The Fastest Way To Make Money 

Bet it all on 00 got it

Honestly way harder the a lot of other options

THATS ILLEGAL⁉️⁉️

I agree. AGI / AI in general (self driving trucks?) are too disruptive to the way the world has worked to not demand serious change. UBI or some equivalent will be required.

Yeah cause when it was actually communist millions of people starved to death.

I would suggest that you look into the political history of china. It can be considered both communist and capitalist at the same time because of the many desires of the leaders. It is shown in leaked Chinese documents that they do desire to become more communist, but they also still look somewhat capitalist because of their global economic presence. One could also argue that China does have something more similar to socialism/communism because of the amount of control the government has over corporations and the means of production. Of course the Chinese government is extremely corrupt but it is still a democracy in name as was intended to be one. China is a great example of why full socialism/communism is both difficult to achieve and very unstable because the leaders will always rise into a higher class and do what benefits themselves. That lead to an oppressive, authoritarian government and what could have been a good situation for the worker turns into the complete opposite. IMO if we want to have a different system we should go with something similar to the Nordic countries as they are consistently the happiest.

It is socialist. socialism =/= zero billionaires.

@@testacals no its not, socialism is when the workers own the means of production, which they do not

@@BlasterRiv Find me any single socialist author suggesting that.

It's the word communism, it's legitimately like an online fly trap for wannabe intellectuals.

Dope

"Socialism is when the number of billionaires goes up and the more billionaires you have the more Socialism it is".

Hassan has rotted people's minds on what socialism and capitalism actually are

I would suggest that you look into the political history of china. It can be considered both communist and capitalist at the same time because of the many desires of the leaders. It is shown in leaked Chinese documents that they do desire to become more communist, but they also still look somewhat capitalist because of their global economic presence. One could also argue that China does have something more similar to socialism/communism because of the amount of control the government has over corporations and the means of production. Of course the Chinese government is extremely corrupt but it is still a democracy in name as was intended to be one. China is a great example of why full socialism/communism is both difficult to achieve and very unstable because the leaders will always rise into a higher class and do what benefits themselves. That lead to an oppressive, authoritarian government and what could have been a good situation for the worker turns into the complete opposite. IMO if we want to have a different system we should go with something similar to the Nordic countries as they are consistently the happiest.

China is socialist, not communist.

@@testacalsplease explain what makes them socialist and not state capitalist

Big A quite often exits his areas of expert knowledge. He’s a lot like Scott Galloway, another public marketing figure.

It's not surprise Scott Galloway is the author of one of his favorite books: The Algebra of Happiness. As a fun fact, he has a series called Winners and Losers: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2BNgMkutpIE.html@@DrRocket8775

The boomers are starting to call 9 minute videos "Clips"...... Your a mag type of person arnt ya.

@@Foxexar clips are what civvies use in their hair, this is called a magazine.

Ferris Wheel for Two Theme - Pokémon Black & White

@@TheFooL_03 yes thank you 🙏

Hearing his perspective on it vs Stanz freaking out about that is so funny tbh

If you’re poor in Denmark it’s your own fault

@@solis2528 99% chanche you are 3 bad months away from Being homeless.

This is not exclusive to Sweden, it's literally the same world wide

Yeah I already know that.. He was talking about nordic countries specifically in one part of the video, that part is what I was referring to. You might have missed it though but it's pretty early in the video.@@RB92.

Luck rng? Do you hear yourself?

​@@nintendonewsreleases4415do you know what RNG means?

He sold game theory to another company but the content hasn't really changed on the channels. IIRC they're more involved in behind the scenes business decisions, but any major changes to the company/brand video-wise still has to go through matpat & his wife. they also got more involved production thru that company & some funding from them but he's not so overworked/managing stuff . if i remember right, at least. (i like game theory stuff sometimes & the quality/content has mostly stayed the same since before they were bought out)

Atrioc? Tax fugitive.

??? He sarcastically pointed out China is increasing its number of billionaires

This is done by most people. They also confuse a planned economy with socialism (even though there can be socialism together with a market, Gerald Cohen wrote about this in Why Not Socialism? for example) . Most countries have historically tried to stomp down any radical left so it is not that surprising that the same arguments are being recycled throughout the years.

Thank you !! I think you mistate my aim as "justifying capitalism". That would be so boring (and presumptuous of me) - this content and my viewers are not changing any global economic systems. My end goal is to get otherwise bright young people to waste less time on theory and shaking their fist at what is essentially the concept of property rights to explain all their problems. I use China because it's the perfect example of what happens after these nominally communist countries have their revolution. Economic pain into an eventual capitulation into capitalism with extra steps. Give me the wealth inequality I already have but extra with the side effect of an incredibly involved and oppressive state? Sign me up! The Nordic countries are ALSO capitalist. Daniel Ek is a billionaire from Spotify! They are also broadly happy right now because he pays some high ass taxes! America post New Deal was as capitalist as it gets but But their combination of stronger labor union participation, antitrust enforcement, high taxes on the wealthy helped it hit the sweet spot of both worlds. That's real! Thats attainable! We could do it in our lifetimes and it would be broadly popular, requiring no violent revolution. Let's skip the step where we (#1 have a violent, tragic revolution and realize we didn't get the utopia we thought because human beings are imperfect and find ways to consolidate power) or (#2, MUCH more likely, waste our youth talking about it while smoking weed and clocking in at Starbucks and nothing changes at all!) And just cut right to supporting real, effective, proven legislation that already existed in this country not long ago!. Something to think about. Imagine I'm drinking a big coffee while Mooing during it if it helps.

