Hi, it’s great to see you here! I’m a Photographer and Videographer based in Vienna. My mission is acquiring all the skills I need to be able to tell the most impactful stories I can. On this channel I share my experiences and skills that I learn on my journey. Enjoy learning with me!
Is it possible to place a mavic air2s vertically in it? also, do you have the internal depth measurement of the main compartment? online there are only external measurements...
They changed the middle divider into a removeable one because people complained. There's always a complaint 😅 Besides, with the old one, if you don't need it you can't remove it and it's a little bulky so it takes space. With the strap pocket, that's a specific problem you had. It wasn't very useful for me. Harder to open, access, and put bigger stuff too. Now I can use it more, maybe with filters or lens covers. Besides, they have a new camera strap clip for arcaswiss that might replace the PD one. It might be easier to use. And the strap pockets possibly made the backpack more comfortable. I'm not sure when the last time I used those pockets. For me, only the removed RFID pocket was a downgrade. I think there's pros and cons to the changes. But I kinda like the design of the older shoulder bag. Cause usually I have other stuff I can put on top compartment, maybe a second camera. It was great when you just want to bring that bag, you can fit an a7c with 35mm there, plus a gropro AND your phone. That was crazy. But it's not a big deal. Sad to see it go but I can adapt and find other ways. But I appreciate this video. All good information, thanks!
My zipper messed up on the same spot and I was really bummed out about it. But I still use the bag, just sucks I cant access the top side panel properly
@@juljanskurani so its pretty much stuck closed at the moment, but the prior "fix" for me was that at the very top part of the track I used to pliers and cut the track. It was the only way I was able to put the zipper back on track , because it dangled loose from one side. It had came off due to the bottom right of the pocket doing the same thing as the video. So it was working, but I forgot to tie a little know at the very top where I had cut, so I zipped it a tad beyond that point. And well as of now its kinda stuck closed lol Hope that all made sense
Some folks yapping about how people buy it for the hype and film simulations. Lets not forget that it has a built in flash, hybrid EVF/OVF, leaf shutter that allows for insane shutter speeds for flash in the sun. Did i mention that there's a lense built into it as well. No other fuji camera has all these elements in the same camera, yes the xpro has the ovf / evf hybrid as well but its big, has no leaf shutter or flash. The xt50 has the flash but none of the other features and no weather proofing Update, also has the built-in nd filters
Yes the X100v is a great camera when compared to other brands (in its original price range) but no way now that it's become an expensive camera on the resale market.. For the amount of money the X100V costs on the resale market at the moment you're getting absolutely scammed if you buy one in 2024. It's essentially a point and shoot camera it has no valid right to cost much more than $1- $1400. For that price range it used to be one of the best point and shoot cameras on the market but if you paid much more than that you got scammed. For the current resale price of the X100V you can literally get a brand new XT-5 which is literally one of Fujifilms flagship professional cameras. People like the x100v for the same reasons as the GR2 they're great point and shoot cameras, they fit in your pocket and used to outperform for their cost. From a professional users perspective they're basically useless, but if you like photography they're so much more fun to use than an iPhone camera (but shouldn't be considered as much more than that)
This is the most honest and relatable review I have seen so far for the backpack, it really deserves way more views. Thank you for the review, it is very helpful.
Great work, it's difficult to find great side by side comparisons like this. This is very interesting because I assumed that shooting 10-bit clog3 on the r6ii would make recovering highlights / shadows easier than the 8-bit clog "1" on the eos r. but I can't see a difference at all (edit: can't see as significant difference as I would have expected). I also have a question for you! I have an eos r and find that the rolling shutter on 4k is tolerable with no fast movements BUT if shooting handheld the electronic stabilization does not mitigate the kind of "ripples" from micro jitters that you get because of rolling shutter. Using my brain, I have concluded that IBIS would actually solve the micro jitter issue. I think the rolling shutter is actually that same on the r6 and eos r in 4k... around 30ms on both. I was wondering if you could confirm the r6 ibis sort of solves these micro jitter induced ripples in the footage. Thank you!
Hi, glad I could help! Yes, the micro jitters used to bother me on the Eos R as well and fortunately since I got the R6 Mk II I haven’t seen those micro jitters caused by the E.I.S. anymore.
