Population of Europe Throughout History (1600-2020) 

You should try playing Stellaris, you might like it

It's not just numbers, it's history

Didnt notice those were 15 min. thx

so do I)

I tried to look at the numbers and the years i remenber with mayor Wars in 19th and 20th centuries. And tou linda understand the Power of countries and thirsty for land

Some people really hated the Austrians some time ago and were ready to kill some of them , not now ...

xD

@@silverbolbo which is weird, of all the other European empires, Austria was the least genocidal, yet most people remember them for oppression and instability

Emu Empire

@@lordyaromir6407 That was really only the function of Austria being the furthest away from the ocean and an access to colonisation out of all the empires, not an active choice. Their oppression of any internal dissidence and elevating people like Metternich or Bach into public office on the other hand, was an active choice.

It is very sad fact that most of people don’t know how many Soviet people died for win. Today in Russia everyone thinks that foreigners don’t know the loss of Soviet Union and Who really won in WWll

I’m just as critical of Stalin as the next guy, as well as the Soviets’ initial cooperation with Germany in 1939. But the US should be thankful for the incomprehensible toll the USSR took to win the war. They nearly lost their country, but they persevered and turned the tide of the European theater. Maybe the Allies would not have won if the USSR didnt join Also, the Soviet invasion of Manchuria was another major reason the Japanese surrendered unconditionally. In addition to the bombs

and war criöes

They lost some countries that's why 😅 omg western propaganda...

@@Apo22662 Im sorry to inform you but the soviet union got bigger after ww2

French did it more often

You mean France 🇫🇷 right?

Im Spanish

Actually, the last flag is put isn t the actual flag

@Діма Базалюк im spanish I know It better than you

Remember, the defeat of 1699 wasn't because the weakness of the ottoman.. But rather, the weakness of european monarchies!! How ?? All of Austria would fall in 1683 without the help of the holy league! Conclusion.. There was no country in europe that could face the ottomans alone!!!

@@user-xr2jt7ss4o yeah it is amazing how they declined. I guess technology + russians screw them over.

@@user-xr2jt7ss4o I think Russians chould beat us alone, we were not good at tech or military. But you are right about Austria they were not do different.

@@umuttopal6402 If the ottomans remain strong the Russian couldn't defeat them alone... don't forget that the ottomans destroyed Moscow twice in 1571 and 1593 The ottoman empire got a good education system and was so powerful in military!

nobody in the Ottoman Empire ever wanted to be in it. (except for Turkey obviously.)

...

*mine

@@justinblue1402 this is Honolulu english ;)

Misused in the video. There was an Ottoman flag until 1923.

I' m Turkish

@@onurexe317 yaşasın ırkımız çine bedel 40mız

@Joe McCan its fake. It was hunger, no holodomor

@@deNATOfication brainwashed russian patriot

@Joe McCan I just know the history of my country

@Joe McCan who let you out of the dope house?

@Joe McCan dude chill

@Ahmet why not?

​@Ahmet Your name is Ahmet but you speaking English ( no problem, just...

Turkey- 15000000 Kurds

@@beliarek4595 F*ck off

@King of the Lilin theu still Kurds

now think about how impressive that is man , same goes for the dutch

Hahahaha that's not as impressive as it looks to be. Back then so many Portuguese soldiers were working for Spain Kingdom. Spain was gonna pay a lot to the soldiers that are attended to the exploring team and i don't even mention the glory they made. Also Magellan was portuguese but he was gonna get paid by spain if he could manage not to die. So Portugal wasn't the one explored the world and colonized the south america. If it was then Brazil wouldn't be the only country speaks portuguese.

@@kvothelamora1925 I think you have confused the exploring of indian ocean with the atlantic ocean missions , portugal had a syrong hold along almost all of the cost of west and east Africa , Yemen and India they also had colonies in east Asia like Macao which they held until the last century . all of this thanks to their impressive architectures who designed impenetrable fortresses

@@kvothelamora1925 There was portuguese working for the spanish as there was spanish working the portuguese, and thats true for other nations as well. The guy who translated the between portuese and hindu was a polish guy, for example. I dont get yout point... In south America Portugal focused on its area imposed by tordesillas treaty, that included Brasil as cisplatina (uruguay) and they had to fight the spanish, dutch amd french there. In the indian ocean, oceania and on he far east the political situation was much more complex.

