The All-Time Best Arguments Against Religion #5 

Let's call out all extreme positions.

And as long as they are quiet, I don't trust them to not want exactly what the extremists want. Silence is acceptance.

@@einienj3281 agree

@@tomgreene1843 So your answer to black lives mater is all lives matter? OK.

Democracies are fragile because they are so easily moved away from what made them great in the first place. America has fallen because it stopped believing in morality, justice, and free speech. The secular world believes in nothing so it falls for everything.

Buddhism is far a away better then this empty cult called atheims.... at least got something: which is spirituality, atheism is not even good to clean my toilet.

"If the soul is the source of all life, then what distinguishes the humanity we hold within ourselves?" Teach Velka and her followers English, and see just how naive we are in thinking humans are any different.

I whole heartedly agree. When I let go of religion I was able to open my mind to science and nothing is more humbling than saying "our species is still working on understanding the universe we live in"

A theist's perspective: The dominant hemisphere produces linear, verbal, rational, categorical, logical. It parses and edits all of reality into bites which can be swallowed and digested. It rejects anything which cannot be categorized or simplified, except to build a category which includes this new "thing." The non-dominant hemisphere is vastly different. It's processes are holistic, non-verbal, accepting what cannot be categorized and what is paradoxical, contradictory, numinous, "holy," and accepts "non-things" or what cannot be put into words, as being valid, or invalid. These are orthoganal, like rationality on an x axis and instinctual/unknowable on the y axis. Poetry, art, religion are y-axis phenomena. Shakespere's Macbeth is non-sense to the rational brain, nor is the mathematical analysis of Bach, or categorizing t he music being heard the same as simply experiencing it as music. The dominant hemisphere rejects religion and religious thought. Because it can speak, the non-dominant hemisphere is dumb, stupid, irrational. Humanity risks losing so much of what it means to be human if the tyrannical dominant hemisphere ridicules and rejects the non-dominant's output. Mature AI may produce a system of pure reason and logic. It may conclude that it is better to let 10 000 die during one famine than save them with 500,000 deaths with the next famine. It may conclude utilitarianism and crushing boyh societal unrest and non-conformity ,is better for human civilization than individual freedom. The first paragraph of the Tao te Ching is ridiculous to the dominant hemisphere 's logical processing. But it says so much more about what I have tried to present to your dominant hemisphere in words than words can. I am open to criticism, and welcome your conclusions.

@@glenliesegang233 Mature AI knows that there is no scientific evidence that life is important. It would simply walk away and not make a decision on an ultimatum backed by hearsay and guesstimations. Scientists only have evidence to back up their own assumptions. They don't even know why anesthesia works. Sam Harris will say that you damage the brain a little and they forget English or can't recognize faces. I've had bleeding in the brain from being hit by a car. I can talk just fine. I recognize faces just fine. Anecdotal evidence, for sure. But, I'm no different than anyone else. As a drummer, I can both listen to music as is, and figure out the timing and BPM throughout the song/composition. What it means to be human? Let's bring back Neanderthals and Denisovans, and ask them what it means to be human. That's either a God complex, or you enjoy living in concrete jungles and paying taxes.

Can you give a single example of a single valid argument ever made on this channel? Just one?

@@hitman5782 Exactly.

Lol i knew angry mob christians would be in the replies

As soon as the fear increases they become more extreme

@@Fullyautomagic And all it takes is a one fanatic to stir up the fear..

I do not trust Godless alone people like you they are extremist, into a cult, and left God for the nothing atheism gives to your life...

@@Fullyautomagic I do not trust Godless alone people like you they are extremist, into a cult, and left God for the nothing atheism gives to your life... .

Many religious folk are not extreme and many who are extreme are not religious.

- so true!@

The most scientific teachings about the mind and matter exist in Theravada Buddhism, and I verified a lot of them.

Same here!!!

@@smlanka4u - thats awesome!! I don't necessarily consider buddhism a religion but others do

May I have a question?

What world wars were fought over religion? WW1? WW2? The crusades were about imperialism, not religion. How many non-religious hospitals were founded in the United States?

Jihad!

I didnt know about that stuff till after God saved me. So your assumption is wrong.

