CNN's Chris Cuomo presses Sarah Sanders on her false statement that President Donald Trump did not dictate a misleading letter about a Trump Tower meeting with the Russians.
I am so sick of staff from this WH trying to tell me what Americans care about. Right now what I care about is if Cuomo can pry an answer out of her regarding those blatant conflicting statements, thank you very much.
Hanner76 I still want to see his taxes too. I also hate hearing this. I want to see how much money he's making off of being president. I laugh at people thinking Hilary was soooooo crooked, etc. So frustrating
Not kidding at all. Maybe, Chris wouldn't have to, if she would answer the questions. She knew when she agreed to the interview what field she was playing on, she was under the assumption that she would be in control. It's her fault for thinking more highly of herself than she ought too.
@@sheriserrano9599 I can appreciate your point of view Sheri. However, I totally disagree. I don't see a nice person at all when I see Sarah. She wasn't impartial, nor was she truthful in her position. She did and said whatever she needed to do to protect a lie. That, in my opinion, is not nice in any arena.
Dang it, I'm SOOO tired of her telling ME what I don't care about! I'm an American and I most certainly DO care about getting some straight answers to the questions that are asked. I wonder if she would still use this same routine if she was in front of a grand jury.
George Lewis sometimes I wonder if all these comments coming from those who were paid by Sorros to riot the day Trump won the the trip to the white house.. besides why would anyone give fake news CNN an explanations.. CNN lossing millions of views.. I don't like trump.. but we the people see what the media CNN HAS BECOME. SAD. this country is in a down hill.
It's like working at the supermarket.... having a problem with your pay.....so you approach the checkout chick to ask her. Ummmmmmmm......HR is out back.
@@goatlandia8457 then go on a obama video and talk about, its like you cant talk about more then one subject?. Also sandrah wanted transparency and honesty to be her legacy, dont you see it being a bit off with how many questions she refuses to answer?. And thirdly, if you think any obama era spokes person was at fault for refusing to answer questions, you dont have much credibilty when you seem ok with sandrah doing it. Lastly when did any obama era spokesperson use it as much as here? When did they lie as much as the trump era press briefings?. Its seems you are fine with lying your self. Show proof
@@kefkahkefkah I seem fine with lying? Wtf?! Put it this way, cnn mentioned the Russian conspiracy theory collusion almost 16,000 times, think about it 16,000 times a conspiracy theory was mentioned. I was a democrat for 30 years, I’m glad I left the slave party/compulsive lying party. I hated Trump in 2015 based off of pure disgusting lies, once I did my research and realized leftist media lied every step of the way is when I realized I will never go back to the left EVER. The left is now known as the party of pure hate and lies. Absolutely disgusting!!!
Try living in it! Its crazy, and I couldn't agree more, its the Twilight Zone, a particularly scary and frightening episode. As someone who had medical issues at a young age (5x spinal surgeries topped off with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis before I was 25) without proper fiscal support from family, it feels as if I am condemned to an existence of illness, pain, and poverty. Its tough seeing a system, the wealthiest ever, ignore the needs of its most vulnerable citizens, and instead give the wealthy another huge tax break while the stock market is continually rising, not to mention the whole spending trillions on war while inequality is skyrocketing and continuing to do so. But yes, definitely feels like living in The Twilight Zone here to me.
Evan Blodgett that’s exactly what she has! She’s believing one thing which isn’t facts. She only Wants to point out one thing and ignore everything else.
Hmmm so she's just going to keep lying. She has no shame and we will keep paying her to do it. It's that simple. She's just gross. I'm absolutely sickened everytime she opens her mouth and I hope after trump is impeached, she won't be able to get a job. How dare she speak so ill about the FBI.
I hope people remember this after she leaves the job and it haunts her for the rest of her career. After Sean Spicer left his job, the late night talk shows tried to rehabilitate him to the public. NO MORE. Sarah Liarbee Sanders will forever be tainted with this.
Carrie Munnick True. So many work at the FBI to make America a better country. She only works to make America a disgusting place that isn’t even attractive to paying tourists.
Armen Yakhszyan, 'lies about?' Your Russian is probably better then your English. Suckabee Sanders can answer, but chooses not too. That's as far as I'm going to answer your question. You can Google the rest.
Jae Ehm I noticed that about Spicer, too. In order to rehabilitate someone, there first needs to be credible remorse. None of that from Spicer. Spicer flushed his dignity down the toilet to please a destructive psychopath - and he took taxpayer money for that. He should first give all that money back, then STFU for a number of years. Then, maybe, at some point in time he could be rehabilitated. You break it, you own it.
