Тёмный

SA-15 Gauntlet / Tor 9K330 Missile System 

galbaldy
Подписаться 553
Просмотров 538 тыс.
50% 1

The 9K331 Tor [SA-15 GAUNTLET land-based, SA-N-9 naval version] low-to-medium altitude SAM system is capable of engaging not only aircraft and helicopters but also RPVs, precision-guided weapons and various types of guided missiles. The HQ-17 is a copy of Tor-M1, that China will use it to replace the aging HQ-61 SAMs, will enter service around the year 2005. Although it is an autonomous system it can be interfaced into an integrated air defense network. SA-15b is designed to be a completely autonomous air defense system (at division level), capable of surveillance, command and control, missile launch and guidance functions from a single vehicle. The basic combat formation is the firing battery consisting of four TLARs and the Rangir battery command post. The TLAR carries eight ready missiles stored in two containers holding four missiles each. The SA-15b has the capability to automatically track and destroy 2 targets simultaneously in any weather and at any time of the day.
Effective range limits are from 1500 to 12000 m with target altitude limits being between 10 and 6000 m. The maximum maneuvering load factor limit on the weapon is 30 g.
The missile launcher consists of a box container extending down below the level of the hull top, holding two groups of four ready to fire missiles in the vertical position. Each missile is in a maintenance-free factory-sealed container-launcher box. The system is reloaded by a dedicated transportation/loader vehicle.
The 3D pulse Doppler electronically beam steered E/F-band surveillance radar provides range, azimuth, elevation and automatic threat evaluation data on up to 48 targets for the digital fire control computer processing system. Automatic track initiation can be performed on the 10 most dangerous targets, which are categorized and prioritized in order of threat for engagement. The operator reconfirms the highest priority target choice and tracks this target before firing the missile. The maximum radar range is stated as 25 kilometers, but the rapid five to eight second reaction time [including fire control target prioritization] suggests a somewhat greater range. The radar antenna, on top of the turret, is swung through 90º to the horizontal position for travel. Target radar surveillance is carried out on the move but the vehicle would normally come to a halt for missile launch.
The phased-array pulse Doppler G/H-band tracking radar is located at the front of the turret. This electronically steered radar is capable of simultaneously tracking two targets traveling at speeds of up to 700 km/h in all weather conditions, and countering threat ECM operations. The antenna assembly can be folded down for travel.
Mounted on the top left of this radar is a small vertical pointing antenna which serves to initially acquire the missile after launch before it is handed over to the main tracking/guidance system. On the lower right side of the tracking radar is an automatic TV tracking system with a range of 20000 m that complements the tracking radar and enables the system to operate in a heavy ECM environment.
The Tor is not amphibious although it is airportable. An NBC system is fitted as standard as is a built-in training system. The chassis of the vehicle is almost identical to that used for the 2S6 self-propelled hybrid air defense system and is based on the GM-569 tracked vehicle. The three man crew consists of the vehicle commander, system operator and vehicle driver, seated at the front of the vehicle with the large box-like unmanned turret in the center and the engine compartment at the rear. This arrangement is similar to that of the Kub (SA-6) and Shilka (ZSU-23-4) vehicles. The vehicle suspension consists of six dual rubber tired roadwheels with the idler at the front, drive sprocket at the rear and three return rollers.
An auxiliary gas turbine powers a 75 kW generator, allowing the main diesel engine to be shut down when the system is deployed to conserve fuel.

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

9 сен 2006

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 244   
@Jeffsterren
@Jeffsterren 16 лет назад
You don't have to be a missile expert to know that branches attached to a flying object destabilizes it's flight.
@Globalizator1
@Globalizator1 15 лет назад
They were horrible monsters but not crazy.Very pragmatic and artful.
@wotan20
@wotan20 17 лет назад
-Cont.- (I know it's hard to believe that too.) The advice we got, that in those areas not to stop at the stop signs, just slow down and be ready to bolt, if we feel threatened. The examples, are endless and all heartwrenching. And I don't speak yesterday, but all the way back to the early 90's, when the living was still thought to be easy.
@straywolf77
@straywolf77 16 лет назад
That's a pretty impressive system. From what I understand, it can also engage Maverick missiles as well as other precision-guided munitions. US has nothing compared to this.
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
yeah they do?
@sturmgeschutze3070
@sturmgeschutze3070 Год назад
@@tobilikebacon Now, maybe, but remember this is a system from the 70s and 80s
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
@@sturmgeschutze3070 its from the late 80’s to 90’s and during that time the u’s had systems such as: MIM-72 a self propelled anti Air missile carrier M6 a bradley with stinger anti Air missiles Patriot missile defense system Even since 1960 America has had similar weapons such as the Hawk anti Air missile.