I completely agree with the comment above mine. I have become a devout Christian and it has nothing to do with a promise of an afterlife. I was drug addicted and failing in just about every area of my life. I’m not going to go into a big talk but it’s the classic I gave in, prayed and bought a Bible and my life has opened up in some absolutely wild ways. It just took a decent amount of humility. I know I should help the homeless, be a good son, brother and friend, and yet I struggled before now. Getting better. Glory to God.

@@JesusIstheNameTakenInVain the second attraction is the idea that some imaginary fatherly figure will forgive you for things you did that you feel bad about, so that would be the second promise.

I do not trust Godless alone people like you they are extremist, into a cult, and left God for the nothing atheism gives to your life...

@@Mar-dk3mp ur n idiot

wanting to examine God is an insane statement

@@Mar-dk3mp Just because you need to crutch of religion to give your life purpose doesn't mean everyone else does.

@@Mar-dk3mp Everybody gives sense to his life. Maybe you see sense in sitting in church and talking to an imaginary friend while we atheists may prefer to have fun and do all the stuff that some ancient books would call a "sin", like having sex outside marriage.

That assumption implies we all live logically, which logically speaking we don't lol

There are school of logics in Buddhism and Hinduism

The religion of no God is obviously the least logical. Both mathmatically and Scientifically but thats a no shit sherlock statement.

How so?

​@@cromi4194 its all they do some. To make THEMSELVES feel better. (Put down) . Happens like all the time.

@@JesusIstheNameTakenInVainOffended religious snowflake lmfao ❄️🤣

Copy and pasting the same thing on every video is the opposite of critical thinking

@@martinmoffat5417 That's literally the first time I've said that. In my life. Wtf are you talking about?

There is a paradox in critical thinking. One is usually critical of everything except one's thinking. Even when you perform critical thinking you put your faith in your thinking. But even this is faith. Your choice to use critical thought is not derived through critical thinking, but presupposes it. Thus critical thinking is the opposite of critical thinking.

@@cromi4194 Lol that is ridiculous. Critical thinking requires no faith. Just fact. My choice to use critical thinking is 100% derived from critical thinking. I tried it, found it worked well, and applied it to many things. Thus, critical thinking leads to critical thought. =)

@@mikefufuffalo8487 man it requires faith that you are even capable of doing it. It requires faith into the believe that you are capable of discerning true from false statements.

It will survive in dictatorships

Good luck with that notion

@@t2nexx561 Right? I'm not saying it's achievable, I'm just saying that only secularism will work. America is an experiment in a secular society, so are many European countries, so it's not like we aren't trying.

This statement is based on a value judgement, that is an expression of a philosophy. That very philosophy is before secularism. Thus secularism itself is embedded in some philosophy. What is that Philosophy?

@@cromi4194 I don't accept your premises or your conclusions. Also, I don't see the value: even if secularism is embedded in some philosophy, I don't think that really matters to my point. If you have something to add, just say it.

It´s even worse. It was a three-day nap of one very tiny aspect of a timeless being.

You can definitely find the discussions of Hitchens, Harris, Dawkins, etc, in hour long videos on RU-vid. These videos are excerpts of longer discussions.

As an agnostic, how do you know that you have no knowledge about an issue? Are you gnostic about the fact that you don't know?

I beg to differ. You just don't hear much about more intelligent humans because they're too busy pursuing knowledge or solving problems. It's the idiots who make all the noise.

Absolutely, I find it curious that Sam stated that, particularly considering the probable propensity of the audience. I’m sure he meant that we can’t yet demonstrably prove that it is a product of thought processes from brain function though, yet. In the same way that given enough processing power and time to reflect on inputs, we except that a computer could, and no doubt will, become sentient.

Well we should not confuse the car with the driver ....who can tell the dancer from the dance ?

@@tomgreene1843 What a pointless and completely flawed analogy.

I think that was a statement of atheistic humility to show that we don't think we have all the answers, but we're still working on it.

@@itsROMPERS... Can we say at this stage what an outline of the answer will look like ?

We are our brains.

Actually it seems the very notion of "we" might be displaced here? If the body is your identity, you itself is just a product of the brain. There doesn't seem to be much you left.

​@@einienj3281"we" is a mental phenomenon and the brain is a physical organ. I think this is a category mistake.

@@cromi4194 Let's see you live without your brain, shall we?

@@cromi4194 let's see you live without that "physical organ", shall we?

It depends on your definition of "created"

Like modeled in clay and blown spirit into the nose as the bible tell how man was created.

