THE HIDDEN GENETIC ROOTS OF INDIAN IS TRACED BACK TO AFRICA? 

Everyone's, including Caucasion, roots go back to Africa. Bible is not legitimate authority on such matters. And as a civilisation, the Indian one is of unprecedented sophistication.

Nonsense . There are many religional spiritual scriptures are there . Which are much older than this bible and Christian religion . This indro aryan is most baseless theory

all human beings came from Africa not only early indians. As a matter of fact white Europeans are closer to africans genetically than first indians. So stop saying only indians came from africa

You are not aware of ancient Tamil literature. It says that even Noah and his family were from ancient Tamil continent Kumarikandam. Tamils were displaced to different parts of the world. The story of Noah is found in Tamil literature and many other ancient cultures across the globe. Tamils were the origins of everything on earth. Even the Jews came from Tamils via Noah.

Sounds like nonsense to me. When India is said to have been Atlantis how is it a part of Africa

In fact, the ancestry of all humans can be traced back to Africa.

tamil is the oldest language in indica

Malayalis are fairer than other south Indians.

It was Druhyu and Anu tribes , thirth and fourth sons of Lunar dynasty who migrated out of India and spread in the middle East and later entered and spread across Europe. Druhyu's descendants were kings of Tripur kingdom, now known as Tripura State in India.

When the migrant or Hurders coming into India Tamils (Nagar) living throughout India. It makes sense since all artifacts discovered in all over India more than 60% belong to Tamils. When the immigrant comes, Tamils were structured themselves as "Kudi" and occupied all the professions. So the only job vacancy in religious job including priest jobs and related ones. The migrant took advantage of it. They took the religious treasure of Tamils and made into more popular religion. Then they used that to earn money. As part of this process Sanskrit was developed.

Prophet Noah ( AS) On Indian soil

No need for Bible, everyone comes from Africa 60 thousands years

That's real interesting

You should provide your data set sources and references to support your hypotheses. The genetic DNA studies you've referenced to substantiate your theories. It's always "fun" to hear a British person explain the historical origin of the Indian subcontinent.

All so interesting However I would like to see maps of areas you are talking about it would all make more sense to me cheers 🌝

ABSOLUTELY AMAZING FACTS ❤

Indians are mixture of 5 or 6 genetic migrant groups not single one: 1. Andamanese are the original african origin people but they are different from dravidians. They came in though western coastal land border of india. I dont think they hsve much genetic footprint left among indians. They have small curly hairs , have extremely dark.skin, are extremely strong physically, are usually of medium to short height and mostly of stocky built. They do not have much facial or body hair. 2. But dravidians came later from ancient Middle East and south western Iran. The dravidian genes are in most people even among north indians. They entered through western and north western border of india. They have highest amount of facial and body hair, are dark skinned, have wavy hair and are medium height and stocky built. 3. The indo europeans or Aryans came later from southern russia through North and North Eastern Iran and Afghanistan. They entered through north west border of india. They do not have as much genetic footprint as dravidian people but have the deepest cultural foorprint. They have much less facial and body hair than Dravidians and are fair skinned , tall and sturdy or slim and can have straight as well as wavy hair varying from individuals to individuals. 4. The austronasians are probably mixture of east asians or south east asians and Australian aborigenes who were the original ancient african migrants in south asia who had subsequently moved to australia and south east asia and they reentered india through eastern border and are dominantly found in North East india and east india and central india. They have straight hair and brown, wheatish to tanned skin and much less facial or body hair than dravidians or indo-aryans. They are usually of taller than average height but shorter than Aryans and have slim physic. 5. Lastly the himalayan hill dwelling mongolian and tibeto burmese (2 groups clubbed into one here) population came from northern and north eastern border into india. They have light skin, very less body and facial hair and straight black hairs like Austronesians. They are of medium to lower than medium height and are of stocky built.

How much old bible is ????

I am of god kubera's son in laws lineage called rishis we are the oldest tamils

🙏🏾🧡☀️🧡🙏🏾God bless us always 🙏🏾

But any temples found in africa

HINDI is not the Official language of India

The term Nepali means a citizen of Nepal and is comparablewith the termsPKistani,Bangladeshi SriLakan like which are citizenship names and NOT an Ethnic name.The term Gorkha Bengali orBangali,Tamil,Sindhi are ethnic names and not limited to citizenshipname of any country. In the other words the termNepali carries citizenship name of Nepal which is a free sovereign state on Ot’s own. Therefore the term Gorkha tat is not only established as an ethnic name but is also NOT a carrier ofNepal’s citizenship name. Hence the term Gorkhabhasa which is also in the Indian Co nstitution could be more positively used in the context of the language. DrMani KUMAR Sharma Siliguri WB India If you are interested I could send you prof of what I have said. 10072024

You mentioned Noah and the Bible that means we traced back our genetic origins from the sons of Noah Shem Ham and Japheth. So, it is suffice to say that there must be inter marriages between their descendants that make up our present genes today. They all speak the same language and only during their migration to west that is the plain of Shinar when they started building the Tower of Babel and its fall because God intervened and confused their language that people on earth began to speak in different tongues but retained their memories. So, people who shared the same tongues went their own ways and spread throughout the world in accordance with the inheritance that was set by Noah prior to their migration. This was explicitly written in the book of Jubilees when Noah divided the world among his three sons and set their boundaries. Except for Canaan, the son of Ham and Madai, the son of Japheth did not like their allotted inheritance settled in the land which were not theirs. See book of Jubilees for the territories allotted for descendants of Shem, Ham and Japheth.

