints, or anything? No! they decided the boy had to do it, and that was that!
What's even more fucked up is if you do go to trial you will be judged by 12 people who don't know a fucking thing about you. For example I always look pissed off, but that's my happy face. 🤬😁 On top of that someone may condemn you because they don't like the way you look (i.e., dress code, nervous twitch) AND there is always the possibility that important information that would help you is excluded thereby said jury does not have ALL the evidence to make an informed decision AND add a public defender to that? Bitch please, I'm going to hell. 😭😭😂😂😂
You know what, I just have to give this man a round of applause. He was so wrongly accused at such a young age for such a heinous crime, yet now that he is out he just wants to go on with his life and graduate college and be successful. That honestly really puts a smile on my face, that’s an inspirational story right there!
This makes me so angry, can’t believe this poor man had to waste his teenage years because of some ridiculous muck up from the police. I can’t even believe how traumatic this was for him, especially to be charged as an adult.
@@rahnishag5160 I heard that there's a strong possibility that it was the woman's ex boyfriend though? The ex had a restraining order against him and I think a couple of domestic dispute calls against him when the woman and him where together. Also, on the fact that it's pretty improbable for an 11 year old to commit murder for no reason, why do you think he's guilty? What's your reasoning?
"Did you kill Kenzie?" "No." OMG I was so surprised. Lmao. Honestly, can you ask a dumber question? "What made you feel you need to be there?" "He's my son." Juju you are just... nevermind.
@@AnneOhn123 he probably is. But he not ready to come to terms with what he did. His fathers love will bring him to balance. His daddy dont wanna lose all three of them.
They should pay this man Millions of dollars for snatching away basically his whole teenage hood Edit: Ok yall im rlly confused can someone tell me if he did it or not stop coming for me 🧍🏾♀️
Lost way more than his teenage hood. Money couldn't replace the time lost or fix the psychological damage, but at least it would give him a better chance at overcoming some of the disadvantages losing that time put him in.
Child: Loses his stepmother, gets wrongly fully inprisoned for a crime he didn't commit and the court just goes "welp that was a mistake lets move on" A few months ago: Some guy with a criminal history resists arrest with fatal amounts of lethal drugs in his system dies claiming he can't breathe courts go "here is millions of dollars for you" Some food for thought.
@Bobbi Cat i was in juvenile hall for 3 months when i turned 14. I cant imagine being there for years. I thought losing 3 months of my first year of highschool was bad, but 3 years?? Jesus. Poor dude. I was able to get my life back on track and Im going to college next year, but had i been there for an extended amount of time, idk that i would’ve been able to turn it around like this guy did. I applaud him for making the best of his situation and staying true to himself and standing by his innocence.
Did the reporter really just ask the dad what made him need to be there visiting his son in jail? just wow...🤦♂️ the stupidity of the question is mind boggling
Strangely enough when dad was asked at press conference whether or not he wants to reopen investigation to find out who killed his pregnant fiancé he replied it’s not our job to investigate. The whole story abs the whole family is fuc*ed up. I don’t trust dad at all, especially the dad who leaves an unsupervised firearm with children. He didn’t seem too concerned then.
@@vkrgfan personal opinion here......I think the kid is guilty but dad obviously loves his son very much and would protect him at all means. Kid had gun powder on him for goodness sake. Losing his room and and the star of his dads eye to another boy... hmmm 🤔
He said "can I say that?"" because of someone's else's reaction to him saying "BS". Listen closely, you can hear someone sigh in disapproval right after he says "BS"
NiggassaggiN every shred of evidence you mean minus a admittance. Kid had fresh gunpowder residue on his hands his shotgun had recently been fired (residue in barrel) last one in the house with her. It’s clear as day this kid is obsessed with his dad in a unhealthy way and killed her before they got married out of jealousy he would lose attention and not be the focus of his dads life anymore like he had been growing up with him and his dad only
@Fman1292 No, there's no gun powder in the kids hand and only in his clothes, because he gone shooting with his dad the day before, those cops are not doing their job well, and they want to frame the kid. That middle cop who said the kid is the murderer has a body language of being aggressive and defensive if you're gonna watch the full documentary, he's the one who looks like a murderer.
