Love your style of review and choice of music. I have seen all the reviews on RU-vid of this gorgeous timepiece, yours is by far the best! Subbed and liked!
Really good video with a relaxing vibe to it. I like how you explain your view on the homage topic and I totally agree. The diver expertise (even if I won't need it) is the thing which amazes me about this design. Can't wait to get my 39mm.
Great comment. The homage topic was simply something I had to get off my cheast. Glad you liked it. And if you are getting the 39mm, I’m sure you’ll enjoy it. I feel and notice the “difference” every time I wear it. Enjoy it!!
Love this video and the music. Made my decision to go with the 39 with my 7 1/4" wrist. I love the looks better and very good points made here. Lume shots would have also been nice. One thing not mentioned and which was part of the deciding factor for me was the back of the watch. The numbering I like better. This will be my second Steinhart as I have the Regulator and love it. I look forward to putting this on a Nato or premium rubber strap. Well done.
I just received the 42mm mk3 version and it is perfect for my 8.25 inch wrist. It fits me about how the 39mm fits you. The newest 42mm has the colour of the markers match the hands. A plus on the 42mm is the bezel being easier to turn.
Hi. That’s true. With a wrist size above 8, you definitely need the 42mm. And I just recently saw Steinhart making the new 42mm version, so I think you now have the same upgrade to your 42mm regarding lume etc. That’s a big step up, so congrats with that. Wear it in good health and enjoy it!
Vincent Yeung Hi Vincent. Thanks! I’m glad I could help. That’s what it is all about. Enjoy it in good health. I enjoy mine more and more over time. For example - try fitting a leather nato on it. It really makes the hour markings pop very nicely.
Great watch, i have the V1 original with the 660ft-200m on the face and the case back, pretty rare from what i have heard. Not too keen on ocean one written on the face under the Steinhart logo on the newer ones. A very good looking watch thats easy on the eye, the bezel is very sexy with the minute markers all the way around.
spot on review! I have the ovm39 too and I really love it. just wishing that steinhart release a 39mm version of the ocean titanium 500 premium in stainless steel with the upgraded eta movement and ceramic bezel
I'm happy that you got a watch you like in the size that works for you. I have 8 1/2" wrists and the 39 would look like a ladies watch on me. I have the Steinhard Ocean One 42mm which fits well, but comes in second to my Panzera Flieger 46 which is perfect on me and the watch I waited a long time to find. It is 52mm lug to lug which suits me fine. I can appreciate the sentiment as an homage piece.
Great review. I bought the 42 without even knowing a 39 was available. Still, these are a very nice watch whatever the size and they feel good in the hand. Still, wish I had the 39!
So nice to see someone take the time to sink the two watches up with the same time! My O C Ds think your way cool , You for sure took the time and gave a crap 💩 thank you for sharing your valuable opinions, I subscribed!! I’ve got two Steinharts, an ocean one gmt 39 and a 42mm o v red , one of Steinharts best looking watches for sure , and eventually I will have more Steinharts!
Thanks for your view, Mark. Yes, I simply “gave a crap” and just made a long video just for the heck of it. Enjoy your Steinharts!! (Am wearing one right now)
The original Rolex was 40mm as it was just a mod to the 5513. I have the 5513 and the Steinhart 39 like yours. I have no. 300. Love this watch and keeps better time than my Rolex. Great review.
Compared to the new 42mm version (I own it), they also improved the crystal. The crystal on the 39mm is more proheminent of the bezel, giving it a little more vintage touch. Not quite a big dome on its own like the Ocean Vintage but it does not align flat with the bezel like the version 3 of the OVM 42mm. The second thing is that I think the bezel on the 39mm is laquered, not simply printed like the 42mm, making it look more shiny and well finished. Anyway, nice video :) Definetely looking to buy it on their next batch.
Thank you for this comparison! Can you, please, indicate the diameter of the dial opening from the inner side of the bezel to the inner side of the bezel on the other size. I wonder if it’s the same. thank you in advance and Regards!
