That won't stick they can thru that shit up against a million was it won't stick his past is the past what these cops did to this man was unacceptable & disrespectful to anyone with a disability
that's pathetic indeed, but, why the judge did what she did is bring up his priors and cement his feet in the box exposing his record, whatever the case, he's about to be a "PARA-MILLIONAIRE or the least, make enough dough to buy a new house and car, this is how i see this mess
Y’all just don’t get it do you? America’s judicial system is not for us. They want money. They are a gang of masons. They don’t care about the kid in the back. They just understand that his skin is black. They took our land and changed our rules into laws that favor the Europeans.
And also child safety violations. But I hope there's a next part where he sues dem and True Justice is serve in his favor cauz I know a few paraplegic ppl and work around one handful of them and it's really sickening to see ppl who job is not only to serve and protect but to deescalate situations, not to abuse your power bcz you ask questions to investigate and think that they might be lying to you. From time he told you that hes a paraplegic patient your next move was to ask him to prove it. 🚶🏿♂️🎤 Mic drop
Ya I guess NOT having that Baby in a car seat should just get a PASS RIGHT! I mean he didn't get him killed so it should be just fine RIGHT? SHUT UP! You don't get to pick and choose even if you think so!
Yeah the coming civil rights trial can focus on that excess force. Over a traffic ticket? Why? Profiling every car stopped in the area might be carrying drugs? That violates the 4A of everyone sniffed by a dog unit.
This is America. They have a so-called "corrections facilitys" where you would go to get corrected and pay for your sins just to hold it over your head for the rest of your life.
Put yourself in their shoes approaching a car they can’t see shit in. People sound so tough and quick to pass judgement on some shit they don’t do. Officers put their lives on the line daily. They saw him leave the house right? So maybe they saw him walking and know he’s full of shit. Stop letting these stories send y’all off. Wait until you have all the facts at least.
@@msshaffer5 - Cops are NOT heroes, they are cowards. If they are so afraid of cars, then come up with a more tactital solution then walking up to a car. To reduce the chances STOP BEING A ROAD PIRATE and robbing money from us. Cops are 99% about revenue, not public safety.
@@msshaffer5 Officer's knew the job was dangerous before they applied.You say get the facts but you are guessing what happened.So where are your fact for your statement
@@truckingwithchristylove9991 Nah we need to Upfund the police for better training. Longer academy, with mandatory month from a civil rights attorney teaching the citizens constitutional rights Trump their tactics to subvert those rights. And ongoing annual training on civil rights. That needs More funding. The cops never should have laid hands on this suspect. He said he's disabled and they immediately disregarded that as a lie, without checking his file which surely identifies him as disabled. That's ehybThis officer was in the hot seat, not the one who checked the record on the computer. This cop didn't get any info as to “disabled” status and attacked with excessive force. That's why he was the police witness being interrogated on the stand in the traffic ticket cases in this video, to get all that good info on the record that he profiled any car on the area as a drug car, which violates every driver he pulls over’s right to freedom from unreasonable search & seizure. If the highest law of the land is the constitution, the officers oaths mean They must protect & defend citizens rights, From Cops, let alone others. This needs a systemic training and practices reform. Nationwide. Take the national imperative from Ffloyd and turn it into upholding citizens rights thru good practices by police in the field. #SolutionOriented
She was quick to say she can only here the traffic issues at hand, but she was quicker to mention his prior drugs charges when he spoke up for himself....
Facts 💯 the system will always try to justify wrong doing from the police department video clearing showing disrespect for a disabled man these cops in so many states even here in Philadelphia the aggressiveness is out of control its sad 😔
This judge had no right to raise that the defendant had previous convictions, its not related to this case,,judge should be reprimanded for disclosing this information,,she should be on trial.,I sincerely hope this guy wins this case.,against this corrupt judicial system.
So what the cop is saying is that any poor person who happens to live in that part of town is AUTOMATICALLY TREATED LIKE A DRUG SUSPECT, NO QUESTIONS ASKED.
Often, a prosecutor is completely on the side of the police regardless the circumstances. However, I have heard of judges both dismissing charges and scolding an officer, when it is obvious that excessive force used during a detainment or arrest.