I can't buy it anywhere. I found a few on the second hand market, but everytime before we set up a meeting, all of them write me that they found another buyer who is offering more than the initial price they've put or they just don't write anymore.. I'm furious! I wanted to buy the new VI model, but the only way is Ebay and the import charges are 1/3th of the total cost...
I disagree with the instagram filters comparison. As of the other fujifilm cameras, I believe you that it’s possible to get similar results with cheaper cameras even though I‘m not very familiar with the system. However I did mention that I liked this camera for the overall laid back vibe and for being so quirky, not for working with it. In today‘s overstimulating world, that might be more important to people than one might think. :)
@@wtfbbqz no I'm not criticizing the camera I'm criticizing how people jump on bandwagons. It's because of youtubers and Instagram influencers that this particular camera now costs 2 - 3x it's original cost. People are buying into the x100v because of youtuber hype, not because of independent thought and rational thinking. People want this camera simply because other people want it. As for the camera itself, you can't even change lens on it meaning all these people using this camera are all basically making the same cookie cutter images as each other given its point and shoot nature. You can literally get fujifilm's current flagship the XT-5 or even the XH2 for less than the current selling price of the inferior in literally every way X100V.
@@juljanskurani you can literally get a brand new XT-5 for cheaper than what X100Vs are currently selling for. It's that ridiculous. The XT-5 is literally a superior camera in every single way and takes way better pictures by every metric. The X100V only limits your creativity as a photographer with its lack of lenses, no grips, no dials, no real viewfinder, a small battery etc it's a fun hobby point and shoot camera to whip out of your pocket at parties, but way overpriced nowadays due to it's influencer hype. There are better Fujifilm cameras that will do the same if not better than the X100V for a fraction of the price because you aren't paying the hype tax.
And the built in flash, ND filters, hybrid EVF/OVF, leaf shutter that allows for insane shutter speeds for flash in the sun. Did it mention that there's a lense built into it as well ?🧐
I have the EOS R and am considering the R6 Mk II for better focusing reason. But I was wondering if the 30MP EOS R had much better picture quality than the 24MP R6. I think you have helped with my decision. Thank you for the video.
Doesn‘t matter because it doesn‘t even work. I‘ve learned the hard way that when transfering long video files through the usb-c cable, they get corrupted. :/
@@juljanskurani you have to use the right cable that has the pd spec. as well as the correct transfer rate otherwise you’ll get USB 2 speeds. I wouldn’t trust it for transfer anyway though. Just nice that it charges the battery right in the camera for those times I leave my charger behind not thinking I need it.
Thank you so much!! I recently bought this camera and I was overwhelmed when I started searching for batteries and stuff and realised that it was such an old model!! Now I'm thrilled to start using it now that I know where to start😅 😄
Unbeatable camera is the eos r with atomos ninja 10bit 422 HQ with speed booster is my favorite only if you shoot 24 not 60p Let me tell you why I can get a eos r used for 700 and since the crop is 1.74x you put a speed booster on it and get wider and more light for low light and on top of that you can use lenses like sigma 18-35mm 1.8 and turn it to a 1.2 Also canon 17-55mm 2.8 stabilized which are goat lenses if the crop was 1.5x wouldn’t be possible so I really like the 1.74x cause even with the speed booster you can use any lens you want with no vignette and Let’s no start about photos cause the eos r is a goat for photos last thing is just remember the eos r was once the best canon mirrorless camera that everyone was talking about just cause the latest and greatest came out don’t let that change your mind the eos r is amazing unless all you need is a slowmo camera
@@juljanskurani yea just stating facts cause you know a lot of people always want the latest and greatest but sometimes it’s not I currently have a c200 and I had a r6 but I sold it cause I realized it was all that much better then the r and I found my self missing the eos r tbh but noted I don’t really use the slowmo stuff and if I need I have 4k 60 in raw on my c200 but also the eos r matches the c200 better so it’s a great pick up for 700 lol
I‘ve seen some footage from the c200 & c300 II and I really like it. I understand how the eos R would match with those, but personally, I would have already sold my eos R if it was for video. The only reason I still keep it is because I like the photos a bit too much 😂
@@juljanskurani that’s why I say only for 24fps lol but exactly if you combine the photos with the great 24p 4k 10bit with a speedbooster it’s a killer if you haven’t tried it then give it a try it will change your mind on the video aspect of the R but only for 24fps lol
thx for your vid ，i am thinking about to buy r62 to replace my eos r which has been reliablely used over 2 years ，I am really not sure about the 6 mega pixels difference would influence the picture quality or not，your vid help me find out the answer.When i got my new r62 i just find out another point-- R is a nice camera if you only shoot static pics ，but r62 makes shooting much more joy ，the pic quality improvement isn't the most important thing,the shooting experience is.
