Robyn Hood Review Gets WORSE - Episode 5 Season 1 

The part where that woman (I'm not bothering to distinguish between them; they're all laughable) says, "No better friend, no worse enemy"? That's from the Marines. The 5/1 if I remember correctly. But wasn't "Little" John in the Army? Or whatever the Canadian equivalent is. 🤷‍♂️

He's only reason he's angry with you is...Well, he's a twat.

" look Mum, look what I made " !

Remember, his name from now on is Direkto 0

( or Zero, either is fine ).

Actually, the character is based on multiple notorious murderers and rapists. True. All well known. Sorry to disappoint you.

Changed by travelling storytelling. There was no such thing. It's a work of fiction created by entertainers who had to up their game from village to village to change the stories ( which were documented ) in order to get paid. They used to tell the real horrible atrocious acts, but over time, people didn't want their kids to hear that, so then the ' folklore ' turned into family entertainment. I live Nottingham. You don't need to research it. It's nothing more than fiction. It never happened.

At least Director Zero / 0 got some of that part right ! Lol 😅

​@@ryanconway2207Wow. That's all I'm going to say. Just...wow. 🤦‍♂️

@brianmurphy6480 lol ! Unfortunately, all true !

I was shocked that was the real edit.

I remember watching it on the original like...hold up, they did that dude WRONG. But it was funny. And now I get to see that clip ALL the time.

I had to rewatch that several times to believe it. How is this real? Is this part of some real life comedy show? He is making fun of the way someone looks while his buddy sits next to him with a disco ball on his head. We have gone so far past "real life is parody" that I think we've fallen into "real life is family guy." How do things get this stupid without following a script that was intentionally written to be as stupid as possible?

@@TheRealMonkeyrogue So that is real? I was wondering about that. Says a lot about the directors cluelessness.

@@Quandry1 Mr. Director clearly loves Watch Dogs. I can even see this being his cheaper version of a Watch Dogs-show. The masks, drones and so on ... yes, he really thinks this all looks good. So of course he has a guy with a disco ball sitting next to him.

He needs the one that Q made for Bond in A View To A Kill

Yeah, you pretty much have to have the people who installed it forget to put the metal covering that goes over where the latch is in the seal.

i get what you mean but "too cool for school means too dumb for life" does not apply here because you dont learn this in school,that comment only makes sense if you learn this in school.

​@@bletheringfool GUARANTEED that COSPLAY MALCOLM X just saw one of the MANY old school movies where a CREDIT CARD was used to open a LOCKED DOOR! Why WOULDN'T "Director X" use just ANOTHER STEREOTYPE in a series literally FULL of STEREOTYPES

@@Marcustheseer You learn BASIC RESEARCH CAPABILITY in school. And LOGIC. And often the difference between Bullshit and Reality. And for that matter, writing skills and dramatic arts. Edit: If you're referring to Robyn (I was referring to Director X) then having attended school might have taught her simple things like 'how mechanisms work', like say, angles and force and the flimsiness of plastic vs well seated metal. You know, basic physics 101. Or grade school science. Of course she lives in a world populated by a moron who doesn't know we solved this problem back when people were using limewood strips to do the trick. You know, before plastic was used for most things.

It's the irony of leftist story telling. When they write any villain with any shred of complexity they accidentally fall in love with them. When they write "evil" characters, normal people think that the evil guy has a point.

​@@lostalone9320And the best part is that the "heroes" in their stories are mostly their own self inserts, that we as audience are supposedly to like. Tells a lot about their ego.

surely you arent implying that we are supposed to root for anyone other than our hero, John Prince, and the brave men and women of New Nottingham Law Enforcement

I'm personally miffed at his villianizing the only red head here. How dare you

That is a summation of the last few videos here.

Nearly everything she's done has been a legal nightmare. Like her overlooking exactly how Robyn and her friends got that bail money. There's no way she didn't know or at least suspect that they ripped off that car, or stole the money somehow.

In addition to her casually carrying lockpicks, which the last I heard were illegal and actionable to own ( except, I assume, for a legal locksmith.)

@@usxxgrant It depends on the province. Generally you can own them as long as you don't carry them with you in public The onus is on you however, if caught with them, to prove that you weren't intending to commit a crime by having them. There is no "innocent until proven guilty".

@@alzaelnext638 That's not necessarily the case. Maybe the lawyer's seen how massive and well furnished their apartment is and assumes they are loaded.

