Тёмный

What if the Soviet Union Never Fell? | Alternate History 

Neatling
Подписаться 44 тыс.
Просмотров 484 тыс.
50% 1

In this video I talk about the fall and collapse of the Soviet Union, its immediate consequences, and what might have happened had it survived till the present.
The major changes in this scenario include no Saur revolution in Afghanistan, no Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and Gorbachev's reforms being very different and more akin to Chinese reforms in the 70s.

Опубликовано:

 

7 сен 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,1 тыс.   
@eliasziad7864
@eliasziad7864 Год назад
Absolutely crazy to think about that one Russian, born in the year between 1900-1910 was born under the Russian empire, tsar nicholas, then go through ww1 and then the Russian revolution, then under Stalin during ww2, then living peacefully in the USSR 45 years during the cold war. Then experiencing the Soviet collapse, and finally dying after 1999 under the Russian federation under President Putin...
@caesarthegreat11
@caesarthegreat11 Год назад
ONG
@timojarun7830
@timojarun7830 Год назад
Imagine that poor guy under all those brutal tyrants
@QWERTY-gp8fd
@QWERTY-gp8fd Год назад
@@RadikatMLG when u have that many people with large land its easy to be world power.
@DeSlagen8
@DeSlagen8 Год назад
He was prime minister in 1999 and president in 2000
@DeSlagen8
@DeSlagen8 Год назад
@Groszek how? its like being alive from king george v to king charles
@tragarts
@tragarts Год назад
"They are our brothers, these freedom fighters". That aged well.
@1035Ghuraba
@1035Ghuraba Год назад
freedom fighters when they benefit us, terrorists when it doesn’t benefit them
@mr.christopheralancurd1349
@mr.christopheralancurd1349 Год назад
They just being used by The West Governments just to abuse The USSR!
@Patrick_TheDoorWcfm
@Patrick_TheDoorWcfm Год назад
Lmao…so,so,so right
@Patrick_TheDoorWcfm
@Patrick_TheDoorWcfm Год назад
I forgot So republicans have always courted fringe types like Trump with Kim ding dong from N.Korea
@Deepakkkr-sy5dl
@Deepakkkr-sy5dl Год назад
Terrorists friends are also a terrorist.
@electrifiedbathbomb7383
@electrifiedbathbomb7383 Год назад
I highly kinda doubt the USSR would stay authoritarian since gorvachev's goal has always been democracy and transparency in my opinion and most likely the USSR would rebrand itself into the soviet federation or something But this video is still a very good interpretation of what would happen
@marintheking1515
@marintheking1515 Год назад
If the august coup never happens the Soviet Union would have rebranded into the Union of Sovereign Soviet Republics where the republics didn’t have to be communist
@vitamc1213
@vitamc1213 Год назад
It definitely would have had to have stayed a one party state, though. Not saying that can't be democratic or transparent, because it can. But, the reason is because you cannot expect that the whole structure of government will change every time a conservative economic party was voted in. In a way, the one party state was exactly what kept it together in unity, in one belief. Democracy is still possible in a one party state, to an extent.
@TheStarcoMarco
@TheStarcoMarco Год назад
There is a naming proposal for the Reformed USSR. It's the Union of Sovereign States(USS). There is also a Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics.
@belgianfried
@belgianfried Год назад
Look into the New Union Treaty by Gorbachev
@ianush.
@ianush. Год назад
Gorbachev was a full believer of marxism and it's doctrines. He tried to make it work, and he failed.
@Marylandbrony
@Marylandbrony Год назад
I would like to see what the miliary technology would be like actually as a lot of programs got canceled or scaled back due to the USSR collapsing in both the east and the west and it would be interesting to see how tech develops with a peer level conflict in mind for 3 decades instead of the war on terror and a third world war perhaps breaking out in February of 2022.
@terrestrialextra4790
@terrestrialextra4790 Год назад
The US would have way more Seawolf subs and 700 some F-22s for STARTERS. Also they would of kept shit like nuclear powered cruisers etc
@qjtvaddict
@qjtvaddict Год назад
Well the Ukraine invasion would not have happened and china would not be as powerful but still powerful.
@JDDC-tq7qm
@JDDC-tq7qm Год назад
@@terrestrialextra4790 USSR would still have way more Nukes than current Russian Federation and more Weapon systems and Personnel
@professorbenjaminfranklinv9911
@@JDDC-tq7qm I remember my first beer
@konstandinosverzamanis5699
@konstandinosverzamanis5699 Год назад
if world war broke out in february 2022 you wouldn't be having internet right now. It's only Russia Ukraine war with NATO desperate to start WW III by supplying Ukraine
@justinroyse4271
@justinroyse4271 Год назад
Yugoslavia might have actually survived because they were reliant upon both the Soviet Union and United States for economic aid. This isn’t gospel, just something to consider.
@supersejkaj3093
@supersejkaj3093 Год назад
Yugoslavia was dead the moment Tito died without naming a successor
@braziliantsar
@braziliantsar Год назад
@@supersejkaj3093 Yugoslavia was dead the moment Tito started to create new nationalities as a way to reduce serbian majority (north macedonians, montenegrins, kosovars).
@user-pn7jz9vr2z
@user-pn7jz9vr2z Год назад
@@supersejkaj3093 fake history expert It existed before him, it could have existed after him
@supersejkaj3093
@supersejkaj3093 Год назад
@@user-pn7jz9vr2z While Yugoslavia existed before Tito, the modern Yugoslav nation was built upon a cult of personality with Tito at it's center. Tito used his power to suppress ethnic tensions in a way that no other political leader would have had the status among both the populace across the country and the political leaders to be allowed to do. The lack of a fit succesor left a sudden power vacuum in the nation, and all presidential solutions up until the Yugoslav wars were half hearted and unstable attempts at trying to save a situation that wasn't to be saved. The only realistic way I could see a prevention of this is if Tito had invested serious time into creating a clear successor as part of probaganda efforts, but this would be a hard task since there were so many politicians and ethnicities to please. Any dismay caused by a switch in leadership would have been disastrous for the Republic, and dismay would be likely. In other words, Yugoslavia was doomed to fall, and Tito would have has to play his cards just right if he was to prevent this. Since he hadn't laid a plan for what was to happen after his death, the country was effectively dead when he died, and the Yugoslavia that we saw in the 1980s was on life support, constantly fighting to avoid the inevitability of the Yugoslav breakup.
@thearbiter3351
@thearbiter3351 Год назад
@@braziliantsar Tako je!
@jgr7487
@jgr7487 Год назад
the thing is: the PRC had to build up all their production capacity from nothing, meanwhile a Perestroika-only opened USSR would be at the technological level to start being the factory of the world. yes, the USSR's industry was extremely advanced in some areas (Buran > Shuttle), but it was also quite behind Western industry standards in other (see autos). esides that, we have the fact that standards of living were lower in the USSR, & so were wages in 1991. with all that put together, we have a highly educated poor population in a highly technological country, which would be able to put out in 1991 the same level of products that China could in the 2ks+ for a fraction of the wages and better quality, all that right by the side of a major market. my guess is that a Perestroika-only open USSR would have pushed the PRCs boom further down the line.