Her answers sound so rehearsed with a passive aggressive tone with some arrogance sprinkled in. And by the way I’m an “American people” and I’m concerned about her lies
You all just don't understand. "American People" means people who cheer at Trumps' rallies. Nobody else qualifies. Or matters. It is a question of supreme indifference to real Americans what anybody except them thinks about anything.
I hope Sara read or reads your comment !! This was 2yrs ago - i think she was replaced w Kaighley !! Wow - i wonder if she NOW regrets being pro-Trump !!
You don't know? Well at least you can tell and know that Sarah Sanders is talking the Truth and nothing but the Truth. Prosperity has increased unther Trump. We here in Europe would be jealous about that. Cuomo could not keep up with Sarah Sanders. I felt real sorry for the guy! Have a nice day!
kayleigh mcenany lindsey graham ted cruz mitch mcmonnell rudy giuliani for starters and yes I purposely did not uppercase their names because they don't deserve to be acknowledged as human beings.
she represents your countries leadership, and by way of the voting system, americans values. you'd think people would take this sort of thing more seriously. to the rest of the world, this sort of thing is representative of the US and Americans (because that's what we see). i think america will see the consequences of this presidency for generations to come.
LMFAO! If this tool were a waitress, she'd be like "I'd really like to take your order, but I'd have to direct you to the Chefs, Restaurant Managers and Menu Planners that have created this menu..." Only she gets paid a HELL of a lot more than the average waitress...on the tax payers' hard earned dimes and nickels!
Yup. She's not only a professional question dodger, but she also wants to keep the paycheck she's receiving. She knows that Trump will can her if she gives an answer he doesn't like.
Thank you for saying this because she's certainly not speaking for many of us. Trump said the same thing about no one wants to see his tax returns. Says who?
I don't. We all know Trump is a corrupt lying piece of shit but he'll serve his term. So I'd rather just not hear about his dumbass every single day. You can't escape Trump no matter what you do and it's obnoxious.
Seven Pointed Star, you're wrong! She became unhinged a long time ago. And why do they bother to have this fat turd on if she's still going to repeat the same old shit! Waste of space!
I know this is seven months old at this point, but I still think it's important, and if you've changed your opinions since, just let me know. I don't like Chris Cuomo, and I'm also wondering if you can clarify what you believe she is saying that is of some sort of relevant substance. Look at his first question at 1:20. In it, he asks her if she agrees that her statement that Trump did not dictate Trump Jr.'s statement to the NY Times about his meeting with Russians in Trump Tower. He was asking her about the truth of the statement that SHE had made, not about anything else, and we know that her statement wasn't true because Trump's own legal team sent a statement to Mueller's office saying that Trump did dictate Trump Jr.'s statement after all. She could have owned up, even said that she had previously believed what she said and then found out later that she was mistaken or misinformed or whatever, but with regards to Cuomo "hearing what she is saying," as you put it, all she said was a referral to Trump's legal team. In other words, she didn't say anything, and that's a way of avoiding a situation when you're caught not knowing what you're talking about. It's a perfectly reasonable thing to refer someone asking you a question to someone else who knows more about it, but she had previously made a statement the topic of whether Trump did or did not dictate his son's statement, so she should have known something about this particular one. She tried to counter by saying that she doesn't understand why she's been asked the same question multiple times, but as Cuomo said, it's because she hasn't answered it yet, and again, the question is about a statement that she made and the subsequent evidence that proved her statement false. Her response to Cuomo was again, "No, I've answered it; you just didn't like the answer that I gave." But remember, the question was, "Do you agree that the statement you made about Trump dictating Trump's NY Times statement is false?" Watch the entire clip from when the question starts at 1:20 to when they take it in a different direction at 3:40. She never once says anything to answer the question other than "I would refer you to the White House counsel," which doesn't answer the question, and she says "We have already answered the question." If that second part is true, then why not just say it again? It took two minutes to dance around the issue when she could have just said the answer, which should have been easy if she'd already answered it before, as she said she had. Continuing on this same thought at 3:40, Cuomo asks her if she wished that the White House had corrected the erroneous statement that Trump had dictated Trump Jr.'s NY Times statement sooner. Keep in mind, Jay Sekulow himself had already proven her statement incorrect in his memo to Mueller's office. Her response is, "I wish that we spent less time focused on things that the American people don't care about," and she went on to mention a number of things that she would rather be asked about. The interesting thing about this idea is that politicians on both sides constantly refer to "what the American people want," and in almost all instances, it's a load of complete