@@canyou7670 Magellan or Magalhães as we call him was Portuguese. This stats count with Portuguese Brazil and Colonies?

Ask if my country Indonesia the capital of Island Java have a population as much as Russia And Java is pretty small

@@technoimperialist9509 I mean Java has better soil and didn’t have a large portion of its population killed by Nazi’s

Will we fight the Japanese we lost so many live fighting in Japanese

And also we fight so many live for for not being the colony of the Dutch

Not basically like you guys we are a colony for like many centuries

Ou! you know about kvass, it's an excellent drink, we really enjoy it.

And u obese.

But the british empire had like 412 million in total, this is just british empire's population in europe.

@@swamicoupet4355 What the heck are you even talking about, I hope you realize he's talking about 1790. Canada and Australia were more or less nothing and in 1800 even India had a total population of only 160 millions (and not a lot of India was under British rule at the time, only a small portion). It's mathematically impossible it reached something like 400 million. At most in 1790 I'd guess it was like 50 million, a lot of Indians in it.

I only know kvass because of Dayz lmao

There's one constant always tho , France and UK racing eachother

And Russia literally twice everybody.

@@EnemyAtom65 Yea because Russia is only partly in europe, but there is data for whole country. Same Turkey.

@Tg52s yea it is, but difference will not that big

@Tg52s I mean most of Russia's population is in its heartlands in Europe, siberia is very sparsely populated despite its size.

Mostly due to new alliances and older nations bending disassembled though.

The European way to gain people!

Mostly Prussia.

Sometimes nations unite voluntarily. ..... Not often, but it happens on occasion.

England didn't conquer Scotland in 1707, it was a mutually agreed union.

ikr. its so confusing watching a video where rhe data starts in like the 14th century and it shows modern countries

Investigate Islam correctly 🕋🏜️

@@atillarustam6613 Tell that to muslims and your religion would disappear overnight 😂

@@MsPaintMr @mr ms paint I agree that my religion will disappear, but later than all religions. Only Islam is true until Qiyamah day .

@@atillarustam6613 is your real name realy Attila?

@@jsmrfuture7928 I like bread

@@jsmrfuture7928 ok

pzdr polska xd

Jeszce Polska nie ziegraly I think that is what they say. :-)

@@michaeldemus6666 "zginęła" often our language is hard for ourselves too (no joke)

Take the video with a grain of salt.

Good point

Yeah thats why Corona had no impact

This is an entertainment.

I suppose that they just took estimates for December and November 2019 and made the video be until January 2020.

It's easy to project one year out.

Turkey: I'm not even a part of Europe.

@@ParleLeVu Turkey: Maybe I am a part of Europe.

@@TheKarahisar03 Turkey: Good thing I occupied Constantinople so I can claim to be a little European.

@@ParleLeVu I think u mean Istanbul

@@TheKarahisar03 Istanbul - Constantinople - Byzantium. Same same, just different names in different eras :-)

Well , romania and czeho-slovakia both participated in ww2 and they both lost territories + a lot of men ... turkey was neutral .

And both suffered Kommunism for 40 years.

...Turkey was neutral?! Since when?! XD It's one of the best jokes ever!

@@pawepioro2998 yeah thats true. in ww2 turkey was neutral.