@marcdigiambattista751
@marcdigiambattista751 Год назад
Looking at how Europe fell in love with cheep Russian energy after the USSR collapsed, one might wonder what direction the EU would have gone with a reformed USSR exporting not just energy but also consumer goods like China does in our timeline. There could even be a scenario where EAST Germany begins to over take WEST Germany in living standards due to subsidized Russian gas coming from their Soviet comrades. And really things were heading in this direction before the 1980s, with the Soviet economy projected to be the world's largest by the year 2000. Things stagnated in the 80s, but living standards were still relatively good and people were relatively happy, so Soviet leaders did nothing to fix the systemic deficiencies in their economy. Gorbachev was the only one who finally saw the writing on the wall and accepted the need to reform, however in my opinion he also had absolutely no idea what the heck he was doing and his advisors were either corrupt, incompetent or both. I believe he genuinely had good intentions for his people, however the agenda he put in place accelerated the stagnant USSR into a full blown decline, leading to a dark age in Eastern Europe which has not only persisted to this day, but has intensified to the point that we now have the biggest ground war in Europe since WWII. Most of the images of starving people lining up for bread under "communism" actually come from Gorbachev's reform era. Ask an old Russian, and they will tell you life was good under Brezhnev. Of course Brezhnev sitting on his hands and not moving the economic project forward set up the conditions which forced Gorbachev to take drastic actions, but the perception of the average Soviet citizen was that there had never in history been that level of relative prosperity in the Eurasian land mass for ordinary working people.
@draker769
@draker769 Год назад
Maybe not, with the Soviet still an enemy of the US, the US will invest much more and more liberalize China
@jgr7487
@jgr7487 Год назад
@@draker769 the US would keep investing in China, butthe Europeans already depended on Soviet fossil fuels, so they were in the position to invest even further in their red neighbour
@goranstojanov1160
@goranstojanov1160 Год назад
Well ist WW1/WW2 that helped wes or more specificaly USA to cick out otehrs form extremely important dominances suc as USA using WW1 to kick out UK from being the maritime trade monopoly and then USA put itself in that place.Not to mention all infrastructure from civil to industrial NOTHING was destoyed or touched while Europe,Asia,Middle East was DECIMATED especialy Europe and some of Asia. West more precicely USA EXTREMELY PROFITED FROM ALL THE WARS bcs tehre was NON of the devastating damages done to it and insetad USED war to extremely porfit and ramp up ist own indursy empire. Thing is/REALITY IS that what Eurpoe/USA accuse China of (dept trap) is LITETRLAY WHAT USA did to Europe jjust the difference is China didnt go around turning countries into stone age and then rebuild it BUT its an UNDENIABLE FACT that TILL THIS DAY there are MANY European countrie sTHAT STILL DIDNT PAY BACK ALL OF THE LOANS/DEBTS FROM WW1 ALONE CBS IT CANST AND WILL NEVE BE ABLE TO DO SO.Thats why MANY TIME Seven thou its not in their inetrest they STILL follow USAs orders like some puppies its cbs they MUST do it.
@mikebond3210
@mikebond3210 Год назад
What do you mean the standards of living were lower in the USSR? They were actually better than now in Russia. And the standards of living were better for the working class in the USSR compared to the USA. Also the soviets in 1991 had a population really educated. Education was great in the USSR and it was free
@robv.8676
@robv.8676 Год назад
I think it would have made more sense if the USSR gave democratisation an other go (as was attempted in 1936-1937 with a new constitution that allowed for non communist to run as candidates in elections etc), abandon market reforms and instead keep the planned economy but instead of basing it on output, do it properly by using computer systems to track demand. Thus making the economy much more effective and more appreciated by the people since it would be a demand based, non profit economy. That could kick of an era of liberty, democracy and economic satisfaction for the people in the USSR. Which in turn would have kept pressure on the western businesses not to let income and wealth inequality grow like it has done in the US, UK etc since the 70s untill this very day. For the average citizen in most countries of the world this could have meant a better position than compared to today's reality?
@prufenful
@prufenful Год назад
I doubt the technology for that would even exist until the common era, or China would be doing it.
@sahilhossain8204
@sahilhossain8204 Год назад
Ah yes neatling let's make a what if video about the 1936 early democratization actually passed
@mikebond3210
@mikebond3210 Год назад
Very good insight I agree with everything you said except about the democracy part which is actually very important for a communist society, but the USSR wasn't there yet. So I don't think democracy as in letting every candidates from every ideology would be good yet because there always a danger of having a greedy drunken guy like Yeltsin win the elections with western money and influence. And having him destroy the USSR like he did. But I do think that the population should be able to vote democraticaly for some communist candidates and be able to stop any presidents that are not going for the interest of communism which are the interests of the masses
@sahilhossian8212
@sahilhossian8212 Год назад
@mike bond that's an interestingly great idea!
@areaxisthegurkha
@areaxisthegurkha Год назад
If democracy ever comes to Russia, it is because of the influence of other democratic countries. Russia will become corrupted as hell and obviously the western europeans won't invest in them at times of need that easily.
@bosanski_Cevap
@bosanski_Cevap Год назад
I think you are wrong with the Yugoslavian wars still happening. Many people claim ethnic tensions as the major reason for the war but in reality the ethnic tensions began just after the Yugoslavian economy hit recession in 1980s. A still economical strong USSR would prevent the recession from becoming an economic disaster like it happen during the 90s where Hyperinflantion happened. And if the Yugoslav wars still happened, I am not sure if an united Bosnian Federation could exist in this timeline duo the Serbs being more supported by the East while at the same time the Bosnian govnerment by the West
@aoki6332
@aoki6332 Год назад
they always had tension in the country the only reason why it was held together was Tito and the country turned into civil war before the soviet dissolution at that point nothing could have help the country everything was going wrong and like ww1 its just needed a catalyst to start
@alengrm7488
@alengrm7488 Год назад
Yugoslavia was a failed state held togheter by Tito. The recession didn't rly spark the coflict at least not in Slovenia. It was the people who were more and more desperate for self-governance. After all, the Slovene money was going to Belgrade before and after the economic troubles and Slovenes were sick of that. Slovenia and probably Croatia would most likely declare independence anyways
@sevenoxia7199
@sevenoxia7199 Год назад
See, Yugoslavia wasn't likely to have a good economy held on by the USSR, since the USSR was somewhat against the regime in Yugoslavia, even after the death of Tito.
@leMiG31
@leMiG31 Год назад
@@alengrm7488 yes Because you are a bunch of capitalistic greedy men that dont want to help other region in need
@christiaanhollander7933
@christiaanhollander7933 Год назад
Ussr colapse under the sanctions + the mayor loses on the batlefield like example there only test unit mobile radar who the sadf captured transported to isreali for researtch aswell as other weapons and vechile including up to date migs , also the rhodesia campeign + vietnam + afganistan + the colapse of joegaslavia became the end of the ussr , like ukraine are doing the 4k sadf troops + unita fighters of johanatan savimbi ( nick name butcher of angola " has to be say his tribe was ethnic mayority and betray by fapla who told they would give them the state witch they told to the legendary men of fnla to ( men who were from child till adault soldiers " who would be train by comander of 44 para the pathfinders , and later also 32 bat the angolan bufalo troop becus they would fight like a bufalo ) also the geurila war in afganistan drained ussr wealth
@maxwellschmidt4498
@maxwellschmidt4498 Год назад
amazing visuals, amazing in depth hypotheticals, very well done. I'd say this video beats all others relating to this topic.
@raymondgough6070
@raymondgough6070 Год назад
This was super interesting. It would have been great to have seen some rough economic and demographic estimates extrapolated from 80s trajectories or based on Eastern European GDPs
@tylerclayton6081
@tylerclayton6081 Год назад
USSR GDP would still be at least 10 times smaller than the USA. Eastern Europe states like the Baltics or Poland didn’t gain prosperity until they joined the west
@raymondgough6070
@raymondgough6070 Год назад
@@tylerclayton6081 China's GDP per capita is now comparable to Russia's even though it started from a MUCH lower base. It's not inconceivable to think that Russia's GDP could be much higher if had avoided the turmoil of the 90s and implemented Chinese-style reforms.
@knightlypoleaxe2501
@knightlypoleaxe2501 Год назад
@@tylerclayton6081 USSR was projected to surpass the USA's in the 2000s, around 2005, so no.
