When it comes to knowledge, methods matter 

I have proof.. I don't know vijay read my gmail or not on this topic.. See bro am giving u an example.. Ap aur main hm dono ek pahad se durr khade he aur asman main white ka kuchl dikhai pad rahi he to app aur main Anuman lagaenge ki ee chij kya he. Ap ne apke mutabik idea lagae aur main mere mutabik? Apne bole ki nahi ye ek badal he aur hm bole ki nahi dhuan he.. Ab wo chij asal main kya he ye to na apko malum he na mujhe.. Aur hamara jo anuman bhi idhar he jo hm dono ne socha us white ko dkh kar udhar hamare anuman bhi hmare hi experience ke hisab se he.. So hm apne idea ko idhar sach nahi man skte. Aur jabtak hm udhar nahi gaye he pahad ke piche tavtak asliyat kya he hmne malum nahi he yehi bolna chahiye aur idea hme us pahad ke pass ja kar sachai dekh kar hi asliyat malum ayegi ye bhi sochna chahiye.. Abhi tak hamne jo bola ye vijay ka bhai bichar he ap study kar sakte ho ..lkin ab baat ye ate he ki jab hum god aur soul. Rebirth ki baat pe ate he tab hm koi decision nahi le pate kiyu ki koi to dekha nahi na. To fir anuman lagao.. Abhi isi anuman pe vijay sab ki point contract kar rahe he. Lkin hm ye bata de anuman ke bad bhi bhat praman god ko siddh karte he. Aur Theist bhi logic se banana Chahiye. Aur hm vijay hamesa science science bolte he. Sir apka science consciousness ke badd kuch janta nahi. Error ho jata he aur abhi tak psycho analysis bhi science ke categories main nahi ata he.. Vijay jo bhi point psycho analysis se de rahe he unse unka hi point contradict ho rahe he. Aur fir ek baat science jo he wo repeat experiment ke upar base he aur usse kese hm logo ki kaam pe la sake ye aim he.. Lkin idhar ved main jo baat he wo to rules he usi rules se hi science kaam kar raha he.. Mera ek question jo vivekanand bhi chicago main uthae the uspe thought ye he ki Duniya main hrr ek chij rules aur regulations and Continuity se chalti he ye philosophy he aur ek admi schgea to malum padd hi jata he to iss regulations kiski wajah se kaam kar raha he aur kya wajah he iske piche ye Science se pucho.. Example -water moves downward but why? Who gives the property to that basic elements of water to moves downward.. And another thing the thing or matter which we all sees are also waves and particles but when we sees normally it's as a proper matter .. Why it's happening?( I know this is not for good proof but the thing by which I can establish Adi Shankaraachaary point bramhan satyam jagad mithya) mithya mean what is this we don't know and no one knows but it exists .. U can search alot western philosophies gives that proof ( John locke. Hume. Berkeley and more) and then bramhan satya it means only god is true what is god? God doesn't mean the statue in our temple .. God is thing that beyond our senses etc.. And a of those point can be logically proof.. And main point is proof for god one I given above.. Now another some points.. Science can't explain about thought and when ur base by that basement u r contradicting all others point and that basement can't explain about thought and ur going to contradict god.. O my god! . science can't explain about moral thought. Although science can't explain about human remembering power. It can't explain the main thing that is mind different from matter or not or if it is then who combined those,?? Science is silent here.. I am giving problems that now we have that much of equipment but we r still in thinking but in ancient they all ready has those answers.. ... If we have some point by which we can contradict another point.. by that point by which we r contradicting another points but we can't explain the reality with our those points.. Har har mahadev.. ( isko bhi hmm religion se tood kar human keliye laa sakta he sirf ek naare ko. naki hm kuch ulte sidhe experiment jismain baht kuhch sahi b sabbit nahi hua ha wo possible pe chal rHa he usko pakad ke hmm jo hme rules batate he ( ved) usko contradict kar rahe be batao.. Jo consciousness ke uppar nahi gaya (science) wo usko contradict kar ne ki kosis pe he jo sabko consciousness bata raha he. Aur jante hue ki experiment galat ho sakata he hmm usko pakad rahe he.. Jab ki ved main ye batYa gaya he ki rules ko hm kitne b hisaab se samjhe aur samjhae ye insaan ka mentality proudness he lkin insan rules change nahi kar sakta.. So I think before we contradict the point of God's we must know that ved is also can't explain god they told there way and tells these are rules but rules can't god bcz if rules exist there must be someone who ruled all rules in consciously or continuesly and alot.