Lena Annis Yea his dad got it for him for there hunting trips. It was that gun that killed her. The barrel and boys hand both hand fresh gunpowder residue and the father told authorities they hadn’t been hunting anytime soon so why the boy had fresh gunpowder residue his prints and the guns barrel aswell was never explained or really tried that hard. The kid never admitted to it and he was the only one in the house when it happened and therefore they have no real evidence without a admittance. To date no one has been charged for the murder of this woman but looking at this dude in the face you can see the guilt. I won’t be buying his book 25 years from now like OJs book “how I woulda done it” lol
Such a sad story ,I hope all his dreams come true and he achieves all what he puts his mind too,he needs a good pay out for this ,it won’t bring his childhood back but it could make his and his family lives a little easier
@Martin Martinez - Overwhelming evidence says he didn't. That's why the PA Supreme Court ruled that the evidence presented shouldn't have even been sufficient to bring the case to trial, which is why Jordan Brown's verdict was overturned and he is free now. My pick for who actually did it? Her violent ex, who'd previously made death threats against her and her family, and against whom she had filed restraining orders in the past. Jordan claims he saw a black truck parked near the house that morning. Guess what? The ex owns/owned a black truck. On top of this, when the cops went to talk to the guy, he simply said he loved her and would never hurt her, and they just took his word for it. No polygraph. No analysis of his clothing and body for DNA evidence(woman was killed with a shotgun to the back of the head, yet no blood/tissue on the gun OR Jordan OR his clothes???). Just his word + the fact that the hood of his truck """""had snow on it""""" and so there's no way he could've driven over there and murdered this woman whom he had threatened to murder in the past, hurr hurr cuz da snow would've fallen off or melted. 🤪 Okay, sure. Kid totally did it. Brilliant detective work there by the Podunk PD. 🙄
I don’t believe we should believe in how he acts I believe we should look at evidence and evidence showed he wasn’t the killer. He wasn’t even home when this happened(he was school). That was the solid evidence that was a huge break of him being released 9 years. All the other evidence the police provided can be easily picked apart because of how horrible the investigation was. The cops literally contaminated the crime scene by not wearing gloves and admiring to it.
The real story here is the crappiest detective and judicial work ever. If you're going to put a young boy in jail for murder, you better be damn sure and be able to prove it beyond reasonable doubt to anyone.
he had every reason to kill his stepmother mother and he is a demon for doing so. There was an earlier comment saying that the murderer could have put gun powder on anyone and frame him. no this demon was not framed he killed his stepmother. The detectives found the shotgun shells outside his home beside the driveway. in the interview with the demon he said that he was walking to his bus stop, while doing so he " threw lint " out of his pocket, how would this demon remember that on the day of the murder he took lint out of his pocket and threw it out on the ground. Yes i believe that he did that but in the mists of the lint throwing he threw out the shotgun shells. In the report there was no sign of a break and enter buy anyone, therefore the murderer was inside with them. the sister claims before they went to school she heard a big bang identified as a gunshot noise why did the curiosity of the kids not go and investigate, I think that the demon said to his sister that everything is fine and nothing happens. the demon killed his step mom nobody else would have because they would have not left the murder wepon inside the house. The demon woke up did his morning routine, moved his guns to a strategic location, he loaded his shotgun before entering the room he went inside and shot his step mom in the back of the head immediately killing her the demon collected the shotgun shells and put them in his pocket before leaving for school. The demon was jealous thats the motive for him. if the tree trimmers would have killed her than there would have been a sign of force of entry the house would have been a mess because of the fighting they would have had but it was not there.
Can anyone tell me… PLEASE Who was the murderer of his StepMom? Who shot the shotgun behind her head? And what was the reason behind killing her? I am still confused and big question inside my mind about this serious mystery murder?
Yeah most children that go away that young stop maturing. Or become cold blooded killers for real as a means to survive. What I wanna know is where's the gun?
“What do you see on this mugshot?” *”I see a kid that just killed his stepmother. That’s why there is a mugshot”* So just because there is a mugshot, that means that he is automatically guilty?
and they didn’t even look further at the guy who literally threatened to kill her whole family and jorden saw the guys car parked that same morning, istg this case doesn’t make sense
I feel so angry for him. Nothing makes me sadder than adults pointing fingers at a child without evidence. Especially the victim's family...who were very quick to want to lock him up. In doing this, they let the real killer get way.
He did it. Review the evidence. His behavior in detention shows no remorse. He didn't show any sense of loss over his stepmother and soon to be born brother and he had been in his room with his 20 gage his dad gave him for Christmas and the shotgun had been recently shot and he had GSR residue on his clothes that morning. He killed her
So, who killed the step mother? And what kind of parent gives a shot gun as a gift to 11 year old? There are a lot of incidents when children either killed themselves or their family members by accident because they had an access to firearm.