BS. That is just another way of trying to gain a false moral authority. I've seen Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer do it just as I'm seeing Sanders guilty of it here. Journalists are supposed to ask important questions, and while Cuomo is a bad journalist, there is a relevant reason for this question. At the time, Trump was in the middle of an investigation for his ties with Russian officials related to the election, similar to Biden and Hunter Biden's Ukraine situation. Now, if you found out that Joe Biden had personally written his son's statement to the press about how there was no corruption or wrongdoing on his part or Joe Biden's part, wouldn't you be suspicious that Joe was trying to cover something up? It's easy to be transparent and tell the truth when you have done nothing shady or wrong and thus have nothing to lie about. But it turned out that Sanders' previous comment that Trump did not dictate his son's statement was untrue, which makes you wonder, was she lying about it to cover it up, or did she legitimately not know? If she didn't know, then that's an easy one to clear up, but she said nothing to clear it up in that way. And to Cuomo's point at 3:57, people DO care about whether or not the people in power are telling the truth. Obviously you do from your comment, "manipulative man," which I happen to agree with overall in this instance. But intentionally or not, Sanders did not tell the truth, and considering Trump was in the middle of a related investigation, that's an important one to get right. Cuomo goes on to completely control the narrative of the conversation and steer it in a direction hostile and humiliating to Sanders, but that doesn't change the reality of the words that Sanders said, which is that she didn't tell the truth previously, and she dodged when she was asked about it. On to the next question at 7:25, Cuomo mentioned that a number of top republicans are saying that the FBI did spy on the president, and then he asks, "Is it time for the president to stop saying that the FBI spied on him?" Now look at Sanders' response: "The president's got some real concerns; we know that the FBI certainly participated in a number of things that I think, frankly, the American people are concerned about, not just the president, and we think they should be looked at, and that's what I think's taking place." "The president's got some real concerns" "The FBI certainly participated in a number of things" "The American people are concerned, not just the president" "We think they should be looked at" Reading those four major points from her response, what did you learn about the situation? In his question, Cuomo established that even top republicans, officials in Trump's own party, had said that, after reviewing the documents, there was no wrongdoing by the FBI. The truth is, Donald Trump can have all the concerns he wants, but until they reveal evidence that Obama spied on his campaign, claims like this should be avoided. In her response, Sanders even mentioned that a couple of FBI people were fired, but, as Cuomo pointed out, their firings were not related to Trump's spying claims. In essence, her attempt to use that as a defense was a deflection through its irrelevance. If Cuomo wasn't aware of the firings or the reasons for them, Sanders probably would have gotten away with her attempt. ****MORE IN A REPLY TO THIS COMMENT****
Going forward, both of them reveal their pettiness by taking shots at each other regarding pettiness. Then, at 9:48, he asks her, "What do you believe the case is for the American people, that, as we look at the first 500 days, 'winning?'" She mentioned the tax bill, and Cuomo mentioned one of the costs of it, which is the growing deficit. Cuomo's right when he said that Trump and his party have said many times that shrinking the deficit is a huge priority for them, and cutting the taxes of the wealthy in particular in such a huge fashion would only add to the deficit, which economists predicted. Sanders' response starts at 11:37, and you should listen to her responses while reading through the following list of main things she says, and tell me what you can get some substance out of, basically, what statements give you a "how" or "why" answer: "The president's working hard" "He's focused on fixing the trade deficit" "He's making sure that we're protecting American workers" "We're putting more money into American's pockets" "We're not allowing countries to rip us off" "The president's standing up to China" "We're bringing the wealth back into the United States" "We've brought in $7T in wealth" "The president is focused on reducing the deficit" "Previous administrations let our military drop down" "We needed a huge surge in military spending" "He made sure that our military was fully funded" In those pre-military responses, she was referencing Trump's tariffs, particularly the ones imposed on Chinese imported goods. Do you happen to know what happened to farmers as a result of Trump's tariffs? In case you didn't know, a tariff increases the cost for the consumer, not the exporter. The idea behind them is that they incentivize American consumers to buy American-produced goods because of the higher import costs. This often doesn't work out so well, because American manufacturers also have to face increased costs for parts that they need to produce their goods in the first place. And it hurts the economy of the country whose goods the tariffs were placed on, because if American consumers buy less of their goods because of the additional taxes, the other country's manufacturers can sell fewer goods. There's a reason