@scvboy1
@scvboy1 Год назад
@@tylerclayton6081 No way. The USSR's GDP per captia would be at least on the level of Poland in OTL
@darkphoenix8941
@darkphoenix8941 Год назад
Eastern Europe wouldn't have the same demographics crisis OTL,In our Timeline before the fall of the 80s, the Eastern bloc country has a higher birth rate than the country of Western Europe but after the fall of the comunist bloc the birth rate collapse.But in this timeline this woudn't happen and if the Eastern bloc succesfuly Reform to market socialism this collapse wouldn't happen,if the USSR still have the same demographics grow of 1991 it would have a population of 356 millions
@georgios_5342
@georgios_5342 Год назад
Another very interesting scenario. Thanks again, Neatling!
@nikitanosov8159
@nikitanosov8159 Год назад
You are missing one big point. Without collapse of USSR, there would not be a free for all theft of Soviet property and resources as what has happened in the 90's USA would be in much bigger debt spiral without a way to write off it's currency debt. The economic boom of the 90's would probably not have happened. NAFTA and globalization would not have happened as fast as it have. There is a very real possibility of USSR and China working out their differences of the 70's
@zombie19gaming
@zombie19gaming Год назад
Yeah, Gorbachev fixed relations between 2 countries which is why Russia and China are allies today. If USSR and Warsaw Pact survived and managed to reform like in this video we would today have super eastern bloc led by 2 super-powers - USSR and China
@schneejacques3502
@schneejacques3502 Год назад
@@zombie19gaming Than soviet would have to abandon india and Vietnam to be pro china
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
Nikita Nosov if USA and allies weren’t able to reach soviet resources I think NAFTA would happen quickly, to secure to Americans control on Canadians and Mexican ones
@MiserableMuon
@MiserableMuon Год назад
Ronald Reagan:"they owe our help" Few decades later: *the state of Afghanistan*
@DeSlagen8
@DeSlagen8 Год назад
He is a good actor though
@kohank5938
@kohank5938 Год назад
​@@DeSlagen8 Better actor than Obummer?
@LucasJasche
@LucasJasche 11 месяцев назад
@@kohank5938 Bush got us into that war, with full support of his party.
@Something_Unique_512
@Something_Unique_512 2 месяца назад
⁠@@kohank5938obummer is a new one I’ve heard
@zombie19gaming
@zombie19gaming Год назад
I think in this alternate timeline China would team up with USSR (like with Russia in our timeline) because of many reasons: 1. Economic ties, both would have market socialism economies 2. USA would be militarily active in Turkiye, directly threatening USSR, forcing it to seek new allies 3. USA would support Taiwan against China (like in our timeline) 4. USA would start focusing on China more than USSR/Russia because China would be surpassing USA in economy and technology (like in our timeline) 5. It was Gorbachev who fixed relations with China, which is reason why Russia and China are allies in our timeline 6. USSR and China both would be seen as a threat by the west, forcing them to work together 7. America would have its bases in Far East, Middle east, Turkey, Europe, Taiwan, effectively encircleing both USSR and China 8. Iran and Pakistan would allign themselves with USA as they would see USSR, China and communism as a threat to their culture and islam 9. Liberal-democratic India would have closer relations with communist USSR (and not with China because of their border dispute) than also liberal-democratic USA and the west because of 1971. but, still would remain non-alligned (like in our timeline) Edit: Oh, and I forgot to mention that in this timeline North Korea, as Soviet sattellite would likely follow steps of USSR like other Soviet-alligned states so it would be able to secularize, modernize and compete with South Korea
@buni1934
@buni1934 Год назад
Turkiye is on the verge of leaving nato an increased us presence would make them leave
@zombie19gaming
@zombie19gaming Год назад
@@buni1934 This is what if Soviet Union survived, Turkiye joined NATO only because it feared falling under Soviet influence
@buni1934
@buni1934 Год назад
@@zombie19gaming the fear of the soviets pretty much ended in the 80s
@zombie19gaming
@zombie19gaming Год назад
@@buni1934 is that why NATO started Able Archer 83 exercise on Soviet border in 80s?
@buni1934
@buni1934 Год назад
@@zombie19gaming sorry i wasn't clear of what i said The fear of the soviets pretty much ended for the turks in the 80s
@plexusGD
@plexusGD Год назад
Me on every single video: When's the new alternate history coming? Neatling: What if the USSR never fell? Me (Bulgarian): Oh HELL no
@bosanski_Cevap
@bosanski_Cevap Год назад
Are you sure of Communist Bulgaria was that terrible? I mean you lost like 20% of your population from 2000 to 2020. Most of your young population has left for the West just like the rest of Eastern Europe*
@plexusGD
@plexusGD Год назад
@@bosanski_Cevap Am I sure it was that bad? The standard of living was in the trash, the government was an authoritarian one-party dictatorship, the country was a complete puppet state to the USSR, and much more are the reasons I think it was "that bad. The real reason people are leaving is because life is better in the west. But they couldn't do that under communism, because the country didn't allow people to leave. So, the fact that people are leaving is not stopping me from preferring democracy, no thanks.
@juantamayo5295
@juantamayo5295 Год назад
@@bosanski_Cevap communism left Bulgaria so poor that now that they're free the youth moves to richer places
@siyacer
@siyacer Год назад
@@bosanski_Cevap Why do you think they wanted to leave in the first place?
@evzenvarga9707
@evzenvarga9707 Год назад
@@bosanski_Cevap communism made the country extremely poor and corrupt, today Bulgaria is a fine country in the upper-middle income group, people still leave because much "better" places are almost right next door.
@gwky
@gwky Год назад
From listening to my family talk about life under the Soviets, they didn't care about politics and thus were wholly detached from the divisive debates tearing our society apart today. The simply pretended to work, actually working like 3 days per month, would go on mandatory 2-week holidays twice per year to holiday resorts and spas, and pretty much drink and party all day every day, since if there wasn't anyone's birthday to celebrate, you would celebrate their friends birthday (in their name, obviously they weren't there in person) or their friend's friend's friends, and so on. They basically made up holidays to drink and party every day. After work, they'd go feast at each other's homes. I wonder if the internet and computerization would have been the same as it is in China, creating a vast internal market, but generally mimicking western tech companies, or if it would have been like North Korea, where only select families would have the ability to use the internet under strict supervision. At the very least, I know that millions wouldn't have killed themselves, and that USSR would have been a much more equal country. It's similar to when I ask my Chinese friends, and they say that they don't need freedom of speech or opinion, basically just don't talk about politics, and then you can do whatever you want. At least in USSR, everyone had free access to schooling of all levels and good healthcare. Free theater spectacles, artistic shows, etc. But my parents did say that the TV programs sucked, it was pretty much soviet propaganda or war films with intermittent showings of the communist party meetings. Boring shit. But hey, at least it was a simple life that everyone enjoyed. People in my home country often reminisce about the good old soviet days, I'm sort of the weird link between the ultra-radical left youth of today and the old conservative soviet boomers, so it's interesting to view such scenarios to contemplate what could have been.