@sturmgeschutze3070
@sturmgeschutze3070 Год назад
@@tobilikebacon The SA-15 isn’t a short range SAM, it’s more along the lines of a point defense system. The intention is to be able to not only shoot down planes, but missiles and sometimes bombs. There was no American equivalent at the time as much as I would love to say otherwise
@kbiltsetskhlashvili
@kbiltsetskhlashvili 14 лет назад
Tor-M1 is the one of the best system in the world!
@akr06
@akr06 17 лет назад
Knowledge is everywhere, it ain't only the Americans who can possess high-tech weaponry.
@SiliconBong
@SiliconBong 16 лет назад
At 5:22 thereabouts you can see something dropping out of the vechile, between the treads, on the left of the screen;; do these things have onboard 'lavatories'?
@ICBMHeadshot
@ICBMHeadshot 16 лет назад
those sam missiles are fast.
@Highstar25
@Highstar25 16 лет назад
Hot damn! scary how those missiles move, they're like fish
@sweetooth1967
@sweetooth1967 16 лет назад
good video looks deadly!!
@cooks2006
@cooks2006 16 лет назад
Very impressive system
@Bobbyo60
@Bobbyo60 16 лет назад
An opinion is something that you are very entitled to, and yes, some things are worth fighting for, but I've come to realize, every time I look at my grandchildren, that we'd better be very careful on the fight we pick. I want them to have the hope of growing old, but I'm afraid that hope is just a hope.
@q9tzb6wk
@q9tzb6wk 17 лет назад
hey they look so futuristic like mission to mars and intergalactic wars
@NorincoPolytech
@NorincoPolytech 17 лет назад
yeah the exhaust does spin
@lashatotladze
@lashatotladze 12 лет назад
you are right, georgians are solidar to polish people... we have one enemy and problem, and we are with you!
@SiliconBong
@SiliconBong 16 лет назад
I think I read about the SR-71 in the Readers Digest of National Geographic or something magazine like that in the eighties. Then they brought out all tv programs on displaying the 'cutting edge' of military technology in the early to mid- nineties. [When was 'Broken Arrow' released does anyone know? - there were a whole swathe of movies using the 'supersonic spyplane' as a main plot device for a short while]
@Jeffsterren
@Jeffsterren 16 лет назад
lol the branches attached to those SCUD Missile Launchers will only destabilize it in it's flight :)
@arikat1
@arikat1 16 лет назад
3:30 good action!
@RAVENSTAR1973
@RAVENSTAR1973 16 лет назад
The Phalanx, its mounted in naval ships, and one land based version. Its demominated a CIWS weapon for ultimate defense system.
@trulynot
@trulynot 15 лет назад
Yeah, good question.
@augdog2
@augdog2 16 лет назад
With a vertical launch system like that, why does it need to turret?
@h4tefury85
@h4tefury85 17 лет назад
Hrmpf ! well..im no space engineer so u might be right about those systems.Butt still how many flights did the Boran do ? 1-2 ?
@bestamerica
@bestamerica 16 лет назад
what country to make it this SA-15 Gauntlet
@Bobbyo60
@Bobbyo60 16 лет назад
Well, the bmp3 was just coming on line in the late 80's at the end of my military career, but let see. I would have to call the bmp a light tank that happens to carry a few troops. With a 100mm rifled cannon/ rocket launcher and a 30 mm cannon, as well as 2 7.62 machine guns, the bmp is much more heavly armed than the bradley. The also addressed the troop squeeze by giving it a higher proflile than the bmp 1or2.
@bitrex
@bitrex 16 лет назад
The US deployed an anti-ballistic missile system comparable to the Soviet Galosh/Gazelle system ringing Moscow in the same period during the early 1970s - it was decommissioned after the US entered the ABM treaty with the Soviet Union. Though up to 2 ABM sites were allowed under the provisions of the treaty, US military strategists came to the conclusion that ABM systems in general were destabilizing to nuclear
@frankyspeaker
@frankyspeaker 17 лет назад
azbadgahad, 1)The S-400 can see stealth from above because it uses the stratosphere to deflect its radar beams down. Every stealth aircraft is EASILY seen from above because the earth is in the aircrafts background this way!
@Nizzemancer
@Nizzemancer 16 лет назад
will do
@S300V
@S300V 16 лет назад
I agree! But there is a need to cover the system from high altitude attackers! So S300PMU1/2 or S400 is needed nex to it!