His 7 year old step sister said nothing out of the ordinary happened before going to school..once the police interviewed her a second time her story mysteriously changed. It's very possible and very likely the police influenced and prompted the young girl to blame her brother. Very sad but it happens.
1 important question: was the woman's ex, or exes, a COP in that town? if the Answer is somewhat YES....then....This is going to be solved if and if , they let us solved this and not by those cops with connections to the YES answer.----Jr Patatas a brilliant in iogical understanding of a true event.
They interviewed her 3 times, the first two times off camera with no recording, the first interview was get her story, the 2nd interview was to plant information in her head and the 3rd recorded interview was to recover the planted information from her head.
It's preposterous that anybody would have to wait 3 years for a trial, let alone an 11 year old! He would have missed important, formative years, no matter whether they had found him guilty or not.
Everybody overlooking the fact that she asked him to stay at home that day too. Why did she ask him to stay home, something had to be going on. I'm not saying the son...but something was making her fearful to the point that she wanted her fiancé to stay home. so sad
@ Joe...Exactly, if your wife asks you to stay home, instincts should tell you that something may be wrong. He probably thought she was over reacting...clearly she was not. So sad smh @ Geisha...I feel the same way. I don't think she was afraid of the children either. Someone definitely wanted to hurt her. sad thing is...if someone truly wanted to hurt her, had her fiancé had stayed home, would he have been murdered too. There are a lot of unanswered questions.
@@wayneburks5872 WHERE IS THE FUCKING HATE I JUST THINK SOMETHING ITS MY OWN FUCKING OPINION JESUS CHRIST MAN I WASNT EVEN HATING I JUST SAID MY OWN OPINION JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
There is absolutely zero evidence of anyone else being in the house. there were even workers outside during the time and none saw anything suspicious. all the evidence points towards him. Hi did it.
@@Obytack just because he’s found innocent doesn’t mean he’s innocent. There are a lot of missing details in this story and the whole case was executed horribly.
So the boy's story changes slightly and they say that's suspicious. But the girl's story changes in a major way, and that just proves that the boy did it. Yeah, I see the rational line of reasoning here. Maybe an investigation could have been conducted prior to an arrest.
Media Stereotypes, I felt the same way, I don't know what happened that day, but it does sound like the police only had circumstantial evidence, they really rushed to arrest him in just hours without a full investigation, killers/intruders have been know to use the victims own weapon, If his dad was rich, his son would not have spent a day in jail, to me that's the sadist part.
The "investigation" (if you can call it that) is laughable. They never tested the supposed weapon he used but instead say it was a "similar" weapon. Their "new witness" was 4 years old at the time. The weapon he supposedly used had zero blood splatter or human tissue on it and they never swabed his hands for gun powder. Oh, and their other leads were quickly eliminated as suspects within less than 24 hours. They stole a boy's childhood and won't even apologize for it.
@@yotatoy8218 that's funny. Children (and adults for that matter) change their stories. Children especially are also tremendously open to being led. So they asl each of the children to try really hard to remember anything at all that wss unusual. Was someone in the truck? Yeah, I think so, maybe. Did you hesr anything? Did it sound like a shot? Yeah maybe? The father should have been present when the kids were interviewed. But no one would have imagined that they were interviewing the boy as a possible suspect. It's crazy to me that they could suggest that an 11 yesr old, acting out pf jealousy, could shoot the woman and just hop off to school like nothing had happened. All in a matter of moments. Even hardened killers need time to pull things together and cover their tracks. But this kid just felt nothing, no panic, nothing. It never even occurred to them to check his story about a black truck. Maybe the saintly woman with a handful of kids was having an affair? Someone in the police department was in an awful hurry to pin this on someone and forgo a real investigation. Whenever that happens, something definitely smells rotten.
The detective said when he interviewed the ex boyfriend he just “felt like he was telling the truth” didn’t bother to polygraph him, search his home or car, or confirm his alibi.. even tho the ex had just threatened to kill her whole family a few days prior. The only interviewed him for 45 minutes before they let him go. I’m not saying I know for sure that the boy was innocent but they could of put forth a little more effort to rule out all other suspects.
@@EliC09 polygraph tests aren't these things that are never wrong. There have been so many murderers that have passed them because they knew how to stay calm while lying.