@nguyenvuminhkhoi8179
@nguyenvuminhkhoi8179 Год назад
i'm Vietnamese and yeah have a one party government, communist one. Theretically we are much alike China government in which we follow liberal free market and are free to make money, as long as it doesnt affect the country direction. Infrastructure and healthcare as well as education are owned by government, giving us low cost of living, the life is kinda simple, but for big company, they have to compromise with the government, so basically if the state people are efficient and well trained people, the developpment is garaunted and life is way more simple, cause you just have to follow one direction in general. Now im studying in the West, life is much more complicated. Big privated companies make tons out of people. Freedom of speech is sometimes overrated, pp protesting nonsensely about deconstructivist ideologies and guided by big media companies, its a big mess. Working class have to worry about bill and tax, some prison are not just behind the bar,... Yeah perharps we cannot talkshit about our government, maybe a constructivist argument but the moment you do that you will have special attention and large scale protest are not allowed, but who protest anw when pp are living simple and easy life, and the economy keep growing? The state isn't perfect but neither does the so call the land of Freedom
@gwky
@gwky Год назад
@@nguyenvuminhkhoi8179 yeah I moved to the states and it's honestly pretty bad, everyone is struggling, whereas the companies as you put, simply play both sides for profit, and yet the people are too stupid to realize that, and get dragged into conflicts with one another, resulting in instability and crime. Almost nobody can change what the government does, so why should we even care? And yet, that's all the talk here in the states, "freedom" and "democracy" they say, but they have neither, and yet they keep deluding themselves. Just like with the "american dream". Everyone keeps dreaming about making it rich, but they work 2 jobs and get a stroke at 50 and die. It is what it is. We exchanged simpler times and social harmony for "capitalism", just another rendition of modern slavery, in my opinion.
@nguyenvuminhkhoi8179
@nguyenvuminhkhoi8179 11 месяцев назад
@@gwky yeah if the USSR had transformed its economy at a lower speed, and not its politics it may still stand as one of the most powefull and revolutionary model of government. Almost like a smaller version of UN, imo,...
@mateuszmazurek7991
@mateuszmazurek7991 6 месяцев назад
How do you expect economy to function if people work actually 3 times a month? That country is doomed to collapse or end up in real poverty
@DiviAugusti
@DiviAugusti 2 месяца назад
@@mateuszmazurek7991Yeah I was going to say this is a recipe for a country that can’t compete with anyone.
@HOTSHTMAN53
@HOTSHTMAN53 Год назад
Correction, the soviet union allocated 1.5-2% of its MILITARY BUDGET towards the maintenance of its troops and equipment in Afghanistan. It didnt just randomly take it from its overall budget. There are CIA documents such as “The economic cost of the Soviet Unions invasion of Afghanistan” , which further proves this
@subz6739
@subz6739 Год назад
The Soviet Union was what kept Europe together… America came into talks with Gorbachev to collapse it… Russia’s shield was officially destroyed. America’s plan was to weaken the Russian economy and military strength and gain access to Europe to expand its NATO.. In fact, Something that America agreed with Russia not to do, Expand their NATO into Europe and former Soviet countries.
@subz6739
@subz6739 Год назад
Their plan is to get stronger and Invade us to take all our land away and split it into pieces… It drives world leaders insane that we got all this land for ourselves so every hundred years or so, They world goes insane, tries to unite, and destroy our nation together.
@bdleo300
@bdleo300 9 месяцев назад
They never kept more than 100k troops there (most of the time significantly less). The war in Afghanistan is the most over hyped and overrated war in history, it was almost as irrelevant as US own war in Afghanistan. USSR lost 15k troops in 10 years, that's nothing, USA lost half of that number in Iraq, Russia and Ukraine lose that number per month and even 200 years ago Russians lost 2-3 that number in a single day of Borodino. So the idea that Afghanistan was crucial in demise of USSR is just pure nonsense (and Reaganist propaganda)
@mitheconomics
@mitheconomics Год назад
Amazing video!I started my channel thanks to your videos and hopefully I can do a good job as well talking about economics.Thank you for inspiring me and keep up the good work.
@skeptical5727
@skeptical5727 Год назад
So happy he made this, i always wondered abt it.
@johnythepvpgod1470
@johnythepvpgod1470 Год назад
There is a Russian serial on what if the Soviet union never collapsed. It has time travel and surreal plot points but it's amazing
@edudev2975
@edudev2975 Год назад
where can i find it or whats the name?
@johnythepvpgod1470
@johnythepvpgod1470 Год назад
@@edudev2975 in russian its called "обратная сторона Луны " which is read obratnaia storona lunî and it translates to "the other side of the moon"
@jazzielcarrillo
@jazzielcarrillo Год назад
Interesting video and view for an alternative history to our own. But how would the world like if the Sino-Soviet split never happened.
@ShenronRage
@ShenronRage Год назад
One of the reasons rarely mentioned for the Soviet collapse is the immense amount of resources Russia had to funnel to the Soviet republics, and to the Warsaw Pact countries. In Russia a lot of people assumed that by selling these goods instead of giving them up like they were Russia would be a lot richer. At that theory looked to be correct till about 2014 when the whole Ukraine thing happened, and triggered an immense amount of paranoia from the Russian population that forced a huge post Cold War realignment with the West.
@MrMegapixelis
@MrMegapixelis Год назад
are you crazy :) or just still in russia propoganda...a lot of these countrys were doing much more better then the old good russia...by pacts and other shit...they stoped these countrys...they took best what they could...and put on regime...that stoped they development...
@kirrax111
@kirrax111 Год назад
They sucked out more resources than invested anyway. Anti-western paranoia began with Putin in power in early 2000s. Just it was not that visible from outside from the stasrt.
@DachshundDogStarluck19
@DachshundDogStarluck19 Год назад
Russian Federation would've been a lot stronger and far richer had they elected a great leader with good intentions to create natural allies rather than creating enemies out of nowhere, like Vladimir Putin did.
@goobot1
@goobot1 6 месяцев назад
Makes you wonder why after reconstruction from ww2 they didn’t just annex all those lands, cheaper to rule over and makes economy stronger
@XOSinclairSmytheXO
@XOSinclairSmytheXO 6 месяцев назад
They were also funding Cuba's wars of Marxist liberation of Africa when the collapse happened no more wars.
@nicholaswilson1310
@nicholaswilson1310 Год назад
Nice bit of alt history analysis there. More please!
@shzarmai
@shzarmai Год назад
Excellent video :))
@Rrgr5
@Rrgr5 Год назад
First things first, the Chinese economic reforms began practically when Deng made land reforms stepping back from the collectivization, Moscow saw it as way to drastic, their reforms were set to do the same as the Chinese did, but without the land reform, that's why they failed, Gorbachev himself said that, instead of openness and economic growth they got ultranationalism and recession, which was the opposite from what happened in China, or perhaps Vietnam, which also did similar reforms, people in the west tend to assume that it was the special economic zones, but they came latter in China, and the reason was the land reform, it was a way to prevent speculation, since if you privatize the land, is obvious that real state enterprises would be like vultures all over it, so they made the SEZ to control it. That said, this could even work in the USSR? Theoretically, yes, and funny enough, the USSR had what China lacks and vice-versa, which was the heavy industry, theoretically a company could build facilities to extract materials, build tools, stuff like that in the USSR, which would use their highly skilled work force, to transform in China and sell all over the world, the problem is that the desindustrialization all over the world would be twice as hard, Japan and Germany would be hit hard, the US recession in the beginning of the 2000 would be way worst and soon enough the crime rates and domestic terrorism would be on the rise, so the war on terror would still be happening, in a very different way, but it will, the arms race would probably stall, the microprocessors and telecom races would become the new thing, the cold war would be over by this point since everything is capitalist now, so it will change everything to stay the same.
@morningstararun6278
@morningstararun6278 8 месяцев назад
"So the crime rates and domestic terrorism would be on the rise". You literally described the current US society in this point.
@ladahieno2382
@ladahieno2382 Год назад
oh also cheers, it's almost been 2 years since i started supporting you! Edit: It's been 2 years :3
@__europa
@__europa Год назад
Fans who have a membership to this channel l
@ladahieno2382
@ladahieno2382 Год назад
@@__europa it's been a blast, I'd just hope Neatling actually gets more time and starts moving on with his channel
@romanempire1536
@romanempire1536 Год назад
Do part 4 for what if eastern Rome didn’t fall. Ideas for what would they have done during the world wars
@djhumous1084
@djhumous1084 Год назад
Is official…Neatling is back
@kropyl_
@kropyl_ Год назад
4:48 ah yes, hindsight, truly a spectacle to stun and amaze.