Forget that in the beginning of the video he said he pulled him over because they suspected him coming from a drug dealer house they have been watching, n now he over here lying 🤥 about how he pulled him over for WINDOW?? WINDOW? WINDOW? N this judge 👩🏽⚖️ is so focused on how she thinks he in danger A child’s life but she’s not talking about the trauma this child will go through for wat he saw the cops doing to his dad? If she wants to get him for that she should get them cops to for emotional damage n physical trauma of the child. SMH 🤦🏽♀️
The thing is, if I was a cop I would have been very uncomfortable having to drag a paraplegic out of a car. And these guys didn't seem to be bothered by it at all
Why didn't he get out of the car however he normally does instead of saying,"That ain't gonna happen"? You drive you have to follow the rules as anyone else would.
@@lyndayates7533 perhaps he should have used a different term, but what he was saying was it was impossible for him to get out do to his paralysis...when he said it ain't gonna happen...he meant he could not walk to take a step out. You have to understand the language
@@heavensentlovely1480 I am around same type people. He still gets out. Whatever his usual way of getting out he should have volunteered to LE and then gotten out. Yet he declares," NO, that's not happening". So you're saying he just stays in the car and with a small child in the back seat who could very easily end up just like him physically? LE requires compliance.
The point he was making about writing the ticket is they prolong the time it took the search his credentials and write the ticket in order for a canine unit to arrive. They had already determined to search the vehicle
It’s strange how you spend more time having to train to become a hairstylist … with apprenticeships everything and yet six months to train to become a cop and hold peoples lives in your hand … you spend more time training to learn how to do somebody’s hair then you spend how to become a cop
6 months in the academy and the continue to train on us citizens and make mistakes on us and destroy people lives , people have to take time off to fight the mistakes and spend money on courts! I was stopped once after I got my license for going through yellow almost red and two cops in the car seen it and they stopped me . I knew I was getting a ticket I knew I made a mistake I had all the paperwork so I have her everything , looked like one of them was a training offices and the other was a rookie ! She came back with two tickets one for light and one was for expired insurance!!! She handed me them and I said what you mean expired she showed me fast the insurance card and the date was like from the past , they left in hurry while I was looking at the ins card and found out that the date was the date it was issued !!!!!! Of course I had to take time off to go to court because you have to go for that to show them you had insurance at that time ! She didn’t know what she was looking at and I was a young driver not knowing how to look at stuff fast and after I realized she made a mistake they were gone !!! I can just imagine how many tickets she issued like this !!!! They are not there for us but to fine us and take our money every time you talk to them and in the best way they can ! Lol sorry for the long story!
Yep and you can move out of mom's house on Monday after pre school and given power, weaponry, and the right to abuse citizens. all while you are still wet behind the ears.
Can't even believe that the DA actually allowed this to get this far and didn't dismiss. Really glad she didn't though, because it was a traffic stop, with only a ticket needing to be issued. WOW, THIS IS GOING TO BE AWESOME in the criminal suit against the BROWN SHIRTS. Looking forward to watching the criminal lawsuit against these monsters.
You can see the disdain from this LEO who clearly is trained to lie and manipulate his way. And this judge is obviously jaded and needs relieved from the bench..traffic viations are not criminal yet she brought his past into the courtroom it is a violation of ethics and can be construed in a manner that hurts defense.
welcome to America. This is the vast majority of policing and judges are worthless as tits on a bull. Let the people judge those in court and not some power hungry individual that believes they are better than others.
15 years ago... which is why they try to get ALL young Black men on something before they reach legal age and have it drag you for the rest of your life. SYSTEMIC RACISM.
IT WAS SAID THAT THE COPS SAW THIS MAN LEAVING A SO-CALLED DRUG HOUSE. AND IN COURT THE POLICE BOY IS SAYING THAT THIS MAN WAS STOPPED FOR IS WINDOWS TINT. CALLING THE DOGS ON A CAR ISN'T JUSTIFIED, BECAUSE OF THE AREA! IF SO, THEY THE POLICE BOYS WOULD HAVE A LOT OF DOG CARS IN THAT AREA. AND A LOT OF CASES DISMISSED.
@@mushroommcfarmer1766 Racism comes from racist people. Idiocy comes from an empty cranium. You are both... Take your mindless chitchat and talk to your reflection in the mirror. I doubt very seriously if your reflection listens to your bullshit either.
