why I can't stomach Eat Predators UPDATE: Alexa Nikolas T-Shirt Backlash, Just Trish Podcast & more 

hi im just finally finishing this up! you mention in this that i'm a founder and i just wanna point out i wasn't a founder and don't want to take credit away from the people who were truly there in the beginning building it! i came in maybe a month or two after the first diplo protest after she invited me to the original discord when it was first created. i was offering to help volunteer early on before that but i had no contribution in establishing what at predators was supposed to be. i appreciate you giving a platform to everyone who's been harmed by alexa and this once again was really well done 💜

I wonder if it's possible that Alexa is using other people's trauma continuously recenter herself, because she simply hasn't done the actual trauma work involved in healing with an actual good therapist... I am speculating that she may be constantly seeking re-validation from her audience for her trauma because she can't find that validation within herself. This is a part of why it can be common for abuse survivors to "trauma dump" prior to extensive therapy, because as most us are never believed or validated by the people in our lives who actually matter, so we end up seeking that validation everywhere else, from everyone else. This isn't an excuse btw. Alexa is responsible for Alexa. It's just sad to witness someone so willfully ignore all the resources and privileges made available to them to truly continue on the journey to heal. . . in favor of capitalizing on other peoples trauma for clicks and views.

Tbh...something about Alexa never sat right with me. Although I believe she went through traumatic experiences as a child actor, she often finds a way to center herself in a lot of situations when she should be passing on the mic. Her flipping the script about Drake Bell has been so odd as well. I can be upset over the child Drake Bell being abused, but adult Drake Bell is trying to sweep his own mistakes under the rug. His victims are being silenced and called liars which is harmful.

Long story but I was friends (for a short time) with one of DB’s ex-girlfriends. It was 2007 and she told me so much about how he was to her when they dated. I already didn’t like him anymore because of her stories. After dating her, he dated another (very young) woman who proceeded to witness and be victim to DB’s behavior and would sometimes reach out to my old friend since she could relate and understand. Fast forward to now. My old friend is no longer alive to speak out. The woman DB dated after her has spoken out and Drake went on a mission to try to discredit what she said. When he pleaded guilty, I felt relief that others now saw Drake for who he is and some of what he has done. Some. Now that he has spoken out about his awful abuse, which should be called out, it’s suddenly like everyone forgot he is guilty. Everyone forgot he isn’t a good guy. Now he’s back to releasing music and doing interviews that paint him as only a victim. I’m angry, to be honest. I was previously trying to get more people to watch Alexa’s videos but now she does THIS? Nah.

I watched these out of order but my take on DB is that the internet will froth at the mouth to give a white man of any level of fame online a redemption arc: Shane Dawson, James Charles, Jeffree Star, Drake Bell; they’ve all faced similar things but they’re never actually held accountable for what they’ve done.

Found this video after the recent Alexa drama with (victim) Adam McIntyre and it’s v interesting!! Thanks for creating this! Super relevant even months later

Her exact reaction to Angelique's video... not only am I speechless, but it was like waking up via electric shock after being under a spell. Like you said SO perfectly - startling and immediate. I hate this reality. EPD really is Alexa's vehicle to fawn over herself and be fawned over, likely due to her emotional maturity level partially stunted as the 12 year old getting bullied for things she couldn't help about herself as a tween (more childlike and very quick to cry, having stuffed animals)

How is someone going to say someone is “stupid enough to believe a little girl” when we are talking, over-archingly, about a whole series of things where we ALL should have listened to and believed all of those little girls who were harmed by Nickelodeon, by Dan Schneider, by Drake Bell. In fact, we could just as easily defend Brain Peck and say “You are stupid enough to believe some little boy” when talking about Drake Bell all those hears ago. It’s just a disgusting supposition even to pose. OF COURSE you listen to the little girl (and the little boy) who tell you they are being hurt. That’s not being stupid; that’s protecting children.

wait until you find out how alexa treated us survivors on Eat Predators discord. she isn’t how she portrays herself to be. many survivors did a mass leave from her platform after the way she treated us. we payed her monthly for her packages to be on discord and apart of EP. we had personal interactions with her through discord. her leadership skills are different than how she is on her EP livestreams.

I had no idea Alexa watched that girl testify and made a video about it only to turn around and refuse to talk about Drake’s predatory behavior after Quiet on Set. Like, wow, I thought that was shitty, but this makes it even worse.