why you probably heard about China introducing retaliatory tariffs after Trump introduced his against China, and that's because China needed to find ways for its own manufacturers and consumers to continue functioning as they had been. A general rule of tariffs is that the more there are, the less trade there is. So, to come back to the farmers, Trump's tariffs basically ran them out of business, as they found it more expensive to buy the parts and other goods they needed to produce, and they found that fewer consumers in China were buying from them because of China's tariffs that were imposed in response. He gave American farmers a $23 billion bailout because the effect of his tariffs was causing them to lose money. And who is going to stay in a business where they can't make money? The farmers would have jumped ship and changed careers, and our country would have produced far less than we do. And to prevent that from happening, Trump had to spend nearly $25 billion to keep that from happening (probably more, at this point). So Sanders can talk all she wants about Trump reducing the debt, but Trump's tariff war was very costly to not only our deficit, but to American businesses and consumers. At 13:35, Cuomo asks another question related to the tariffs, that the tax breaks that we received (more on that in a moment) are going to be virtually erased because of the higher costs due to the tariffs. I don't particularly care about that question at the moment, but Sanders' response shows that she doesn't fully understand how tariffs work. An absence of tariffs doesn't mean that a country is ripping you off, and neither does a trade imbalance. A trade imbalance just means that we want more of what they produce than what they want of what we produce. And then they will just buy the rest of what they need from another country that produces those products (or from their own local suppliers). What REALLY matters is whether or not our economy can sustain itself and grow. If we only buy from foreign manufacturers, then American manufacturers have no business. But that doesn't mean that buying from foreign businesses is wrong in every circumstance. For some reason, Trump thinks that, because we buy from China more than they buy from us, we are at some sort of a "disadvantage." And that may be true in the long term to a certain extent, but only if we're not also helping American businesses to succeed. Tariffs are nothing but an incentive to buy American because they tax and thus raise the cost of foreign goods (remember that the tax is paid by American consumers). And I'm not saying that tariffs are only bad. However, they did have a bad outcome in this instance. But Sanders' replies are, "The president is focused on good trade deals and not being ripped off by other countries." "We have a $500 billion trade imbalance." "The president is focused on fixing the problem." "We're very confident in his ability to get the deal we need." There is zero substance to those. Saying "We're very confident in his ability to get the deal we need" gives not even a single indication of a plan. And that's a little over 3/4 of the interview. Cuomo's last two questions don't really matter in the ways that his previous questions do. Your comment read, "Manipulative man. Gosh this is great hearing from her. What strength to be calm.in these attack question without hearing what she is saying." Could you tell me what exactly was great hearing from her? Could you tell me exactly what she was saying that Cuomo wasn't hearing?
She is handling this like the daily press briefing. No need to have her on. She can't and won't be honest. She has to stick to talking points. She has no credibility.
You can see how hard it is for her to restrain herself from answering. She’s struggling she come up with lies to cover up other lies.i don’t think i could ever do a job like hers. how can people support someone who openly lies and not answer serious questions.
PIndyJones Oh but what about the popular vote my friend? I refuse to let anyone tell me what's important to me. There's alot of these they would like to tell aren't important like how the goal post has been moved so many times for this dude. Like how if Obama did maybe 5 of these things that they would be outraged. How Trump lied about Obama, backtracked when confronted and acts like nothing ever happened. Like how people across America have spoken out about police brutality not just with minorities but in general and they have rolled back police reform only to cry foul when they are the ones investigated
ctl6985 By the time Trump breached the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election, he was also leading on the popular vote by a couple 100Ks. Then, the next day, Hillary has a sudden surge of about 3M in popular votes. It was unreal and It didn't make any sense. When that popular vote surge was investigated, the numbers did not add up and the investigation was quickly dropped. I'm sure you've noticed. Nobody in the media talked about that popular vote and for good reasons.
BULL!! oboooooMa's going to get his days in GITMO!! You can go visit him peering through the bars, because that 'illegal-POS-anti-America-Bum' knows he will never get out!! Same goes with the man with him!!
Alfreda Green you got a lot of nerve to talk when you're watching CNN for like real news this is like comedy News Network don't you know that lol it should be called a liar Central
@Dee Gomez That sounds even worse because you're now saying Trump didn't defend us from them! That's one of his duties as Commander In Chief. He FAILED. Can't wait for his clown ass to be out in November.