Calling for a dog, provokes FEAR into the defendant, and is an obvious tactic employed by the police. The Police pulled him over for a traffic violation, not suspicion of drugs or guns. It was a "Fishing Expedition" without reasonable suspicion, or no suspicion at all.
It's funny how window tint is such a huge issue, but cops can have window tint and they have no recourse for their actions. A total waste of taxpayers time to have court. Cops need to have better things to do.
Totally agree. I feel like they only do that to see what we as tax payers are doing inside our vehicles and I feel like if we can’t have dark tint neither should they the same way they wanna look inside we should be able to look inside as well the system is all screwed up 🤦♂️
The entire thing could’ve been avoided if mr handicap would’ve followed simple orders and not resist arrest . The cops were perfectly fine helping him out of his car to make there arrest . What’s a waste of my tax money is the ahole suing the cops for his wrong doings smh .
@Bmike unless those cops had paramedic training they have no business helping or pulling him out of the car. Have you ever been a paraplegic? If not you don't know what you're talking about. My husbands a paraplegic and no one had better help him unless they know how. Spinal cord injuries are no joke. The cops should have allowed him to stay seated in his car and requested an ambo so paramedics that have training could've helped him out of car. The way the two pigs did it, could have done more serious injuries. Only an uneducated mind would consider this resisting arrest. This was 100% racial profiling. Tinted windows equals black ppl to cops. Following him for five blocks gave them enough time to have run his plate, saw his priors from 14 yrs ago and went with the drug bullshit.
@@bmike3808 actually did you watch the same video I did? Look cops profile everyone and for you to say what just did means you are either a cop or a cop lover! The cops in this video pulled a man over for nothing but profile! The other charges were to cover cops a$$!
I really can’t believe that this made it this far. There are so many rights that were violated. As a disabled person the officer can’t seem to recognize anything that pertains to him or his partner doing anything wrong. Yet he seems to remember all things pointing to the disabled man being a possible felon.
@@OmniMaleu clout chasing u clearly can't believe that bs...yo son or daughters a paraplegic and gets pulled by their hair out of a vehicle with no remorse or restraint 🤣🤣🤣goofball ass fool is what u are 💪🏿
what?? that cop gave a impossible command he wanted him to step outta the car, the guy isnt able to walk hes disabled. they dragged him out by his hair. @@OmniMale
Drugs are in every neighborhood. The entire game of the Court is to askew the truth with the entire picture. The dog questions are indeed relevant as it happened during the stop in which the man is at court for. Was the dog needed to determine if window tinting violated one of the many laws against freedom? Calling for a drug dog for no reason connected to Defendant other than he is a black man in a "drug" neighborhood.
@@lewismiller9281 because criminals are only such when charged and indicted. otherwise they are held to the same standard as everyone else. innocent until proven guilty.
This stuff is ridiculous they should be focusing on what wrongs the committed against him yet you want to talk about some tint and a darn seatbelt! I hope all involved get fired period
Love love loved this attorney setting him up for when they go after the city for pulling him out of the car. All of that is on the record now. Boy those DAs are soMe kind of work for not dismissing those charges. Slime balls to the core.
The problem they are going to have is that he is NOT paraplegic and it was obvious to anybody that knows what to look for. Like, handicap plates, sticker, or tag. None. Wheel chair.. None. Handicap driver's license.. Nope. Driving equipment on the steering wheel for a paraplegic..None. inability to move his legs... Nope, he moved them at the stop while in the car, without his hands. Plus, he was driving with his legs and feet. Long and short of it, he Lied. He is Not paraplegic. That means, he refused to comply. He can walk. Being drug out was his choice. They didnt drop him on his face, or abuse him. They took him out of the car. He could have stood up. He chose not to and he chose not to comply. They video shows him moving his legs in the car. Plus, he can walk. His attorney let that out in his press conference. He may have a harder time with the "lawsuit" that people think. The lie alone.. claiming to be paraplegic, when he is not, may be all it takes for him to lose.
@@BLKnPrd67 paralysis... and paraplegic are two different things. He could have said, I have paralysis, and cant get out unassisted. He is NOT a paraplegic! Paraplegic literally means paralyzed from the waste down. He is Not.
