She is the most dangerous kind of copper.... never admits being wrong and happy to use any act whether justified or not to deprive you of your rights and freedom.
FYI - during 2021 the Met police stopped and searched 461 people under section 43. Not a single one of those people was subsequently charged with a terror related crime! So yes, clearly section 43 is being abused and will surely go the way of section 44 in time!
no police officer found any terrorists at any time... only special units and investigations... but still, they give them wide arms to kick people's freedom...
It's clearly being used to obedience groom citizens.., you better stop and allow me to bully, harass and intimidate you, or else. It's filthy disgusting piggy behavior and creepy how 'polite' they act while doing it.
The contrast between the male officer and the female officer was incredible. She was territorial and he was enlightened (he seemed to be, anyway). He wasn't antagonistic, he was diplomatic, and he came across as a much better person/officer than her.
nothing of the sort, as soon as AB put it to her about knowing law, that is when he shat his pants realising they could have action taken against them...Every time i watch these vids now, it is always, ALWAYS section 43. If it was me, personally i would reply with something that would really really piss them off.
Where she is from, telling a white person what to do is considered one of the highest possible achievements in your professional life. Unfortunately, she is no good at it.
There is no interaction an egotistical control freak, power mad copper can't and will make worse. This peewee is a ideal example of a little knowledge is dangerous. It is only to happy to abuse her powers and law to threaten and concoct false representation of the situation. She is one to be kept an eye on for future abuses of the public.
That police woman was quick out of the starting blocks with her attitude and threats to arrest you under section 43 and record you without informing you. IMO a nasty piece of work who I'm sure wouldn't think twice about abusing her power.
Yes her attitude as a constable was an abhoration. We do not pay taxes to get spoken to and looked at like we are criminals. She was particularly obnoxious.
The male policeman, Fraiser, is a credit to the Metropolitan Police. An excellent officer whose behaviour, body language, and non-threatening demeanour was exemplary. He epitomises the kind of police we want on our streets. It would be a pleasure to meet with him.
The female officer says, DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF HER COLLEAGUE, "I can detain you under section 43..." WHEN ASKED TO CONFIRM WHAT THE FEMALE OFFICER JUST SAID IN FRONT OF HIM the male copper says, " I wasn't here for that part of the conversation..." *SHE JUST SAID IT!!!! WE ALL HEARD HER!!!!!* 10.44 mins (FFS?????) Then the same woman was unaware of her own code of conduct regarding her body-camera!!???? (WHO TRAINS/GRADUATES THESE PEOPLE??????) (Not to mention that as soon as she was taken to task, her whole previously entitled persona was that of a skunk forced to lick shit off barbed wire...) Perfect casting, indeed...
If they are so paranoid about people taking pictures of this building, why the bloody hell did they put it in the middle of a major tourist city that is busy all the time?
@@csar07. The question was, "If they are so paranoid about people taking pictures, why put it in the middle of a major city". Your answer was to another question. You only answered "Why put a police building in a major city" not "Why put a police building if they are paranoid".
She was even covering her body camera 19 mins in with her two fingers. The male officer however I hold in high esteam for his calm demeaner letting you speak and you letting him speak. Top work AB
I also hold the officer in very high esteem. His time could have been put to much better use that day for half an hour, but A. Bum has bills to pay presumably (unless he still lives 'at home', so to speak), and this is how he chooses to do it - by monetizing the wasting of police time. Give this man 28 days slammer NOW!!
She is a liability. Not often I praise the police, but the man de-escalated this encounter, albeit reluctantly. Luckily for him being there, this could of went south. AB stood his ground, that lady didn't get anything of what was going on. That's how this seems to me.
Office Fraser did a good job alright. She needed a cold bucket of water thrown over her to cool her down. Her attitude was awful, even when she recognised that AB knew more about the law and her policies than she did, she still didn't apologize or acknowledge that she was wrong. Notice how she folded her arms as she realised she was caught out.