@@Anoneemus_Noenayme No. You're wrong. It is expressly illegal in most of Canada to carry one. And in Alberta and BC even owning is illegal if you are not a licensed lockpick. Read 351(1) of the criminal code. If you have possession of any item that can be used for breaking and entering into a persons place of residence or property you must be able to provide a lawful excuse for why you have such item. If there is any suspicion that the item has been, will be, or you have the intention of using it for criminal activity you can be subject to ten years imprisonment. If you want to know about Alberta; The Security Services and Investigators Act (SSIA), section 5(1) states that no person may possess lockpicking tools without a license.

Also known as the far left

"Criminals" AKA Bl

@@Jimmy-yi7iq Or black culture.

So it's kind of what's going now with all the looters in America...

Little John: "That would be returning to the scene of the crime." When one of the characters acknowledges their own illegal actions to the other characters and nobody bats an eye.

And he couldn’t pronounce it…

Maybe he hopes the hashtag "disparu" will lead someone to discover his "magna opus"and get some views on top of the 12 from his mom's boyfriends

Director X does not know the basics of Public Relations. So, he makes a lot of rookie mistakes. Hell, he could have leaned into the criticism and say this train wreck is being watched wrong and it is just heavy-handed satirical crime drama -- a heavy-handed cautionary tale -- especially how he just reinforces negative Black stereotypes in this crap. Hell, Disparu just gave Director X that opening at the end of the review.

And you know an idiot is an idiot when he tries personal attacks on reviewers instead of defending his crap

I find it funny none of the criticisms were taken into account to improve the show. Instead he just talks about critics being goofy while sitting in a room with a dude wearing a disco ball.

The flack meme never lies!

You have to see it from a different perspective: There are so few people watching this show he just feels the need to talk to every one of them directly 😉

Rube Goldberg's chest is swelling!

What gets me is that acoustic guitars are actually pretty cheap. Like, you can get a brand new one for $30 if you wanted to. Sure, the rich guy was a douche for breaking it, but he threw $1000 at him. Just buy a new guitar.

@@qty1315 I am a guitarist. Can confirm.

Director Ex- Lax indeed has never been poor in his life; He was raised in an affluent gated community, and as an adult, he quickly found success directing talentless (c)rap music videos and became even richer.

@@qty1315 Director X has probably never even met someone who can play a guitar lol. It’s like Lucille Bluth guessing the price of a banana

completely Agree

Not a very high bar to overcome but completely agree :p

other shows that Disparu reviewed I actually watched. This one, ill stick only to D. reviews.

I an using these reviews to attend my masochist desire to see this show. At least Disparu is the mirror of Perseus which allows me to see this show without turning into stone.

As with so many other modern products this is the only way I watch. Enjoyed maybe 3 times the length of she hulk vicariously with them, then wheel of time, willow, secret invasion... Modern crap at least produces inspiration for our content creators

Well, it starts inside... And ends outside, if done right 😅

I like this show because it's so bad. It's like a Mystery Science Theater 3000 movie

​@@TheSoonToBePurgedJackMeHoffIV Mystery Science Theater 3000 realtime

i love the show aswell. i only need to tell people the setting and everyone breaks out laughing. hatewatching is how i get 90% of my enjoyment out of shows these days

@@TheSoonToBePurgedJackMeHoffIV One of the reasons I enjoy Disparu's reviews so much is that it reminds me of a MST3K episode.

Well I'm sure he loves making some Bank off of morons. I would too!

They paid for the guitar, even if they broke it, I dont see a crime other than shoving a thousand bucks at him which he can use for food, clothes, another guitar...

@@asarishepard8171 he refused to sell, that means it wasn't theirs to break.

@@DH-xw6jp Exactly. It wasn’t an “oops, I accidentally broke your guitar, let me compensate you”, it was deliberately breaking it in an act of malice, and then shoving money at the issue as if it makes the problem go away. It is legitimately the first time I’ve seen the bad guys in the show act elitist and commit an actual crime, and then use their money to try to get out of any resulting issue. Which is supposedly what they are doing *all* the time, but the show is too dumb to understand that nothing the villains did up until that was actually criminal?

From what I just looked up, a new mid-range acoutic guitar starts at $500. It doesn't excuse the whole "I can do anything I want because I'm rich and can throw money at things" attitude, but, yes, one wonders why guitar guy didn't just go buy a new one and had to have money raised for him when he had sufficient cash. The Hood could have faced felony charges for what his moping drove them to do. Well, sort-of drove them to considering they could have bought him a guitar instead of buying new clothes to infiltrate the party.

