WINNIE THE POOH: BLOOD & HONEY - A Terrible Horror Movie 

You should review the American pie movies please and thank you

@@Looptoo That’s actually a good idea

I know it would be terrible 😅

Tigger's not in the movie because the character will not be in public domain until 2024.

Promoting gambling, nice job, unsub.

the exact definition of "misinterpreting freedom of speech"

So true.

So true

“Insert Jurassic Park quote here!”

@@PinaKoalaGaming So preoccupied with wether or not you could that you didn’t stop to think if you should.

LMAO

yeah i know right

Not even just carrots he has a whole garden of various veggies XD

​@@EmisopIn the movie it said they starved in winter. Which I assume maybe they couldn't grow?

Not just finding honey, GORGING on honey. Tubby lil' mofo sucks down a whole jar of the stuff in seconds and then happily inquires about there being more.

well crud

I think they might have run into issues with Disney if they had him say that.

You can’t copyright dialogue, right?

FR 😅😅😅

When he was going to get hit by a car "Ho bother"

Oh bother 😭

Yes that's right. Including poohs iconic outfit.

@@BohoAstronaut0819 Oh bother

Yeah plus his little red shirt is still under copyright, which is why they had to give pooh the hick outfit.

I was gonna come here and say this.

I was coming to say this! 😂

Damn I missed that didn't know this movie was a thing until all the youtubers I watch reviewed it. Its some what safe under this rock!

@@shivonnevius5040 Well they made a lot of money that's why they are able to make a sequel

@@augustonembungu6721 well hopefully they do better storytelling in the next one.

Yeah, the marketing was pretty solid considering me my relatively normie brother both heard about it like a year before it came out and remembered it. I think they did a really popular Reddit post where we both heard about it.

It's pretty clear from the plot that it was just going to be a regular slasher film and then they decided to make it Winnie the Pooh to make some extra cash

Because it's a female name. He was named after two animals at the London zoo: a female black bear Winnipeg, and a swan Pooh.

@aduckofsomesort Winnipeg. After a black bear at the London zoo and a swan named Pooh.

Me: WINNIE POOH! Pooh: wtf Me: POOH WINNIE WINNIE POOH

Also, what is a "Pooh"? Since he's referred to as "THE Pooh", like Barney THE Dinosaur or Sylvester THE Cat.

@@danieldietrich9969 He was named after two real animals: a black bear at the London zoo named Winnipeg, and a swan named pooh.

Legally we can more than just horror movies starring Pooh. Imagine if someone made an superhero movie about Winnie-the-Pooh called “Winnie-the-Pooh: No Honey At Home.”

Except, completely unfunny for a parody.

@@Lutherstrode17492 pooh wrath of honey

@@corbano9679 Pooh: Honey and Money

I think meat canyons parody was much more entertaining

This comment has me dying!!! 😭😭

And More winnie the pooh like

damn id watch that!

that soundz so silly lol

I agree ❤😢

While he was never my favourite growing up, I still always loved him particularly because my late grandpa's voice sounded like a happy version of Eeyore. I appreciate him much more as an adult too, and since my grandpa's passing, I've felt even closer to him. :'c

Nicholas Cage’s greatest enemy.

elvis could write a better movie,I truly believe that.

NOT THE BEES!

As he should

What a fucking gigachad. Holy crap.

That's hilarious

Naw not the heffalump, I loved them in the movie where Roo meets them and becomes forbidden friends. My childhood would cry tears enough to fill a pool!

I'd watch that

Oddly, I prefer this idea lol. It would make the costumes make sense.

I honestly thought they were guys in costumes until Elvis said they were actual animals- your idea works perfectly

That would have been better than this crap and more interesting

OMG YESS

Kind of shocked no one in the movie said this: “Eat shit, Winnie-the-Crap.”

I didn't necessarily grow up with these characters, but to see such wholesome characters so full of hate makes me sad

Traumatized? Really?

Puzzy

This is why I just can't watch these movies.

Phones "unusable" cliche

^^^ honestly!

I think it’s mostly a budget question, honestly. Some of the most iconic horror movies have been made on a minuscule budget, that’s just not possible with proper animation and such

It's a bit surface level. Based more on the image of innocence rather than why that image was so stringently upheld (Disney wanting to be too clean for controversy and subsequent loss of revenue).

Oh shut up

mickey will be in public domain in 2024 there's DEFINITELY gonna be a horror movie on mickey pretty soon, i will not be surprised

Yeah i watched Papa Meat talk about this movie first and i was surprised when i heard that Christopher was the setup kill and it decided to introduce college girls for a generic Friday the 13th like movie which makes no sense. Why even have the rights to Christopher Robin and Winnie the Pooh if you’re not gonna use both to the fullest you can?

​@@chandllerburse737I see your point but I did feel like the actresses were not bad at all given the script/lines. They were all pretty natural

And money

@@aduckofsomesort That would have been funny

It's disappointing they could have done better than this but no they went with crap

I’m sorry but it’s spelled Winnie.. I’ve honestly never seen it spelled so off before.. 😭

I would watch that definitely

The idea of a child befriending monsters, not realizing how dangerous they are, could work on it's own, imo. And by creating their own characters, they would have had more freedom with the project. Now this guy wants to do horror movies with Bambi, Peter Pan, even the Powerpuff Girls if he gets permission/rights to do it.

And a lot more interesting.

