Jordan B. Peterson | Full interview | SVT/TV 2/Skavlan 

Everyone who disagrees with me below is a brain dead sheep & the world would be better off without them

@@thegodofyoutube266 its called thinking

youssef gold aly I’m better than you

Jimmy The Gent your opinion won you 2 likes! Way to go champ!

Jimmy The Gent he literally said directly after that he wasn’t suggesting forcing couples who are bound to have trouble, to stay together! You wasted my time. Actually thought you were worth the debate. Your second comment speaks volumes!

No, not at all.

@@citizen6458 Yes it is lol.

@@citizen6458 yes it is.

Depends on the purpose of the group. I have been the bearer of illuminating facts in a professional settings, and, because I was respected for past work, the facts were accepted, and eventually led (with a great deal of work by greatly skilled coworkers and managers who knew how to build a team) to winning a multi-billion dollar contract against very competent competition.

@@DonMeaker Wow dude thats crazy

I admire his command of the English language, and the ability to find the words be uses to express himself in an instant.

He is very careful how he speaks❤

I admire his patience and kindness he showed, to his interviewers here who at times had some struggles articulating what they were thinking.

Yea in public speaking grammar word choice and tone and meter….all just about perfect

You will see this type of language in Dickens or Austin. It's the precision, they say exactly what they mean, definitely helps with understanding and almost more Importantly preventing misunderstanding. Excellent interview.

You'll bounce back brotha 💪🏻

@@danielvail8764 thank you fam 🙏🏾

all the best to you sir. You'll get thru this

If you were able to do that demanding and difficult Fedex delivery job 70 hours a week for three years you need not be concerned about anything. You are destined for a great career elsewhere. I hope you are a Canadian.

You Are Not Alone - There Are Many Like You - And They're Very Close Around. Reach Out.

to be provoked is more of a response.

As he said in order to think you have to be willing to be offensive

People are bitches now days

In a world where people watch TikTok, each clip only lasts for seconds, more and more adults are acting like babies.

And a great quote I recently heard "It is very important not to offend people but it is equally important that we as a people not be so easily offended" - Unsure ; )

THIS is what I like to see on the internet

We were all created for times such as this. Through the works of God he used Peterson to save your life. You are not hopeless, you are not meaningless. From what I read in your post, it seems that God has put his hands on your life. We should all be grateful for that. 😊

That’s amazing. What a beautiful story!

What a blessing. Your life has meaning. Not just to yourself, but to humanity. Be the best you possible and bless someone else.

All of this and these comments. We need more of this.

She does not seem to agree with him, but is respectful. I would agree that she understands him and that he isn't saying that women cannot do traditionally male roles or occupations, just that he believes its not a result of society but instead biology. Whether or not that is true is irrelevant really.

exactly, I didn't see it coming. I was astounded at her composure towards the end of the video

Exemple of debatting, everyone is a winner in the end. If we only could listen to each others like that.

@@dumbiriezike5598 she's one of the more compassionate women

good woman knows her place

Yeah I wish we had a show like this in the US

I think JP is one of the most emotionally and intellectually intelligent people alive on the planet today. I find so many don't actually listen to what he has to say. They hear a part of it, misconstrue it, and try and pick a fight at their own peril ;-)

I understand she wants to empower her daughter but saying that boys have its easy, to make a success on this planet is not fair, and what the science shows what happens when you try to force a square peg in a round hole... Maybe I'm wrong but that what understand.

I don't think they understood what he was saying. I mean the questions they had were pretty strange given the discussion of Peterson

Paranoix _ the majority of people with similarly-themed false beliefs continue to embrace them and live in denial since it brings them more comfort and value - sadly though this simultaneously continues the spread of misinformation and the damage it causes. Hopefully she’s able to acknowledge the truth and move forward comfortably with it

The smile on her face when Peterson referenced her topic and acknowledges agreeableness :D 27:45

Christ, I just had to pause the video to say just this. That look confusion mixed with self-righteous indignation is just so pathetic. And she just keeps fucking repeating herself as if simply repeating what she feels to be true enough times, he'll eventually stop refuting her points and go 'oh, I'm sorry; you're right'. It's just disgusting.