@@StarWarsomania the problem being that what they did is a relatively minor crime, and actually paying for it is one of the actual remedies for said crime. So while it is a crime, throwing money at it is an actual solution to it.

Nooo dont give him ideas hell do it! 😂

Yassssssss please let Director X see this!!!!! lol.

​@@asarishepard8171come on, that would be hilarious and it's not like it would hurt Disparu. Pretty sure the show's audience doesn't even know he exists 😂

And he'll really show up Disparu by making him spit pure logic and facts and let everyone know he makes more money with his well made videos than directors of colour make with badly made shows.... How will Disparu survive?

Oh, Director X's next project will "roast" all of the RU-vid critics. And boost their channels!! "She-Hulk" did it and that is what exactly happened! 🤣🤣 I will bet good money on that!

Modern day victimhood mentality

My big question is: why not just shop at a different drug store? One without price hikes? It's not like busses don't exist.

Whoever the writers are for the show, they never read any comic books or even fiction books, because all of them end up teaching how to be a good human being eventually. Makes me wonder, if the writers don't ever read, how can they write?

Her biggest struggle is her condom jar needing a re-up.

@@scottdoesntmatter4409 clearly you haven't read mainstream comic books written after about 2015. Where the hero's are horrible horrible people with no morals and the villains are sympathetic, deep, likable, and actually morally correct.

It is actually kind of amazing how wrong Director Twitter gets this culture he is trying to portray. I have learned more about it from watching people tear this show apart than I used to know, and yet I still knew this was wrong right off the bat. I mean, has he never even watched movies set in the kind of neighborhood Sherwood is supposed to be?

@@Pylo-ry6ff No. Why else do you think he believes a single mother with two kids and no apparent source of income could live in such a big apartment with several bedrooms. All the while having the luxury of wasting time on activism.

@@alzaelnext638 It is funny how well off all the resident of the supposed struggling community seem, with their living space looking not far off as the actual rich characters. The only one of them who actually looks like they're facing poverty is the white guy who gets mugged this episode who Robyn is suddenly like 'Actually, we can't help or get justice for him. That's not what the hood does!'.

I've mentioned elsewhere that one of the bigger political issues in the neighbourhood where X grew up was that the locals wanted more (not some, more) gazebos in their local parks. And probably the biggest economic hardship is that local condo prices aren't going up for investors because locals prefer to live in detached homes.

@@nobody2996 I actually went and looked and I managed to find the apartment building from the show. It's a luxury apartment in Hamilton Ont. called "The Village. The rent for a basic 2-bedroom is $1,800 dollars. A slightly above minimum wage job would get you about $1,200 per month. I can only think of one thing Robyn and her mother could be doing to make up the rest of that money...and I think it finally explains the condom jar.

Because the one universal rule you find in all of storytelling and jurisprudence: "It is permissible to do bad things to bad people." Most people agree with rule to some degree or another. Chet is a "bad person". That was "established" very clearly in the beginning of the episode. So, anything done to Chet by our "heroes" - no matter how horrible it is - is justifiable.

@@luckyleo25 Correct. If one defines the self as "good" , then any decision or action, no matter how vile, is "good" by definition. It it _literally_ a Third Reich attitude.

@@steveouk90126 That group (Third Reich) definitely had that mindset but they are not unique in it. That group were the good guys in their mind (like everyone who wants to believe that they are on the "right side of history"). So it was okay to do anything and everything to the "other group" because they were "evil" and "diabolic". And so the other group "deserved" what was coming to them. But really, it is a common agreement amongst people that is so common, most people do not even notice it anymore. It's in almost all of our storytelling mediums and it's in most of our legal systems. "It is okay to do bad things to bad people." The real problem stems from who is doing the labeling and who is being labeled. And since almost everyone think they are the "good guys", the "bad guys" usually end up being: "the other people who have more than me" or "the other people who will not let me have my way" or "the other people that I just do not like". That's the real problem with the train wreck called "Robyn Hood". The Hood could be great villain protagonists if the show was better written. They are the most unlikable and unsympathetic villain protagonists I have ever come across in fiction. And a good villain protagonist has to be both likeable AND sympathetic. Otherwise, the story just ends up as hot garbage!