Gorgeous presentation! I sincerely appreciate you sharing this knowledge!

Primarily there are five ancient dravidian languages (pancha dravida bashaa) in this you have a very prominent language, that say it all that you want to promote one literature which it's is distorted, so mate get right by getting some valid proof gy working on it, anyways that doesn't work since you are working for a cause for which you are remuneration very long way to go son............😊

what migration? Do some more research & you'll discover the term Gondwanaland when SAmerica, Africa, India & Australia were fused as a single landmass with India fitting into the Ethiopian land space.

Bible is not at all a reference of origin civilsed world.. In indian history there r lot of written n history sayings r there for reference for world history..

Life originated in Africa.

Even Aryans or Iranian farmers or whoever ultimately came from African migrants.

No need of your false bible statements we indians exactly know where we came from

All human beings are from MARS Earth is not humans home they were brought from Mars after mars was destroyed by Nuclear War!

According to new studies, Aryan invasion/migration is big false. It was from India the world migration happened.

All came from Africa. You are confused with times lines. Bible talks history of last 5000 years. Ancient African migrations occured 50000 to 100000 years ago. This is the established and well researched conclusion amon academic world.

I think it is time to stop saying Sanskrit is Indo European language. Your comment itself contradict the fact. If it is Indo European language, then at least remanent of the language should exist somewhere. But the truth is that Sanskrit exists only in India. It is a flip flop of ancient Tamil language. Tamili script is much older than Brahmi script. The recent excavation in Tamil Nadu shows Tamili script on mud pots. It means the language is already used by ordinary people. However, Brahmi is used only by Ashokan, at least that's the only inscription discovered. So, the Tamili was developed long before 300BC. It takes long time to develop a language to be used among ordinary population, writing skill. Sanskrit developed as business language to communicate with God. Then with Tamil language influence evolved into more structural language as the religious baseness was booming. Since hard core evidence missing only possible to prove logically. My argument purely logical.

great video for me

Indian history is fooor older than the Bible.

Tamils are the oldest origin on the earth...

This video is complete bollocks. The Europeans can also be traced back to Africa. If they didn't come from Africa, where did they come from? Or is the author claiming there a lost white tribe from Africa from which Europeans were decended? The Andamanese are not related to Dravidians, they are partly related to Malays due to neolithic admixture, with some Indian genes probably due to the convicts brought there from India which is a recent admixture. This is understandable due to its proximity to Malaysia and Burma. The Sentinelese who look like Africans with black skin and frizzy hair, are not actually closely related wigh Africans, and neither are the Melonesians in the west pacific islands. The Andamanese are thought to be the first people to leave Africa who were trapped and isolated from other populations on the sentinal island. Because they were the first to leave Africa, the Sentinelese who look like Africans are in fact the least closely related population to Africans on earth.

Symbol of knowledge 😅

Bible should be studied for mentions of indian ppl. But then whch bible. Old testment new testment books that have been discarded by church ethiopian bible etc.

Son searching grand father history/ origin. Non sense

The Aryan invasion theory is disproved by genetic research, especially mitochondrial DNA research. Indians have migrated and settled in central Asia and Europe. Indian history and Vedas are dated 17000 BC and to rely on 2000 year old Bible for treatise on such an old civilization is erroneous. Please read Mr Nilesh Oak.

Sanskrit is the king of all language in the world, every language today uses Sanskrit words.

It's all imagination of the narrator and Christian Bible is a human creation

iam north indian we r aryans foreigners ❤❤❤

Tamil is the mother language for all the other languages including sanskrit..

Humans didnt come from africa.

Grow up kid

Dravidians r the native people of india

Bakwad

Vedas are word of god

NONSENSE ! Bible is a religious book ! How can you study ethnicity, linguistics , genetic history , culture with biblical references ?! We indians have lot and lot of our own evidences to know our culture heritage language ethnicity... etc.! We don't need bible !

The Bible was not yet known to people India and the entire world was ruled by lord Ram

Nova from India

According to Bible and Bible scholars, the genesis happened 6000 years back,. Your description and trying to legitamize, Bible , christianity is preposterous. Desist from such speculations. hindu dharma, time scale and extent of universe more approximates, aligns with hindu scriptural descriptions. samskritam language of INDIA is the oldest language known to humanity, Ramayana , mahabharata oldest and greatest epics of humanity - thousands of years - predating to bible and christianity.