Good review. I like the high polish on the 39mm, and the bezel grip is a bit thinner which makes it look a bit nicer. However, which do you recommend for 7.5 inch wrist? 39mm vs 42mm?
Glad you liked it. With a 7.5 inch wrist you can sport both of them, so it’s a matter of preference. However, I’m totally biased and can only recommend the 39mm. It really does something to the dynamics when the size changes, and the watch doesn’t wobble as much. So I can definitely recommend 39mm. But I know there’s a lot of diehard 42mm lovers out there, and that is fine too. They can then buy my 42mm :-). Enjoy it!
@@WristMech Thanks for that. Yeah, I have the Seiko Sarb035, and its 38mm with 44mm lug height. I love this watch, but its a fraction small on my wrist. I think the OVM 39mm is more closer in size to the SKX007, which I also have, and with the lug height around 47mm. I find the SKX sits nicely on my wrist. I'm not a fan of big watches either. 40mm is my ideal size tbh.
Also does your Steinhart OVM MK1 on it’s case back engraved sating 660ft or 1000ft? I ask because I’ve noticed the one engraved with 1000ft is more common than the 660ft? What are your thoughts?
I can answer that. The MK1 says 200 meter on the dial and 300 meter on the back. It is really a 300 meter watch, but on the original Rolex it said 200m, so that is why they put that on the dial. They got a lot of comments because of that. Now they just write 300m on both dial and backside.
i got this one the le no 8*8 got it for a great price fits nice looks great im happy i didnt buy a rolex sub saved lots of cash good vid very somber thanks you did this watch justice
I agree on your assessment. Since we cannot obtain the few MilSubs out there for under 6 figures, I am okay with a homage, especially when executed well, like this one. It is not a matter of one just saving a bit of money up to get one. I've seen a few others on the market, but Steinhart seems to have done the best job. I have the same feeling about their Ocean One Vintage GMT, though it is not quite as close without the cyclops. The original Explorer II 1655 in that style goes for over $30,000 and the orange hand is only a 24hr hand and not an actual GMT. While useful for its cave exploring intentions, I believe a GMT function is more useful for the modern watch owner. Anyway, I appreciate the comparison between the 2 sizes. I might like 40mm a bit better, but the 39mm seems to be the better choice of the 2, even though I can wear 42mm. I would just want more of that vintage feel. This is definitely in my top 5 watches to get list.
Hi. I agree that this is one where I am ok with a homage. I hate fake watches and I don’t like copy watches - but this is a true homage because it is so rare and impossible to buy. Steinhart is clearly the best version. I would actually also like a 40mm better than 39mm. I don’t use my 42 any longer, so I have to put it up for sale some time. In any case, a steinhart with a solid nato is a good thing to rock. Take care, and have a great weekend!
Thank you, Ojay. That means a lot. I have my conviction about homage, but I see a lot of people throwing these different terms around and they are not really clear on what they mean. This distinction is - at least for me - making some sense, separating fake, copy and homage into three very different things. The OVM 42 is fine, so do go for that. If you cannot find one, you can always buy mine. I still have it but only use the 39.
I am just now looking about mechanical watches couple people pointed me towards Steinhart. The watch I wear now is s Garmin Fenix 5 and that is 47 mm and I find it to be ok. I wonder if 39 would be too small to what I am used too. Hmm also I noticed I personally like the goldish patina on the ,39 over the 42
Enjoyed the video. I have a Steinhart Batman titanium and REALY enjoy it. Only negative is your comment on homage watches that you don’t want a Rolex yet you keep comparing it to the Rolex.
I’m getting ready to purchase a Steinhart ocean one but I can’t decide between the 39 or 42. For context I’m 6’6” (198cm) tall and 250lbs (113kg) with a little over 8 inch wrist and I’m worried it will look too small for my frame, should I be concerned or just go for the 42mm? My Apple Watch is 42mm but cause it’s square I’m not sure if it’s directly comparable to a round face watch.