@@luckyleo25 I disagree with your thesis, and (no offence) it's one of the mistakes that's crippling modern writers. The concept of 'the greater good' and it's nasty habit of justifying some of the worst atrocities in history is not a universal concept in storytelling. Storytelling is not simply constructed around good and evil but vice and virtue; restraint and proportionality being examples. Modern storytelling has completely embraced this idea of a subjective truth/extremism and forgotten about an objective sense of morality... 'Everything is nebulous, nothing is anything, there is no right or wrong, heroes are villains and villains heroes'. I saw a movie a few years back where the protagonists were being invaded by the barbarian horde, their forces beaten in open battle, the survivors decided to use human sacrifice to summon a demon to kill all their enemies... And they were the 'heroes' of that story? The people who believe there is no basic, objective morality in the human condition are the worst storytellers.

@@luckyleo25 Thanks for the lengthy explanation of what I summarized.

They were thinking exactly what Director X imagined them thinking: morally and intellectually bereft thoughts.

The almost childish pettiness and ridiculous escalation makes me wonder what the season finale is. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they break into the rich guy's tower again to spray-paint "I'm a pee-pee poo-poo head" on all his stuff, but then when something happens where they almost get caught they tie him up and burn the entire tower down with him & everyone else that isn't on their side inside.

In reality the the bad guys son is Edward 1st aka longshanks (yes the "king in braveheart"). He was a power hungry, thieving warmonger way worse than his father. He was also scared of Robert de Ferrers who the robin hood ballads are based on. The show making him a feckless layabout with his head in the sand is major irony

Something about there being no bad tactics, only bad targets.

its like watching a trainwreck. You can't turn away.

I keep saying it's quite noble all these companies are willingly loosing money for the sole reason ppl like disparu can make a living and ppl like us can have a good time watching him while complately ignoring shows/movies

​@@johndoe-vy4btas baby-face said, daddy needs a new couch!! # not actual statement

because you may not have noticed, but they run this run this run this hood run it run it run it run it. 🤮

​@@johnjamelethat's really catchy, you should try putting it to music.

@@johnjamele genius!

Well, there’s a lot of free room in his head …

If director x was smart he'd take the criticism and better his work instead of just dismissing it

​@@a.m.2066and I will bet money on the fact that you are right

Right? Like, there's a flood of criticism for plenty of actors, directors, writers, and studio executives, but you wouldn't know it based on how a lot of them react. We can complain about the problems with Star Wars until we're blue in the face, but I'm under no illusion that someone like J.J. Abrams or Kathleen Kennedy is lying in bed awake at night trying to get thoughts of the things fans have said about their movies out of their heads. But this guy? He definitely sits around fuming about the criticism his show is getting.

I am basically waiting for a Disparu knockoff to appear as a character in the actual show, just like that Doomcock lookalike in She Hulk.

You sound like one of those people who has seen shows and movies before.

He didnt grow a conscience. He grew Stockholm syndrome and joined a gang.

I mean they could but usually under extreme circumstances, that one moment where the situation so f-up that your brain suddenly do an instant reset and jolt right back up, like that one girl who escape from Jones town.

Really all that he SHOULD be doing is going up to his so called friends, telling them to fuck off, and finding new friends. Instead he's gonna join the hood gang. What a downgrade.

It’s called Stockholm Syndrome and it generally kicks in as a survival strategy after weeks, if not months, of gruelling emotional and psychological torture by nasty bastards. I’m impressed that Robyn and her not-merry men can cause it to happen in such short order.

That’s actually insulting A.I.

If it was A.I., it would make more sense.

Only an IQ over 80 would realise. Expect to repercussions.

Political Liberals live in an alternate reality in which cause and effect don't exist.

The AI would have written something more cohesive.

There is a video short out there, where a woman (quite possibly a trans due to an unusually deep voice) puts out a plea for her incacerated boyfriend with, "All he did was rob a gas station. Y'all acting like he robbed a Walmart or sum'n" I kid you not 😂

I'm from the suburbs of Northern Sacramento where the biggest crime are 16 year olds drinking 40s in the park after sun down... that'll get you jumped and money stolen too😂

And if that happens in NYC it is the ultra wealthy from Manhatten doing the beating and the stealing... right? RIGHT?????

@@JohnGalt916 That's because that IDIOT DEMOCRAT GOVERNOR Gavin Newsome has literally LEGALIZED CRIME..same as NY STATE GOVERNOR Kathy Holchule has done here! Hang in there brother hopefully BETTER DAYS are on the WAY

If I was busking I'd at least walk to a more affluent neighborhood

@@suzannekirkwood6392 EXACTLY.. the ONLY places I EVER see people playing guitars.. singing..etc etc... here in NYC are in the HIGH END neighborhood SUBWAY STATIONS & STREET CORNERS!