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Yes. Perhaps even BILLIONS.
@Icarusdecending82
@Icarusdecending82 16 лет назад
I think by saying "battle out in the open" he was simply implying a conventional war. Airstrikes are certainly not cowardly...its simply smarter.
@randomusernamemygod
@randomusernamemygod 16 лет назад
Yes, but the problem is on most occasions you wont know if they are there. Plus you will have to strike a target at one point or another. Only thing you can do is if the AAM or AAA depending on older systems make a mistake and show up for SEAD aircraft.
@the9thpuppy
@the9thpuppy 13 лет назад
The Tor and the Patriot are two different kinds of air defense systems. Tor is tactical short range ~12km, Patriot is medium range 70+ for PAC-2. They don't compare to each other. Also, Patriot kills TBMs. The Tor does not do this. The S300 reportedly does, and I am sure it is a very capable system, but this arrived years after the Patriot. If anything, the copying went the other way, as this is a normal thing to do.
@thunderbedford
@thunderbedford 15 лет назад
what's the name of the machine in the begining
@paulvonk1421
@paulvonk1421 4 года назад
Thats it the missle from Iran who killed 176 people as retaliation.
@ShArpSh0t
@ShArpSh0t 4 года назад
Most likely operator failure "oh look IFF says it's not a friendly, must be a US fighter, kill it"
@hoangtvu
@hoangtvu 16 лет назад
I still cant understand how the missile can chase the plane. Because the plane is also running fast too or be shift up and down... I don't get it how is that working>
@t43562
@t43562 17 лет назад
Lots of Russian helicopters have been shot down by Afghanis. The most famous Russian contribution to world culture is the AK-47. I am from Africa and all the death and suffering there - you guys helped it to happen. Hope you are all proud.
@Abanamat85
@Abanamat85 15 лет назад
Shilka? SA-2? OSA?
@hellstone77
@hellstone77 17 лет назад
Its a cool piece of armament. But I think counter measures are in place.
@locolopelocolope
@locolopelocolope 16 лет назад
It would be nice to add a translation or captions
@frankyspeaker
@frankyspeaker 17 лет назад
LittleDevil0071,azbadgahad, This is great! Americans that are objective and critical about their Government! Good job! Many Americans deny when it's about American wrongdoings and only brag about America. Keep your minds open!
@matrixmsi
@matrixmsi 15 лет назад
please can i ask you for subtitles English please THanks you
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Yeah, I'd like to know more about this. It looks very interesting. w/e. I'll look it up on Wikipedia. Hopefully, their summary is somewhat accurate.
@hard_lighter
@hard_lighter 17 лет назад
You`re right! But if you seek peace how did you get to this video? Nice video anyway.
@Dhextter
@Dhextter 16 лет назад
Nice at 1:03, my car has the same acceleration.
@Hartzi4Ever
@Hartzi4Ever 17 лет назад
Amen
@SiliconBong
@SiliconBong 16 лет назад
Probably, still I was thinking the crew might have made a few 'modifications' to enhance their onroad experiance. Maybe that guy at 1:52 has the 'hotseat'. P.S. do you notice at 2:20 the vid speeds up for a few seconds?
@SiliconBong
@SiliconBong 17 лет назад
Is that true? i've never been to america, but a mate of mine who had said every third person you meet over there didn't have a home.
@SAMTOMAS
@SAMTOMAS 16 лет назад
that can kick the F-16 and apche's ass from the sky lol
@vaninec
@vaninec 16 лет назад
for sure reason for it
@wotan20
@wotan20 17 лет назад
BS Broco2002. Even the Americans admit that their Raptors give out radar signature. Small radar signature like a larger bird, but still. On improved radar system the plane can be clearly seen. So all the US has done is made a super plane for the price of 5 competent planes, which is still vulnerable.
@buchnermarkus
@buchnermarkus 16 лет назад
looks like it they have launched the missile with the camouflage net on. LOL.
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Yeah, I know they found a way to track the F-117, but the stealth technology on that plane was different. It relied primarily on the shape of the plane, as well as the radar absorbant paint to remain undetected. New stealth is different. Unfortunately, I'm sure these systems will be tested soon enough. We'll see.
@bitrex
@bitrex 16 лет назад
Hit the wrong button, oops. Anyhow, strategists came to the belief that ABM systems were destabilizing to nuclear "game theory" and increased the chance of a spiraling arms race. My point is that the reason the US has not had an ABM system for 30 odd years was entirely political and strategic; not due to any technological inability. I assume that the former Soviet Union chose to build only one ABM site for similar reasons.