He did NOT do a good job. He literally lied to and tried to mislead AB with regard to the law which is FRAUD! Basically, you are saying that you are happy to be oppressed by those sworn to uphold the law as long as they do it politely which is the doctrine of a coward. Both of those traitors need hoisting but Brits seem to lack the stomach for the job, sadly.
AB should report the officer for the body worn camera policy violation. With the met under special measures the public should pass the information to the iopc to show how deep the problems are.
@@lozziel9662 If you left the 'honestly' out I'd agree. He was not having any criticism of his colleague but I believe he knew she was (1) wrong to threaten to use Section 43 and (2) wrong about her obligation to inform that she was recording. He was trying to defuse the situation while ignoring her dishonesty. It was her DISHONESTY that needed to be defused!
@@vic_tim7956 Unfortunately if a cop goes against another in public word would spread that he's not a team player. You can guess the consequences. They are a gang and they act like a gang.
AB, please print off a copy of the policy that states police officers have to inform a member of the public that they are recording. When they say they don't simply hand them a copy. The proof is then in their hand.
when I was visited on a number of occasions and subsequently arrested I told Hampshire Police officers they were supposed to inform me - they blatanly said they do not have to inform me.
@@wellerjam College of policing have provided policy and guidance on the use of body warn cameras that are incumbent across all police forces He only needs that one
So basically, if you don't *'engage'* with them then they will find you suspicious and use 43? So if you just walk away, conducting your lawful business, they think they can arrest you? 🤯
Wow wasn't she a proper little horror thinking she's got some sort of moral high ground,this is exactly why you should always record the police 🤳 EXPOSE THEM ALL 🤬
In all the times I've seen Section 43 applied and an auditor searched, the police have never found anything dangerous and usually not even an ID, but yet they just let the auditor walk away. What happened to all those reasonable grounds, or "suspicion", if you prefer. No, it's obviously nothing more than retaliation and an exhibition of power to humiliate, degrade, and harass a citizen whose activities they don't like.
It is an exercise in Intimidation Escalation and Incrimitation, the idea being you kow tow and don't do it again ask AB and his 200,000 subscribers how has this idea worked for these cùntish police bandits
I grew up in Kennington just down the road from this building and have always wondered what this building was and why it has so many cameras and now seeing AB doing an audit on it its mind blowing..this guy.is a legend 👏
Worth noting - under the Data Protection Act, you have a right to be informed that your data is being captured, no later than the point at which its captured. It’s not just police policy, it’s law. When you film an officer telling you they don’t have to tell you they’re recording, you’ve got an instant claim for compensation under Article 82 of the GDPR for their failure to uphold your right to be informed. They can’t even wriggle out of it when they openly declare they don’t have to tell you. The law says they do, and if they don’t, kerching!
That woman police officer, secretly records you while covering the red lights with her hand and had the audacity to give you cheek. Definitely needs retrained or sacked
They are recording without any notice when they want to, but they stop recording when they are facing a real Crime and have to face evidences. They Don't even report it
I wonder if they will be so zealous when the government can't afford to pay their wages. Edit: File a complaint against frosty knickers for breach of the Data Protection Act 2018. These clowns need retraining, clearly.
Govt will always find a way to pay their mercenaries, until a robot force can do the same job more efficiently. Only then will these utterly thick uniformed plebs realise that by acting like a robot they have brought about their own demise.
The interaction with the officer was great,he was friendly and professional,the lady was threatening to use section 43 as a pitty and she’s not suppose to use that as a power to show who’s in charge
She’d obviously forgotten to inform you that she was filming you, but she was too proud to admit that you were correct. Her male colleague didn’t know what to say ,or do, so made a quick exit with her, very bad police response.