Glad I could help! 😊 That‘s so true! Enjoy your new camera! Got a new video coming up very soon, where I‘m comparing them for Video as well. Stay tuned 👀
Great video man!! I want to buy the preset but the problem is don’t have apple pay, is there a chance you can offer another payment method in the shop? 😊
Thanks a lot!! Yes, it‘s also possible with the credit/debit card. But I have a technical problem with the shop - „add to card“ button is invisible 🫥 It‘s next to the „amount“, but you can only see it when you put the computer mouse on it, or when you guess-tap on it on the phone. Have fun with it! 😊😊
Undeniably they cannot beat film. It's always possible that at some point in the future this might happen, but it's not there yet. I have both types of camera, but won't use my mirrorless for any image I think is in any way interesting.
it's so easy to recognize what is film what is digital thought, i would've thought you did an uno reserve and the old switcheroo. the digital preset is so obvious, with it's lack of pale green undertone and low contrast image, and the most giving away part is the artificial grain just down right awful to the eye ( the photos were okay tho )
To answer your question: a film preset can still not beat film, as for your editing I'm able to pick it out every single time, the one with the more natural looking grain and the more vibrant colors and contrast just to happens to be film, tonally I suppose they look similar, but in some examples that's not true either 3:08 is just too muted, film looks great. It's either not close enough or not possible.
I use my camera for outdoor and wildlife photos. Since it's on mountain hikes I do, I rather go with the lighter lens and the little bit of extra magnification. Would be nice to get better photos at dawn but I think I can live with the trade off.
Hi Juljan, An after-market buckle for the strap could partially solve your chest strap issue. Find the buckle you like (there are many options on the net) with the correct width, and please measure it three times before cutting the original PGY strap in the right place. However, that will not solve the ability to move it easily up and down. I had the peak design backpack strap mount, and I hated it. Every step was a click because there was play in the mechanics. I replaced it with the PGY version and have been happy ever since. The PGY version is cheaper and PGY offers a wider range of attachments, such as those for any tripod (so you wouldn't have to buy the limited variety and very expensive PD tripods). The PGY downside is that you cannot adjust as precisely the hold on the strap, and I wish it would not slide slowly down while attached to OneMo 2. The lack of answer from the PGY warranty department is a bummer.
just dug one of these out of my closet and got some black and white film, im loving it so far but film price makes me probably not want to shoot film often
I feel you man! I bought 4 rolls of film last summer. I developed and scanned 2 of them, shot the third but left it undeveloped and the 4th I haven‘t even started yet because I don’t want to spend money on it. I think I‘ll just keep the camera and the film for when I start being overstimulated from the digital world again. Until then, just enjoying my digital cameras and I‘ve made a film-like preset for when I miss the aesthetics. ✌🏻
Anyone that has used this (I purchased the product and it works well) have you ran into battery problems with the device you use (my cell phone). My phone drains after fully charged when streaming my son's 60 min soccer game. It barely makes it through. Trying to connect the phone to an external power bank while in the gimbal, the gimbal recognizes the weight difference and starts beeping and doesn't work. Does anyone have any battery charging solutions they have tried that doesn't mess with the gimbal calibration?
Ah, so those aftermarket batteries are no good. I just bought the RP and those types of batteries in my cart. But it looks like I should pay more for the Canon battery. Thank you!