I love all the reviews of this show, but DISPARU absolutely obliterates!! 😂🤘

@@A_Scanner_Lightly It so does!! 😂😂

I don't know if you use for phone for it (as evidently lots of people do), but there's a fix if you use a laptop (or desktop pc). UBlock Origin still works and they are angels. They don't take donations & will update their extension multiple times a day (because RU-vid updates their code multiple times a day to stop it). And it works. I can still use RU-vid (and other sites with videos) & I don't get any ads. (I've used it for awhile & gotten used to being on the internet & watching stuff without ads. And then I'm showing my aunt & uncle stuff on their tv with youtube tv. Or my sister's showing me an episode on her laptop, which doesn't have adbblocker. And I'm reminded of how insanely addicted society (especially American culture) is when it comes to ads/commercials. Internet's basically unusable without adblockers).

Conversely, it also proves how shit the show is, if a RU-vidr can just make better props for a two-minute skit 😂.

I'd have thought it was on purpose if they didn't put so much into their writing that makes it clear that is not what they are actually trying to do. Much like many comic book writers these days working for the big name brand comic book companies.

@@Quandry1 yeah I’d thought it be on purpose if the writing made it obvious it was not the intention at all but purely by accident

Yes but he kinda admitted that this is not the show he wanted.

@@napoleonfeanor The show literally no one wanted. Dang.

@@napoleonfeanor Eh, he wanted a Power Rangers show and was told to make a Robin Hood one. A. I don't want to see his Power Rangers take either and B. I really don't have sympathy for writers/directors who have their own idea but are told by the studio to do another project. They should just do their best with the show or film they're given to prove they have what it takes to do other stuff.

It's not all that surprising though, he's gone his whole career having smoke blown up his ass and rarely faces any criticism. He literally rubs elbows with rich white liberals at those sorts of parties on a regular basis and is a part of the rich Hollywood bourgeois class, he has far more in common with the villains of his show than the " heroes".

Wait a minute... isn't Robin Hood a black lady of disrepute from Canada??? You know the old fables saying , rob from the rich and... yeah, yeah, done.

The swap is w/e it's just how he is trying to tell the story that is the insult.

American culture is like that. Blacks and women scream oppression from the comfort of their protected bubbles.

Dunno, maybe because you’ve allowed TPTB to race swap your entire nation out from under you? (After all yts are down to 55% of your under-5s and a good chunk of those are continentals.)

He probably never even gave it a second thought, tbh. Like most people, he actually seems pretty astute on some points, but on other points, horribly unreflective and ignorant.

Show him channeling all his anger at his uncaring father into becoming a formidable fighter, all so he can attack that same father's enemies in hopes of earning the man's respect. An interesting villain arc that we are most likely not going to see.

They should have made him the Robin Hood. Rich guy finds out his father is plotting to get rid of the locals to buy the land, teams up with them to thwart his plans. Would have made a better show but then we wouldn't have these hilarious reviews😅

John's son is Edward 1st aka longshanks. He was who Robert de Ferrers (who the robin hood ballads were based on) tried to get his land back from. John saddled him with a metric fuck tonne of debt on his lands when Robert was fostered by John due to being orphaned in the 1st baron rebellion. Edward was so scared of Robert he fucked him out of the Scottish crown then invaded after putting a weak king on the Scottish throne. Yes Edward longshanks is the same king in the Scottish war of independence aka Braveheart. Turning johns son into robin hood is like turning Kathleen Kennedy into Az.