​@@thesomuu god dsnt exist thats y it took such a long answer to explain it.. There is no proof.. Stop trying to make god rational.

Is there any proof that he doesn't exist..?

​​@@mukta2822btw.. Don't think rational is the normal things.. If u know hegel and also I think evolution is also happening through rationality and when someone taking the rational path and trying to disproof god then why not us.. And also I don't know man ( or miss) why people putting god in rationalism bcz god can't be known through rationality.. But rationality can help somehow to proof that someone exist.. So I think here we both have rationality and through that rationality u want to disproof and I want to proof... And yes waiting for ur thought man..

Level infinity

Main na sehta 😖

All I can hear belief belief belief.

Madrassa is a jalebi making factory.........thanx to rangeela Rasgoo-lulla dingi dingi

Bro are they forcing you to practice any religion,you d your work let them do their work

Na that guy is talking lot of confusing circular reasoning

seekho bhai, Hindi seekhne se to bahut accha hai

अंग्रेजी के दो पैग लगाओ

I didn't have this opinion before, but I now seriously believe religion is the worst problem in India. Without it, goons like our current premier would never have come to power. And people would easily focus on actual areas of progress. Like civic sense, education, health.

He already met a bigger fan than you in Pune airport

​@@realshot9125someday vimoh should visit a windmill farm He will meet much bigger fans

I do a live stream every Saturday at 8 pm. Everyone is welcome to come.

why is it needed to be decided. We know morally what is right or wrong. And its not something which we learnt rapily. Human civilization took time to learn what is good and what is bad. You can still see, in some country death penalty is common, in japan until 2014 teen p**n watching was aloud, in shariya law apostasy is punished by death, so on. So we still face dilemma in finding the good thing. And who knows may be God is the worst. Why we only presume that god is all good. May be he is crook who created this never ending universe, where almost 90% of planets, solar system, nebulas, blackholes, are useless lifeless.

You do.

There are many books you can read for all this.

Sab log Hindi nahi samajhte hain

@@Reinrosannir lekin sab log english bh nh smjhte jaise mai

@@gauravkgautam1463 compromise toh karna padega bhai

​@@gauravkgautam1463 more Indians understand English than Hindi.

@@Reinrosannir ha lag to esa hi raha h

@AryanVerma-vs5kc “I Don't have a [...] god are true” =================== Until now-and now as well-there is no credible evidence, no verifiable evidence that any god exists. Therefore, there is no valid reason to believe that any god exists.

First of all it's not even a theory, it's just a Hypothesis. Also, yes the hypothesis matters but it still remains just a hypothesis if no evidence is presented. There is no reason to believe in that hypothesis.

@@rohittekchandani5720It doesn't matter. Whatever you want to call it, the evidence is decided by the hypothesis. You cannot present arbitrary evidence in support or dismissal of a hypothesis. The hypothesis tells you the observables that need to be computed that will prove or disprove the hypothesis. Based on the observables the experimental setup or method is decided for the computation of the observables. This is the so-called 'evidence' for or against the hypothesis. Also, disproving a hypothesis is not disproving the phenomena. It just means that phenomena requires some other testable hypothesis to be explained. You keep repeating the process to get the correct hypothesis that explains the phenomena.

i will try to answer since I have watched almost all of the Vimoh Video 1. Vimoh never said god doesnt exist. He always say, "I dont know, once someone prove it then I will start believing in it". Burden of proof is necessary, because any one can claim anything, so its necessary to prove your claims. 2. Here also Vimoh always say, we dont have clear picture how life has been originated. There is evolution theory which is widely accepted and somewhat seems suitable but we still dont have prominent knowledge about it. We are still looking for answer. Beside we cant rely on religious aspect, because every religion offer their own origin story. And religious theory often contradicts with the current scientific discovery. 3. Well I didn't understand this question completely. Here is what I understood, you are trying to say that information can only be come from intelligent form, what is the source of intelligence? Well intelligence or information is not something which came into existence in a blink. It took a long course of time to gain information. Humans have vast history of experiments, through which they gained information about thing. So its a slow and long process. In stone age Humans didnt have that much intelligence as much they have now. We have collected information with time.

Blud know the difference between rejecting and making a claim .

@@Hexa_radiate Explain

@@SeekingTruth-7403 The next step after proving something is disproving it. When something is proven, only then can it be disproven if it's incorrect. So, first provide evidence for your claim to explain why you think it's proven, then I'll respond with why it's not.

@@Hexa_radiate It seems you missed out the points I shared earlier as evidences, and I've observed this behaviour with most atheists who does very less to read, and research. Disprove those first, and then come back with your ideas.