AJS News- R6: Siege MONTHLY Subscription Added?!, Embracer considers $80 Games, Netflix Minecraft 

👏 👏 👏 👏

Plus Battlepasses 💀☠️

@@mikeydragon13579 cheers to that, spend $70 for a game, that SOB should come with the game first month at least. Or ya know what day one stuff like that, should be accessible by earning it in game.

And destiny 2 dlc is $50-$100like what!?

That’s because the budget goes to visuals and not the real reason the consumers buy them for

aaa arent worth. there are early access worth 70

The only time that I'd ever pay $80 for a game is if it's a new Ratchet & Clank game (my #1 favorite game series)

@@ImotekhtheStormlord-tx2it They will take more L pricetags 😂

If it ain't $20 or less I ain't buying it. Why would I? I just got DEAD SPACE and RESI 4 for 15 bucks a pop and those games came out just last year at $60-70. I have so many games to play I won't even get to those until sometime next year. What reality would I ever spent $80 on your crap?

​@@RotcodFoxIn my country ubishit games already are 90$ this shit is insane and we get here in Poland less money than americans in dolars

Lmao okay kid.

@@vidmasterK1 I love how you go around calling people kids for playing old games while saying "Lmao", thus proving yourself to be a kid instead. It's ironic in a rather hilarious way.

Dude I just reconnected my 360 and set it up in my room plus found another one in a storage mint condition and connected it at my girls house. I have about 60 games from then and they are all Full solid amazing games. My ps5 Library is basically just my Ps4 Library plus maybe 2-3 games ive gotten for the ps5. To say that game quality is extremely low is an understatement. Nothing REALLY excites my anymore.

Damn right. Shit. I time to time bust out the nes and n64 still and have a blast. Old games had 1 chance to sell. Not this "oh we will fix it LATER"

@@McBummly That was 20 years ago. Slowly it changed into "Let's finish this game later", then into "Let's add content later", and now we are at the cusp of "let's start actually working on this game later".

Ty

Neil fartman.🤣

Neil Druckman is an idiot for…being misquoted?

neil druckmann is indeed an idiot💩

​@@rasengdori13 not to mention, TLOU 2 story got leaked, and he still released the game

That's funny, but to be honest we'll probably just see shrink-flation if players reject a price hike

Typical, just typical Ubisucks 😂

My answer to Ubisoft on that question is: Fuck you, you didn't earn my money.

more like, dont you have jobs

Ubisoft is doing a speedrun for the most hated mid game publisher

Or don’t buy at all ^^ that’s mostly better lol

@@ZinoAmaredude seriously, I haven’t boughten a full price game in a while, I think Elden ring was my last one. Just sad, watching what’s happening to games turning into a live service and them wanting you to pay for same things that have been in previous games, with no difference in gameplay or they have a previous game alright made thst superb and they make a turd the next one. Like WTF how…..

I'm already waiting for 70$ games to price drop and after that i might buy them.. eventually? Plenty of games to play and no reason to gamble on the new overpriced overmonetized games being good.

I'd say the jet one and only game I would be comfortable paying full price for is path of exile 2 but fortunately it is free to play hahaha

Yea that's what happen to me too, haven't buying game full price because they lacking in content and sometimes not working properly while launching.

maybe that was da plan all along

They are spiralling into industry bankruptcy, essentially.

I still don't even pay 70 for a game, still 50 tops. I hardly buy anything on release anymore.

The market is so oversaturated with affordable games that AAA literally can't sustain- because cutting costs reduces their share value, the only option is to hike to 80, 90, 100+ until the company busts and they can golden parachute out.

@@BritBox777exactly

Yo ho yo ho a pirates life for me ….

Imagine paying full price for the buggiest version of the game lol

@@ctg4818imagine giving Ubisoft money in 2024

Exactly, it's like what McDonald's is doing with it's menu prices over inflating the rate of it's own inflation causing it to be far more expensive than anything else and so less profits.

