Decoding global economics and geopolitics, we specialize in BRICS countries and the Global South. Our content delves into the complexities of macroeconomics, geopolitics, and social change. Our in-depth videos are designed for discerning viewers who seek in-depth analysis of current events and emerging trends.
As TVBRICS.com's partner, we offer unique perspectives on vibrant emerging economies. Stay informed, subscribe today, and keep pace with a rapidly changing world.
Disclaimer: This channel is for informational purposes only. Opinions expressed by guests are their own and not our team's. All footage, data, and information used in our videos are sourced and utilized under the Fair Use law for educational and commentary purposes. We are not financial advisors and all videos are not a recommendation to buy/sell securities. Always do your own due diligence.
The Universe is Not a Hierarchical Pyramid of Mathematic Quantities The Universe is a Holarchic Sphere of Spheres of Consciousness Qualities Timeless and Formless Consciousness Shines in the Form in Time ❤️ 💚 💜
I absolutely do NOT agree with ANY of the "the West's" ideology and the direction in which it is heading. This is the WEF vs BRICS, and I'm sorry...MY ethics line up with the BRICS. I want NOTHING to do with the WEF. I'm terrified for my grandchildren. Please, what do people like me do? My great grandparents and grandparents worked very very hard to get all of my family to the USA from Russian Communist rule from 1906 to 1971. USA is heading toward this Communist bullshit. I know first hand how that story rolls, I want no part of it, I do not want my grandchildren to be a part of it...I need to bring them back, it appears??? I despair.
WTO is totally a useful idiot. Only serves US and western's interest. Global South must leave WTO and form their own league, boycotting US and western countries
I'm beginning to realize that there is a silver lining to the very negative attitude and resentment treatment from the West towards Russia and China. No one wants a new Cold War or a Hot War. I prefer real World Peace. Yet, the West's hostility inadvertently helped make the relations between the BRICS and other Nations even stronger in a shorter period of time than if everyone were still divided and not united.
The people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. Strategically ambiguous rulers make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical "divide and rule". Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Endless wars, constant dissent. Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... Who wields the POWER? Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Same types of people and systems. Different times. Same games. ------------------------------------- The people of the Africa have been "divided and ruled" over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. Strategically ambiguous rulers make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the "playground" during the Cold War. Moscow was taking on the role of arming the resistance. Once the dividers have reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) so the own systems of gain can siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical "divide and rule". Today, all African dissenters, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent. Give them money, and they will dance for the dividers... Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... Four corners of the globe. Different rules. Same games. -------------------------------------- The people of the Americas (most of whom are Christians), including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide and rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), then after 1900 as European colonial powers' influence decreased, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. _Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide and rule games on their neighbours._ *Forget "nukes". The "divide and rule/conquer"-strategy is the most powerful force on the planet.* Ever since the two-faced "snake" slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), human beings have fruitlessly warned and have continuously been warned, against "divisions" within a peaceful status quo. Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a "system" divided by lies and deceit). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide and rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror", constant dissent with everything's a war war war... Insert levers of lies, mistrust... Create favourites: favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER, to those who volunteer to act as proxies... Point the systemic finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power... Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... *In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."* [Critical question: Who is "we"?] And that is what they did. And that is what you are fighting for. America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Europe are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a "pattern" of alignments which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the MENA region) against each other. It is how divide and rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Who wields the POWER? Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? That is what empires have always done. Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances... The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them in the divide and rule technique of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams *War is a great "divider." It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.*
The WTO, IMF, and World Bank were set up to control global trade, finance, and development, often reinforcing the power of America and Western countries. Many view these institutions as tools that keep developing nations in a state of economic dependency and reinforce Western dominance. Given this, it might be in BRICS nations' best interest to exit these organizations. Staying in them could mean continuing to support a system that many argue enforces financial subjugation and inequality. ]
BRICS should leave WTO. BRICS has been trampled from left to right. Why stay with someone who has hurt you constantly? BRICS would be able to surive on their own. BRICS is resilient.
What does WTO do anyway? Trade barrier and sanctions is flying around. I live in SE Asia; we get trade done thru FTA. WTO only make things complicated.
W.T.O and U.N. where the sitting chairs are mostly taken by westerns ! I think this organisation's must be run by percentage of population, for a 14%% in population to determine and run this world's economy is ridiculous ! Example the top 25 population, should be chaired .
Brics will not leave IMF but it will not support it either. They know IMF is nothing more than a western financial tool of subjugation. Unless IMF changed to truly represent the world, it will weather and disappeared.
US with the West has been using WTO unfairly. BRICS wants to strengthen it. In fact, it's the US that is disabling it to prevent it from working properly
I can't watch this channel anymore. The WTO is headquartered in Geneva, which is NOT THE CAPITAL OF SWITZERLAND. The capital, Bern, is halfway across the country from the Geneva. The two cities don't even speak the same language. You make mistakes like this in every video. How can we be expected to believe anything that you say is true? You're doing a disservice to BRICS.