Hi, i use only original battery. I can make 600-700pic with one charge, but its depend on the light conditions. when the screen is always On it drain much faster the battery :D
HI, have you noticed in the 2.8 version that it jumps from 84mm to 86mm and does not allow for an exact 85mm? Do you know how to correct this? Thank you.
Highlight rolloff: Resolve can change gamma using colour space transform to get underexposed shadows back. Then resolve studio has nice noise reduction for R6 underexposed. Sharpness: Can look into edge detect softening strategies in resolve.
With the appropriate choice of older EF lenses, sharpness can be reduced, although AF in video won't be quite as good. (I also use vintage lenses with manual focus, even more organic.). There are also other types of filters for existing lenses, but I am less of a fan of that those.
That‘s a good point, but I‘d like a solution where I can keep using my RF lenses, because I don‘t want to loose money selling those or spend money and getting ef versions of the rf lenses I already have. That sounds wasteful in all ways. I need a way to get sharp footage when I need that, and softer footage when I want a more film/documentary style on the RF lenses I have. That way I can keep my setup small and minimalist. At the moment, it seems like getting the c70 would be the next step to solve this problem, since it produces softer footage, has great DR and can make use of my RF lenses. But before that, maybe playing around with some mist filters to see if they can help with the highlights on my R6 II is the way. Why aren‘t you a fan of filters?
I almost always buy used, preferably pristine items, so I basically never use value on any of the gear I own (unless I damage it, even then I usually get close to even) Unless prices hit an all-time low for a daily fire sale on new stuff. For instance: got my (2nd) R6 Mark II for 2300€ with cashback - does not sound special, until you realise it comes with an RF 24-105/4L kit lens that I just sold for 900€ (that one had a disappointing squealing noise when tracking AF was used for stills, I had multiple copies, quality control on kit lenses seems inconsistent) so the body only cost me 1400€ (1st R6II wasn't bad either for 1700€, would have bought more if I had the resources). Then I also got multiple R6 bodies on Black Friday for 920€ each, also a steal, they have to be worth a few hundred more currently. And finally, with the imminent arrival of the R5 II I can be a lookout for an R5 again, which I still prefer to the R6 Mark II, having it sold at the worst time before the 1.6 firmware (also paid a joke price just a few months after release, guy was probably fed up with error messages, his SD card was the culprit, nothing wrong with the R5) It does have a slightly more organic look, for lack of a better word in 24p, where it downamples from 8K (sharpness setting 0) And as a hybrid, handling is more sublime than the R6 series (programmable C3 video mode for pressing the record button in stills mode, photo and video modes are independently treated and remembered, meaning I can go from C1 photo to C2 video with just one click, I can disable other modes instead of spinning the wheel of fortune on an R6 II. Sounds like a tiny thing, but it is miles better. So, after a while, I tend to flip them, only to realise later that certain items should have been kept, lenses hold their value steady, and deals on EF lenses seem to be scarce. Well, the problem with filters come into play when I have to stack multiple ones. Yes, ND+mist combined ones do exist, but most filters are hideously expensive for what they are(well, at least I didn't pay new prices because they can be hard to resell if it is not the "right" type, size, etc.), and having so many vintage lenses I am almost guaranteed not to have the right size, adapter rings are also a pain etc. Very fiddly and costly at the end of the day. (Might be the C70 one day, saw it for a very good price once, but that is rare, and loosing IBIS won't be the best) I really need to start scaling down vintage stuff, but the difficult part is that they all look quite fantastic for video. So it's not like i oppose to filters, I just think the effect of those lenses cannot be replicated to the same degree and they are getting harder to obtain by the minute. Cheers, Adam@@juljanskurani
But remember how bad the dynamic range and canon log is was on the eos R! Just because there are better cameras out there, it dosnt make the one you own bad. I think dynamic range is only one piece of the puzzle in creating high quality cinema. Keep crushing it man. Your footage is looking great 🤙
Yes this is an upgrade from the R for sure! I can’t help nerding out on my cameras and when I notice something’s not quite there, like the dynamic range and the highlight roll off, it bothers me and I start looking for better cameras xp I’ll have try some sort of mist filters first, because they might help with the highlights, before I start considering switching cameras again. I’m supper happy you liked the footage though!! 😊