Step 3 of the "Four Steps for Ideological Subversion" (Yuri Bezmenov, 1985) Crisis-This is a major step lasting up to six weeks and involves a revolutionary change of power. This is where a cataclysmic event (false flag event, civil war, invasion) upsets and divides the country thereby creating panic among the citizens. To Americans, symptoms would include circumventing the Constitution (re: Use "privately owned" social media sites to restrict free speech/First Amendment rights) and altering the checks and balances of government , and possible martial law. Creation of economic, financial and national security crisis. Also includes social crisis and a breakdown of previously self-evident restrictions on moral behavior. The Cloward-Piven approach is used to create more takers than producers (re: More workers than available jobs) The crisis produces benevolent leaders who will promise to deliver things to meet people's needs through “hope and change” (ie: Hitler’s rise to power amidst a disenfranchised German population reeling from the economic effects of WW1) through social and economic justice. False illusion that the situation is under control if strategic directions are followed-Bailouts, regulations of industry and so forth. What do all of these big AAA companies and other large corporations have in common these days? Other than greed, I mean. If you are being intellectually honest, you see they have all jumped on the "progressive" Liberal (Marxist) bandwagon of "Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, PRIDE" and other "social justice" talking points. Why is it these people promote Marxist ideologies, yet when it comes to running their businesses, they are the most unethical, greedy, manipulative Capitalists on the face of the earth? They are useful idiots whose purpose is to create division in society, economic turmoil and the scapegoats for all of our problems. This will give Conservatives, led by DJT, the opportunity to enact a revolutionary change of power in which they remove Liberals from positions of power, authority and influence so we can have a "Great Reset" of the economy and society.

True and even if you work 9-5 or 2or 3 shift jobs you dont always have the time or want to play games in your freetime. Example, i work as a first responder , usually i work evenings 12-22, about 4-6 times a week. I still want to hang out with my family and friends and other hobbies so usually i play games with my friends about 3-4 days a month, so i will not pay a goddamn 10 euro sub for a game😂

Same. This is what needs to be done for anything to even have a chance at changing. But it won’t. It’ll get worse, people will continue to spend and splurge.

​@@popcornfilms1people are dumb unfortunately

Thats a 5th grader opinion.

​@@nickuva6508no that's an adult's opinion. Thinking it's ok for Bobby to walk away with 300 million dollars after all the money he made while ruining people's lives is childish. Stop putting up with bullshit

@@nickuva6508explain why it’s a 5th grade opinion or you just sound like a bully with no facts

​@@nickuva6508 No thats reality, grow up and maybe you'd get it

Shareholders need to demand their own returns lower.

Don’t you feel privileged to contribute to the shareholders’ wealth? Little CEO needs to service their yacht

True, then there could actually be something to look forward to every year during the Showcases

that would be too smart for them

This company is worse than any of the gaming industry standards. I haven’t bought a single thing from them

'Games are expensive to make' - Development studios say...yet never realise they are expensive to make BECAUSE of the way they are making games. There are exponentially more people playing video games today than 20 years ago...they sell more copies at higher prices AND have fewer deductions and costs to account for compared to making a game in any other point in time. No longer do studios/publishers have anywhere near the same costs involved in physical manufacturing/shipping/global logistics and third party brick and mortar stores taking their cuts from sales. Marketing is vastly different...no longer do they have the same expensive costs of advertising in legacy print media and TV and other stunts they used to do. They have social media and digital platforms to market on instead. The actual tools with which they make games have become vastly more efficient and productive. ALL of these things combined highlights there's some BS with the blanket statement about games being expensive to make. Games are expensive to make now because they make them that way...look back at games from the past...some fps game for example. They had half a dozen weapons and they were the same at the start as they were at the end...but NOW: 20 weapons and each weapon has multiple component parts that can each be sold and packaged separately with their own skins and colours and model variations and...and...and...scopes and sights and stocks and grips and dibbly-bobbly doohickeys that have no purpose...and they need one of 47 different currencies to acquire. And all of those things have to be designed, prototyped, modelled and animated. Before you know it, instead of one dude that made the weapons for a game... you instead need half a dozen artsts, several animators and modellers and then extra devs to make it all work yada yada yada...and then there's loads more sounds required that need recording and processing and whatever the F else goes with it all. That's the problem...overcomplication.

they just went to 70 a year or 2 ago

You will

Highly doubt it

Did you complain when they jumped up to 60 during the beginning of the 360 and PS3 era? Because PS2 games were like 30 or 40 bucks

@@madisonbailey2564 he didnt say he wont play them. And who actually wants to support such greedy companies.

💯

For the old $60 tag you can walk away with multiple AAA games and a handful of indies these days. Most smaller titles go on sale for 5 bucks or even free. There is nothing an $80 game can offer to make up that difference- gaming is just too cheap and too high quality right now.