@Dee Gomez HE CALLED THE VIRUS A HOAX AS PEOPLE DIED AROUND THE WORLD. The economy was also not his, he rode the coattails of Obama until finally crashing it with his stupidity. You can't look at a single economic graph and point to his policies being put into effect until right at the very end when it all plummets
@Dee Gomez actually he was accused of being a racist xenophobe over banning countries having nothing to do with the virus, not for banning China. He also CALLED. THE VIRUS. A HOAX. He fired the pandemic response team, he never refilled stockpiles of PPE, and blamed Obama for everything, including a lack of testing kits that couldn't have possibly existed yet since it's a new virus. You hone in on one thing Joe Biden says and act like it's everything in the world while your orange idiot says 10 things a day 10 times as bad. The economy was Obama's and Trump rode his coattails until finally being faced with something he needed to make the right moves with, and he DIDN'T. He crashed the economy all on his own. No other country has seen their economy crash like ours, or seen their numbers spiral out of control like ours, and do not tell me the democrats did this to hurt him because they are NOT in charge. This is entire his doing and the only way anyone continues to support this guy is by lying to themselves. You are pathetic!
If you don't have time to watch the full 20 minute video, here's a quick summary: Sarah Sanders: "My job is to provide the most accurate information possible, and I think I have done so successfully." Chris Cuomo: "Could you give us some of that accurate information?" Sarah Sanders: "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." "I'll have to refer you to the outside counsel." ERROR! ERROR!
josue CH I like the guy but you really need to read a newspaper. I can list 10 great journalist off the top of my head. He just comes from a politically connected New York family. Although, being an attorney helps his interview style
Totally agree. She has zero personality! Must be very exhausting to have a defense and a lie up all the time. You lose yourself in it and not even realize it.
hamburgerhelperflick Isn't he the same guy who said that it's illegal to see the wikileaks documents so the public must listen only to them for what is in there? I'm sorry but after that I can't take this guy seriously.
He really said credibility is what people care about. The truth is what people care about and in the same breath said only she and Trump thinks its a witch hunt. Lol. There are millions of people who know its a witch hunt. Bongino, Hannity, Judicial Watch all know its a witch hunt. Should i go on. Credibility? This dude is a clown.
Maria Reyes oh just wait till Muellar has his day with her, she will be calling for daddy to tell the mean man to stop talking to her( she will have on a diaper).
Jesus. This wouldn't be a question if that had been her answer in the first place! What the f*** is going on here!? Why even attend these bogus briefings?
The Great Redrover Although I think that's what they're going for- completely invalidate the media and any attempt at holding this administration accountible
Low class?? By any chance that you get your "news" from "Fake"news, murdoch's ( not even an American) lying, spinning news station? Miss Debbie, I'll bet that you either live in the deep red state of Arkansas, or you are a right- wing Christian conservative of the Baptist persuasion, and or BOTH, huh?? This Sanders person was so morose in her daily, dogged appearance that the woman-hating, major manipulating ex-prez replaced her with a good looking, blue eyed blonde, who, BTW, lied even more treacherously than poor, down- in- the- mouth Sarah... The treasonous attack by the ex-prez (his words) and his ugly, violent supporters (their actions) should make this woman repent for her promoting, by being his press secretary, the many lies and exaggerations of a highly corrupted, incompetent demagogue. But, no, this so called Christian woman will take the devil's money to get her a high paying job as governor of Arkansas. She is without ethics, without experience and without intelligence, but, you know, you just love the Huckabees.Stay safe, stay well😷🤕🤮
I care that my president has been smeared since day 1. You are right. Love him or hate him, whatever. Vote him out in 2020. But smear after smear after smear with nothing to show for it...knock it off. Get behind the president until he isnt the president. The media is driving the divide.
The answer is so obvious. Stop asking the question in relation to the conflicting statements. Simply ask her "why" she said he didn't dictate the response. Forget about what the lawyers said afterwards, let's just ask her why "she" said that he didn't dictate it. Then, based on her answer we can connect the dots.
Many have tried that already. She deflects, pivots and screams backs at the facts, and simple questions, so you have to find creative ways to get her to answer questions. She was ready for this though, and didn't give an inch.
I get really tired of people calling people like Sarah a "wordsmith" and that she's "good at deflecting." Listen, you can ask me any question and I can answer it by rambling about something completely non-related to your question. Does that make me a wordsmith?
A scripted interview, with just asking prewritten questions is boring as hell and is more of a stage for the interviewed person if there is no follow-on question.