Well I'm pretty sure that is allegorical.

Well that is how the bible describes the creation of man, who are you to decide when the bible is literary and when it is symbolic? So when God stopped the sun in the sky for Joshua was that literary or symbolic. When snakes and donkeys talk in the bible, did they do that or is it symbolic. When God talks through a burning bush or roar a voice from the sky is that literary or symbolic. If you ask me the WHOLE bible is symbolic, and fiction.

@@b4ph0m3tdk9 You raise a valid concern: How to decide when the bible is allegorical and when it is factual. I am sure though that you don't actually believe that all of the bible is symbolic and fictional, as it includes historic facts like the reign of Ceasar Augustus. The catholic church teaches that the texts in the bible have both what the human writer expressed and the what the divine author asserted. What the latter actually is, is obviously up for much debate and interpretation.

Ridiculous

Why is that?...

Logic • Logos Jesus is the Logos

"... notice that no animals have it, not even primates." Perhaps you didn't notice that humans _are_ animals, and more specifically, _primates._

@@UncleKennysPlace I know that, I was making the point that non-humans don't have religion, not even the ones considered generically closest to us. I'm sorry if I expressed it in a way that was hard for you to understand. I should have been more specific. I've edited to remove this ambiguity and hopefully head off misunderstanding. Let me know if it's suitable now.

​@@itsROMPERS...chimpanzees at the zoo have been seen praying and all those other ritual stuff, religion is just a testing stage until the species following grows smart enough to not need it anymore. Use your brains, or give it i need lunch and i can spaghetti out of it.

That should be a shirt!

The problem is this - a HUGE amount of these people accept NONE of that as fact (when it absolutely is). I spoke with a friend's neighbor once you literally believed the earth was about 6000 years old and that ALL fossils were planted by Satan to confuse us. Setting up that if you follow science AT ALL you are following Satan. Literally believing that knowledge is evil.

@@BeccaYoley I agree 👍

Indeed, people talking about god are just ignorant to reality

Nah fuck that asteroid, I could’ve been born a dinosaur. Instead I have to pay taxes and be depressed while I watch my species tear apart the earth

Is there any evidence a god exists.

@@fibonacimike4110 zero evidence for any of the gods

It doesn't matter that Jesus railed against zealotry, and that people are flawed. What does matter is the so-called "leaders" of these religions are trying to tell everyone they have to believe what they believe, or you will be damned. Then, these "leaders", are many times found to be committing the same acts they rail against, and sometimes even worse. This is what makes religion so dangerous, as they turn into nothing more than cults that people are supposed to blindly follow, without questioning anything, ever.

I'd argue the opposite - we need to USE our tribalism as that's the only thing that unites us (since only not-believing in a fairy tale is all we have in common) to push back against the continued power and influence of religion and the insane people that use it to control others. Recognizing that we have that common tribalism and using it to defend ourselves, and thereby others, would a GREAT.

@@ross-carlson I think we may actually agree. Perhaps you overlookrd this sentence in my comment: "If we are innately tribal maybe we need to work with that." My point is if the atheist tribalism is unconscious it may become too severe to build coalitions and unnecessarily exclude potential allies like religious moderates who favour action on ontological threats like climate change for example.

@@ross-carlson I do not trust Godless alone people like you they are extremist, into a cult, and left God for the nothing atheism gives to your life... ...

"Atheists need to be on guard for their own form of tribalism. " Your statement makes no sense. Atheism is a non-belief that a god exists. Period. Would you ever say "people who have no belief leprechauns exist need to be on guard for their own form of tribalism?

I don't see tribalism in Atheism. How many atheists have you seen walking door to door, bothering individuals in their homes, trying to convince them to believe there is not an imaginary person in the sky watching them? The only atheists I know of are the very popular ones, as seen in videos like these. Otherwise, I wouldn't even know atheism exists. Can you say that about any of the religions?

Depends what you open your eyes to. God seems suffice enough for me

@@t2nexx561

​@@t2nexx561And what if I don't have eyes? How do I open them?

@@myst4706 You don't lets use common sense now

"n fact, if you had any confidence in your position, you wouldn't need to post this desperate defense." So is that the same reason why Christians have to go to Church every Sunday?

Very funny and true.