The ONLY reason I got a ps5 was demons souls. Otherwise not a single new generation game would be worth it for me

Especially since they don't do heavy lifting. Game engines are the way to make games. It's the game engines that do all of that heavy lifting for the game devs.

It's published by Bandai Namco.

I dead ass thought all 3 of them were early 30s, this blew my mind. Looking good angry joe show lol.

​@Brizizaz lol you must be new here. Early 30's was like 10 years ago. Angry Joe and other jo been around near the start of youtube. I got on youtube when it 1st came out in 05. Joe was like the 2nd wave of youtubers. Joe started around like 08. Oj used to pop in every now and then. He joined the show in like 2010 or 2012. It's crazy how time Flies. Basically grew up with these dudes. Used to play online with them back in the day. Now we're all old and ish😂 OJ used to look like a damn 18 year old before he bulked up 😆

only 3 years younger than me 😮 I'm surprised.

Wait oj is 46!? Wow he really doesn't look that old

@@Ruddy_Games it can't be right. He must've done the math wrong lol

thanks man

Defending druckman is a new low for angry Joe. Time to unsub

​@@Kyle_Riel not to mention, TLOU 2 story got leaked, and he still released the game

Mmm true in uk we pay 76 dollars worth, but you gotta remember that each country has a different minimum wage

Less players but maybe more money

100$ for a game is worth it. … If it can entertain you for atleast 10 hours and is good finish. Otherwise, idc the cost of the prodoct, if its good im buying it but if its broken trash then im not buying said product simple w

​@@lastgen2615that's a strategy with diminishing returns. You can only count on so many whales

Me too, but you have to realize this is also part of the problem. If they don't get their money up front, they''l get it on the back end--through MTX and "games as a service" so, don't think you are clever. you (and me) are huge part of the problem. they are going to get their money or they aren't going to make games...so who's winning? you? fuck no...games fucking suck now.... you aren't winning anything... now you have to pay the piper. that piper is shitty games designed from the outset to fleece..... congratulations, smarty pants..... you're gonna have to pray too.

@@oliverdurgen5953 Nah. There are always good games. Even when studios close, even when teams disband, there are good games. Just recently, Dead Space remake, RE4 remake, Baldurs Gate 3, FF7 Rebirth, FF16. Your theory is flawed. Live-service and mtx aren't prevalent because "they'll get it on the back end." The prevalence comes from the fact that live-service and mtx works. It ain't about recouping losses. It's about maximizing profits. So no, we aren't part of the problem. We're the solution. If people would just stop providing publishers those profits "on the back end" then they would be forced to provide you with a better game upfront to convince people like you and me to purchase full-price. But, they don't. Because they don't have to. Me not supporting good games at full-price isn't a vote for crappy games. Them supporting crappy games at full-price and mtx IS a vote for crappy games. See the difference?

Bro doesn't know what singleplayer games are.

@@oliverdurgen5953 Flawed logic. Live-service and mtx are prevalent because they are supported by the player base. It has nothing to do with trying to make back money. It has to do with trying to make MORE money. Me not supporting games at $80 isn't a vote for bad games. Y'all supporting bad games at $80 plus $100 mtx IS a vote for bad games. That's a difference.

I just got Resi 4 and Dead Space remake for less than 20 bucks each. And those were two of the biggest hit releases of last year.

Oh this time they'll have story adds on.

Exactly. I see comments saying they will not buy an $80.00 game, yes you will. It depends on the game. People will buy Grand Theft Auto VI for that price. People won't wait for the price to drop because that game has too much hype around it. That FOMO will take full effect.

@theretrogamingnerd3316 yup. People said the exact same for the 70 but now thats the norm and people still accept it.

@@theretrogamingnerd3316 If GTA VI is going to be an 'always online' game then I'm not interested even if it was $20.

@JTsavage7577 That's why I believe games will eventually be $100.00. It's only a matter of time. It will only take that one company to get away with that price like you said, and all others will follow. We, the consumers can stop this from happening, but I don't think we will. If there's a game out there that people really want, they will buy it. It doesn't matter what the price is.

I'm with you, I've seen tons of people suggest they label the vids Part 1 and Part 2. Not sure why they don't.

@@shantyguy not Angry Joe, _Lazy AF_ Joe

*OMG its so hard to swipe down on the vid and click the other one or close the window on pc, gotta be a bitch and complain* fixed yalls statements

DEI funding is my guess

Because a lot of kids and genz idiots still buy this BS