48:37 the way she has totally flipped on the doc now after not being invited back on is wild.

I had to unsubscribe from her channel because she kept bringing up the fact of her being bullied on Zoey 101 and her stalker. I get that it's HER CHANNEL but good lawd she should have named it something else and had her channel dedicated about her life. Stop using other people's trauma for clickbait alexa 🗣🗣🗣🗣

thank god. u have no idea how glad i am that this popped up on my suggestions. i literally thought I was a terrible person because I just didn't understand why she was detailing stories of bullying she had when she was a child and framing other children (probably going through the same thing) as evil and sorta aligned them w dan schneider. the whole time watching trishas podcast I was waiting for her to stop recounting these stories and say like 'whatever we were all children its in the past but dan schnieder and nickelodean' but she never did . also I haven't watched ur video yet I was just so excited to voice this bc I was reading all the comments and no one said anything bad so if u disagree with this SORRY

I’m glad there’s videos about this. Lately, she’s calling out people she just doesn’t like (Travis Kelce for example) and claiming “predatory behavior” when they aren’t predators. It’s like she has her agenda and opinion and if you don’t agree or follow it, you’re a predator. Speaking as a survivor, that’s a huge problem. I definitely agree that she centers herself like Christy C does.

I found you through Adam McIntyre and I’m in love with your content! I also just want to point out a very small error - when Drakes victim was speaking in court, she was giving a victim impact statement, not testifying under oath or under the penalty of perjury. (I’m an attorney and have worked in prosecutors’ offices so I’m familiar with the process) It isn’t a huge error but I think it’s important to make the distinction before one of the DB defenders tries to weaponize that. Again, I absolutely love your videos!!!

omg yeah the discord video doxxing finally confirmed my feelings that alexa is bringing anything and everything online and it is honestly just retraumatizing and she needs to learn how to heal without blasting everything onto the internet.

alexa is all about speaking out but loves to silence anyone who has a criticism of her

Finally people are starting to see thru her ruse.

Making my way through your catalogue - I've shared the exact same thoughts on Alexa. Frankly, she immediately made me uncomfortable as she's very reactive. Great dialogue!

We need to get you a better mic so you can keep doing these! Where’s the gofundme link???

I love what she stands for, but she does give the energy of a girl who would tattle on you to the teacher for not wanting to be her friend. I was bullied relentlessly in middle school, and I don't think about my bullies ever as a 28 year old. The way she hates Jamie and Victoria is weird to me, or the way she frames adult Jamie and Victoria around their 12 year old selves admitting they are not close. I think there's a strong correlation between being socially loud and being insecure. I've never met a secure person who wants to be the face of a large social media platform and be loud and opinionated to strangers. Insecure people tend to teeter their beliefs to be accepted, and as we know from her story she has always strived for peer acceptance. I think she needs a little more true self love, and maybe be a little less passionate about what she's gonna say if she's gonna flip-flop. As I've aged and found myself I find myself needing to share less about myself, especially my past. I couldn't ever imagine being so bothered by someone, especially over a decade later, that I'd need to sit down and make a feature length video on how they hurt my feelings. I'm naturally stoic so maybe I'm missing something, but I personally would never want to be friends with her solely about from how easily she'll talk about someone who's not a PDFfile or Pre-dator on a podcast dedicated to that topic.

After I saw the Trasha Paytas vid. I was so livid. You are so much nicer of a person than me to look at this with a lot of nuance I respect you for that. I also noticed the same thing at the end of Drake Bells new music video that raised an eyebrow to me. Like this is the first thing he wants us to know that he's "innocent." I'm just curious. Where did you get the clips of the deleted Drake vid?

She disliked drake bell until he got a second wind by announcing he's a victim. Then she conveniently forgot that drake bell is a monster that continues the cycle. Edit: she says she can't be compared to Christy C Romono because she didn't give drake a platform because he wasn't on her show. They don't have to be on your show to give them a platform. You give them a platform every time you talk about them. It's just convenient that she won't talk about him now because she was "bullied" about the video. She knows she quietly took down the video and all she had to do was make a tweet about why the video was down. If she planned on making a correction video, all she had to do was say so. But no, she was bullied so now she can't put the video up. She's a professional victim

i am the first person to say “it’s not a competition” when it comes to trauma. i mean as someone who’s been bullied, it genuinely fucks you up. however, the way she constantly acts like it’s the same level as sexual assault and abuse is just very wrong to me. her trauma is valid, but being bullied by other teen girls isn’t the same as being sexually assaulted by a grown man. i mean, i feel if anything, the trauma that can relate most to that would be with her abusive ex. of course i understand her pain, 100%. and it’s wrong that those who were in charge didn’t do enough to stop it, and that is wrong and a valid reason to add onto why nickelodeon sucks. but like, it’s like breaking your leg and complaining to somebody in a full body cast. like yes, that’s horrible that you broke your leg, but let’s read the room.