@@dickybird6916 Um, you've missed a generation: John's (eldest) son was Henry III (b. 1207 r.1216-1272). Edward I (b. 1239 r.1272-1307) was John's grandson. John died in 1216. Queen Margaret of Scotland, whose death instigated the First Interregnum and the Thirteen Claimants, did not die until 1290. Someone who was fostered by John would have been a very old man by that point and not much of a direct threat. Assuming the Robert de Ferrers you are talking about (several members of the family in different generations were called Robert) is the 6th Earl of Derby, who was a royal ward and who did try to regain estates/castles the family had formerly held from the crown and who did join Montfort's Rebellion/The Second Baron's War (1263-1265/6) against Henry III and of whom it was said "Of no one was Edward [the future Edward I] more afraid", his dates are c.1239-1279 (so he died before the dispute to the Scottish succession even started) and his father died in 1254, which is a long time after the first barons' rebellion (1215-1217). (I am also confused as to what you mean about the Scottish throne, because to the best of my knowledge none of the thirteen claimants was a de Ferrers. Are you confusing him with Robert de Brus?) If you are setting Robin Hood at the time of Prince John's attempt to seize power from Richard I (the Lionheart) while he was away on the Third Crusade, that's the 1190s. Richard left on crusade in 1189, John took over government in 1191, Richard was taken prisoner on his way back to England and a ransom demanded in 1192, the ransom was paid (raising it and paying for the wars contributed to the high taxes) and he returned in 1194. A few months later Richard went to fight in France and never returned, dying there in 1199. Funnily enough, William de Ferrers, 4th Earl of Derby (grandfather of the above Robert de Ferrers) -- whose father died on crusade with Richard I -- did take Nottingham Castle against John's supporters in 1194 (fighting in support of Richard I) and briefly become Sheriff of Nottingham; however on John's legal accession in 1199, he supported him, because he was loyal to the Crown regardless of who wore it. He survived John and supported his son, Henry III, against the barons, and was granted castles etc to hold during Henry's minority. He was in very good standing with the Crown, not a dispossessed outlaw in rebellion against his king. There are a hundred years between John taking over the government of England in Richard I's absence and Edward I "hammering" the Scots. Any attempt to find the "actual" Robin Hood is a bit like the search for the "real" King Arthur. The earliest written accounts we have date from hundreds of years after the events they purport to tell, there are multiple "types" of the character in different sources, characters and details were added and changed in the various historical retellings. Every age has their own King Arthur and Robin Hood.

It helps to understand right from wrong yourself.

Maybe he just doesn't understand paper money.

Wholesome comment.

They look 10x better too lmao

@@sayLeotardbutsayitChinese they really do actually XD

@@sayLeotardbutsayitChinese Disparu could be a successful DJ with his masks and Director X would sh*t himself in more envy.

When Willow ended i was so sad but thankfully this piece of shit show came to save Disparu 😭

@@natecallon9755 yeah, he had a lot of hilarious things to say for every episode as always XD

What are you talking about? This show is a God sent. You know how BORING it was to TRY and watch our boy mock Gotham Knights? Thank you Canada

No worries, man! The reviews are hilarious!

It's funded by Canadian tax money. They'll prolly give him ten seasons.

@@Mereologistwhich is great for Disparu.

@@clogs4956 Which in turn is great for me.

I'm still hoping to see good representation of bisexuals :(

Its like my mum always used to say: "You're not bi, you're just greedy, and nobody likes you"

It's the same trope with gay people. The second another of the same sex is in the room thry try to have sex with it immediately. Or the gay couple trope where they are mandated to stare at the camera and exclaim that they are gay to the audience.

​@@NeoBluereaperwell, isn't it is a true? Gays do fook around far more...

It's a bit of a catch-22. The moment a character or person enters a monogamous, long-term relationship the bisexuality goes out the window by default. So that person/character has to be a free agent browsing the market to retain that identity.

Global already said no to a second season. Well there is always more drek to come.

@@JB-yb4wn sad it's the pinnacle of Canadian culture

​@@JB-yb4wnfirst Gotham Knights, now this. They be robin us of fun😕

Considering the show was funded by Canadian tax money, I imagine their government is making the sensible move to distance themselves from a public embarrassment.

@@hawkeye5955 It just angers me how much of the Canadian taxpayers money gets pissed away on utter garbage like this because this drek checks all the right social boxes. For once, I wish they would actually read the script and see whether this thing will fly.

That was Saturday mid morning viewing when I was a kid. After the Racoons, Chucklevision, TMNT and Thundercats…the good old days!

Jeez, I forgot about that ! I used to love that as a teenager. I sense memes coming !

Sir Tony Robinson also presents 'Time Team', a scientific archeological series.

@@GIBBO4182 Run with us, we've got ev'rything you need

The role reversal for that was for comedic effect where as this show is all about "educating" the audience...

Nice reference 😊

You expect too much of director X. And I’d say that’d be extremely latent character development, given that of all the crimes they’ve committed leading up to this (including bankrupting their own neighborhood through their rampant crime), _kidnapping_ was the only crime potent enough to make them even rethink their actions. That’s hardly conducive to sympathy.

I want at least 8 seasons.