@RDWillett1
@RDWillett1 Год назад
If the Soviet Union never collapsed, everything woulda have been better, because the Cold War is what made both sides prosper and it made astonishing advances in technology and research, plus the Military would constantly be advancing and we wouldn't have to worry about 9/11 or any middle eastern wars. It would also be the way we all get space colonization, seeing how the space race would eventually evolve into the colonization of planets, they would have fast Space ships, pretty much the beginning of Star Trek-type tech. Of course, after a while of that, the 2 sides would start to stop feuding and begin to work together, since they both have colonies on the same planets, after many joint endeavors, the 2 would eventually merge or create a United Space program and it will be the beginning of Earth Unity. At that time, both sides would be doing very well economically and Militarily as well as tech-wise too, so the de-escalation of the Cold War would happen and both sides would try to work together, ushering in a new era of Peace and prosperity. Until China starts doing their own colonization of planets and creates a 3rd party, then the peace would slowly die, due to people on the West side being outraged and angry that the government's decision to work with the " enemy" and many riots and revolts would happen in the West as well as fear of China and Soviet Union joining forces once again and going against the West, which would probably cause civil wars in western countries and the installation of Anti-East governments who would try to get the Ring leader, America on board, but America being the leading country of the West to want to join forces with the Soviets, would lead the nations in favor of it causing a rift between Anti-East and Pro-East governments which would probably cause wars and a new Faction to rise up in the West, Neo Fascism. The NeoFascists would most likely focus more on Earth politics than space, so they would cease all space developments and efforts, knowing that they could just steal or copy the Western Alliance and Soviet tech and use it for space. The rising tensions with NeoFascist Coalition and Western Alliance and the Chinese hegemony, it would start the 3rd World War or a smaller regional war for dominance, but since the Soviets and Western Alliance are at peace and working together, they both have become the only superpowers in the world, with China rising to be 3rd and the NeoFascist Coalition trying to reach the status in 4th place. This would affect both the West and the Soviets, which would cause them to get involved in the wars and shift focus on Earth, this would reintroduce the Cold War mindset back into the Soviets and West which would affect the relationship, and eventually cause it to break due to the re-escalation of the now old Cold War that's been going on for almost 200 years. Then, after so many wars and years of it, I imagine there will be a rise of pacifist movements in all factions to try to end the wars and go back to space, it would be another 50 years until that idea would catch on seeing how governments don't really care for end of wars to happen, once they do, the call for Earth Unification would begin and eventually there would be a Loose Union of countries then after a while of that, a fully united Earth Government would be established and the 4 factions would exist as States in this Earth Government and this new Global Government would definitely focus on Space and i believe the start of Star Trek type federation would be in the works of forming with United Earth being the founding Member.
@notidentifieduser6533
@notidentifieduser6533 Год назад
That's a great idea and video
@eater999
@eater999 Год назад
Guess there's no way to know how this would turn out thanks to the beliefs and convictions of a few people. Rest in Peace Mikhail Gorbachev.
@purhepechatumbi3915
@purhepechatumbi3915 Год назад
No rest in piss to Gorbachev he sold out for Pizza Hut
@sovietunion3964
@sovietunion3964 Год назад
@@purhepechatumbi3915 glory to communist
@miniaturejayhawk8702
@miniaturejayhawk8702 Год назад
Bruh no, Gorbachev wanted to kickstart the economy but failed miserably by kickstarting regional nationalism.
@sovietunion3964
@sovietunion3964 Год назад
@@miniaturejayhawk8702 🛠️⚒️
@Maxzes_
@Maxzes_ Год назад
@@purhepechatumbi3915 Explain to me communism.
@zyr0n249
@zyr0n249 Год назад
Truly an underrated channel
@aeronaut1906
@aeronaut1906 Год назад
that's nutty to think that if the USSR's Afghanistan didnt go so horribly, it would indirectly cause 9/11 and the whole war on terror to never happen
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
Aeronaut the war on terror as we saw in our world could also not have happened if Bush jr. was a decent human being
@trollmcclure2659
@trollmcclure2659 3 месяца назад
It's more like the USA indirectly creating Al Qaeda, but nothing new the USA have always supported terrorists and dictatorships when they thought it was in their interests Furthemore, the USSR intervention was requested by Afghan government (then already socialist) and was initially successful but couldn't keep control and had to retreat as the USA will repeat later (but the American retreat was much more catastrophic and humiliating).
@Levitationable
@Levitationable Год назад
Woah, this is very underrated.
@Brady_Dzanaj
@Brady_Dzanaj Год назад
Really happy I found this channel
@randomworld4662
@randomworld4662 Год назад
Ussr had 5 million active army and 30 million reseeve+ 60000 tanks and 100000 trucks + 10000 aircraft and second biggest economy 3rd largest population and world largest land area and superior technology and industry and imagine if its exist after 30 years
@ritemolawbks8012
@ritemolawbks8012 Год назад
The former republics still exists, but it would probably be some where comparable to a resource rich and modern-day European Union with a smaller GDP and population size. The USA and Japan would likely still have the first and second largest economies.
@Trinitycore0720
@Trinitycore0720 Год назад
This is basically for all mankind season four and five predictions
@RuheAgir
@RuheAgir 8 месяцев назад
nice touch to the "what if" youtube history videos with that intro
@truthlemonade9793
@truthlemonade9793 11 месяцев назад
That was really interesting. However, I am sure you realize that a lot of unexpected things would have happened in this alternate reality.
@gerardanderson9665
@gerardanderson9665 Год назад
This World is much better than our World TBH. Especially with the Space Race Continuing
@CevicheGato
@CevicheGato Год назад
Exactly. Space Race would innovate human colonization of space early on. Maybe humanity would fix the earth by limiting the population on earth and expanding the population beyond the earth. Satellite colonies. Colonies on the moon, Mars, and the asteroid belt.
@shzarmai
@shzarmai Год назад
Agreed ;) for the space race continuing on which would be awesome 👌.
@kirrax111
@kirrax111 Год назад
better? if you don't have to live in the fcking USSR, may be.
@orgluzman561Peace_IL_PS
@orgluzman561Peace_IL_PS Год назад
hay Neatling what do you think about the tv show for all mankind and it's world (which is also one when the Soviet Union Never Fell) ?
@generationclash5004
@generationclash5004 Год назад
Gonna steal this scenario for my own alternative timeline but I'm keeping Yugoslavia alive as well as having Finland, Poland and Romania as non-aligned nations.
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
Generation Clash Poland would have been a non-aligned nation covered of nukes of its own property and anti-missiles system, just to be secure 😅
@generationclash5004
@generationclash5004 Год назад
@@ciii4361 Same with Romania and Finland!
@_Kyrepa_
@_Kyrepa_ Год назад
if Gorbachev's reforms were successful, the world would be a better placeif Gorbachev's reforms were successful, the world would be a better place
@JuanFernandez-dl9ok
@JuanFernandez-dl9ok Год назад
you repeated that you repeated that
@JL220_77
@JL220_77 Год назад
When you forget what you wanted to say:
@cryptic2121
@cryptic2121 Год назад
kid named dementia
@RutakoVon
@RutakoVon Год назад
Pov: you are joe biden
@jagdpanther2224
@jagdpanther2224 Год назад
Gorbachev had no will to reform, in fact he sabotaged the USSR, he was a traitor!
@Kingofportals
@Kingofportals Год назад
Birth Rates of a reformed USSR: Soviet Union: 2.5, Poland: 3.1, East Germany: 2.2, Czechoslovakia: 2.3, Hungary: 2.3, Romania: 2.7, Serbia Montenegro: 3.2, North Macedonia: 3.2, Bulgaria: 2.4.