@jonathanalexand
@jonathanalexand 17 лет назад
Excellent Video! I wish that I understood Russian.
@derublicheverdachtige8950
@derublicheverdachtige8950 6 лет назад
why do not the usa develop leathal weapon systems like the sa15 or 2k22
@Nizzemancer
@Nizzemancer 16 лет назад
All I'm saying is that they wouldn't risk any aircraft when the area is full of AAA without taking out most, if not all of the sites first, the US are terrified of the idea that they could lose planes and will go to great lenghts to keep them in the air.
@tjakal
@tjakal 16 лет назад
because of the tracking radar on the front of the turret.
@Nizzemancer
@Nizzemancer 16 лет назад
Acctually the americans have a system that intercepts missiles and artillery using a radar and a Gattlinggun, I recently saw a clip of it here on youtube.
@jokinaroun100
@jokinaroun100 17 лет назад
look at this actual, footage that they are gearing up for war
@bittemeinrammstein
@bittemeinrammstein 17 лет назад
they have high alttitude defence covered now as well the russians are working on a whole neu generration of military equipment
@Csp499
@Csp499 17 лет назад
Just like we are?
@Csp499
@Csp499 17 лет назад
... Why'd you reply to ME with that? Why not him?
@31415916
@31415916 17 лет назад
Thats one of the ways of getting some bucks;)
@t43562
@t43562 17 лет назад
Fair enough. Fighting the cold war through proxies in Africa was also a problem but there are many people to blame for that.
@Amid87
@Amid87 16 лет назад
uhmm...actually, the missile defense shield is already up and running in parts of Europe...
@wotan20
@wotan20 17 лет назад
Oh hell, SiliconBong. Soon as we crossed the border at Buffalo NY, potholes on the street starting 10 feet from the line, like you couldn't believe it. At other time we actually drove through Detroit. I'm not sure if you believe me, but whole districts reminded me of document footages of bombed-out Berlin, right after the war. I dont making it up! -Cont.-
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Well, it's complicated, but I'd actually say raisins are my true arch enemy. I just....hate them so much.
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Ok, now that's just ridiculous.
@Ruotus
@Ruotus 15 лет назад
Poland will never forget and forgive what russia done our land, we never before "stick together" and we never will ! Because history still come back like a bumerang ! Russia will never change !
@visker81
@visker81 13 лет назад
Question to my Russian friends. How much do the Tor / tunguska / pantsir systems differ? all 3 seems to be about short / medium range rockets , So i dont know if some are simply better, or if they have a different purpose. thanks.
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
i think they are made for the same purpose some are just newer
@visker81
@visker81 Год назад
@@tobilikebacon thanks!
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
@@visker81 no way you just answered 11 years later 😂
@visker81
@visker81 Год назад
@@tobilikebacon was keeping this video open in a seperate tab for 11 years checking every hour if someone answered.
@onren
@onren 16 лет назад
around 25 mil. US dollars :)
@lacollll
@lacollll 16 лет назад
sell some to serbia .. we want it :)
@utehchan
@utehchan 17 лет назад
Just another testament of Russian Military ingenuity.
@wastedxlife21
@wastedxlife21 17 лет назад
hey pumak7500.. research american Raptor jets, each different one for each different branch of the military. supposedly, any target will be obliterated while you see only a glimpse of the plane because of its speed, and because its virtually invisible to radar.. enjoy : )
@fantasycm
@fantasycm 15 лет назад
q chidos carritos xD
@geod5
@geod5 15 лет назад
i heard about that
@frankyspeaker
@frankyspeaker 17 лет назад
azbadgahad, 2)This is the way the S-400 works: Tiny particles in the atmosphere deflect radiation in different directions. It's called scattering. The S-400 radar uses these particals to deflect it's radar beam down towards earth. Making the Stealth aircraft signature bounce of the earth. Wich makes it visible.
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
When you wrote this comment it would still be another 9 years untill the f-35 entered service.
@supersetan2008
@supersetan2008 15 лет назад
a shilka. great.
@h4tefury85
@h4tefury85 17 лет назад
You know why it had to be able to land automaticly ?.First of all,Your country cant afford to have cosmonauts.and second that copy has only been to space ONE time (I might be wrong on that one)
@tunkki321
@tunkki321 16 лет назад
I must brush up my russian :) Not too many words understood :)
@phhph
@phhph 17 лет назад
Hi Guys! Have you seen the documentary film "Dance with Death" about Soviet SA-2 missile system against US air force in Vietnam? That's awesome. Someone says it's Shit but according to the US pilots who involved in 7-8 years air war in Vietnam, it's scary and deadly. So, please respect Russian air defense technologies.