Idk why there aren’t more horror movies in the uncanny valley

Its actually not Disney. The original Book is in public domain now while Tigger and Co werent introduces until later Books so their copyright is still active. Disney only holds the Copyright to their version of the Characters thats why their arent allowed to make them look similar to the Disney Version

Can't wait 😂

@@lunaris7342 OOhhhh, gotcha! Well, we can still hope that in later time once those catch up he'll fall in, unless they plan on extending them out cause - they are Disney so why not

Tigger is glad he was spared.

@@TF2CrunchyFrogif I recall the video I saw explaining it he was introduced just a couple years later so he’ll probably be in the sequel or third one

It's the same with all the characters except for Pooh, Piglet and Cristopher Robin AFAIK, as those three recently entered the public domain. There are different rules for copyright and the public domain in the US, but for Tigger, the copyright was still in effect when this movie was shot and released. Fun fact is that Tigger will be entering the public domain (from what I understand) this year, so if they ever make a sequel to this movie, they can include Tigger in it.

Its actually not because of Disney the original Book is in public domain now while Tiggers first appearance was in a later Book. His Copyright runs out next Year

So why couldn't the filmmakers wait a few years if they wanted to feature all Pooh chracters in the movie? Pooh, Piglet and Tigger could've been featured all together then.

It would be appear in the sequel

I was wondering what any of the original Pooh VAs thought of this abomination of a horror movie. I'm guessing if they introduce Tigger in the sequel, he'll have to be silent too since Jim Cummins also voices him

No it wouldn't

What was the Wild Things movie suppose to be a darker version of the book? I thought the book already was that dark.

@@chandllerburse737 i’ve never read the book but i believe so? sorry my comment was kind of confusing i meant it would’ve been cool if the winnie the pooh horror movie was taken more in the direction of a dark children’s story. It would have been more intriguing or at least creative to see them warp the original story into something darker, maybe Christopher Robin being lost in the 100 acre wood with animalistic monsters compared to a slasher with men in masks. That’s personally what I would have preferred in this kind of movie

Fun fact: this fact wasn't fun

?????????........

Actually, that aspect isn’t that far off from real life. Wild animals survive just fine, and humans start feeding them and that animal stops hunting because it can just go to the human for food. Why go through all the trouble of chasing prey when you can just eat some slightly-expired raw bacon someone left out for you? They get comfortable. They let themselves go, because humans have them covered. Until the humans don’t and these out of practice animals either don’t remember how to hunt or physically can’t, and starve to death. So Pooh could’ve been getting his own honey, then gotten so used to being handed food by Christopher Robin that he forgot how to gather honey. Once CR left, Pooh didn’t have the food from Christopher Robin nor the ability to find his own food, and so he starved.

@@finalfroggitapproaches6418 Still doesn't make sense since Pooh HAS honey and looks fat...

It's because they're just toys representing the magic and innocence of childhood...

That is completely wrong. You can literally see the original toys in a museum that look exactly like the original illustrations. Don't just spout easily debunk-able nonsense. I'm guessing you've never touched a book, at least not the Winnie the Pooh books, because if you had you would know they are all in there. However, Disney did create some aspects about the characters that they do own, like character designs specific for the show - like Poo's red shirt. Tigger didn't bounce on his tail in the books either.

@@Renoistic Dont insult me then try to correct me, fuck you

Buddy, slow down. To do that, you'd need a scriptwriter and an editor. Those cost money!

I . . . I was just about to comment near the same thing. Winnie The Pooh would work so much better as a psycological horror over a slasher, but that would actually take effort. Edit: Okay, I've been thinking about this a little more, and I have a plot. One of the things I don't like about these "reimaginings" is that they take away every and all wholesomeness and make it over-the-top edgy instead. With Winnie the Pooh especially, it would be better to lean into it. You can still make it unsettling and I'm going to explain how. Start it off with Christopher Robinson playing with his stuffed animals. They're his comfort because he struggles to socialize with other kids. He even sees the stuffed animals as real people with lives, struggles, and personalties. Fast forward 14 years and he's 21. Everything in his life is falling apart: His parents are dead, he's in debt, he's losing friends, etc. Christopher becomes desperate for any kind of comfort, so he turns to his imaginary friends, but he believes they're real people, 100%. Winnie, Piglet, Tigger, and the others aren't malicious, conniving, or fake like humans. They have their pastel colors and bright smiles and always want to go on adventures. Christopher starts going insane. He can barely see the real world anymore, just the imaginary one in his head (maybe he even starts seeing himself as a stuffed animal or is physically TURNING INTO ONE- I'm sorry, I love transformation body horror). A couple comes into the woods for a trip, only to see a sickly man who doesn't look quite human. He hasn't cleaned himself in so long, nor has eaten. Real stuffed animals didn't need those things. They report it to the cops. The cops search the woods, only to find Chrisopher dead to the elements or starvation. Edit 2: I'm late to this, but since Christopher Robin is actually a real person, nevermind. Change the name.

Christopher Robin is a real guy, making up a story about how he was abused and schizophrenic is sorta weird. He's dead now, so he couldn't sue you or anything, but it would still be weird.

I was JUST about to say the same thing. A psychological horror would have been much better and creepier then a slasher film -_-

@@siophecles Really? Well you learn something new every day. In that case yeah, it WOULD be insensitive.

I think you put more thought into this than the writers did

@47Cartoonguy That's just how I cope from massive disappointment. I do wish they put more thought and love into the project.

Nah, he secretly hated his fiancé cuz she didn't cut the crust off his toast and she HAD to die for that transgression

That movie felt like it only existed because of an attempt to cash in on FNAF popularity since like didn’t the FNAF movie also get announced around the same time?

@@chandllerburse737 It’s even sillier than that: it only exists because the Winnie The Pooh copyright finally expired. Anyone can make a Winnie the Pooh anything right now!