Excellent use of public funds. Dayton must be flush with taxpayer dollars. That's gonna come in handy when this man wins his lawsuit. If his tint was too dark they should have pulled him over, given him a ticket and sent him on his way. It's illegal to hold somebody longer than it takes to write a ticket in order to wait for a K9 to arrive arrive. Never mind dragging a paraplegic man out of the car by his hair.. These officers need to be fired and then they need to be charged with a crime.
Same here, but then it wont fit the screenplay im writing, a guy wins a billion dollars in pow and is able to hire people to do to the cops what they do to us, it,s only fair!
So would the cop also call a for a K9 unit to come to the scene even if he puled over a 80 year old grandmother because they were in a known high drug area?
I guess the judge didn't want to hear about the criminal acts of the officers and instead focused her attention on window tint and child safety seats. Isn't it ironic that government employees can drive around bus loads of children with no safety restraints but they fine us when we do it. Ridiculous!
@@momofreytag3521 I saw the video where they asked that punk to get out of car and he refused. So, the police pulled that punk out of car. These criminals gotta learn if you wanna play you gotta pay
@@r0ckstar666 how is a paralyzed person just get out the car? They didn't have to grab him by the hair and pull him out the car and they didn't need all that "help" to subdue him either
I did not know they did all that in front of his child. Those cops are wack. The fact that this dude is having to defend himself right now is ludicrous. It should be the cops on trial. WTF? All this because of window tint!
Prosecutor should not be re-elected. People should work in the community to find a prosecutor who has more compassion. The judge was out of order for bringing up his past non related offenses. That was totally uncalled for.
This 2022, nobody really gets pulled over for tinted windows today. They didn't stop him because of the tint so it should be thrown out. People are getting there whole front window tinted now and are not getting pulled over.
This is a case of profiling just because I make travel through an area doesn't mean that I belong in that area and if I live in that area doesn't mean that I condone what my neighbors are doing I may have lived in the area for 40 years and my neighbors came in and have been there only 5 years and they start doing some of the things in the area there may be drug dealers passing through the area that you happen to stop that doesn't mean the area is a high crime area clear and cut case of profiling
This cop said he preforms window tint tests 100's of times a month!!! All of which they most likely ticket the drivers for!!!! 🙄 and all for the money and numbers!!! Imagine if the cops and courts actually cared about the community and the people in it!!!
@@sueouzounis9439 because you can legally sell it because it could be used legally but the driver is illegally driving with it! You can install dark tint on a vehicle if you don't drive it like that on the road, but as soon as you drive it on the road it is over!!!!
@@lewismiller9281 The driver is a businessman that owns many rental properties in the area. He should've received his tickets and set free since that was the initial reason for the stop. They never stated any smell of drugs so what was the need for the K-9? Also after the fact the took his 20K saying the K-9 reacted to a small scent of drugs in which none nor any weapons were in the car.
@@lewismiller9281 everyone I know especially here in Florida rides with Limousine tint which is 5%. 20% is way lighter than that. Far as him having a criminal record from the past has no bearing on what happened that day. He complied in every way, how a tint & unrestrained child violations result into needing a K-9? Remember they admitted no smell of drugs, also the officer admitted to profiling in that area.
Why aren't the police just being honest and charging him for excessive skin tint? The charge of having an unrestrained child should stick though, along with charging the two police officers who dragged him out with assault and the other officers present with dereliction of duty.
Cosgrove is not a poor excuse for a good judge, when the stop was for no turn signal, all evidence after should not be inadmissible and just goes to show that 9-10 cops are bad and if you are black you are guilty.
That's the damndest shit I ever heard from a judge!!! How she gonna ask him about his prior convictions which had nothing to do with the case in hand ! And second of all she said I guess you learned your lesson about window tint ! So dark tint on a traffic stop is reason enough for a cop to snatch a paralyzed person from a car by their hair and drag them down a street ? WOW!!!! Not surprised the whole damn system is a joke and that judge after seeing that video and talking to that man like that needs to be fired. If that was a white man or a dog being treated like that and drag down the street those cop's would have been in jail that day ! Sad that we as black people are not seen as human anywhere on this planet. Why should we abide by any laws when the system doesn't work for us ?