@blast2003
@blast2003 17 лет назад
It could be great is someone add subtittles to all these videos....most ppl dont speak russian.
@KaminStalker
@KaminStalker 16 лет назад
wtf are they talking about ;( i don t understand them
@SHUKVI
@SHUKVI 15 лет назад
mogijvi torshi!
@Bobbyo60
@Bobbyo60 16 лет назад
The Bradley isn't my favorite piece of equiptment, although the upgrades of reactive armour and powerplant have made it better. It has a good combat record, does the BMP?? If we were comparing apple to apples, I'd say the BMP is a better vehicle, but I'd watch that French sighting system..LOl Furthermore, I'm old enough to be your Grandfather, and have more experince in this world than you. I've been in two wars, as a line officer in Viet-Nam, and the first Gulf war in intell.
@XwendigoX
@XwendigoX 16 лет назад
OO a vertical sam launcher on a land based system...never seen that before... the russians are always good for a surprise xD 5*
@SAMTOMAS
@SAMTOMAS 16 лет назад
1950s ? lol it went in service in 1979
@Primorsky
@Primorsky 16 лет назад
It is immigrants who left Russia during 1990's (very hard time). Many of them not from Russia, but from former Soviet Union respublics. They can speak Russian, but they really not Russians.
@h4tefury85
@h4tefury85 17 лет назад
Millions ?
@tegenoor
@tegenoor 13 лет назад
@PfhUkJiu101 let's talk about Vietnam, Korea, IraQ etc etc
@forphuksake
@forphuksake 16 лет назад
i know my father was there. australians were fighting under american/brithish orders
@h4tefury85
@h4tefury85 17 лет назад
Yeah...Im sorry =(
@drbrunch
@drbrunch 16 лет назад
Pretty rad system, although Israeli Air Force pwned Syria's TOR defenses by hacking their radar systems...TOR operators didn't even know the non-stealth jets were there until after the target went bye-bye. Still a rad system tho.
@grey2fox
@grey2fox 15 лет назад
Where's Tanya! and where the hell are my Prism tanks!! noooooooooooo!!
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
I wonder if this thing would detect an F-22.
@tobilikebacon
@tobilikebacon Год назад
Very close range, yes.
@frankyspeaker
@frankyspeaker 17 лет назад
azbadgahad, Stealth isn't a waste because it has a huge advantage against non stealth aircraft and is extremely effective in less modern environments. But over Russia stealth is in real trouble. Lacking stealth is the reason why Russia leads the world in air defence systems.
@azbadgahad
@azbadgahad 17 лет назад
Well, they'll ruin a completely good batch of cookies, for one. Also, they give me the shits. If someone I knew personally had ruined a batch of cookies, and gave me diarrhea, wouldn't I have a pretty good reason to hate them? So, yes...raisins.
@darthwehmann
@darthwehmann 15 лет назад
The major fault is that the Gauntlet cannot go to the frontline, he doen't have any gun to self defend against a single soldier with a panzerfaust3/RPG29/LAW!
@JackPLflashpoint
@JackPLflashpoint 15 лет назад
think, the most effective russian weapon on close range anti-air deffence is tunguska. That's only my opinion
@Icarusdecending82
@Icarusdecending82 16 лет назад
Thats right im American. What comment do you have a problem with? If you have a problem do try and bring a logical arguement with your next comment please.
Далее
air defense ZSU-23 Shilka Tunguska
5:55
Просмотров 240 тыс.
SA-12 S-300V Gladiator MIssile
6:34
Просмотров 160 тыс.
Я КУПИЛ САМЫЙ МОЩНЫЙ МОТОЦИКЛ!
59:15
M777 vs 2a65 | excalibur vs krsnopol
15:06
Просмотров 2,4 млн
TOR-M1 9A331 SA-15 Gauntlet surface-to-air missile
6:15
KASHTAN-M anti-aircraft anti-missile system
4:40
Просмотров 730 тыс.
SS-21 SCARAB 9K79 Tochka FROG-7 Luna
6:11
Просмотров 269 тыс.
Tor-2M - Russian assassin of Bayraktars
1:00
Просмотров 17 тыс.
Tor-М2 short-range SAM system
3:55
Просмотров 195 тыс.
Modern Wood Rifle / Woox Furiosa Ultra
0:30
Просмотров 8 млн
Похороны #мототаня
0:14
Просмотров 1,4 млн
гороховый СУП
0:57
Просмотров 1,6 млн