Standard childish policing to never admit to being wrong, to argue until blue in the face that they are correct despite being wrong, childish “your welcome” when she left.. failed interaction yet again… and that is how 95% of the interactions shown in auditing content go. Its all very wrong and i believe the training is wrong and they are trained to abuse the rules with the assumption that “the public dont know, who cares so long as you achieve what you need and win the interaction”
Her whole demeanour throughout was defensive. From the crossing of arms, to the slamming of the police door. She knew she was in the wrong but couldn't admit it. They walked away in defeat knowing there was nothing they could do from stopping a member of the public filming in a public place.
Correct. If the male had not felt the need to protect her she would have done something really stupid... Re the arms folded, as well as displaying her attitude it is also a reckless thing to do when dealing with a situation, and invites a decent punch to the throat.
Dangerous little woman. Scary how she probably treats people who don't stand up for themselves. She should always seek advise from her male colleagues to help her do her job properly
From watching these videos I find the majority of female officers, especially the "smaller" ones to be the absolute worst kind of police officers. They know they're going to be as much use as tits on a brick in a physical altercation so they make up for it (or so they think) by being assertive and forceful in their demeanour. Problem there is by doing that, most of them come across as abrasive and condescending so they inevitably always seem to have the effect of escalating situations unnecessarily.
A person who rightly refuses to give their ID is seen as someone who wont submit to their authority and then it become an ego thing and this is the opportunity when they will most likely arrest under the terrorism act. they know full well the person is not a terrorist they just don't like to be disobeyed. That stupid police woman could not stand to be disobeyed so her knee jerk action was to arrest. She should not be a police officer this becomes obvious because of her actions
So sorry to hear, I know I'm a stranger but I know all to well what loss feels like. May she rest in peace on the otherside of life. Take one day at a time , be kind to yourself. Big hug 🫂
great audit! been local to that area for over 10 years and their police sickens me to a core sometimes. I only searched up local audits to Hemel because i started believing AB was staged from how the police seem to always say its suspicious and they're on high alert since corona virus broke out. absolutely disgraceful part on that Guinness-head looney harassing you for your details like that you stated your reasoning for everything you did too it was genuine honestly so it made my blood boil when he thought you had some sort of intention against the building itself. nothing suspicious or illegal about filming in public view. if anything its the exact opposite
Come charging up no identification and start demanding answers! It always seems Johnny Foreigner cops seem to forget that there not in Eastern Europe anymore and we do have freedom in this country….
You forgot the 'indigenous' cops on other AB videos. What do you say about their ethnicity/background when they behave in the same manner, or does that not fit your racist agenda?
@@massynu183 oh here we go with the racist comment, grow up you little snowflake! Do you really believe that if a Brit joined the , say Portuguese police and started the same shit that others wouldn’t comment as to why a foreigner was acting the same as this little weasel. This is NOT racism it’s human nature and dare I say a little bit of good old nationalism.
Clive, why are you being xenophobic? Eastern Europe? She could be Italian or Danish. Where is AB from? Most of the tyrants on this channel are English.
I disagree, he implied that someone refusing to engage with him (ie, exercising one of the most fundamental of all rights in police interactions) would be contributing grounds towards having reasonable suspicion of a crime. That's a hard fail. In terms of courtesy, tone, engagement de-escalation - I agree with you, the officer did well; But you have to get the fundamentals right and he didn't. There's a foundational problem in his thinking, and it needs to be corrected.
@@scottishrob7119 If you look at her and listen to her you can hear how proud she is of herself, very self absorbed. She is also that kind that will act as a victim immediately if things goes against her,a real little feminazi.
Chancers, they never learn. Such rampant unapologetic ignorance and misrepresentation. Then they mask it as a genuine mistake when they violate your rights without grounds. Unacceptable!
We know they congregate in hordes within the stations (we've seen them come out a dozen at a time when their cars are threatened by a dangerous camera), but why don't they educate each other about auditors. I guess, there's not a gossip on the force.