@@anordinaryboi9506 In theory... Kinda yes. Throughout the entire period of WWII, Turkey was maneuvering, trying to stay out of the conflict. Why? Generally speaking, it did not pay off for the Turks to join the war on either side. There were several reasons for this: 1. Trauma after WW I, in which Turkey lost. They were concerned about the loss of more territories and possibly sovereignty. The example of Iran, occupied by the British and Soviets from 1941, cooled all enthusiasm. 2. Poverty in the country, Turkey at that time was underdeveloped, its arms industry was dwarf, everything was bought abroad. 3. Military weakness - in 1939 the Turkish army had 20 infantry divisions, 3 mountain brigades and 1 fortress brigades, and 5 cavalry divisions, aviation - 370 aircraft, mostly obsolete. Fleet - powerful on paper, in fact larger units (Yavuz battlecruiser, Mecidiye and Hamidiye light cruisers) completely obsolete and used as hulk, 4 relatively modern destroyers, 8 OPs and some "trinkets". Until 1941, the army was expanded - it had 43 divisions and 3 independent infantry brigades, 2 divisions and 1 independent cavalry brigade and 2 mechanized divisions, the aviation had about 400-500 aircraft, some equipment was purchased from the Germans, Americans and the British (including 2 destroyers and 2 OP for the fleet), but that was still not enough. The army was underarmed and had no combat experience. Turkey had great problems with maintaining this army in peacetime, so it was difficult to think about hostilities.

😂😂😂

@@oguzkarabolu9525 nabıyon la

@@seyyarsatc1082 Ne

This is called Nazi Erdogan

@@parthenope. Nazi ? Do you know anything about national socialism?

Also count the illegal settlings

😹😹😹

Germany copied that behaviour

The fact is France will change only during 19th century (except a little part 1940-42)..

Heureusement que tu n'apprend pas l'histoire de France en cours, car j'en garde des souvenirs par sa complexité xD

No, just the government. For some reason they kept the same flag over and over lol

Turquia país fantástico😃😃😃👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Yes 15 million of it is probably Syrians and other refugees who constantly give birth And im also pretty sure that each day more Syrians are given birth than Turks which is kinda ironic

@@erdniealinik yea no wonder anti syrian/arab sentiment grows many think turks have been arabified and should return to turkic culture

thats not really possible considering the dictators intention to turn Turkey into a islamist arab country

@@erdniealinik thats why hes losing popularity especially from right wing/conservative young people

...or a plague outbreak

Ireland : yes but actually no

or you are just polish

Thats because of migration! We have in the Netherlands 4,6 million not-western people.

I call those hogs.

Unless you do something in your life more productive than watching random numbers on youtube floating, then not really, you're just vegetating on other's people expense.

@@aradanat231 the points still holds tru

@@aradanat231 it hurts, but let back to work

Nice to know I’m part of overpopulation

@@ryanholder7728 if you (will) have less than 3+ children you are part of underpopulation

dude back in 30s turkey was 2 times bigger than greece.. now its more than 8! they are just booming and booming

Problem wit Turkey was that it wasnt industrialized. That is why you see a population boom. If Turkey had industrilized at 1750-1850 it might have been bigger than Russia today

@@zisispit no it is getting slower and slower the max will be around 100 million and then decline

@@think9747 hayır 2060 ta 110 milyon olup zirveyi görücez knk

@NAMEKSİK not just ww1 Tripolitanian War, Balkan Wars and then ww1 with internal disturbances there is no way to see population grow

We have so many population we have even exported them to foreign countries. with an agreement. to solve unemployment problem. in exchange of money.

@Emre no it was because of mass migration

Thanks to syrian in a syria family you must do minimum 5 child

@@DoofyGilmore1299 Refugees are not Turkish citizens

@@ebruuu9343 no the government of Turkey to win votes giving citizenship to Syrian refugees

Watch the 14 minutes, save your love to music

i slowed down the speed to understand which countries go and which come

I actually did because I have to get up at 4.30am tomorrow and it’s 21.30 and I wanna sleep but can’t

I wish to read it before i watch :(

@@bahadrkelesoglu618 It can also work for future videos ;)

hahaha

Spilt stick spilt stick

You dont know what happend right?

