The Rolling Stones | Meeting Brigitte Bardot and Françoise Hardy in Paris (1966) 

I want to go to there too

Those ladies are still around and I am sure they have their own stories to tell.

It don't get better than that.

FRANCOISE HARDY. GORGEOUS

BRIGITTE.Not Bridget.

@@Laughandsong Sorry, Ms. Bardot!

​​@@Laughandsong the most stunning, enigmatic woman, BB. Just amazing & an icon.

It's gone unfortunately save a few croaks.Wonder what form the next renascence will take....if and when

@@randybackgammon890 Christ Return!

look at the clothes these cats wore in the mid to late 1960s.. just incredible...super hip.. I can't even look at bands now they look like freakin' trash in stupid outfits and sneakers..😂.. everything about those times was so much hipper

@@pgroove163 .... shortpants ,sneakers, baseball caps and somewhat overweight are 'de rigueur' for a few decades already.... .👍🥴

@@pgroove163 Totally agree. The Stones 1965-67 look has been my sartorial directory for life!

This and "pop goes the sixties" by matt Williamson are the Best two.

@@zylbher1 I really like the "Pop Goes the 60s" channel, great stuff.

Auto-generated voice-over. Text from period journals.

@@Lightw81 You ended your list rather abruptly and, as a result, left out some other features> These are the features that really make this channel great: 1) Selection of topics-each of the topics presented sheds light on what was going on with the rock music business back in those early years. 2) Assemblage of material pertaining to that topic. In this case involving tracking down copies of, now extremely rare, music papers. 3) Selection of images and texts to illustrate the points being made. 4) Research, including accessing footage-some of it extremely rare. 5) Hours and hours of editing to assemble the material and create a unified whole. Anyone with even the skimpiest experience of editing video-will tell you that this channel puts a ton of work into each and every video they produce.

Agree!

Thank you. Glad you enjoyed it.

Thanks, Maurice!

Never saw that kind of player before. Was it a European thingamabob?

@@389383 I don't know. Never saw anything like that in the States in the 60's. That unit probably had a 10g tonearm and sapphire stylus - likely to destroy a priceless Aftermath rough mix acetate in only 1 or 2 plays :)

Glad you like it, thanks!

The Animals,Yardbirds,Small faces,Spencer Davis,Zombies,Cream,Blues breakers,Trogs,Tremaloes,Donovan,Hollies,Blue flames.Manfreds,Moody Blues,Creation,Action,The Smoke ,The Moody Blues,Hendrix and Lord knows how many groovy Americans....and that doesn't even sum it up

The Move

@@randybackgammon890 Animals were the best after The Stones. Actually , they were better until Stones started writing originals

@@brucemarshall3446 Yep nothing more soulfull than Eric and the boys in their prime

That's pretty cool. He was definitely very lucky!

A similar thing happened to me. I wrote a song called "Paint It Black" when I was in New Delhi back in 1966. The BBC was doing a documentary about the pariahs of India and they filmed me playing that song near the Yamuna river. The Stones saw the documentary on TV and a couple months later my song "Paint It Black" was all over the charts and it was credited to Jagger/Richards.

@@YesterdaysPapers 😂😂😂

@@YesterdaysPapers - Mick has a lot to answer for. Keith is off the hook because he's Keith. Great story and knowing Mick...it is easy to believe. Mick Taylor feels ripped off as well. Jagger is not big on sharing, apparently.

​@@YesterdaysPapers how do you think i feel???? bloody Beatles stole every song i ever wrote!

I think Jagger spoke french.

Bardot speaks English.

@@Camille_Anderson Here's a quote from photographer Terry O'Neill "I had been hired to get publicity images from the set of The Legend of Frenchie King, a [1971] film Brigitte Bardot was doing in Spain with Claudia Cardinale. I had photographed Brigitte before, although we never really became friends. She didn't try to speak English, so she kept up this barrier between us."

Well, whatever I remembered about the Beatles/Bardot story seems to be incorrect: "Journalist Michael Braun, who accompanied the Beatles on their first trip to Paris, at the end of April and begining of May, recalled that they'd made a specific request to their French record company that they'd like to meet up with Brigitte Bardot during their visit. 'All of the Beatles, apparently, shared a desire to meet Mlle Bardot. The following morning a large box of candy arrived in their suite. Accompanying it was a card off the director of their French record company. "Unfortunately," it read, "Brigitte Bardot is detained in Brazil! Let's hope these sweets will make up for her." One problem with the above is that their first trip to Paris was a 3 week engagement at the Olympia Theatre that started January 16 1964, not April. I also read that it was May, 1968, that John Lennon met Bardot for the only time, at the Mayfair Hotel in London. He took LSD before the visit. “The only thing I said to [Bardot] all night was 'Hello,' when we went to shake hands with her,” Lennon reportedly told [long-time friend Pete] Shotton. “Then she spent the whole time talking in French with her friends, and I could never think of anything to say. It was a terrible night -- worse than meeting Elvis. "

The problem with the remastered CD versions is that it's usually the reprocessed stereo mix, which I don't particularly like. I found a first pressing of the album in mono a few years ago and the sound is amazing. Sounds way more natural, the drums sound terrific and the mix is more punchy. I definitely recommend the mono version of that record.

@@YesterdaysPapers The SACD issued on ABKCO in 2002 sounds terrific. They searched world wide for the best available tapes and it shows. If I remember correctly it's the stereo version. Don't think I've ever heard the mono.

@@willieluncheonette5843 Check out the mono version if you have the chance. It's really good.

@@YesterdaysPapers will do. I know I prefer the mono versions of all the early Stones albums but that is an easy call. That ABKCO hybrid SACD/CD series does contain the songs recorded in stereo the Stones cut at Chess Studios and those do sound wonderful

@@steveconn I take your word for it, but that was still not allowed, right? My point was in hardcore, for the most part, the divide between band and audience disappeared and members of the audience going up on stage was common. and allowed

I wonder if we can still somehow find those answers 😅 I’m intrigued now

@@belenramires1I've been looking online but I can't find anything. I really wish we knew what he said 😂

Yes, he played with Georgie prior to joining the Jimi Hendrix Experience.

To each their own. The Stones are my all-time favourite band.

@@YesterdaysPapers I love you anyway,

Get back to your QAnon bs. Charlie Watts passing is not an excuse to knock his band that kept on as he wished they would.

@@Viajealduende It's good you knew about his "wishes" 👍🙂

Why do you types like to cut down on people doing what they do?

Jagger Richard's and Wood are still English lol

@@buster9168 No they ain't....lol 👍🥴

Marianne had some pretty succesful singles in France at the time.

I love both bands and I agree with you. And I think that's because, as George Harrison himself once said, the Beatles didn't really live the 60s because they spent the 60s locked in rooms. The Stones seemed to be able to do whatever they wanted to do and they lived the 60s to the fullest.

@@YesterdaysPapers never heard that before but it could definitely be true...

well if Mr Jones was still here he'd tell u the same...👍

Yes, Brian "accelerate", all is said.