I just got my 39 mm OVM in the mail from Gnomon. My one complaint about this watch is that they very clearly shrunk a 39 mm case around a dial and hands intended for a larger case. The case crowds the dial: you can tell this when you look at the dial straight on. The inner walls of the case are not visible unless you look at the dial from a steep angle. In most watches, and certainly most vintage dive watches, the inner walls of the case are angled slightly outward away from the dial. On this watch, they seem to be either vertical or maybe even angled slightly inward. In my opinion this watch would have been a lot better if they had produced a properly sized dial and hands for the smaller case.
Hi ggongi. I just checked your claim, and you are indeed correct. It is a bit of “cost cutting”, which is understandable at this price. But an outward angle would be more ideal, I agree. It’s something I didn’t notice myself. After having seen it I cannot “unsee” it. But at the end of the day I always tend to look at the watch “as it is” without comparing to others, and ask “Is this watch worth buying if I didn’t have it?”. And the answer I found is that I do want to buy it, if I didn’t have it. But thanks for your sharp eyes!
@@WristMech Hi WM, I agree with you that this is due entirely to cost-cutting. I didn't mean to take away from your or anyone else's enjoyment of this watch -- I enjoy it too, especially at its price point, and don't regret buying it. I posted the same comments as above in a review at Gnomon, which I hope they will take into consideration for future iterations. I have a MkII LRRP UTC milsub no-date also, and with a 42 mm case and 22 mm lugs, that watch is too big and heavy for my wrist. I prefer the way the MkII looks, but much prefer the way this 39 mm Steinhart wears. Stay safe and healthy in this time in which we find ourselves! And thank you for your thoughtful and well-made comparion of the 42 mm and 39 mm OVMs!
Great eye- you’re absolutely correct with your assessment. After noticing this (hour hand looks wide in the 39mm case), I opted for the 42mm version but lightened it up by putting it on a sailcloth strap. Now it’s comfortable and secure on my smaller 6.75” wrist. That 39mm set up does wear well, as I absolutely adore my Ocean 39 Explorer - my all time favorite homage!!
@@willardhooton920 Thanks -- something seemed off to me about the watch as soon as I opened the box. Then I realized what it was by comparing it to other dive watches I have. I would have gone for the 42 but it's too big for my 6.5" wrist. I wound up selling the 39 -- if Steinhart ever make a correctly proportioned 40 mm OVM I'll probably pick it up. Enjoy your watches in good health!
ggongi Thanks! BTW, have you checked out that 40mm NTH Amphion?? MilSub all the way, but with an actual gilt dial! (w/ red triangle on bezel - MilSub and BB 58 had a baby??). Visually one of the nicest vintage inspired divers I have ever seen!! (Still on sale, would have ordered one if I didn’t already have four Steiny Ocean Ones...)
It,s the best 5517 Homage you can buy...In either 42mm or 39mm......I also have the Squale Militaire.....And the Steiny beats it hands down.......I own the Black 42mm and the Grey 42mm......And will shortly take ownership of the 39mm OVM......Beautiful pieces all......And on a Bracelet or a Nato.....There are few pieces that give you that true MilSub Vibe like the Steinhart.....Highly recommended, both the Watches and the Company.
I own a bronze 42 ,&a steel ocean 1 42 nice on my 7& half wrist, I also have a Kermit &a vintage double red both 39mm , both sizes are fine, as for wearing a Steinhart I feel safer,wearing a Rolex ( in some situations) can be dangerous in some places.