@@refox0537 I do know, I'm from Germany and we do have history, but thanks for asking mate :)

@@COPROO Dann bist du einfach dumm

Not a very good work! Really not! Because the founding of the united German state in 1871 was a gigantic catastrophe for Europe! The unification of the various small German states into a united German state was a terrible catastrophe for Europe! Actually the forerunner of the worst catastrophes of all times in the 20th century. Because without this unified Germany, neither World War I nor World War II would have happened. This united nation would not have had the opportunity to commit various genocides before WW1 and during WW2. If Prussia had not existed and thus also no unified Germany, then there would not have been also almost 50 years of communist oppression in half of Europe. The communist victory in the fallen Russian Empire was the result of the First World War caused by Germany and Austria so the communist rule over the areas of the fallen Russian Empire would never have existed without Germany like the later successes of the communists after the 2nd World War with the occupation of half of Europe and force the nations there into Communism. Even if one denies the German-Austrian war guilt, the First World War would not have happened without the united German state. The result would be the same. So NO world wars, NO genocides, NO immeasurable destruction and NO strong communism. This multiple NO would be the result of the destruction or considerable weakening of Prussia. Because Prussia made this German state possible in the first place. That was actually the only relevant achievement by Prussia! Unfortunately, when the Poles had the opportunity to do so, they did not destroy Prussia! Too bad for Europe! Others also had the opportunity to destroy Prussia or to weaken it decisively. The French in the 19th century and the Russians in the 18th century had the opportunity to destroy Prussia or to weaken it decisively. Unfortunately they didn't use the opportunity to destroy Prussia either.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Hmmm, I think you're simplifying the story a bit. If Germany had not existed as a unit, other states might have waged wars against each other. Especially in times of colonialism, no state begrudged the world power to the other. In principle, the German Reich had existed for 1000 years, just not yet united as a state. Eventually, the unification was triggered by Napoleon, who was able to occupy one weak German state after the other almost without resistance and turn them into puppets. After Napoleon's defeat, this feeling of powerlessness in German-speaking countries led to the founding of the North German Confederation, the first sub-confederation that was formed and defended itself against further greed from other states. The misfortune you describe was not necessarily the unification of Germany, but that the March Revolution of 1848 failed and the state did not become a democracy from below, but an authoritarian empire founded by Bismarck, in which the nobility could continue to rule under Prussian leadership. A harmful breeding ground in which nationalism could grow.