Hi, you are absolutely right, we made a mistake by saying that the WTO is located in the capital of Switzerland and not in Geneva. We relied too much on our source and made a mistake. However, your harsh tone is unnecessary. If you notice other mistakes in other videos as well, please let us know. If you decide to leave, we will not stop you. Thank you for pointing this out to us; we have corrected it.
I Thik the BRICS move towards reforming the WTO in a manner that will duly take into consideration the interests of developing countries and will suppress opposition priviledges that dominant countries like the US have resorted to to favour their oligarks interests may not fully succeed, but this will certainly bring more in the open the favouritism and the hypocrisy that have so far conditioned the Western attitude amids WTO member nations...
I understand how some people may feel excitement after the BRICS+ relating to the WTO, IMF, and World Bank. But I was born and raised in the U.S. and I see nothing but belligerence towards these institutions unless they control them. Say the WTO comes out with a ruling against the U.S. on these tariffs issues (or any other issue) with China. Does anyone think just because the U.S. is a member of the WTO and maybe more and more global south countries havve joined, that this will make any difference to the U.S. government? The U.S. has held it's sole hegemony for about a century and it believes, many believe christianity backs them (I am dead serious here) solely, that the U.S. believes it has the sole right and the only true God's given right and authority, to rule economically, politically, and militarily the entire planet. You may scoff and/or laugh it off, but there are well funded think tanks (these are where laws are drafted which those who actually control our government want congress to vote on) that have drafted many papers outlining how those in power can go forward with this agenda. There are a large group of politically powerful people who are just as fanatical in this way, as their may be in the extreme muslim belief system. As anyone knows, and I've watched 6 decades go by, that the U.S. will do whatever it wants to and gain allies by hook or crook, to back them up. They have done it over and over and over in this country's history. I hope you are right and reforms can be made and all members are held to account equally. But due to observed history, I'm skeptical.
😂. Do not care. Where is the: CONTRACT. I do not have contract with any: fraud-CORPORATION. If it's not:Quantum-language-syntax-parce. You are guilty of fraud by language and venue.
The material prosperity of China, and the financialized accounting trick of western GDP, have both grown by China's 2001 inclusion into the WTO. Just as with other western dominated and unjust international institutions like the UN, the BRICS are staging a long term and legal coup of the WTO. This really is the only way to make the world a better place. Rich nations using poor ones as cheap labor for maximum profit for the production class isn't a sustainable model.
The same backers of genocide are the same people behind the 🇻🇪 tensions and the attempts to create a war by creating a power vacuum in 🇲🇽 and they applaud it all 🤔❤️
REFORMs of these International entities set up by the crooked WEST, mission impossible & thus pure WOT. BRICs if not going to give up MUST set up similar entities emulating existing ones reformed as envisioned then inviting ALL Nations to join. This will achieve the required end result as it will give pressure for the reforms to existing entities and if not as more & more nations join up to the new, the existing will be made redundant. Such needs to be expedited as far, far, too many people around the Wrold are being affected by the recalcitrant, sour losers the WEST & G7 !@#$
I find it hard to accept. The IMF & World Banks harsh negative impacts tells a rotten story. Similar for the WTO. The history of All western inspired bodies. Shows a altogether negative impacts for non western countries. No i still believe that All Western inspired bodies should be exited by all non western countries. And they should come together to start their own international systems.
Most of what you said is fine. However, it's hard to grasp the multipolarity argument. If the G7 is not a multipolar body, given the vast gap between the GDP of the US and the rest, how is BRICS not a counter setup with China at the top? Given that almost all these countries are also recipients of Chinese investments through the BRI project, the overwhelming dominance of China is only reinforced. Additionally, while every BRICS member has healthy trade volumes with China, trade volumes between the BRICS countries themselves remain insignificant. It would not be quite proper to compare the history of economic coercion by the US with similar behavior by China, as China has not yet acquired a comparable level of economic and institutional heft. Despite this, China has frequently employed its economic muscle to serve its political ends. Australia, the Balkan countries, and Norway are robust cases in point. As for the WTO, we must remember that China's entry into this organization primarily drove its economic growth to begin with. It is therefore obvious that China would not wish to leave such an organization. As for the WTO, we must remember that China's entry into this organization primarily drove its economic growth to begin with. It is therefore obvious that China would not wish to leave such an organization. So, how is BRICS an agent of multipolarity and not merely a tool serving Chinese political ends? As we know, China has almost no allies to speak of. Its current friendship with Russia is more a result of the Western economic straitjacketing of Russia than anything else. Despite this, Russia still has no significant trade volumes with any of the other BRICS members apart from China and India. While reforms are undoubtedly needed, the demand for them has long been raised by developing countries, often acting in unison. In the international arena, economic hegemony through institutional arrangements is a phenomenon premised on political convergence. Even as China is far from the dominant power that America is, it is expedient for it to champion multipolarity, especially in a contested arena where it is in the crosshairs of an antagonistic West. Its behavior otherwise fails to inspire confidence in the prospects for behavioral changes should circumstances change. While one might argue for a bipolar world, multipolarity seems to be nothing more than a shared desire for now.