That's really silly comment. When sentencing the prior history of the accused with similar offences is clearly relevant. You get less punishment for first offences than if you are a habitual offender so the fact that the guy had tinted window o fences previously was relevant and it was correct for the judge to consider. I can see from the proceedings that there was a lot going on that did not come in to play and the judge was right not to let it come into play because all she was deciding was the window tinting and the child restraint. The defendant will certainly have his day in court what I expect is an accusation of brutality, and it looks as if he might have a good case. His lawyer was a crafty old man and really knew this stuff. I would love to see him working on a jury. The defence lawyer was gathering material for the lawsuit. There was clearly no defence to the charges.
You would not succeed as a lawyer. That judge did fine. She kept the case on the rails. The guy was obviously guilty of these piddling offences k and that was all she was there to decide.
Wow, that's great to see a black man as a lawyer, we need more black lawyers & here in Sydney Australia 🇦🇺 WE NEED more black people in the police force, the cops here r not gun-happy all though there is a lot of profiling.
As always on code ... Didn't she the "judge" say that she was only there to hear about the traffic violations but then just like a hypocrite start trying to question the defendant about the on going case that does not pertain to her court ; you can immediately observe the hostile tone the wittness took with the defence attorney and disrespectfully got up during his questioning. Two points are apparent there is without much thought racism involved with the profiling ... Lots of people live in area's that have drugs sold and unfortunately those communities are usually neglected and below poverty level predominantly people of color . #2 so at this time it's a no brainer that the real reason he was pulled over was because he was driving while black and he knew who he was before they stopped him ... Why because he followed him 5 bloocks before the stop so you know they ran his plate and the priors came up. Can anyone say bull💩 cause I can smell it from here.
@@dangerousseriouslypreparin7875 you would be totally wrong. The defendants prior history -- or lack of it -- as to related offences is key factor in sentencing
@linda not in the case in question the judge stated that she was only hearing the traffic portion of the case not the aggressive attack that was against the defendant as was told to his attorney... But then tried to get the defendant to speak about past records that was not relevant to the actual case in her court room also any questions should have posed to his lawyer as we all have the right to remain silent as not to incriminate yourself.
Yeah, he was stopped because he was LIVING WHILE BLACK. And secondly, this thing about. "Declaring War on Drugs". That is a false premise, a fucking fallacy. It's more - DECLARING WAR ON BLACK PEOPLE!!
It really isn't child endangerment. We'd had cars nearly a hundred years before seatbelts were a law. It is giving extra protection, yes, but not endangerment or no more than letting a kid play anywhere without 100% supervision.
The attorney was right on point why didn't you give the man the tickets and let him go. you had other evil thoughts and even evil intentions is what you had in mind. These racist white police officers already had evil intentions.
@@renees1021 its the law not 1000 years ago vs current law. Tint window has law too its ridiculous but its still a stupid law that good citizen should follow or petition to change it. Plus this dude is a fake handicapped.
The judge had to beat the man down even more by ripping his history even though we all know tint was not the reason for being pulled over. I truly believe they meant to beat this man as soon as they saw him.
Happens all the time,first judge said we are here only for the traffic violations,however as soon as the defendant spoke up she mentioned his prior drug offense. The system will always slap you down when up speak up. As for the officer,he said he makes a drug arrest everyday. I find that very hard to beleave,and because that door was opened the defense should have been able to walk right on in. This entire trial was a disaster and so was the judge
Called for a drug dog based on the area not by any indicators from the vehicle. Illegal detainment. This lawyer is good. He got it on the recorded so that it can be used in future questioning in civil actions.
This is some bull, so he determined even though he wasn't sure that there was drugs in the car or didn't even suspect that there were drugs actually in the car that he could call for a police dog because it's a high drug and crime area that doesn't even make sense you don't call for a canine police dog I wouldn't think unless you suspect that there's drug paraphernalia in the car why would you call for a police dog if you're not even sure if there are actually drugs in the car and you don't smell any drugs guns or anything of that sort in the car? That whole line of thinking doesn't make any sense to me and if you ask me this officer is on some bullshit!
Basically they knew who this guy was and they knew he would not give consent to search his car. They ran his plate and saw he had prior convictions and that was the reason for the stop. It should be illegal to run someone plates if they aren't breaking any laws but we know police lie and make up shit all the time. And they have the DA and judges like this to cover their asses .
I was pulled over one week prior to the driver/passenger window tint law changing. The officer offered me a razor blade to remove it immediately or a ticket. I accepted the ticket to go to court and beat it because the officer didn't show up. Strange huh 🤔
The crime committed in this traffic stop was committed bye these cops . then the judge uses her power to demean this victim. we see who really is committing crimes here. having complete immunity from prosecution means doing as you please. tints don't hurt people cops do .