@@callsigndd9ls897 Yes, nobody doubts that there would have been wars even without the Germans. But not such wars driven by utter barbaric and racist megalomania. There would certainly not have been a total of 70 million victims caused by 2 world wars and the various genocides and this immense destruction. Incidentally, it is a fact that all this gigantic misfortune would not have happened without the founding of the German state in 1871. No matter what caused this founding of the state. Because all this could only happen because there was a German state. The equation is very simple. None of this without the German state! But you are right about one thing! Without the Bismark state, Nazism would not have existed. The Bismarck and Kaiser state was politically completely backward and the nucleus of Nazism! This state was anti-democratic. Nazism did not fall from the sky and the German population was not replaced in 1933 when the Nazis came to power. Also the German population was not replaced after the First World War in 1918. I am also not claiming that Bismarck was a Nazi, but a forerunner of Nazism like the entire German population of his time. That is an original quote from Bismarck on Poles: "Do the Poles hit that they despair of life, if we want to survive, all we can do is exterminate them ... ". That was also the attitude towards Poles in the Nazi state of the 30s and 40s. This was an anti-enlightenment attitude that was widespread among the German population. The origin of the Nazi ideology was actually already Prussia which was continued in the German Kaiserreich! The term used by the Nazis for "living space in the east" ( "Lebensraum im Osten" ) which was an important aspect of Nazi ideology was also developed in the 19th century especially in Prussia. This idea was then spread from Prussia to all the German small states. With reference to the medieval conquest of German-speaking settlers in the Baltic States, the idea of ​​German colonization of Eastern Europe became increasingly popular. The idea was widespread in German society from the German natural right to rule and colonize the Slavic and Baltic areas east of Germany. In this context, the Germanization of Poland was propagated as the highest goal of Prussian politics. The idea of ​​solving the social problems and the supposed overpopulation of Germany by gaining new settlement areas in Eastern Europe was expressed with the catchphrase “people without space”. The German war aims in World War I were also shaped by the idea of ​​conquering large areas in the east. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk clearly testifies to this urge to expand to the east, in which the Bolsheviks who ruled Russia were forced to cede vast territories to Germany. In the First World War there were already clearly formed structures that can be called forerunners of Nazism. The by Germany occupied areas called Upper East (Ober Ost) in the 1st World War was the forerunner of the Nazi nation's General Plan East ( German Generalplan Ost)which aimed at various genocides in occupied Eastern Europe. A kind of blueprint for General Plan East! Regarding the genocide of the Slavic nations and the colonization of the conquered areas in Eastern Europe. Because with the Ober Ost policy, which was not only practiced in Ober Ost but also in other occupied areas of eastern europe, the germ Nazism was clearly recognizable as early as the First World War. These areas of Ober Ost were brutally exploited, including forced labor. After defeating the Russians with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, the Germans planned to extend this method of power from Ober Ost, which was very similar to Nazi methods, to all conquered Slavic territories. Those were only a few steps to Nazism! So there would have been a Nazi state even with a German victory in World War I, but instead of a "Führer" in government with a German monarch. In this anti-enlightenment spirit in World War I, the German army then systematically waged a completely brutal war against all war conventions, including many massacres on civilians. A completely criminal warfare that was very similar to the warfare of the Nazis, including various massacres of civilians as early as World War I. Not only did the infantry massacred civilians, but also the German artillery with shelling on civilians, the German Navy with the shelling on civilians with ship artillery, and the German air force with with bomb raids on civilians. With this many massacres of civilians many children were also murdered. Mind you, already in the 1st world war. In fact, German warfare in World War I was reminiscent in many aspects of German warfare in World War II. This is not surprising since it was the same nation that fought both wars. One war was waged by the forerunners of the Nazis, and the other war was waged by the fully developed Nazis!

@@callsigndd9ls897 By the way, in the 20s after the First World War there was in the German population a virulent longing for a leader like Bismarck. The German historian Hans Ulrich Wehler writes in connection with the rise of National Socialism that Hitler was able to benefit from the longing for a "new Bismarck" as a dictatorial leader. In their detailed studies of the Bismarck myths, the German historians Richard Frankel and Robert Gerwarth emphasize that the Nazis used the Bismarck myth to expand their following. That helped that Voters turned away from the classic right-wing parties - above all the DNVP and had flowed to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP). Hitler in particular had the “political potential of the Bismarck myth” used and to stage itself as "the second Bismarck" or at least as his heir. Even after the Nazis took over power in Germany, Bismark continued to be used as a model. Hundreds of Bismarck monuments had been erected, anniversaries such as Bismarck's birthday on April 1, 1815, and the anniversary of his death on July 30, 1898, offered an opportunity to approach the myth every year appointed. Bismarck also uses phrases like "blood and iron decides the questions of the time" in reference to his policies, which fit the Nazi concept very well. It is also clear that Bismark was a forerunner of Nazism because of his contempt for Poles. He was a Poles hater! Original quote from Bismarck on Poles: "Do the Poles hit that they despair of life, if we want to survive, all we can do is exterminate them ... " The Germans then did that under the leadership of the Nazi government with the general plan East (German Gneralplan Ost). This plan involved the annihilation of the Polish nation as well as all Slavic nations. The Generalplan Ost was the plan for the genocide and ethnic cleansing on a vast scale, and colonization of Central and Eastern Europe. It was to be undertaken in territories occupied by them during World War II. The plan was realized during the war, resulting directly and indirectly in the deaths of 20 million ethnic Slavs by starvation, disease, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, or extermination through labor.

Same with Norway haha :P

@William S. D. Albertsen Yes

surprised we even touched the list, it's so empty here in Finland, everywhere else in the world populations are exploding meanwhile here: 1919: 3 million 2020: 5 million at least once overpopulation starts becoming a problem elsewhere we'll be fine here.