@user-mx4oq5ww5b
@user-mx4oq5ww5b Год назад
Sounds great but based on what?
@Kingofportals
@Kingofportals Год назад
@@user-mx4oq5ww5b Economic speculation and the birth rates before the Iron Curtain fell.
@GimmeDePusiBoss
@GimmeDePusiBoss Год назад
@@Kingofportals Can you please site your source(s)?
@asasdsaasda
@asasdsaasda Год назад
What does Romania have to do with this? Romania was never part of USSR
@Kingofportals
@Kingofportals Год назад
@@asasdsaasda Romania was a Soviet Puppet State that was heavily influenced and even controlled by them.
@hieunguyenrileygekko
@hieunguyenrileygekko 5 месяцев назад
if the Soviet Union made it, it would be more like the Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics, Gorbachev's idea giving more autonomy to the states but keeping them within the union is the way to go
@elperrodelautumo7511
@elperrodelautumo7511 4 месяца назад
Exactly. Only allowing 9 republics to stay with Moscow. But the Baltic states, Armenia, Moldova, and Georgia like how it would allow it to be in the real proposed New Union treaty.
@scvboy1
@scvboy1 Год назад
Can you do a follow up video with the population and GDP of the Soviet Union and their sphere of influence.
@ScuffTuff
@ScuffTuff 9 месяцев назад
I honestly think that to survive, the Soviets wouldve had to have retracted their reach somewhat to re-establish their power at home. At the very least, I do think this would’ve still meant German reunification if not the collapse or at least withdrawal of some other members of the Warsaw pact. I could easily still see Czechoslovakia splitting and both becoming neutral states as well. Possibly Bulgaria or Hungary too? My other critique is regarding an amelioration of ties between China and the Soviets, the two countries who almost nukes each other and came closer to war towards the end than America and either of them. If anything, I think Chinese ties with America would grow stronger in this scenario due to the perceived threat of the Soviets. North Korea preferred the Soviets over the Chinese up until their collapse so they’d likely be a battleground for influence between the two, making the Korean Peninsula less of a competition between China and NK vs America and SK like today. There’s likely still be a lot of tensions, particularly around Taiwan but China would likely feel cornered by both. The difference is while America is sticking to islands outside of South Korea who is basically an island anyways, the Soviets are directly competing with China for influence in countries that China sees as its sphere but all preferred the Soviets. It’s not only North Korea but Vietnam and Mongolia as well. China would also face a lot of competition from in the Middle East from the Soviets, particularly in Iran but widely in general. The Soviets shared borders with much of the Middle East in Central Asia and the Caucasus while also being close with India who we would likely see closer and ties with than in our timeline due to a stronger potential on the Russian end. I would also argue that American willingness to offshore production to China would be greatly reduced without the collapse of the Soviet Union. The electronics factory of the world would likely find its home elsewhere, probably around Mexico, Colombia, the Philippines, or Malaysia. That’s a lot harder to predict though because it wasn’t only America offshoring to China but Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan as well. Supply chains would be super interesting to see in this kind of world.
@chelseatillidie3450
@chelseatillidie3450 Год назад
In other words for everyone outside of the US and Eastern Europe the world is 100 times better and for Eastern Europe and the US its 50/50 wether things would be slightly better or slightly worse? Fuck sake Gorbachev all you had to do was not rush your reforms and the world on the whole would be a much better place.
@thearbiter3351
@thearbiter3351 Год назад
Thank you for your non biased, informative video!
@HollowSleep
@HollowSleep Год назад
Good stuff
@ivandinsmore6217
@ivandinsmore6217 Год назад
Excellent video. You have a nice voice for an American.
@321_au
@321_au Год назад
I'm also thinking that there'd still be that chance that Romania would remain rather independent within the Eastern Bloc in such alternate timeline. Just to be clear, that's precisely the path Romania took in the aftermath of the rest of the Warsaw Pact destroying the Prague Spring. who knows whether Romania would be more nationalistic in that alternate timeline.
@Kaiser_von_Europa
@Kaiser_von_Europa Год назад
Can you do an alternate history of the Greco-Roman empire, it is a compromise between the Greek and Latin speaking cultures co-exist together like the Austria Hungary compromise in 1867, pls make it happened, pls
@G0TIMAN
@G0TIMAN Год назад
12:40 as a Pole it's sad that you didn't mention other costs.And it's stupid to speak that we would get assimilated to russian culture. We were independent. Now we are more assimilating to the American culture than then to the Russian one
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
G0TIMAN I think probably he was talking about soviet republics, not Warsaw Pact’s states
@mikman7219
@mikman7219 Год назад
@@ciii4361 In the USSR they encouraged Russian people to learn local languages and even to officially change their nationality in their passports. I am not sure if any state in the USA forces to learn any Indian language.
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
@@mikman7219 yeah sure the Soviets did also some effort to revive minor nationalities in the Union. But the Russian cultural presence was more prominent in the Union than in the allied countries
@mikman7219
@mikman7219 Год назад
@@ciii4361 There was no Russian cultural presence in the Socialist countries since the borders were closed for regular people. No Soviet TV. These countries knew little about the USSR. I guess they learned Russian a little at school but not to the level they could speak well. After the USSR collapsed I talked to many people from these countries and found how little they knew about us and how little we knew about them too. They even did not know that we never celebrated Christmas. And for me it was weird that they celebrated it.
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
@@mikman7219 yeah we’re saying the same thing. I’m saying that outside USSR there was less Russian cultural influence than inside
@davidnice1
@davidnice1 Год назад
I love this guy's analysis it was very fair. 🙂👍👍👍.
@jeremyandrews3292
@jeremyandrews3292 Год назад
While the USSR surviving wouldn't have been good, I have always noticed that it seems like America started to lose its edge and allow things to fall apart after the USSR fell. Like, very soon after that we stopped winning things like Field's medals in Mathematics, the space program was put on the back burner, industry started being outsourced more, and in general without the fear of the USSR to pressure our leaders into doing a good job and showing how we were superior, it's like our leaders just... gave up and let us fall behind China which they didn't see as a threat. I think the USSR completely collapsing in the 1980s made everyone overconfident in the idea of world peace. Maybe it would have been better if the collapse had been more gradual, with the Warsaw Pact countries breaking away first, but the USSR itself holding on longer and continuing to be a threat. Enough that the Iron Curtain starts to come down and Eastern Europe is more free, but not enough that our leaders start thinking we're in an era of peace and prosperity and stop worrying about national security.
@twirlyturd4364
@twirlyturd4364 Год назад
Good too see McCarthyism still alive good on yah
@devanshgupta.233
@devanshgupta.233 Год назад
Sorry but america is a big threat to peace. It never cared about peace, only superiority.
@user-hz1oy6ni6kpaparovits
@user-hz1oy6ni6kpaparovits Год назад
Say thank you to the soviets they learn you mathematics soviet education system is and will be the best of the best just see china as example
@thestumpinator5774
@thestumpinator5774 Год назад
I haven’t finished the video yet, but I just want to point out something you kept mentioning. How “there would be a return to “an increase of Cold War tensions” as if after the collapse there was less of a divide between East and West. We know for a fact, especially right now, that just isn’t true. Gorbachev working towards better relations with the West was not a policy that was exclusive to Glasnost. He would have continued pushing for peace and prosperity with the West. So I think this whole thing about “increases Cold War tensions” is quite frankly based on nothing
@daddy_1453
@daddy_1453 Год назад
Putin for most of his reign had tried to get closer to the West. But time and time again he was given a cold shoulder by the western powers. This left him with no choice but to eventually take a more confrontational approach with the West. You’re mistaken.
@JTL1776
@JTL1776 Год назад
@NEATLING please do a video on what if the artic America purchases were successful.