I can’t imagine be 11 having the person you called mom killed then get blamed for it and chastised by the media. Then spending the rest of your childhood in prison.
Because the judge basically refused to look into anyone else being a suspect. The whole case is pretty dodgey. Here's an article with some more information if you'd like. people.com/crime/accused-killer-jordan-brown-17-may-get-new-trial/
@@damianjackson7437 So just so ppl know.. the family allowed the boy to have access to his own shotgun. The sister saw the boy carrying it around before they left for school and heard it being shot. There was snow surrounding the house and a single shotgun case following the boys footsteps that lead to his bus stop. The boy had gun powder on him, but the defendant stated it wouldn’t be unlikely since the family often shot weapons. Law enforcement figured this would be sufficient enough evidence. It was not. The kid was spoiled and was about to be less spoiled due to the soon to be step mom being a few weeks away from having a baby. He failed a lot of testing once in custody, showing he had a really hard time taking accountability for anything he’d do. I’m not saying he’s 100% at fault, but he 100% did do it.
He's got no choice. If he accepted reality, he'd end up losing not only his new wife and potential child, but his son as well. That would be too much for him. Look at how fat he is too. He avoids hard things in life like eating properly and accepting the truth about his son.
@@erickanew lol, he's proven innocent and it takes 10 years to do that, i think that's enough time to prove his innocence. The cops are not doing their job well, you're probably one of the cops wife who did the investigation lol.
All who accused this child like that man who said "i see a man who commited murder" he will pay God sees everything and we pay the wrongs we do! all of the people who stole his childhood will get their karma !!
@@BijinMCMXC another person without a brain, you think an 11 year old could kill a woman without leaving a crumb of evidence leading back to him? stupid comment made by a stupid person
I feel so bad for him. The kid missed his prime years of his childhood, the time he could’ve spent discovering himself and experiencing new things. Instead his childhood was taken away by police wanting to close the case instantly. The “I see a mugshot so he’s the murderer” statement was completely ignorant, and basically sums up the police who investigated the crime.
I think he was framed, I'd investigate those guys doing the trimming in that backyard. That little girl was confused by the interviewers desperate to arrest someone. So basically anyone can grab clothes rub them with gun powder. Who's to say the person in that house didn't go in the kids room and grab that gun.
Dominique They wouldn't they can simple go in the house start snooping around, looking for Money....and stumble upon the gun and maybe Mom happened to stumble upon them in the boy's room. Like my predecessor (jk lol) up there said there's too many variables to reach ANY kind of conclusion. So I'll just stick to my theology on the Lord for now. 😆 (As if that's easier)
miresly777777 The mother was shot in the back of the head while sleeping. Nothing was reported stolen or missing from the home. Yes, there are many variables to this case, but there are also facts.
@@Dominini Agreed. Plus the bullets for the gun were in the parents bedroom in an armoire. No stranger would have known to get the gun from the kids bedroom and check an armoire in her bedroom for the shells with her NOT waking up. The boy did it. Police messed up when they didn't check his hands for gun powder.
No DNA, No fingerprints, no proof any shotguns found in the house was used.They did found a gunshot shell but it did not match any guns in the house.They are not going to prosecute again. Let this man live. He is innocent.
That is incorrect. The shotgun shell and ammunition was consistent with the weapon that belong to the kid. It was also a gunshot residue on his hands. You tell me that's not evidence
Steven Bodner You can get gunshot residue on your hands and clothes by picking up a gun, petting a dog that went hunting or wearing a jacket or shoes that were used in shooting a couple weeks before. You can get gunshot residue off blankets where a hunting coat was laid on a bed and as a LEO not have a clue how old the residue may be.
That's what the Demorats are doing now, your guilty untill proven innocent. Did the cops check to see if the was at school, why wasn't more details about the case given since his conviction was overturned. This whole crime investigation sounds like it was a joke. How did they come to the conclusion he did it an arrested him later that night or early the next day
The idea that anyone could even consider trying an 11 year old as an adult is just shameful. Our system shouldn't allow for that too happen. Even if he DID do it, for fucks sake he's still a child.
@@wselenag45 so this woman just owed like 20,000 to the mob for gambling debts, right? someone just came into her house for no reason and capped her in the head, because they were kind of bored?
Nobody ever says if the boy had gunshot residue on his hands or even if his gun had been fired recently. They eliminated his father by residue. What about the girls?