Atrioc you know we Zoomers cant read more than 3 sentences smh

@@AtriocClips Thank you for the response! I think I was a bit too harsh in my original comment (I’ve been a bit pessimistic lately); the holidays have exposed me to much more borderline racist “China bad, communism is the devil” discourse and I projected that on to you. Your reply reminded me of your other content and I generally agree with your position that much of the most important stuff is attainable and not necessarily exclusive to socialism (anti trust, unions, etc.). While the subject is nuanced, ultimately what gets done to improve the human condition is most important. Personally, while I believe that the positive aspects of all economies can be attributed to the “socialist” parts (e.g. higher taxes on the rich (socialism) while still having rich people (capitalism)), I do commend your support for the tangible action taking place in the world. It is way more than can be said than for most creators, especially since you are a marketing guy and not political science. I apologize if I originally came off as rude-I think it would be most productive to support the action now and argue about theory later.

of course there are unhappy people but it’s just objectively true that way less people are in debt, they get more time off, and depression rates are lower

Not a utopia, but further away from a dystopia as others. Having geothermal energy is a major factor that a lot of people forget. What works in Nordic countries doesn't work overall because public resources per individual is higher than nearly all countries.

"So you're saying not always having to work for an absurd minimum wage, paycheck to paycheck, having a good functioning democracy and not having giant hospital or school bills makes your population generally happier????? You must believe in fairytales!"

You're hella projecting if you think the main reason for "get rich quick" becoming popular isn't real world financial issues.

Is it really a myth if for the past 3-4 years Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Finland (which has won the award 6 years in a row) all rank in the top 10 happiest countries according to the world happiness report?

first reply

First Divorce (I literally signed the paper 3 minutes ago 📝😮‍💨)

​@@Speedwarsfirst reply to this reply

I would suggest that you look into the political history of china. It can be considered both communist and capitalist at the same time because of the many desires of the leaders. It is shown in leaked Chinese documents that they do desire to become more communist, but they also still look somewhat capitalist because of their global economic presence. One could also argue that China does have something more similar to socialism/communism because of the amount of control the government has over corporations and the means of production. Of course the Chinese government is extremely corrupt but it is still a democracy in name as was intended to be one. China is a great example of why full socialism/communism is both difficult to achieve and very unstable because the leaders will always rise into a higher class and do what benefits themselves. That lead to an oppressive, authoritarian government and what could have been a good situation for the worker turns into the complete opposite. IMO if we want to have a different system we should go with something similar to the Nordic countries as they are consistently the happiest.

It isn't capitalist. It's a socialist market economy. If it was capitalist, government wouldn't crush very profitable industries for the sake of social ends.

@@testacalsHere are two instances where non-state capitalist economies crushed profitable companies for ideological reasons. First, many MLMs have been corporate profitable but go out of business due to legal action because of IC deception, etc. Here, norms about how business out to be done sometimes crush profitable businesses. But you might think this isn’t a good case because you’d like a case of a profitable business being crushed for ideological reasons where the business isn’t a net negative on society. My example is beer companies pre-Carter presidency. Due to lobbying from the largest beer companies, licensing for producing beer was effectively priced out for startups for largely unjustified reasons (non-evidence backed health and safety concerns) from the depression until Carter. Here, as we now know, there would have been many profitable businesses that would have had a net positive on society (at least in capitalist terms), but these were all blocked because of cartelization and madeup health reasons. So crushing profitable companies for ideological reasons is not precluded by capitalism as a type of economic system.

Also, quite often China’s justifications for limiting profitable businesses often has to do with retaining state power. If businesses get too big and international, then they’d be able to push out the currently prevailing govt ideologies, which doesn’t really entail that the government isn’t capitalist so much as show that there is a power struggle. And lastly, can you say why you think moderate centralization automatically make an economic system socialist? If that’s the case then the US is market socialist due to their control on the whole of agriculture production.

@@DrRocket8775 China's justification for limiting profitability is rarely has to do with retaining power. The gaming industry and the tuition industry both got hit by cpc and the reasoning was always for a social end. Afaik tuition industry isn't even that big compared to other industries. It's not centralization that make them socialist. It's what they do with centralization that make them socialist. Has USA ever attacked a profitable industry for a social end ?