@bredoom
@bredoom 5 месяцев назад
Had Gorbachev succeeded we could see OGAS being implemented making the mix of planned economy and matket econmy more efficient
@d3thkn1ghtmcgee74
@d3thkn1ghtmcgee74 Год назад
Fun fact the Chinese also backed the rebel groups in Afghanistan to help hurt the USSR. Since the Sino-soviet split back in the 60s they became more rivals powers towards rather than allies considering the USSR implementing deStalinization which china kinda disagreed with and also being seen a by the soviets as junior partner to them kinda rubbed them the wrong way. One example of them having competing spheres of influence is how N. Korea had closer relations with the USSR and how Albania was aligned with PRC rather than the USSR. The geopolitical relations between the PRC and USSR in that time line would be similar to now where china and the USSR still being allies of convenience though the USSR being not nearly as much of a junior partner (maybe more equal if their economy managed to grow as was predicted back in the 80s if the reforms were successful) to china as in this timeline.
@meatiest1989
@meatiest1989 Год назад
China only backed maoist rebel groups I think
@feedingtime7059
@feedingtime7059 Год назад
Lots of countries contributed to the funding of the Mujahideen. Pakistan, Iran, India, Saudi Arabia, and several Muslim countries as well. Some say that only 25% of the Mujahideen's support came from the USA while other countries poured in money aswell.
@meatiest1989
@meatiest1989 Год назад
@@feedingtime7059 then my family sh0t all the mujahideen they came across 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
@jaystrickland4151
@jaystrickland4151 Год назад
A tripolar system is the least stable. Two parties always team up against the other. I suspect we would have had a major war between the great powers directly if the Soviet Union survived past 2000.
@soneda
@soneda Год назад
In the early year, preferably after stallin, Soviet union need someone like deng ziaoping who can build a grand masterplan to stimulate soviet economy, and to enter the world market like china today. Sadly Soviet higher up doesnt have such people. If only trotsky take over the succesion instead of stallin, i wonder what would happen to our world now
@ciii4361
@ciii4361 Год назад
Sonera the thing they needed more after Stalin was a good agricultural reform, especially on the economic point of view, Chruschev tried to make it, but failed, ironically, from my point of view, due to a lack of opposition
@daddy_1453
@daddy_1453 Год назад
China’s rise would be impacted. In our current timeline,China was able to create its Belt and Road initiative across the Eurasian continent because the Central Asian states were free from Moscows control and could now independently sign infrastructure deals with Beijing. They also provide resources to China to fuel its rise to superpower status. And act as buffer states between Russia and China. If the Soviet Union was still around, they would do anything to prevent a superpower growing across their Southern border. They might block trade deals, infrastructure projects etc through their Central Asian republics. I would also expect the West to continue to be friendly with China in order to oppose the Soviets. So I’d expect no mentions of Taiwan or Hong Kong in western media.
@elseggs6504
@elseggs6504 10 месяцев назад
Hong Kong they certainly wont give two shits about but Republic of China is still a wild card as the US informally vowing to protect them is not a new thing at all. The only change, and thats a stretch as it is, from the status quo would be them brokering a reunification deal much like HK and Macau
@sylviamontaez3889
@sylviamontaez3889 Год назад
5:13 problem is whether or not the USSR can get the eastern bloc to copy their economc reforms in this timeline. ceaucescu was very stubborn and romania had bad relations with the USSR. this would probably be fixed after ceaucescus death though.
@airsmellnice4133
@airsmellnice4133 Год назад
The Stick does not care about rules it only follows the will of it's Master
@asasdsaasda
@asasdsaasda Год назад
What make you think Ceausescu would fall in this timeline? the chance that the Westerners had a hand in the Romanian Revolution is quite big, Romania was never a fan of USSR, so i would say probably independent or conquered would be the fate
@nicholasantonson7296
@nicholasantonson7296 Год назад
The USSR be 100 years old in 2022
@speedracer1004
@speedracer1004 6 месяцев назад
I'd say the soviet collapse could be akin to a tight grasp of many ropes holding the state together, because if the one at the top lets go, there's no guarantee that the whole system will stand on it's own. Which is why that's exactly what happened to Gorbachev, he let go of the ropes to fast. Causing the whole rotten structure to collapse, if the soviet union could've established a stable foundation before loosening it's grip, there's a chance the union could've survived
@Axedawgion
@Axedawgion Год назад
Well the problem with ussr is mainly on the topic of "decentralization". An organization (like a country) to work it needs it's management to be devided.
@mediapeter4913
@mediapeter4913 Год назад
Can you please reupload your video about what if the Russian revolution never happened?
@makouras
@makouras Год назад
I'm curious as to why you neglected mentioning the fate of North Macedonia. Seeing as you have it painted red, you assume it would remain in the Serbian sphere of influence, which makes more sense. It would affect the political situation in Greece, as well. Seeing as the right-wing populist party that's currently in power, the one that is partly responsible for the country's fiscal crisis, won the last elections based on its opposition to the Prespes Agreement, which settled the naming dispute. So a non-independent North Macedonia would change Greece's course, too.
@Diego-gg1rc
@Diego-gg1rc Год назад
Yeah
@darkphoenix8941
@darkphoenix8941 Год назад
With the Fear of comunist invasion Far right party like Golden Down can have more support
@bdleo300
@bdleo300 9 месяцев назад
Yugoslavia would never collapse in this scenario, it was the USA proving ground for creating chaos in ex-USSR (as we can see today).
@goobot1
@goobot1 6 месяцев назад
Grease only cared about that because of tourism tho, if it’s part of the iron curtain tourist aren’t going there anyway.
@projectw.a.a.p.f.t.a.d7762
@projectw.a.a.p.f.t.a.d7762 Год назад
Anything that led to the USSR collapsing, look familiar? It sure does, too me. But I don't believe a full collapse will occur. But there'll definitely be a lot of changes on all levels. Just my shared opinion.
@sgauden02
@sgauden02 Год назад
You should do what if the Vikings stayed in Vinland?
@Wolf_3125
@Wolf_3125 Год назад
This sounds similar to the universe in For All Mankind
@mrsclio4752
@mrsclio4752 Год назад
"It was real. And it was glorious"
@Mark-xh8md
@Mark-xh8md 5 месяцев назад
Also, would the Gulf War even still happen in this timeline? It's much more likely that the USSR would rekindle its relationship with Iraq, veto the resolution, and prevent it entirely. Or, if the US persisted in invading Iraq, arming Iraq to the teeth, making victory uncertain...and it'd be a pyrrhic one if it happened.
@sylviamontaez3889
@sylviamontaez3889 Год назад
theyd also need to crush the solidarity movement to prevent poland from declaring martial law.
@felipelima3626
@felipelima3626 Год назад
Poderia fazer o vídeo sobre a Cornélia do norte?
@dylansyme9234
@dylansyme9234 11 месяцев назад
Good video. I think, though, for the premise to be plausible, Soviet economic reforms have to start earlier, during Brezhnev's reign. The period between The Eyebrow's health decline and Gorbachev's ascension was really the nail in the USSR's coffin - a whole decade of inaction and stagnation. Remember during this period there were huge propaganda own-goals from the West in Vietnam, the Iranian revolution/hostage crisis, inflation and the oil crisis, and so on. The Soviets, being an authoritarian one-party state led at the time by a gormless invalid, were unable to take advantage of any of those crises. And then you had Afghanistan, Soviet leaders who dropped dead within months... Gorbachev comes way too late... and then Chernobyl happens which really sealed the public distrust and dissatisfaction with Soviet governance. Essentially, nothing useful was done 1975-1985. For this scenario to be most plausible, Brezhnev dies from heart attack or stroke in 1975, to be succeeded by (probably) Gromyko or Kulakov (NOT Andropov), allowing reform to commence in the late 70s.
