One thing makes no sense to me. It is common knowledge that the farther away from Earth the light source is, the greater its light's redshift is. But if so - isn't that the proof that the rate of expansion is DECELLERATING - since the light from the closer light sources is, you know - NEWER?

So it’s because when things collide, energy is lost and when they collide, they clump together, causing it to be more gravitationally attractive which causes it to be more flat?

What if you tethered the earth to the moon?

Gravity doesn’t exist. Globetards use it as a God-like excuse

Cats per Norway per year / CNY the official best measurement of all time

So THIS is what gender fluid is

I barely made it past your ridiculous long strumming with a normal pick...but it's clear this is very hard to control and cannot do single strings. It sounds like crap. Another gimmick to take your money

What a bad video

The golden videos of RU-vid 10 years ago, I miss them

I was actually doing Time Travel. Maybe similar to those chemicals people got knocked up in USA movie Firestarter. Nobody knows about it except me. Got award the 2007 United States Washington State Quarter out of it. Some branch US military. Enlisted Selective Service back mid 1980's. Don't know how it works. Have to be in elite shape physically. They set up USA population 9 months to a year before knockout. Get a couple CIA type attractive girlfriends. Bam. Out like a light. Throw in distractions to keep you alive. Wake up psyche ward few years later no problems. Military runs USA population next 7 to 8 years.

The crazy thing about this new atomic model is that they seem like they wouldn’t work at all with The model that’s used for chemistry, which is amazingly successful in predicting chemical properties ?

For those what a neutrino is it can be said as a less stable fundamental particle which is having mass approx million times less than that of electron havingcharge zero which spin in anticlockwise direction

I can’t believe this thought experiment still gets as much attention as it does. If you put “unstable” explosives in a bunker with a cat, you can only postulate whether or not the explosives detonated or not. This idea that the explosive is “unstable” and has a 50/50 chance of detonating is silly. Explosives are part of a chain reaction of a chemical reaction. They DO NOT explode for no reason. Sure you can create a thought experiment and get silly with it, but reality ISN’T a made up silly experiment. Everything can be measured! The explosives would have no reason to have a 50/50 chance of exploding! This is why science is so important rather than theistic thought or philosophy. We can precisely measure and predict outcomes of cause and effects. Laplace’s Demons hit the nail on the head with this. If we had a supercomputer that could calculate every atom in the universe it would be able to predict the future. Now back to the cat. Its life is contingent on the explosion and NOT whether or not we look inside the bunker. That is all. We can know that if you put a full grenade in a bunker without pulling the pin that the cat will be safe. Pull the pin, and there may be a slight chance that it survives, but the probability is reduced. Opening the hatch to the bunker and looking inside has NOTHING to do with the cat living or dying. No need for multiple universes or dimensions. Just one measurable reality.

Multiverse is the most idiotic hipotesis offered by scientists.

Are you going to sell this relativity “globe”?

0:48 is this also true for walking? Because I always thought that walking is more effucinet than running.

I am so old that I took O Levels rather than GCSEs(I’m English). Anyway, it was the very first day of my A Level Chemistry course(Year 12) and the first thing our teacher said to us was, “Ok, everything you learned about atomic structure at O level…well, forget it. What you learnt was a simplified representation of atomic structure. That was over forty years ago and we’re still struggling with how to represent the atom but your representation makes so much sense.

Shrodingers cat

I just had a funny thought about magnets, and those people who love crystals and their perceived properties that affect your body. Some people might see it as often associated with spiritual stuff, like the bohemian or similar culture but there is some truth to it. Our body contains iron, and therefore, we are related to iron, or other minerals, or substances, because after all we're made of the same particle, we're just a bunch of atoms put together, and some turned humans, and some pigs. It made me think that since pure iron, which is the most magnetic element there is, usually attracts other and similar metals, and the strength of the magnet solely depends on how thick the magnet is, and the other metal where it sticks to when they come in contact, or close proximity. I tried searching on Google but of course, it's an AI, and it predicts other types of analysis instead of showing similar experiments that might've been done already. Part of it is likely because it's a bit more complex than just a single question. In hypothesis, there is a narrow path just enough for one person to pass through about a hundred meters long. On both sides of the path are giant iron (magnetic) walls towering any living human being, and several times thicker than any human body. Both walls of several meters long are fixed to the ground making sure they don't stick to each other as its properties naturally do. Both walls might be fixed firmly to the ground, and would never have physical contact with each other, but the energy between them being both magnetic materials is so active, but the reason why they're not touching each other is because they're both on opposite sides attached firmly to the ground, and a human being with high iron in his/her blood walks through. I wonder what implications it would have on that person's health, or body, or even the sensation they would feel walking for several meters long narrow path with magnetic walls on both sides. Although the magnetic properties are active energies, but they're not radioactive, so they can't be radiation, but I wonder what it's called. This can't be the first time someone wondered, but Google either doesn't think so, or it just doesn't want me to find written thesis about it lol.

Its a probability smear of where you MIGHT find the electron. Mystery solved.

#1 is THE BEST!!! "We have proof that Earth is round because we have pictures from the Moon!" We just don't have proof we EVER wen went to the Moon....

he was like, hmm hang on, this fire doesnt work

lets turn neptune into neptunium they said its millions of miles away they said what harm could it possibly cause they said!

if we did this with tardigrades instead of flease could we fling the cat out into space as long as they have both been in that hibernative state for a really long time so they could both be dead or alive?

1:42 I guess that's per cup of human. The whole human body actually radiates about 100W at rest. You get this by 2000 kcal × 4182 J/kcal / (24 × 60 × 60 s) ≈ 97 W.

So the C stands for cat. Got it.

Man, I love this so much. The simple representations that are traditionally taught are so boring. There is so much complexity and beauty in these more dynamic representations. I wonder what a more complex molecule like benzene would look like in this representation with the resonance structure and symmetry

"Uranuses shockwave will reach and destroy us an our faster"

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1114.

If approximations are misleading, isn't it misleading to talk about light getting "bent"? Doesn't light go straight, following space-time? Aren't we talking about gravity bending space-time rather than "attracting photons"?

Bro proved the existence of god in a Schrodinger's cat vedio😵‍💫

Google sponsored this video?! Wtf

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1074.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1073

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1072.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1071.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1070.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1069.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1068.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1067.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique RU-vid video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 1063.

except. if time has a new dimension each moment. is that really just plus ONE dimension? because then you have another moment and another and another. i guess if you believe the past and present dont really exist then thats fine. but if you believe in the more radical theories like time travel well its not really 3+1 then is it? more like 3 dimensions of space in a time continuum

i just realized a spinor is basically when you sit in a spinny chair and sway your body back and forth to achieve a total velocity in one direction.

You need a bucket, and a nether portal for easy lava source

Thank you, saved my night, I didn't get length contraction until I watched you explain that you need to wait to measure the second event. Now my math gets the expected results.

One went east over Texas ,,,,,,,,,any thought

wait how do you get the drawing thing 2:54

with an umbrella, you can run at the speed of light or stand still indefinitely without getting wet =)

so this was a,tiktok style video before tiktok

Einsteins biggest mistake was defrauding the public exatly like berrnie madoff. Both were fraudsters . Both could not make a penny with their junk knowledge