Uggh and I can’t even with the way DB looks at the camera while his victim - not *alleged* victim, he admitted to this shit and it is NOT “alleged” it is *FACT* - is talking. It’s so disgusting and, as a person who worked with Level 4s / SVPs for moat of my career, I’ve seen those looks over and over when a victim is speaking on their experiences. It’s disgusting.

Me not watching your video on Trish and skipping through areas where you discuss her is me demonstrating for anyone this might apply to *cough* on how to simply not watch things you know will trigger you 🥰

I was waiting for SOMEONE to make a video about this

Ok, so I'm all about using (the royal you) your experiences to empathize/sympathize with people's stories and voices, but Alexa genuinely feels to me like she's finding any and every way to insert herself into other people's unrelated (or tangentially related at BEST) trauma, a sort of "yeah listen to this, but don't forget about ME and MY experiences because I'M the main character! "

I had off vibes about her for a bit, couldn't quite articulate it. But you've done a great job in this video! Tbh it's hard to even take her seriously sometimes. Between the mispronounced words, poor sentences and bad makeup, i just can't help but see her a certain way. Almost like she has arrested development, which could very well be possible.

im so happy I finally found a comprehensive video about all this cause holy cow ive been so lost.definitely gonna be keeping up with your coverage on this I think that if you don't already (I don't want to assume either way) scripting these out, or scripting them out more because there were just a lot of really long pauses or talking really slow that prob made the video longer. I def do the same thing every time I record myself while trying to get my thoughts together so genuinely not trying to be shady or anything at all 🥺

I’ve been going through all of these videos and I am just so glad to have found this channel. I’ve felt this way throughout Alexa’s entire rise on this platform and haven’t heard anyone else that sees what I see here. There’s so much that’s performative and seems only to center herself in any of these conversations. She wants victims to speak just loud enough for her to talk over them. It’s vampire shit.

Thank you for making these videos! I've watched some Alexa Videos and I had a 'funny feeling' about her content, which was furthered when I looked at the Eat Predator's website and continues to be furthered with what to me felt like the devolution of her content and activism. I agree when you say 'it feels like high school BS'. I don't think the nature of the 'discourse' she creates is particularly helpful for survivors- in fact, as you've outlined, its actively harmful in many ways - even malicious. I'm particularly shocked by how she has turned on DB's victim. Thank you for starting discourse on this and I deeply appreciate your nuanced approach all around.

1:05:31 “So we agree on that.” Oop 🫢 Trish was definitely picking up on Alexa’s weird deflections about Drake Bell being a perpetrator.

Alexa Nikolas' "activism" is intertwined with her livelihood. MAJOR RED FLAG!!!

You are spot on! I almost choked when you said EP is an AN Fan Club. One gazillion percent! Her commandeering of others’ stories is nauseating and gross. Thank you for the deep dives. I watched all of them and subscribed. Keep up the amazing work!

Alexa claiming she’s a SURVIVOR because Dan Schneider and Britney Spears YELLED at her ONE single time and then making her entire personality as a Nickelodeon survivor 🥴 I’m sorry but this is ridiculous

Thank you so much for posting these videos. Legit it’s crazy making to observe all of these things and god forbid you call it out, lest you face the wrath of her following. Two people on RU-vid I know of that she associates with have similar attitudes and use their followings to attack others. I’m not even wanting to post their names lol. But one is a young guy who makes TMZ grade gossip content marketed as facts, conspiracies/misinformation, etc and started gaining traction during the free Britney movement. The other is one who asserts wild claims and conspiracy theories as irrefutable facts and accuses anyone questioning her of being a part of something nefarious. It’s soooo toxic and not helpful at all.