Give me ma'am I just want to reply on your comment and when you said Miss Sarah said that she wasn't to go back and forth with the gentleman interviewer. There are intellectual interviews and there are unintellectual interviews. And if you can tell the way this lady thanks anyway she comes to the service and to the table he's coming with pure Dee intelligence and no games guy she said I'm not going back and forth with you I like that that straight up and straight out oh, and she getting to the point like you just said what's the point getting to the point is the point. And that's what she is about Miss Sarah represent Donald Trump. So she's an answer let Donna that's all. Sorry I forgot your name wrong. Thank you you have a great day enjoy your holiday season stay safe please.
@@kitt1797 exactly Miss kid I just explained it to her cuz maybe she missed the point or misinterpret what an interview is about she's looking at most interviews she may be recognizing is that they go back and forth and most people don't know about different intellectual conversations that come to the table for discussion. So it wouldn't hurt some time to help somebody out maybe they don't understand. But I thank you for making it point-blank clear so you just like Miss are you coming straight out and straight up and straight out with the point. I love that. Have a great holiday season stay safe. And you take care
The whole purpose of coming on the show is for people to have a back and forth, that is literally the reason for bringing a guest on, why the hell does she keep saying she doesn't want to get into one?
Sure, you're entitled to your opinion. You have brought up a provocative point. But, her job is to answer the questions for the role she is in! To the American people. That means, if Sara gets a question on the economy, she should refer you to an economist! If Sara gets a Foreign Policy question, she should refer us to the American Diplomat in 'wherever'....like Netanyahu or If I've got a question on the White House, Sara should say, "ask the maid"??? The News papers and Networks (which are totally fake by the way) HAVE asked the experts!!! 'They', are giving her the opportunity to clarify the White House position!!! It's the OTHER way around. Pruitt and the damage he's done to the E.P.A., or how about the tariffs on China???Too long and too late to change that! American interests went over there 30 years ago or more and the goods just keep coming back to the American shores. China's got as many multi- millionaires as this country has people. And China still has over 1 billion population over that! What a LOSER country America is becoming!!! Mr. "My name Don't Matter", I'm sure you worked hard in your life. What/where is it you think America is advancing today??? The Norwegians are running to America! What does that tell you???
Damnnn I noticed his technique when he speaks to her. He must have been taught about that when he studied. You have to get into the psychology of a person and since Sarah is a nut job, he had to speak to her softly
hannah ingle When you speak softly the person you are speaking to must make an effort to listen to what you are saying. He knows how to handle people like her, and I was impressed.
Its a elementary technique to convey to you dumbass leftists you see me im speaking like a 3 year old im just an innocent soft guy here I wouldn't hurt anybody I am the victim just like you guys I wouldn't lie to you. Sarah is the big bad wolf. He knows he can't fool Sarah with that horseshit
Bullseye. Their minds are cloned. They must have attended the same Trump brainwashing training in lies, damn lies and forever lies. Obama's name always come into Trump and his press secretary conversations. Funny that... Is there political jealousy and insecurities in being so dumb and stupid?
Harry Ball-Sax my brother worked for Ford, he was an engineer. One time we were eating in a restaurant, and I mentioned to t he flirty waitress he was an engineer. He got pissed because he asked if I noticed her changed attitude. My brother despised the general arrogant egos of most engineers. They're worse than doctors. That guy mentioned he's an engineer out of pure ego.
Hey Sarah! I'm an American who votes and pays lots of taxes. I care about the too many conflicting stories, lies and cover ups spread by the direct words of you, your boss and the rest of his "Administration."
Hey... I am an American too! Guess what? It was the same when former, President Obama, was in office. If you deny that, then you Sir, ma'am or gender X person, are incredibly biased and have no sense of what it means to just recognize that BOTH parties are wrong, can be wrong, etc. Get back to the center.
No dodging. Just the answers you don't want to hear. Her role is a spokesperson for The White House and the President's policies. She has NOTHING to do with the President's private life and life before presidency. She cannot answer questions that have nothing to do with her job, her role, her expertise and her knowledge. The question should be asked to the President's outside council, not the White House.
she did answer all questions, if u dont like them, that is on you but please dont alternate reality or do it just to yourself its disgusting and retarded
If she has nothing to do with president's private life why does she call Muller's investigation a witch hunt, just like trump does and constantly tries to defect, and excuse trumps actions if it's not her job to?
@K H my honorable friend a.g. barr is doing his investigation. The first set of indictments will be coming late July early August. We will see who is dumber than snot in about 45 more days stay tuned. Check and Mate.