It's funny. There are many videos on Steinharts. There's one that even opens the casing - no big surprise there - but, can someone talk about the waterproofing? The inside rubber ring on the case is obvious, but what about the crown stem? The Rolex Sub crown stem has three instances of waterproofing, i.e. three rubber seals. One around the case thread; one inside the screw thread; and the last one inside the crown itself. You can bet all these three gives a good seal to the watch. I have a Steinhart Triton 30 ATM and wonders about similar waterproofing strategies around the crown and stem. Can someone advise? Has anybody removed the stem to check??? TQ in advance. ;-)
Buck Rogers Hi there, Buck Rogers (like the name/alias!). It’s a great question you ask. I can talk a lot about design, but when it comes to technical issues like you mention - then I’m the guy who can open the hood of the car and look very “speculative” (but having no clue what I’m looking at). But someone is bound to be technical and know the answer. Would like to know myself :-)
Throwing in a second comment, now that I bought the 39mm and sold my 42. I still loved the 42, mind you .. but I thought it a bit redundant to own both sizes - and I do prefer the 39. The smaller case just fits the vintage vibe of the OVM (and of the other three Gnomon-editions) better than the 42mm case. Meaning that it looks and feels more like a vintage piece in 39mm. And while I still own 42mm Steinharts and they fit my wrist quite nicely, the smaller case does sit easier on the wrist IMO. Some days I really dig the larger models, but lots of days the 39mm ones feel better. There are only two gripes I have with the watch ... well, one "real" gripe, if I'm honest: 1. My 42 OVM was the most accurate mechanical I own. I had it re-regulated by Steinhart after a drop and it was running within COSC in everyday wear. +0.5s/day were not unheard of with that thing. The 39 is now about two or three weeks old and will probably settle in a bit more, but it's nowhere near the accuracy of my 42. At the moment it's usually around +4 to +6 s/d. 2. There's no way around the fact that the 39's hand-set is a tad too large for the watch. I had them both side by side and in front of a pic of the MilSub and the hands-to-dial-proportions were spot on with the 42 (how far the individual hands reach out into the minute-track). With the 39, they're just a bit too long. Which is only really noticeable with the minute- and seconds-hands, but it is noticeable. The 39's seconds-hand nearly reaches the steel rehaut and the minute-hand covers about half the length of the minute-track markers. On the MilSub, and on the 42, the seconds-hand covers less than half the length of the minute-track markers and the minute-hand *barely* touches the track markers. It doesn't really bother me though because it's only noticeable if you have the 42 (or a Milsub :D ) sitting next to the 39 for comparison. I'd still highly recommend both versions and I would urge lovers of larger sizes to give the smaller variant a try. It certainly doesn't look like a child's or lady's watch on wrist - if anything, it makes the 42mm watch look weirdly oversized in direct comparison... :)
Hi there. You have some good comments and observations there. Basically neither the 42 or the 39 will match the milsub perfectly, so it’s a personal preference. I just think the 39 hits a sweetspot in size that is closer to the milsub. I enjoy the 39 every time I wear it. I didn’t get around to selling my 42 like you, but I should.
After long time of considering and thinking I have decided to go for 42 mm and I was happy to do it. First of all version 3 of 42 mm that came out recently was improved in many ways... thing i dint like about 39 mm is proportions... that dial is definitely too big for 39 mm cause it firs 42 version perfectly. Rehault is to small not deep enough and looks like cristal is sitting abit to low so I dont even see the chapter ring. That dial/bezel ratio at 39 mm is just off and i didnt like that... Proportions on 42 mm are perfect... i dont mind if minute had extends 1/2 mm shorter... doesn bother me at all. I was afraid watch would be to big but somehow it look just fine on my 7 inc wrist. I had ocean one 39 39 and did not like it for the same reason.. proportions were totaly off... the should have use smaller dial and than it would be perfect... Alo that the price tag on 39 mm makes no sense compared to 42 mm... those were my reasons :)
Another great review, 👍up given. I know this'll sound like a knitpick but truth be told, The MOD didn't and doesn't "design" the MilSub. MilSub is a set of specification drawn up and given to perspective manufacturers who then in turn design and build their idea of a watch to meet The MOD's given specifications. Example: The hands need not be sword hands or Mecedes hands or any other commonly used type of hands. As long as they meet all and any specs required by the MOD. It could have been Disney's Micky Mouse hands as long as they met the length/width/ability to take a given amount of lume material specification, they're good. (Aren't we glad they didn't choose Mickey's hands?😁)
Hi Arthur. I didn’t know the specifications were that way. That seems kind of loose for a military operation. Imagine them running with mickey mouse hands :-) Anyway, thanks for telling me. Have a great day!