If they taught them law and they were capable of learning it, they would end up arresting politicians and untouchable rich folk... They, the parasites who control this cannot allow that. So they keep them uneducated and dumb. That's how they maintain control
A.B. you missed an important bit, when "P.C. Nice guy" stated, "we need to establish grounds and determine suspicion" when they had no reasonable grounds
Exactly he missed a lot of it through the verbal diarrhoea. More excuses than a kid who hasn’t done his homework. Saying that not answering increases the grounds is a violation of rights.,
I have so much respect for what you’re doing AB because you’re teaching people. You are teaching me and my wife, thank you so much. I know what to watch now whenever I speak to a police officer.
I'm noticing more and more section 43 being used to intimidate auditors, being thrown around as an excuse to move on, detain or get I.D. It's shameful, disrespectful and more importantly loosing the police trust with the public. Non of this filming is covert and is in fact in full open view. Just wish I could have spoken to the police yesterday when I had my house broken in but sadly could not get to speak to anyone, I seriously don't see how the word public service is accurate.
You should have gone into the street and put your camera up to your neighbor's care window. Then when they called the police, it would be treated as an emergency.
The phone operator who answered the initial call, should’ve said to the caller that you are paranoid, and you should seek counselling. There is not a crime being committed go and have a coffee.
I love you man you are the best keep going there is thousands of police force like her that need to learn a lesson otherwise they will continue abuse they power 💪🏽
Section 43😅..I don't know who the idiot told them that the terrorist goes to shoot in broad daylight in front of everyone and doesn't hide even a little In addition, the last terrorist strike against the government was 52 years ago and was not related to photography
Well it is obvious he is not a crook, however, you reasoning is straight up 💩. Most attacks are done in broad daylight with as many witnesses and viewers as possible. That's the main motor behind a terror attack, Fahd Osman
That was extremely painful to watch!! 🤦🏻♀️ the pair of them, pains in the arse! I was getting so frustrated watching this! AB you’ve got the patience of a saint! X
She standing arms folded like a petulant child not getting her own way. The pair are another example of quota hires and box tickers unsuitable and unstable for the job.
the look of contempt and arrogance directed at you and also the other officer when he was talking with you is literaly palpable, she was so butt hurt at his talking with you in the manner he did it was literaly painful for her to bear lol
@Auditing Britain First of all a massive big up to you. The security guard lied to you, as it said Warrant Cards and we know who carrys WARRANT CARDS. Regarding that POLICE WOMAN 👮♀️ she most definitely is one of those tyrant police officers and stuck up her own arse way too far. This is the reason why alot of people hate police because of people like her. At least you taught her someone new, after checking their own policy on filming the public I bet you she felt like a right clown 🤡. Great video, already looking forward to the next video. 🔥💯♥️👊🏾🙏
ep, they need to be told "It's people like you that make the police distasteful to the general public, the new home secretary is very insistent that this must change"
My first wife was like her ! We got married in 1982 and she counted every penny in the pay poke I gave her on the first week of marriage, I had to account for every penny I spent , She could argue black was white and made my life hell for two years until I ran away and went into hiding in the lake district, This video should be part of a pre marital training programme about how women's mind work !
Engie the construction company I worked for very briefly who employed an African immigrant as a site foreman who got put away for 20 years for credit card fraud then tried to silence anyone that dared to mention it, including assaulting their staff
The male officer was very compliant and explained himself in a professional manner which is certainly worth a praise. As for the female officer she was quite willing to use section 43 if need be. Until the female officer realised you were no push over. Silence from her say’s a lot in this matter.
Summed it up when you told the female officer she was stubborn & then she actually replied 'I Am' 😂 Good job the male officer took over otherwise she would have had those cuffs out in the wink of an eye
Always, childish excuses for the wrong conduct, and displaying quite a bit of ignorance in doing so. *Reason* that an act of terrorism with reason as to the 'crime' suspected to be done, or has been done! She's a Liar, and he needs to 'protect' her as a fellow gang member and embarrass himself by doing so!!! Both acting on the wrong side of the Law...
Do they even know what the definition of a terrorist is? I've come to the conclusion that they don't. They seem to think a terrorist is someone who catches them on film tossing it off instead of working.