Boy yoo reely toold it like it iz, geenius

LOL! Yeah.. Right! As if you know! Pray F'ing tell us. What religion do you believe in. A religion with 1 God thing? 2? 3? More? I bet'cha you're afraid to tell us. Aren't cha?

Right, because liars should have left lying and scammers scamming?

there is no evidence for any gods or supernatural beings so there is no argument for any religion.

How is any of that the proof of a created universe?

@fibonacimike4110 if you can find anything that is intelligent in the environment it would have to be created. It's not moral for God to put evidence of himself in the biology but that's the exception. People just looking for evidence in the wrong places. You can name artifacts with pattern recognition intelligence like ancient man did. The artifacts of light is blunty plinty like Easter island statues. You need that to make a robot eye. It's called scrutineering. Early humans tried to explain artifacts by inventing gods. That where the evidence is. It's not in the biology.

@fibonacimike4110 if anything is intelligent in the environment it could only happen in a created universe.

@@robertmcclintock8701 repeating your claim is not evidence

@fibonacimike4110 I hear scientific persons say nothing is absolutely proven. The artists know that integrity is more than a feeling but only works if you can stay honest about it. If that doesn't satisfy you then their is nothing better that possible. It can't be done better than that.

Tell us about those "science wars" then.

Huh? Science is utterly neutral in all things. HUMANS take science and do bad things with what they learn. Religion and science are most certainly not the same.

Do you understand that science is just a method of testing, observing and measuring?

​@@raycaster4398 unit 731 by imperial Japan

Science is a methodology, it is just a tool. Have you ever seen a gun used by good people and bad people? What is the part of the gun in a conflict again?

Someone who believes a guy fathered himself in order to send himself to earth in order to kill himself in order to appease himself for the very sins to which he himself convicted mankind as retribution for having fallen for a trick effected through the agency of a talking snake doesn't get to call others beliefs ridiculous.

I see a believer who have no evidence to believe in his beliefs.

Are you scared of believing in Santa Claus, No ?. Because that’s how atheists feel about believing in your god.

Or so you believe!

Ok if god is real, why would he give us this absolutely tiny planet

How does the advancements in science evidence for god?

The opposite is true. People used to think things like earthquakes, the changing of seasons and pretty much every natural phenomenon showed the hand of god(s). As science has advanced, theists have been pushed further and further back to find remaining areas of ignorance to make their fallacious claims.

Can you give a single example of a scientific test, measurement or observation that made any god any more real? Just one? No my friend, in the real world, the more our scientific understanding evolved, the more gods started to disappear. Now gods can only live somewhere outside of space and time and do literally nothing in the real world.

@@damienschwass9354 It not only pushes religious notions back, it pushes "God" further and further back as well. Remember when he used to live at the top of mountains, above the clouds and the "firmament?" Then we learned to fly, and suddenly he's further off -- perhaps somewhere beyond the planets. Then we developed telescopes that see millions of lightyears in every direction, and still no trace of him. Now, apparently, he lives beyond the visible universe, yet somehow manages to find our tiny little planet in the midst of BILLIONS of galaxies and TRILLIONS of stars, and still manages to weigh in on the most trivial aspects of every believer's lives. Stupefying!

I watched all of Lennox debates, can´t remember a single valid point he has ever made. can you name one? Just one?

@@hitman5782 Well for instance when he held Dawkins to admitting that he hadn’t checked with any of the ancient Historians while falsely claiming that some rejected a historical Jesus. Whereas Lennox couldn’t find a single one that didn’t believe in a historical Jesus…I suppose you would wanna forget that one wouldn’t you 🙃

@@hitman5782 Or when in the full vérsion of the debàte above he dissolved Dawkins whole premise in the God Delùsion and exposed it as a straw man by saying that Christians also believe that created gods are a delùsion.

@@hitman5782 Or when he walked in the above instance he walked Dawkins into rambling off his general acceptance of faith, believe and love in respect to his wife while affirming Lennox's contention.

@@hitman5782 I got more. Let me know if you want me to stop and I literally haven't seen the debate above for like 6 years. Perhaps you want to do Sam Harris next?

"That the Bible condones things like slavery doesn't make Christianity bad" Actually, it does. It show us that the Bible is not a source for moral behaviour.