Sorry, but the MOD issued a spec that included a specific design - see Ministry Of Defence Document 66-4 Part 1 / Issue 2. The design is identical to the Omega referenced in the video.
Gene Martin Hi Gene. I agree, there are actually too many abbreviations. OVM stands for Ocean Vintage Military (sort of, a diver that is vintage inspired and comes from a military design). Too many abbreviations. I usually smile and say: “There too many TLA’s”. (Three Letter Abbreviations) :-)
Hi. Good question! The best of the straps (on the 39 mm) is from PhenomeNato Strap - “Admiralty Grey”. I simply pinched the idea from another youtuber having this strap (Bruce), and he directed me to PhenomeNato. Very nice straps. Suggestion: You can also try a light tan leather nato strap. It plays incredibly well with the mustard yellow markings. Enjoy!
Assuming you are German... : How much was it after taxes/import fees? I spoke to the Steinhart dealer in Aachen last week and he made it quite clear that neither he nor Steinhart would be selling me a 39mm OVM, so I would have to order from Singapore.
It’s a long time ago, so I’m not sure. But I think it is a “seatbelt” type of nato (same wowen pattern like a seatbelt). I believe I got it from WatchGecko - but several companies have them.
the 42 bezel is way better but mostly because of the grip... larger size and sharper edges. I love both my 39 and my 42, but I think 40 would be perfect.
yes i had the 39mm but it was a bit small , the 42 is perfect the chrystals on these watches are tough , iv beat mine about for two years rarely take it off , like never , whichever you buy you will be happy years down the line , it is a true divers watch ,
Just found your channel/and I'm subscribing.I'm no watch maker but ( I ) have been wondering how they used the movements in both watches. And I think I just figured it out. You are the first one ( and I have watched a hell of a lotof videos) the dial must be the same on this watch and the 40,41,42 Tct. That use the 2824 or whatever the ETA # are. I think it is the ring around the dial that makes it bigger. I have a HEUER /pre tag and it is 38/39mm? And the sides are 90deg of the bezel. Then I look at Rolex pics and that ring has engraving on it and it looks to be at a 45 den or so( it has to bo on some angle to see the engraving. Maybe I'm just anal but I have a small wrist and a small watch fits better. Also if it is to big it gets in the way when you work on stuff. Thanks for the video. You are not like all the others. It is the same with everything ( watches,motorcycles,res, trucks) the journalist,bloggers,vlogers seem to just do what marketing tell them. You are a critical thinker and thank you for that
@@WristMech i have three 42 ovm mk3 . ocean one 39 . ocean 44 . . ones been in the washing machine on a full 40 minute cycle .. unscathed . totally by accident ..
You could buy mine. For some reason my taste in watches has evolved toward more dressier pieces, so I don’t use mine any longer. So you could buy mine. But arranging payment and shipment is always a hassle. Easier if you can find it new somewhere.
Who says its based on rolex ? A dozen watch companies Omega IWC and a load more got the licences from the MOD to make them ,, rolex was the third in line and was sold for £10 to the MOD , the design was exacly the same for all 12 watch companies , so its really a homage to the ministry of defence designers ,
I said the same thing in the video. Word for word. It was not a Rolex design. I’m not even crediting the MOD. I’m crediting the team of divers that sat down and designed this thing. THAT is why it’s awesome.