@RuosongGao
@RuosongGao 7 месяцев назад
This is a fascinating point. And yes, using the West's retreat in the 1970s to do internal reforms seems like the best option. Too bad the Soviets irl just used that as an opportunity to win more pointless victories in the third world, wasting their money and antagonizing various countries around the world.
@vtheman1850
@vtheman1850 7 месяцев назад
Just one correction on our map. Yugoslavia was never a part of the USSR, in fact it was one of the signing members of the post WW II Battle act, the precursor to what would become NATO. As the informbiro scandal developed, and Tito alienated from the communist party ideologically, Yugoslavia was considered one of the key factors in deterring any potential soviet invasions. They almost came to blows a few times, and the YPA, one of the largest militaries in Europe at the time enjoyed a lot of funding and help from western allies.
@notsostealthmission5184
@notsostealthmission5184 9 месяцев назад
This would end up being a BETTER world if the USSR ends up still making democratic glasnost style reforms eventually. But probably in late 90s and 2000s. Likely doing it slower. And still letting the Warsaw pact countries do their own thing in the 2000s as well, eventually ending the Cold War sometime around then
@elperrodelautumo7511
@elperrodelautumo7511 8 месяцев назад
Something like that. A reformed Soviet Union could’ve made Russia more militaristically stronger and more efficient. Maybe an EU type governance could’ve allowed the international community to see how those Soviet republics culturally differ from each other. Even allow flights to those places. I imagine Grozny, Chechnya gets some international flights. Even a Siberian republic would get some tourism. Even Crimea would be a resort spot for Soviet citizens and international tourists. Learning that Russia isn’t this big country we only think of. That it’s already a melting pot of cultures. Both European and Asian. Eurasian even. Moscow would have to be a cultural city state. Independent from the rest of Russia. But remain a capital city of the Soviet Union.
@BruhV52
@BruhV52 8 месяцев назад
Yugoslavia would not have collapsed also because of there would be a war, the military from the Eastern Block would intervene it from happening.
@BruhV52
@BruhV52 8 месяцев назад
Yugoslavia would likely join the Eastern Block around 2000s and Africa would be divided with China controlling some, USSR controlling some and america controlling some.
@sensei4042
@sensei4042 Год назад
The only reason I want this scenario to exist is simply for the fact that the space race would be reignited. GOD I wanna see competition in space
@sirkermitthefirstoffrogeth9622
Not, only in just space, imagine technology and science! What would phones be like? Medicine? God that would actually be cool. Not the tensions part of it though. There's also cybernetics and apparently the Soviets were quite ahead.
@shzarmai
@shzarmai 10 месяцев назад
Yeah, ikr a continuous space race would have been amazing for Humanity as a whole 😢 sigh....
@Ghfvhvfg
@Ghfvhvfg Год назад
It would be a better world.
@OstojaSRB
@OstojaSRB Год назад
As a Serb I quite prefer this timeline, as my homeland isn't ruined via intervention. Not only that but the space race continuing is great due to the amount of resources we would get from the asteroids and such. This however all coming at a cost of autoretarian governments but personally I think its a fair trade
@averagebohemian5791
@averagebohemian5791 10 месяцев назад
As a Czech, I would prefer this timeline too....
@gggdrengen
@gggdrengen Год назад
love it very nice
@joshram4354
@joshram4354 Год назад
Without the Fall of the USSR, China never becomes the country it is today. The 90s is when China truly took a step to become what it is today and that's because the fear of communism had fallen by a lot the moment USSR disappeared. With USSR no way US integrates their economy so much with them. More likely we see what we were seeing already by companies at the time and its India that gets a lot more companies over there.
@marnickfox9891
@marnickfox9891 4 месяца назад
It would've been better for the sake of balance now the U.S. is dominating and aggressively expanding thier zone of influence
@TheBeso1994
@TheBeso1994 11 месяцев назад
I think the alternate scenario would've been much better.
@Soviete_Imperial.
@Soviete_Imperial. Год назад
Perfect
@liammckevitt8096
@liammckevitt8096 Год назад
W timeline, and a refreshing lack of "USSR bad and evil, it will kill us all" that im used to with these types of alt history
@pep-qew1977
@pep-qew1977 Год назад
Queen is no more
@chippiepoi
@chippiepoi Год назад
Amazing job
@basileus2824
@basileus2824 Год назад
Did you not steal that intro reel from alt hist hub?
@spaghettiking7312
@spaghettiking7312 Год назад
*The timeline where the Middle East has true peace.*
@worldeconomicfella3228
@worldeconomicfella3228 11 месяцев назад
I don't think so. The Soviet Union was a big sponsor of a lot of Arab regimes. So it can be expected the First Gulf War going to be more like a Syrian Civil War and maybe the Soviets are going to be able again to unite the Arab countries surrounding Israel again to wage a massive war again against Israel. Meanwhile, the West might do more their best to get rid of the ayatollah regime in Iran. There's also a lot more at stake when the Arab Spring is going to be a thing. The Middle East is screwed anyway. Although I've the impression the Middle East is incrementally stabilizing.
@purple.requiem
@purple.requiem 10 месяцев назад
*no*
@spaghettiking7312
@spaghettiking7312 10 месяцев назад
@@purple.requiem Lol yes.
@bdleo300
@bdleo300 9 месяцев назад
The war in Afghanistan is the most over hyped and overrated war in history, it was almost as irrelevant as US own war in Afghanistan.
@holakfun8243
@holakfun8243 6 месяцев назад
Honestly,whilst more difficult to imagine, had Brezhnev failed in 1964 and Kruschev stayed in power until his death, the USSR would have been much better of since Brezhnev nearly doomed it by his insistent hate of reforms of any kind,had this happened and with the hardliners staying out of power, the USSR could have, through gradual reforms,not like Gorbachev's insanity ones, easily reformed into a China like state at worst or a Eastern democracy at best.
@TravisNguyen-1504
@TravisNguyen-1504 Месяц назад
I wonder: 1. In this universe, does the Soviet Union allowed their citizen to travel abroad ? 2. In Romania, how long Nicolae Ceaușescu was in the power and does he reform his country ?
@odindave6506
@odindave6506 3 месяца назад
I'm from Russia, I didn't realise the Soviet Union fell, no change here
@phantom522
@phantom522 2 месяца назад
fuck you mean no change here you would have the ussr flag up not the russian one
@Argentvs
@Argentvs Год назад
The ISS is not the freedom space station. The USSR was building the MIR 2, with the end of the cold war, the US offered funds and join programs. The ISS is basically the MIR 2 with US segments. The core of the ISS is the Soviet MIR 2 segments hosting the most important systems of the station, navigation, attitude control, water recycling and has its own electrical and air control systems. The US just added science segments and the big solar panels structure.
@malchik4789
@malchik4789 Год назад
Hope we get a part 2
@Roofers-Nail-Hardest
@Roofers-Nail-Hardest 11 месяцев назад
I watched this channel bald and bankrupt where the guy actually goes and hunts down the rusted remains of the Bouran soviet space shuttle locked up in the middle of the Kazakh steppes. It was worth checking out if your into this kind of USSR stuff
Далее
The Breakup of the Soviet Union Explained
41:47
Просмотров 7 млн
The Russian Revolution - OverSimplified (Part 1)
21:04
What if the Soviets Landed on the Moon First?
7:41
Просмотров 1,7 млн
What if Japan Became a Superpower? | Alternate History
12:02
What If Everything Went PERFECT For Russia?
16:12
Просмотров 413 тыс.
What if Russia Joined NATO?
18:55
Просмотров 1,7 млн
What if Sweden Won the Great Northern War?
18:12
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Russia's Turtle Tanks Are Evolving
10:36
Просмотров 724 тыс.