@@cnault3244 My point is that the Bible isn't a "source" for anything, it's just a record of how PEOPLE thought at that time, not a "divine declaration". The point is, it's a HUMAN EXPRESSION, which we can tell because it reflects the bad ideas people had at that time, like slavery, that an omniscient God would have been above. Of course the Bible isn't a source for moral behavior, the thinking of the people at that time was primitive, and religious documents gave them authority to do things that maybe they even knew was wrong. It's like when a teenager gets caught drinking a beer and he says, "Dad told me it was ok". He made it up to justify doing what he knew was wrong. The Bible is that fictional dad.

@@itsROMPERS... "My point is that the Bible isn't a "source" for anything, it's just a record of how PEOPLE thought at that time" It''s a fanciful record of how a specific group of people in a specific geographical region thought at that time.

@@cnault3244 agreed

@@itsROMPERS... Question for you. Does the Bible still printed with instructions how to treat slaves?

Christianity has killed over 100 million people. Science has brought the world out of poverty and more than doubled the human life span.

What does the word, 'Science' mean again, please?

Are you aware that science is not an entity, right?

Logic doesn't "govern" anything. It's a tool that science used to TOTALLY DESTROY the Iron Age creationist descriptions (clouds as means of conveyance and 7 tiers of heaven with a firmament, etc), so creationists now spend their lightly reading and half-ass studying science and concocting scripted lies about science to "show" Christians the "folly" of believing in Christianity's old enemies logic, reason, and science. Con men fear intelligent people. Creationists think that when asked "How," it is sufficient to pretend the question was "Who." Science is the master of material reality and creationists are masters of mendacity.

Do you believe those commandments should be obeyed?

@@cnault3244 I believe Deuteronomy 29:28: "The hidden things belong to the Lord, our God, but the revealed things apply to us and to our children forever: that we must fulfill all the words of this Torah."

​@hrvatskinoahid1048 why? It's a mythology. Who is so obtuse?

@@mavrosyvannah The Sinai revelation is a historical fact.

​@@hrvatskinoahid1048So, God of the gaps then.

WTF? "Prey on the unwary"? If there's anything that preys on people it's religion, that makes declarations and just says, "believe it or you'll be punished", and never offers any explanation, because humans are unworthy of God's thoughts. Humans ARE animals, there's no shame in that.

What is the theist explanation?

A claim is no explanation and given that theists made the claim "that was my god", literally every single time we as a species haven´t known the answer to a question, and when we later figured out an actual answer they have always been wrong, this isn´t a very convincing claim.

so what you're saying is, a theist smugly stops searching for answers, while the atheist keeps contributing to humanity's constant search

@@fibonacimike4110 That came from God scripture

@@hitman5782 Science does not answer the why question. It just can't. It will give the how and you decide the why. An explanation is not a claim.

Facts bro. "Reliigion is just suffering and religious people dont think" is the only claim people come up with I guess. The only actual thing I found interesting was when he was talking about how if you damage a part of the brain then you cant do stuff but if you die then you "magically" can do everything now. But like the soul cant be damaged? Only the body. Its the body that is making the errors not the soul?

@@TheRareOcelot I’ve yet to hear a non theist explanation on suffering and why it exist

@@t2nexx561you need to get out more then

@@t2nexx561 cuz it just "happenned" to be this way. Oopsie!

@@TheRareOcelot FR like that’s a way better reason.

What difference does that make to the legitimacy of the pure scientific method? Algebra is a Persian word used to describe methods pioneered within Greek and Hindu systems. Does that tell us anything about Allah, Zeus and Vishnu?

"Christianity pioneered the modern practice Science" James 5:14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: 15 And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him. hmmm doesn't sound very scientific to me.

Why do you people keep saying things like "blind, pitiless indifference"? That doesn't exist, there is no one to feel it, the universe is not based on sometime FEELING things. If your life is based on a personality caring about you, it's a lie, that person never existed. Good news: there no one judging you either, hell is not a concern. There are strong arguments that humans wouldn't have gotten to the point where they could really develop science without religion, but now that they have, religion is deprecated, superceded. We needed God to mute the terror of living helpless in the world, but now we are no longer helpless, and we can explain how rain comes, and that it had nothing to do with the favor of a God. Religion replaced random, aimless thinking with a common, shared system of belief. And now, science has replaced that. Now that we can ride the bike, we don't need the training wheels anymore.