@@eVill420 Nah, once the Africans and Arabs fill up Western Europe, we will be sure to send them up to you guys.

@@Armor3d0ne idk bro not many people want to live like this, Finland's population is like 90% in the southern part of the country and 10% in the northern half and I live in the northern parts. humans aren't made for this shit.

My ancestors in Prussia emigrated to Australia about that time. Thank fuck.

@@aldunlop4622 what should this mean ?

There are actually many reasons behind that achievement like being an Island , large navy , and focusing on occupying Over seas territories and setteling rather than waging wars in Continental Euorpe ect , but still Imperrisve.

they have nothing to do with european civilisation!!

@@plamenjekov4568 Well. Almost 40% of the entire population was european balkan so...

@@kaganayhan8437 what u mean exactly ?!?!?

It did. If you watch on x0.25 speed

@@plamenjekov4568 europe is a continent dumbass, everyone on the continent is european. There is no such thing as "European civilisation"

Yalan gardaşım yalan, Abdülhamit bir karış toprak vermemiştir yalan bu veriler sjjsshskhd

@@Yagiz.Ozturk git biraz araştır

@@tictacktictack818 Bu yaptığım şeye ironi deniyor aptal herif.

@@tictacktictack818 Abdülhamit zamanında kaybedilen topraklar Tunus Yunanistan Romanya Kıbrıs mısır Sırbistan Karabağ Girit Bulgaristan toplamı Türkiye'nin iki katı ebatında ve başka hiç bir padişah Abdülhamit kadar toprak kaybetmedi. Ekonomi hiper enflasyon ile karşılaştı. Azınlıkların hepsi ayaklandı. Ki hala o ayaklanmaların etkisi devam ediyor ayaklanan azınlıklara kavgamız bitmedi ve bu yönetimi çok iyi yönetim diye yutturabiliyorlar. Tarihi objektif yansız kaynaklardan öğrenmek yerine dizilerden öğrenince insan bu şekilde düşünebilir tabi sen de haklısın.

@@abdullahcoskun3236 normalde sana uzun uzun aciklardim ama kapasite az olduğu icin anlaman imkansiz, sen böyle devam et elinde sonunda hem turklerden hemde kiclarini yaladigin ingilizlerden dislaninca anlicaksin aptallığın cezasını ve kimsenin umrunda olmicaksin

🤣😂

It's completely whacky that the population of ireland was halved TWICE in the last 400 years. And yet I unironically know british people who think that britain colonizing ireland was actually good for ireland

@@perpetual_suffering1458 there are brits, specially English, who think the empire was good with its INVADED territories.

@@biohita They mass starved indians

There's a reason they put his head on a stick

@@niono1587 the only thing 1600 ireland and 1600 england agreed on is that they both hated cromwell

What country can take over Europe? Italy: I did it 2000 years ago France: I did it many times centuries ago Ottoman empire: goes brrrr Nazi Germany: all descendants of German should be in Germany including Celtics from France and UK USSR: is the second most powerful country in the world and has half of Europe Portugal, Spain and UK: don't care about Europe and take over the world instead

@@laytonjr6601 in colonial times, whoever controls Europe, controls the world.

Your UK has 100 less people per square km than Belgium and 200 less than the Netherlands. Mayby in big cities but in just normal municipamities (or whatever you call it over there) it should be way less than here lol.

​@Dennis Engelen England is comparable to the Netherlands tbh, but yeah the UK as a whole not so much.

*steal

*conquers back

@@Antarctide *No

That's some acceleration! Don't worry, we took their colonies and everything. Made them nice. Now they are brilliant, still near the top of population and productivity.

@@vincent_hall Du bist aber auch ganz schön stolz deutscher zu sein hm

You figure right now is the end (of time)?

@@beorlingo exactly. history has a tendency to repeat itself

Who care

@@DreamWalkerVl I do.