38:16 Reminds me of those people who will “correct” you if you refer to an adult who’s attracted to pubescent minors as a pedophile. Like I’m automatically suspicious of those people, because I can be a pedantic asshole sometimes, but even I don’t care about the technicalities when it comes to something that morally reprehensible.

I also had a thought that she sounds like someone who would fall down that rabbit hole. The language she uses is very conspiracy theorist. especially in the video of her accusing Kat of not wanting facts. eek

i cant understand how someone can be this twofaced. it makes my stomach turn seeing how alexa goes from condemning drake bell with such fervor during the victims testimony to essentially being a drake bell fan girl a few weeks later. just shocking.

i’m glad that you included the video that she deleted about drake because it really does highlight how much of a hypocrite she is. i don’t know if she thought that no one would notice that she took the video down or what her goal with that was but it’s very weird. why change your mind now that you know something happened to him? i don’t see how it could change anything from that case. he pled guilty. also i never saw the video where she was comparing her situation to angelique’s but i’ve always noticed how much she likes to talk about herself in regards to other people’s stories.

Alexa during a live mistook a dark Brando satirical tweet as an actual official tweet and went off. she absolutely could be in Qanon if she isnt already

I appreciate your bravery speaking out on this!! Great video!

I just have one criticism and it has less to do with Alexa or just a particular point that you brought up that I feel misses the point about journalism and the overrall structure of society. So, having said that, I respectfully disagree with the notion that people should get paid by journalists for sharing their stories. Firstly, because it suggests rather unitentionally that when a specific piece of say investigative journalism gets published, the reporter in a staff position is making a profit solely from the particular story and if its included in an issue of a magazine or a paper that they're entitled to the profits from that copy rather than being compensated as a function of their salary which they would receive regardless of whether or not story goes into print. That alters in a freelance context but even there a writer only gets paid once for the writing of the piece not the decimination that occurs after it's published. Secondly --- and most importantly--- providing subjects with monetary compensation replaces the point of journalism with the logic of capitalism: the notion that nothing is sacred and must bare a price tag if its any worth. The entire point of reporting/journalism is to provide citizens with necessary information about their society in both the macro and the micro, so the information being broadcasted is supposed to be as accessible as possible. To start offering money to those who would be interviewed would signal to the broader world that critical information should be priviliged because now you are not motivated by the purpose of trying inform on a reality like whether or not your government commited war crimes but now a need to make sure your immediate material needs are the top priority, not whether or not the information you have being made public could be possibly better the rest of our lives. Within this problem emerges another problem which is how are you going to decide how much informants get paid? Papers could try to set a fixed amount but informants would argue that the amount offered is not enough so it would follow logically that papers would cave and just give people exactly what they want because they can't not have the information. In a time when newspaper budgets are already thin to disseapearing (an issue that might not get resolved soon) so staff margins are shrinking and resources like fact checkers can't be acquired papers would invitably fold because they wouldn't be able to keep up with having to pay informants what would likely be ridicolous fees for conducting interviews. You get into dangerous territory when you start giving items arbitrary amounts, look at the way we treat housing in America. Having all of the issues with the idea you presented bare, it would be foolish of me not acknowldge why you likely came to that conclusion. The implication is that interview subjects are often poor/don't have access to resources needed in order to survive, so offering them money in exchange for information would somehwat elimeriate their suffering and even the plainfield . That's a very compassionate and humane conclusion to come to given the circumstances but what it does it higlight the fail to highlight the larger elephant in the room in a meaningful way. It shouldn't be the job of private individuals or private instutions to care for the rest society out of pocket. Rather, we should be pushing to reshape our governments in a way where we are provided sufficient economic resources to live a life of dignity. I can speak to this as somone who was born to a Danish mother and having actually done a good portion of my university experience in Denmark and the greater Scandinavia, having governments that provide economic safety nets is a great way to go and I really can't advocate for it enough. I bring this up to say that I don't think you're a bad person or anything of that sort (quite the opposite) but could just that your strain of thinking on that issue is just a product of you and others being raised in a purely American context so there's no avenue to expand our collective imaginations on how to resolve this issues in truly meangful ways. I'm just worried that if the idea of paying people for their stories became popular it would embolden corperate and wealthy America would use it as a vehicle for making journalism more restrictive, which it already has. This is why the biggest news stories about national and international occurances are behind big pay walls on established news sites like the New York Times. I hope you find this constructive.