Hi DS. I didn’t even know Dents, but have checked them out. Sounds great. The music in this clip, however, is from bensound.com that provide a lot of background music. But thanks for pointing me to Dents :-)
Couple of things. You put the watch on and its over part of your hand. You wouldn't wear it over the wrist bone or shouldn't.. I have a wrist exact size as you and the 42 looks great. Anything smaller will come across too dainty and feminine.
Hi. In the video I actually agree with you. The 42 “looks” fine, and it certainly doesn’t overhang. So it “should” be fine, but then I (and others I know) just doesn’t wear it as much because it is too bulky and heavy. The 39 feels so much lighter and more wearable. But relativity is a big part of this, as I’m coming from smaller vintage watches, whereas you could be coming from bigger 45 mm watches. In that case a 42 would seem small and light to you. Relativity, just like Einstein said. And the second point about the wrist bone, hmm. It’s just a matter of preference. I like it that way. Just like you like your coffee with milk, and I prefer it black. So Relativity and Preference...
Willard Hooton Totally agree. Personally I prefer a 39 / 40 mm watch but something is wrong with this 39 mm version. I wish it was the same look, just scaled down.
Good for you. That is, after all, closer to the original watch sizes back in time, so it makes sense to me that 39 or 40 mm is more appropriate. Wear it in good health!
Marshal77 Hi. The one I like best is from Phenomenato. It’s called Admiralty Grey. I currently switch between the Phenomenato, a canvas zulu from WatchGecko also a leather zulu. Too many good choices... :-)
@@WristMechgnomon ovm 39 seems to have phenome nato, but whats that on the original ovm 42 ? Seems not phenome but with nice vertical "bars" but still having nice finish.
Marshal77 Hi. Yes, that’s a zuludiver from WatchGecko. They have many zuludiver styles, but I believe this is the “seatbelt” type. It uses the kind of fabric you find in car seatbelts which is why it has that textured effect. Enjoy!
Dear Mr.WristMech. Thank you for the nice video you have made, it was so informative that I watched it at least 5-7 times, became so infatuated to buy the 39mm from Gnomon Watches, Singapore however the things turned not so pleasant when I canceled my actual order from the day before of Steinhart originally for 42mm and I have "personally believe" normal or average 7.5inch wrist so,,, when receiving the actual 39mm it looked like a girl watch or one for kids it was so small, in fact it was dwarfed by my Ocean One Titanium premium class ordered a few weeks before, I actually now felt so disappointed since now have to pay $54.00 dollars to return this watch, they most likely will be deducting further costly damage watching your explanation is about $100.00 plus for me in taking your recommendations. I say please for those who have 7+ inch wrist not to buy the 39 mm however shiny and "coinage being sparkling" the doll version if it maybe may even look older and represent the vintage look better than this tiny 39mm. Anyway, please specify again that your wrist is small and that small 39mm is fit for some of us who do not have a small wrist. thank you all.
Hi. It’s good to hear your story and view. I have myself been “burned” a few times and spent money I regretted (by getting too big watches, whereas your story is by getting a too small watch). The truth is that we have to try things out, and only then do we learn what suits you. I wish I could know this in advance, so I could avoid losing money, but it’s part of the process of learning. So now I know what size work best for me (and this cost me) with a 7 inch wrist. And know you know what size works for you - as you have a bigger wrist. All is well. Thanks for the story, because it may help others that have similar wrist size.
shariar Military men who were issued this watch with wrists the same size as yours sometimes bigger wore the real version of this homage watch and it worked great for them.