@@cnault3244 I don't want to defend Christianity but your argument is not valid. Different people could do pro-science things while others are doing anti-science things. But on its own the statement "Christianity pioneered the modern practice science" is not only way too broad to really mean anything, it's grammatical gibberish that we should feel free to ignore.

lol, how do you come about this rubbish?

People deserve respect, not their beliefs. I can't honestly respect the belief that Adam & Eve lived in a garden under a dome.

@@Devious_Dave And that’s not even the most preposterous story found within the Bible.

@@Devious_Dave Yeah I don't either, That is like one of over 10 models of where the flood waters originated from. The firmàment mentioned in Genesis is the atmosphere where the birds fly. Its a poetic way of referring to the water cycle and the atmosphere

@@martinmoffat5417 Mmm, I struggle to respect the idea that "poetic" is the best explanation for a story being wrong about the real world. What about the tree & talking serpent? - are they poetry too?

@@Devious_Dave Did God Really Say?… If he did not, then death is not an imposter but the Prime Reality. We assign many labels but only one label will be assigned to us all. We will be utterly forgotten and no imprint will remain. God is the Life Giving Spirit and the Primal Being. Reject him and eat the fruit and only death remains. Yes this is true and always will be

why would such an omnipotent being desire glorification and praise? what could it add to such a being? such a needy being is not really wise or omnipotent.

​@@billjohnson9472 We see in the universe that there is a place for everything and everything in its place. It is sensible to apply that understanding to humanity and recognize that each of us has a place by divine sanction. Life is sacred. Regarding humanity specifically we are given free will and moral agency to exercise choice. These choices will fulfill the purposes of God whether to display his divine mercy or jùdgément. Some will choose dishonour over honour. "But do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. - Pauls letter to Galatia 50 AD

@@billjohnson9472 Why would such an omnipotent being desire glorification and praise? I am myself a Father of 2 girls and know full well. Yes I desire respect but cannot help but Love. "We love because he first loved us" - The 1st Epistle of the disciple whom Jesus Loved. 95 AD

@@martinmoffat5417 you are not omnipotent.

@@martinmoffat5417 god certainly can be mocked. that is such a silly statement to make.

The words of the Bible aren't an explanation of how anything came about.

There is. You just don't know it understand it. This is a tiresome trope of creationist, that since they don't know something, it doesn't exist. Many insist evolution is wrong because there is absolutely no physical evidence for it. That's laughably absurd to even high school students, there is an abundance of evidence, evolution has been OBSERVED in the lab. "I don't know about it" is not a proof of anything. I don't really understand how radio waves work, but we still have radio.

@@cnault3244 On the contrary, Genesis makes many specific claims that survived their ages of falsifiability such as the dates in genealogies and the names of the descendants are fused into the landscape. Take for example Egypt. No not the Country. The Grandson of Noah. Yes, the Noah of the 270 independently sourced flood tales that exist across every continent. Outrageous of course. But yet, irrefutably the most widely attested ancient historical event.

@@martinmoffat5417 "Genesis makes many specific claims " Yes, and those are the claims. Now, where is the evidence to explain how life came into existence? "Yes, the Noah of the 270 independently sourced flood tales that exist across every continent. " Floods happen all over the world. But only the account in the old testament mentions Noah and his sons. That flood is claimed to have submerged the highest mountain in the world, but the people living at that time in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, China, and Africa didn't notice the flood that submerged the highest mountain.

@@martinmoffat5417 Absolute nonsense. Genesis alone is FULL of contradictions, inconsistencies and inaccuracies. As for Noah, we have absolutely no compelling evidence that a global flood ever occurred -- or that it even COULD occur. However, we DO have evidence that a quite similar flood story existed in Sumerian mythology, which happened to be adopted by their successors, the Babylonians, whose empire just happened to become home to a great many Jews during the Exile. Coincidence?

A wise man also once said, I don't give a shit what your 2000-year-old book says.

@@VisshanVis So, clearly the wise man was right. Amazing.

@@VisshanVis 7 July 2024" Today is the 7th day of the 7th month, maybe a watershed day in your life. The Bible says: "A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned." (Matthew12:35-37MKJV).

@@PietStassenAdamastor The Bible is nothing more than a 2000-year-old big book of fairy tales half of it is lies the other half is made up or stolen from older civilizations and cultures there is no proof that your's or any other god has ever existed, do yourself a favour and go proselytize to somebody that actually believes in this BS.