This is seriously a travesty of our judicial system, the least concern is the issue of the tinted windows. The real issue is how the officers treated this individual irregardless of his race or looks, its a disgrace to all good police officers in this country to allow some "bad seeds" to get away with this kind of behavior!
@@iqbalsandu8182 That doesn't justify disgraceful treatment of another human being. I own rentals and the way the courts have given rights to renters creates a big problem trying to evict someone who is abusing your properties. That's like saying anyone who goes into a bar is an alcoholic, regardless of the reason for being there. Because he went to his apartment complex, that a unit known for drug sales, that was the only reason that he could possibly be there. Also if its a known issue with drugs, why haven't they shut it down already. In this situation, it would take a lot of explaining to ever justify such inhumane and disrespectful treatment of another person, especially if you cant prove that there was any threat of bodily harm.
Nothing but harassment. 18 USC §241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
To mr.jj johnson..thank u . For caring for others u dont know God and others do thanks u and prayers will allways be going up with ur name on it....Godbless.
So the cop called for a dog for no particular reason other than "the area?" I see a civil suit on the way. The cop delayed and extended the stop unnecessarily. A civil rights violation.
I and two others were kidnapped by officers when I was younger walking to a friend's house. We did have one know drug street to walk by, and the officers used that as an excuse to unlawfully detain/ kidnap us for nearly 2 hours. During this time, harassing us. Then unlawfully charged us with a curfew violation even though we were nowhere near curfew when taken. So, actually, they unlawfully forced us past curfew and kidnapped. They were actually committing the violations of our rights. This is nothing new for many officers.
Wasn’t the initial stop because they claimed he’d just left a “drug house”? And seeings how they found no drugs inside his car or on his persons, they’re now saying it was all over tinted windows? Well- why would you need to pull him out of his car, by his hair, and tell him he had to get out of his vehicle so they can have their dogs do an air sniff test.
Was the window tint a criminal violation...or a code infraction. The cop is being sarcastic and antagonistic and deceptive. The judge is trying to be fair because she knows this copy is crooked. The area we were in.........that is speculation! Lawyer did a Columbo on them.......I have one more question.....LOL Those too young might not understand that reference......check out a Columbo show from years ago. Relevance judge? Did you check the record of the officers.......any internal investigations since his history is relevant?
Those charges should have been dismissed the failure to have child in a car seat being as though I'm quite sure a ticket was never written up for that yet it was brought up in court only to cover the cops tracts and the ticket for the tint because having tint no matter how dark the tint is not committing a crib being as though Noone is being harmed neither is there anyone's property being destroyed come on this needs to stop let's not forget the 3 year old in the car watching all of this blessed that poor little heart I have not yet hear any apologies from the cops that was involved in this incident or their police depart# Again after watching this it leaves me with one question What ever happened to Justice For All and not just Justice For Yall that makes yall statues that overrides Common Law
If he was pulled over for suspicion of window tint being too dark and in the process of testing the tint a child restraint charge was discovered. At that time the ticket should have been issued and Mr. Owensby should be allowed to leave. At what point is a K9 required too test window tint? He stated he requested the K9 bc it was a high crime area. Is that probable cause? I think not! I certainly hope the COMPLETE traffic stop will be presented to the court and all of the wrong doings of these officers and numerous violations of Mr. Owensby's rights will be addressed.
window tint violations while cop cars mostly have privacy tint and that is somehow legal but woe betide civilians having slightly darker tint on their windows (only cops can have the comfort of cooler cars) which helps reduce the heat transfer into the car
The cop’s job is arrest people for drugs and weapon related but what need to be investigated is how many arrest are made in reality, related to drug and weapons. As I can see they arrest any black person and then see what they may charge them. But what is more important here is the abuse.
It’s interesting how the judge brought his past up but the defense can’t bring up the entire encounter. It’s really fd up then she gives him the max. Wow but this shit is not new. I’m glad his defense team told him to not respond because I’m sure she has something her belt to use at a later time. I hope.
The was stopped for window, because it said in the other that they saw his car coming from a drug house. In the case of the windows and car sit why didn't they just give him a ticket and send him on his way. They would have made their quota that day.
