It's a shame the witness that drove by and didn't see anyone, didn't take a pic of the car. It would have sealed pip squeak's fate within seconds with no broken windshield and no one there flagging anyone down for help. That man has zero reason to make it up or lie.
@@harletterider9658 He would have killed him too, if he had. Then he probably would have said someone drove by and killed them both and he tried to protect them...yada, yada, yada. I had forgotten about this case until you commented. What a temper this guy has. I'd still bet she mentioned a divorce and he went wild. It still saddens me that even after death, she had not one family member on her side. Not one kid, nor her family. I wonder if any has really thought about it and have changed their mind? It would be interesting to know.
@@holylandfan3275 ..sure would. since he couldn't get along at work, she may have insisted her mother come live w/them. divorce tho -probably...love to know. ..i saw something real disturbing yesterday. a women w/2 girls in an apartment filming - then she comes back & says to the x hubby (in the film she's taking) she has killed the two girls & took some pills & she's gonna die. then she was at the police dept. interrogation. i'm going to go see this again, i didn't read anything about it before i watched!! now i'll know what's going on. have u seen it ? ok. later~*
@@harletterider9658 That's terrible. People are full of demons these days. I am truly believing that drugs literally have demons in them. People have no conscience and don't care. It's crazy. I haven't heard about that one. I had to lay off watching some of these trials. Very dark, if you know what I mean. All upset me, but I can't handle the ones where children are murdered. I always wish family had intervened before it got there. 🙁
@@breeze_and_sky Innocent people have no reason to lie. He was still lying a year later. The jury heard both sides and took only 9 hours to find him guilty. None so blind as those who will not see.
From 🇨🇦. While all interrogations with the police and in this trial. He must have said: I don’t recall/remember approximately 1000 times !!! Did anybody count?
Esther Long I know that I will get some heat from saying this, maybe a lot, but I don't believe Jodi Arias deserved the death penalty or even life w/of parole; maybe 25, 40 or even life at the most. As one of Travis Alexander's close female friend even said " He was a collector of women". Travis abused her mentally, emotionally and used her for sex. She was crazy, but she loved him and he knew it. I know this is a different trial but I was not fortunate to know about LadyJ during the trial.
She brutally murdered Travis because she refused to let go of him and did not want anyone else to have him. She killed him three times over. She certainly did deserve the DP. Her ex boyfriends statements showed she had a pattern of being sneaky and not letting them go. Why do you believe she didn't deserve to get LWOP?
I also believe Clara Harris and Betty Broderick sentences were too harsh. And no I don't hate men; I just feel in all three of these cases the women were driven over the edge from being hurt so badly.
If every woman that has been hurt by a man and chooses to stay and do what these women have done they certainly belong in prison. The two women you mention here were wealthy and educated, they chose their own path.
I've been watching this I don't get all the other injuries A pipe through the wind shield? Seems guilty to me But if he were Was I wish he'd just man up First I've heard about the plastic on the dash board
@@harletterider9658 So the whole drive to work was a plan to murder her? In a relationship with no conflict at all? With a pipe in the trunk? But then he rage beats her while driving? Because the plan tho? You a special type of dipshit?
He never said where he got it. It had apparently been in her trunk the day she was murdered, bc it had her trace DNA all over it, as well as dirt and grass, which was still on the pipe and in the trunk. There was no blood anywhere on the pipe, at all.
Was Juan Martinez the first prosecutor to show time in silence to commit a crime? I have been noticing it quite often in trials since he did it in the Arias trial.
I'm very confused listening to this... I was under the impression that the state thought Todd killed her at their house and then drove somewhere to make it look like they had been in a car accident. So now is the prosecutor suggesting that Todd did this at 8 AM in broad daylight on the side of a road, right outside of their car that was pulled over?? I'm not saying that I don't think that he is guilty; I just find it hard to believe that somebody would beat their wife to death at 8 o'clock in the morning on the side of a road when they have their car pulled over in a way that would certainly draw attention.
it was clever. she might not have liked it but she sat through it like the rest of them did. the defense attorneys had to be besides themselves , you could hear a pin drop. i wonder what they were doing.
I've been looking at this case & still not sure if this was a freak accident or a beating. The prosecution was definitely better at presenting their case.
How can you not be sure-are you serious??? Did you hear the evidence of the physics expert?? The glass expert?? If you did, among the other experts, and still aren’t sure, I dk how to help you get it. Let’s consider: ** The pipe hit her in the back of the head, causing _THREE DIFFERENT FRACTURES???_ Really?!? No way! One blow = one fracture. If it had come at her the way TK said it did, it could only have caused ONE large fracture....but not THREE. Unless the pipe bounced! ** If the pipe hit her in the back of the head, how did the bones in her throat get crushed, fractured?? How did her nose get broken?? How did she get other injuries on her face, and defensive injuries on her hands?? And how did her husband’s DNA get wedged under her fingernails, corresponding with the scratches on his chest and throat?? ** If the pipe hit _HER,_ explain how he got all of _HIS_ injuries?? I think that ought to clear up any questions you still have, but if not, I suggest you watch _the entire trial,_ if you really want to resolve any lingering doubt. But all of the evidence, not counting the victim’s injuries, clearly shows that he still hasn’t told the whole story. Where were they going? Why were they driving north out of town, instead of to her job?? Why didn’t the victim call her school to say she would be late, when over the past 20 or so years, _she was never late?!??_ Why didn’t she call her mother, as she ALWAYS did, every single day, on the way to work?? The murderer never answered one of those questions! That alone tells ME he’s guilty, but luckily the State had much more evidence.
How awful if he's innocent! Two people excited about CranFest may have started their day differently that day... May have decided to drive in the direction he said, to see if by chance, his colleague may have known someone in need of a windshield... Accident may have happened just b4 she wld call in to work... Also he tried to get a lot done that morning to clear up the weekend.... A pipe was found on the road, nothing said about that 2nd pipe at trial....
He told lies that he thought wouldn't be fact checked. And if the police had been lazy it would've been written off he'd be the grieving widower and free to make a life with his boyfriend. Good thing the cops did their job. He is right where he belongs. She, sadly, is not.
The other pipe found 1/2-1 mile away was testified to at trial. Course, that pipe was simply lying on the shoulder of the road. Not flying off a truck, causing over 50 multi-plane injuries & then magically remaining suspended through a windshield.