Wow I just finished both your videos on Alexa. They were great videos because I couldnt voice my problem with her but you summarized it so well. Thank you for your videos on this subject. Just to let you know, im here because Adam spoke out about her just recently and when looking at the comments, one of the comments mentioned your videos on her and i decided id like to listen to a different perspective on her. I immediately unsubbed from her. I was concerned why she hadnt posted in 2 months, i thought it was sus because she left no explanation but after Adams video, it made sense why she hadnt posted.

1:20:25 this one really hit me hard, because while again, bullying is difficult, its hard to deal with, its upsetting, sure. Not dismissing those feelings, but to hear someone say "i was a victim of child abuse" and to go "it sounds like we had similar situations in terms of bullying" is so so centering herself that im almost flabbergasted. Because Angelique was not "bullied", that is, without dismissing its own effects, not as bad a word as what she went through

I have finally finished both these videos and I want to make a comment. It will be lengthy but I’m excited to talk about it ❤ I had been watching Alexa very loosely for a few months. I’m not a podcast person either so I’d just scroll through here and there. I really wanted to support her because I saw Eat Predators was for all survivors of abuse. I am a survivor of CSA, and I wanted to be in a space where I didn’t feel so alone. But I saw how it changed to only being about survivors in the film or music industry. Which had me kind of confused since she has talked about this being a movement for survivors by survivors, but shifting it to only be focused on survivors of the industry keeps it pretty closed. I thought maybe I was wrong for feeling that way, but it seems I wasn’t alone in that thought. I don’t understand her giving so much shit to the kids who bullied her. I was severely bullied too. And as much as bullying affected my life, I don’t ever think about the specific people who bullied me in a way of “Damn that Jessica. You may have bullied me when we were 11 and now we are 24, but I STILL despise you”. Nowadays I just hope that they grew and changed. Also the streams of her showing the inappropriate content, like the kissing videos, Ariana Grande’s videos, or the Amanda Bynes website??? Why would you do that??? They are survivors just as much as you and they did NOT consent to that. Yes Nick posted the kissing video on their RU-vid channel, that doesn’t give her the right to showcase that on a stream and be gagging and saying “Ewww! Gross! Look at that!” Just awful behavior. And the last thing I want to touch on is my absolute anger at her always having to make shit about herself. If you want to be a platform for survivors to feel safe and seen, why do you insert your own shit into it constantly? That’s disgusting behavior. You should not be running a “movement” like this if you can’t put your own issues aside and give space to people who need it. Even though truthfully nobody has even come to her podcast to talk about it. It’s like you said, it’s presented as gossip in the way she talks about it. It’s the same reason I don’t watch the h3 podcast despite loving their old videos on h3h3productions. I don’t like gossip podcasts where it’s just people talking about serious allegations/stories from someone else. I had no idea about the Drake Bell podcast she had deleted or all the horrible things she’s done to members of Eat Predators. I’ll probably still keep an eye on her channel out of morbid curiosity if she’ll change, but I won’t be a supporter any longer. Now I will be starting your Girl Defined video because that’s another topic I have been deep diving into for a long time now. I’m a deconstructed Christian as well and it’s wild watching what Girl Defined has become since I did used to watch them here and there as a young Christian afab. Love the channel ❤❤

thank you so much for this video. I really enjoyed listening to your critiques and agree.

To my understanding.. Alexa needs to raise money for the cause somehow. Then she can keep doing what she's doing. However, despite agreeing with her cause, I do get some unsure feelings about her sometimes, so I have been treading lightly.. and I really don't like how she said she "wont be bullied" into re-explaining her opinion on Drake....then what is her channel for? If not exposing predators like him?? I don't get it. I get that she feels attacked, but c'mon.. she should have known that deleting that video out of nowhere would not be a good look, and therefor she should have given us a fair warning before deleting that video. She should understand why people reacted the way that they did, and she could have explained herself in a more productive way. Just my opinion. I appreciate your video and thank you if you took the time to read this comment

No Alexa is a liar. I don’t trust her at all

5:04 I wonder if that person feels the same way about believing child Drake’s accusations against his abuser? Like is it the age or the gender that determines whether or not they believe someone?

