The Great Mirrorless Camera Autofocus Shootout! (GH4, X-T1, A6000, E-M1) 

+1

For AF? They AF at the widest aperture anyway, then close the aperture to take the photo.

Lyn Rees Wow... I actually did not know that. Thanks for that info.

That means you have to rise ISO x4 to get the same shutter

Rambalac . You need to raise ISO 2 stops in 35mm format to compete with m4/3 or 1 stop to compete with APS-C format (1.5x crop factor) to maintain same shutter speed. So if you need high shutter speed (lets say "acceptable") and deeper depth of field (you rarely can shoot full open aperture when handling 35mm format camera) so you can have multiple subjects or whole subject sharp in different distance, then you are easily lose the 1-2 stops better ISO quality. Add to that combination of amazing Olympus 5-axis in body image stabilization and you get 4-5 stop benefit in low light or macro. And if you have money so you can buy f/0.95-f.8 lenses, you can even do full-size portraits with almost identical results as 35mm format camera with f/1.4-1.8 because the depth of field difference just two stops and if wanted, rest can be done in post process too in many cases. 1-2 stops in ISO quality might sound huge difference but it really isn't when placing side by side a large prints (60x60cm) and observed both from close range (like 10-15cm).

dude holy fuck same

No, it wouldn't have made sense since they're goal isn't to compare MILCs to similarly priced DSLRs. The point they're trying to make is "How do these MILCs stack up against each other since they all say they have the fastest AF and how they stack up against the fastest AF camera, the Nikon D4s?" Another question they wanted to answer was "If they can match the D4s in AF speed and tracking, are cameras like the D4s really relevant when cameras priced well-below the D4s are available?" These cameras for sure smoke the D7200 and the 7D for AF and burst, it's an absolute no-brainer.

Even Panasonic complains because reviewers don't compare DSLR to "Mirrorless" enough, segregating the two worlds in the buyer's perception. It started to market the GH4 as "DSLR" in some places.

I seriously doubt that. In another RU-vid video, I saw Olympus etc. Struggle indoor, when even D5300 does better. Plus comparisons are best done in same price bracket.

That is not true. Did you not pay attention in the video? The Sony a6000 which costs much less than the Fuji XT-1 is better at AF tracking and has more MP. Comparisons shouldn't be limited to the same price range, it should include things that are similarly specced or better. I advise you to actually try these cameras out for yourself before just saying "D5300 is better b/c... Oh, b/c... I... watched a RU-vid video..."

Canon 7D? May be. I wouldn't bet on D7100 though.

The Japanese comments are hilarious: "I don't speak Japanese very wall but I like cats" :-)

Martin Görner Is it really what is he saying? Oo

The female voice, yes LoL

Martin Görner I don't understand japanese too but I was sure to hear the word "neko" and thought to myself wtf... thanks for clearification

Where?

+atramos2 Yepp, and the X-T1 firmware update also massively improved the AF performance. Looks like it is time to do a rematch.