@@DreamWalkerVl me

Adını bida değiştir ( bu yorum youtube adınla elgili(:::: )

@@ardahanimparatorlugu4009 b küçük çaplı bir paradoks yaratır

@@surekliismidegisenkanal1890 heee(:

It took more than a whole century to overpopulate the ottoman empire

That mainly because in that moment france prety much lose 1/4 of his teritory for exemple belgium , luxembourg and 2/3 other region was french teritory.

@@azopeopaz3059 yeah, I know, that has nothing to do with what I said.

He is talking about the song

Or as Tchaikovsky himself called it, "the drop".

And everyone only knew the Belgians exist

Or France to have a larger population than Russia

Yes, but remember at that time Spain included southern Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, Milan, Luxembourg, Belgium and the French regions of Artois and Franche-Comte

That's what exponential population growth and demographic changes do! Africa had 1/3 of Europe's population in 1950 and now it has around 60% more people, and in 2100 it will have over 3 times Europe's population

@@juliosalazar6924 they really had all of that in 1695 yeah, no

@@skland1619 normal, europeans dont want kids

So true, even if I wonder how accurately the borders are counted each time it changes. Nice work though.

*Tsardom, not Kingdom.

@@HorusHeresist I just didn't know how to use the English Tsardom

Türk gücü!

Şakşuk!

of course after erdoğan start house erdoğan and become sultan and khalifa 😂😂😂

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr selen ne dıyon kız :D

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr abla lütfen yorumu sil. Aksi takdirde bu yorumu gelecekte okuyacak olan insanlar çok ilginç şeyler yaşayabilir.

@@xxxxxx-rg6qr selen rezil ettin kız bizi :))

@@baron2282 neden ki gerçek gelecekte olucakları söyledim sadece xD

Probably an American dude who, as always, thinks the world has waited for America to exist to start existing too.

@@logannslm1593 comme d'habitude avec de pays répugnant

"throughout history" is NOT the same as "throughout the history of Europe" Obviously population counts weren't accurate before 1600

@@logannslm1593 Now that's an ignorant response. Nobody thinks that you silly fool. What he was trying to say was that the data could've began in BC or something like that. You took it to another extent saying, "Probably an American." The guy has a Greek name as well. Now that really shines the ignorance on you.

@@seanbrummfield448 Idiot, my first comment was referring to the dude who broadcasted the video, not the Greek dude I replied to.

I read "from start to Finnish".😂

I am surpised they had almost twice the population as denmark-norway when denmark had the whole of sleswigh and southern sweden. I dont think the numbers hold op.

@@TheBarser Also, Norway lost 60 % of its population to the black death so they could'nt help much with the numbers either

Probably because the Swedes killed enough civilians elsewhere in the Thirty Years War and later on.

I was surprised sweden was more populous than brandenburg prussia

Lets all be like switzerland and love ourselves

(Me, just an ITSY BITSY tiny bit Swiss) *Yes, why don’t we?*

@Alexander Ortiz NONSENSE!

@Alexander Ortiz Who tf cares?

India: me too )

@@dimakvac4918 India: mm interesting UK: I think you' re even more interesting

Maalesef

Cidden ya maalesef

Onlar nüfusa kayıtlı Değilki😶 Türk Kürt Nüfusu Ve TC vatandaşı sayılan Suriyeliler değilmi

84,5M TC vatandaşı var en fazla 3-4M Suriyeli var

@@alikoc5739 Suriyeli mülteciler nüfusa kayıtlı değil. Sadece ikametgahları var.

3% is in Europe, that is, both in Europe and in Asia.

You mean '90

In 1990 after the communist fall Romanians were killed 4 milions because there was a guy who was still communist in the gouverment

@@Fernando-lb3lx Thats not what happen, people left the country for a better life.

@@Fernando-lb3lx thats true, but not 4 milion of them.

@@Fernando-lb3lx Lol 2 milion people killed on streets... actually it was aprox 800. When communism falls a lot of people left the country in 90-91' . In 2007 after we joined in UE , again a lot of people left for a better life...