Danielle Fishel (Topanga) isn't married to anyone associated with Saving Christmas

no way the alexa clip at 1:20:15 is how she herself edited and posted that..... did you cut that at all? even shorten a breath? ANYTHING? surely she couldn't be THAT blatant with making everything about herself omg...

I hadn’t been caught up on the current issues surrounding her, but wow. Yeah, at best, RU-vid fame really went to this woman’s head. At worst, she’s Hopeless Peaches 2.0

I can't wait until this channel starts to make money🤔

not sure if the cat paintings are yours but i love them💖 the cutest prettiest style and colors

Alexa is clearly a narcissist. You can tell how much she's loving being back in the spotlight, not to mention how hypocritical she is on certain things.

in regards to shirts in one of her stream and trish interview she said she sees them as protests signs she had them up before the doc. she also said those who participated the doc approved logo and bought some before she post about them be up as limited offer

YES

I want drake to go away.

with what you on doc not be good o have seen people criticise how the doc started as when it wasnt actors or on set people talk about their own experiences it came across as sensationalized and having outssders who werent involved

I really can’t stand hearing about the Johnny Depp “bot farm” crap. Maybe there was some online campaign he was paying for, idk about all that because I developed zero of my opinions about that case based on social media. I watched the trial start to finish, I went into it not knowing anything nor being a fan of either of them, and I agree with the verdict. I agree that Amber was the primary physical aggressor, even if you don’t like the words Johnny Depp used to describe her. I don’t like how he spoke either, but there’s only evidence of Amber being physically abusive and manipulating evidence. This is part of my problem with Alexa too. She said out loud that Johnny’s words were abusive and therefore she stands by Amber… sorry, words don’t excuse hurling a huge glass bottle at a person and cutting their finger off just because you’re a woman and he’s a man. And Amber had plenty of abusive words of her own. The double standard for male victims pisses me off. Women can be abusers too and it doesn’t negate your feminism and advocacy to admit, even embrace, that provable fact. Regardless of how people are speaking about it online, the trial was based on evidence and testimony from both of them, not social media, and the evidence painted a VERY clear picture. And that’s how I feel about Alexa’s claims about bot farms too. Regardless of what’s happening on twitter or wherever else, I’m not paying attention to that to develop my opinion. My opinion comes from watching HER videos, from listening to HER words, from seeing HER actions. The bot farm bullshit is a deflection and an excuse.

Nice

I understand what you are saying but at the same time someone that has been left out and bullied in childhood and also being broomed, it causes you to believe everyone is attacking you and wanting alternative unspoken intentions . She talks about her trauma almost daily and she gets re triggered but I do believe that she needs to heal more . It’s not easy to be put in this position when you have a clouded vision on the world …

Idk when yall are gonna start using critical thinking skills and realize that if someone is creating a business they are ultimately self serving

If you've been through anything bad (and I think you know what I mean by "bad") you can definitely spot that kind of person a mile away. DB raised that red flag for me, the moment I began reading about him. (I did not know who he was until this year, I am too old to have watched his TV shows, so I had only heard his name. So I decided to read up on the controversy) Just looking at his photo made me cringe. I'm not calling him unattractive, I'm talking about recognizing the kind of person he is... I don't even want to remotely get into the kind of men I've had to endure in my life, because this is not the place to do it. But in my opinion, DB has those vibes. 100 percent! He has fans left? Really? Well, these days, I'm not surprised. SMH. And honestly, I don't get the problem people have with Alexa. It's scary enough for me to leave this comment, let alone do the kind of public work she has done, TRYING her damndest to bring justice to the world. I'm respectfully disagreeing with anyone who doesn't find Alexa N. a hero. To a lot of us she is.

calling trish’s podcast a drama podcast is soooo inaccurate & clearly biased 🙄 your distain for alexa seems based more in personal opinion versus facts. i’m not an alexa fan nor do i dislike her so i don’t really have a horse in this race

You guys are really gross. Should Alexa make no money for her children and family and just starve? Should she just dissapear because you all dont like her? Because you dont want to hear her story anymore? Move along. Do something positive.

I wasn’t planning on watching her appearance on Just Trish…but I was fucking GAGGED. Trish is probably not the best platform for an “activist” especially if your followers are BEGGING you not to do it. But as mindless drivel, I like her enough. Seeing her reaffirm that Drake is a predator and Alexa never taking the bait was crazy 😭 how do you manage to look bad in front of her?

The comments section is looking like a reddit forum.