steinhart excellent solid watches , rolex had touts in every watchmakers in the 30s untill the 80s , to be the first with new ideas . i prefer the fact mines an mod design not Rolex with their dodgy history ,
I have seen a lot of reviews on this watch, and is a pity that Steinhart didn´t release it with something, wich is to my mind, one of the most important things in all Submariner vintages models: and that is the strong curved and tall plexiglass. Why spend money in a sapphire glass, that does not follow the same shape the original watch that are you trying to "homage" does?... I don´t understand that, specially because this is a watch that you buy to enjoy, to use everyday, and not to worry if it get some scratches in the glass (even Steinhart could provide it with a replacement Plexiglass, so you dont´have to worry if you broke it). The other very important thing to me, about the 42mm is the bezel and how rough looks it (the coin edge), in comparison with the 39 mm. Maybe the 39 mm is more accurate to the 5517 in that particular, but the shape of the bezel in the 42mm version I think is far superior and look really like a "Tool", and stands with that message immediately: "this is a real Tool", that´s what that bezel is saying... Regards! and thank you for share your impressions and thoughts !
Hi Frederico. Thanks for your input. You have two observations that are interesting, and one of them is new for me. I have not thought about the domed glass. Perhaps because I have not held a real Milsub (they are too expensive). So I checked my watch. You are right. The glass looks different than a domed Milsub glass. The Steinhart has a slightly domed sapphire crystal, so it is halfway there, but it is not like a bubble plexiglass. I agree with you: If Steinhart had one version in sapphire and one version in domed plexi, I would take the period correct domed plexi. But the sapphire is halfway there and sort of ok. The bezel: I really like the coin edge on the 39 mm and it looks much more correct than the 42mm, so I’m really happy with this improvement. Enjoy your watch, and thanks for your input!
@@WristMech Thank you WristMech. I found very educative your considerations about the range of variations of possibilities on the design issues when it comes to release a watch that invariably will be compared with something so much iconic as the Submariner is (and Oysters in general). I agree with you about the intent of Steinhart here, in comparison for example of what Invicta do with there designs (obviously just plain copies). It is a very difficult issue, because I can not think in other industrial product that had been produced for more than 60 years almost unchanged, been so successful, and been so imitated as the Oyster in general and the Submariner in particular. So, it is very difficult to improve that !, that´s why I think the modification launch in early 2000's was a big mistake... But in a way I think Rolex has been a victim of their own success, because been so vastly imitated tends to trivialize the brand... Unfortunately today the Submariner is not a high-end tool anymore, as it was in the past... But that history is the thing that is interesting to people like you and I. Regards!
Yifan Li Hmmm, I can see what you mean. From the outside it fits the wrist, so it looks fine. But it “feels” too big on the wrist on a daily wear. So looks and wearability is somewhat different. But I get your point :-)
Hi. Good point. When looking at the price you certainly have to remember the import tax, and also the handling fees which is around 20 usd (in my country). So tax + fees. So you are right. Nobody fooled us into thinking this was a cheap hobby. Even the government get its cut.
Hi. The 42 is for sale :-) But Gnomon is still carrying the 39mm. Visit gnomonwatches and they can help you. They are out of stock now, but you can be put on the list for the next shipment. But you’ve got to hurry, because I think they will not produce it for much longer.
I have the 42mm version and it fits my 8 1/2 inch wrist. Personally I think you are nit picking the watches. You spend more time down grading them then showing the positives. It's the biggest bang for the buck. They are awesome watches.
You have a real mans wrist, so 42mm and higher would be the best for you. It’s like shoes that has to fit your feet. I hope I didn’t talk too much about the negatives. The whole video is done as a tribute to an awesome watch - and now made even more awesome by having more sizes to choose from. I think people can see the tribute, and I agree with you that they are awesome. That’s why they deserved a video. Thanks for participating.
Vintage, it isn't, it's a replication of a vintage and we all know it uses modern materials. So, the question here, in my mind, why the cheap, ugly aluminum insert which will wear out in a few months and not a ceramic or sapphire insert. Altho I do like this vintage mil steinhart, unless I see a ceramic insert it's a no go for me. Thank you for the honest review.
@@WristMech or probably Rolex had themselves copied designs but was better at branding, hence, copying a design doesnt necessarily constitute copying a brand