Nah the host kept smiling cuz he know he spitting facts

Jordan generally takes great care to go easy on his detractors.

They had us in the first half, not gonna lie

Hahaha. Jordan be like Jackie Chan lone fighting kungfu-hooligans easy.

@@_91K_ They were easy pickins for sure.It's nice to have an easy day at the office from time to time.

Yet the war against "the patriarchy" is primarily a war against "the hierarchy of competence"

Amén to that ! I agree wholeheartedly 😅

How could they argue with someone who's been a Psychologist, University lecturer, WROTE books, reads books (not BS ones) and debates people like Slavoj Zizek? They tried to win by having an interviewer w a st00p1d smirk, an opportunist politician and a bum looking weasel guy. Altogether they have 3 braincells.

this is basically the entire problem

In my opinion idea of equal outcome it is a product of envy. The belief that one person having something that another does not is unfair. The fantasy that two people have the same job should be paid the same even if they perform at different levels. Now that I think about it, could it be about self worth? You being paid more than me suggests that you are worth more than I am. People on the left need constant validation, they need to feel of equal value as people.

@@doomnotron there are plenty of examples of this disconnect even when there is no language barrier.

Virtue signaling is not logical.

I'm a bit new to this terminology. So is Peterson arguing that we should have "equality of opportunity" while the feminists want "equality of outcome"? Or am I getting them mixed up? Can someone please clarify

He is an academic.

Turned a debate into a lecture lol

Yeah it's fantastic to see how badly educated the others were. Their points and reactions were not even in the same ballpark. They did not understand much from Jordan. They think their opinion means as much as facts 🤣

They didn’t even understand him… language barrier? Or just trolling him?

Good call. Many people through the years have said he taught a class here.

I noticed that too. She looks at him in a very interesting way after he corrects her in a forceful and direct, but so kind and truthful way.

Your interpretation is doubtful. She’s appalled.

LOL. I'm thinking the woman on the panel still believes that woman should be equally represented in all proffessional and high paying jobs but with little to no representation in difficult, strenuous, dangerous and low paying jobs while the fellow with the beard is mulling divorce himself. One of the best panels hosting Dr. Peterson yet.

I do believe it is a conflict in her, because in Sweden they put rational thought and knowledge very highly, so they can't really reject science. And at the same time they rate equality highly. So it surely must have put her in a very difficult place mentally.

I read that completely different. At least in the first half, it was far more of a judgemental and an "in disagreement" sort of look. By the second half it definitely became your point tho

Agree. He's one in a gazillion.

He IS greatly needed

Hope and humility. He's like an elevator that makes us see the big picture of where we come from, where we are and where we seems to go. This vertical ascending shows how fragile is humans in this chaos but also the strength we also have available to fight against our own prejudice and vulnerability. Such great ambassador for humanty.

Josh Deal All Talk Shows should be like this. Let everybody talk and listen...then answer. I think that’s so much more productive.

I just ADOOOREEEE Skavlan! When i want comedy/entertainment i watch Graham Norton, when i want to learn what's in the head of a person i am interested in (Ester Perel, Adele, Jordan B.Peterson, Sofia Helig, Ricky Gervais, some people from European cultural/political scene) - i click Skånlan. He is an amazing listener, but even more the audience amazes me, so modest, nice people...

@@judasiscariot8396 He's just an immature little fuckboy acting all edgy by having that account-name.

@@innominatum9906 you said, to a guy who called himself Judas Iscariot. lol

You don't know what you are seeing here. It is not a matter of letting him speak. It is that Peterson is far too cerebral for these people to react quickly, and they are a bit intimidated when encountering English speakers. It is important to note that this discussion goes WAY outside the box of allowed discourse in Scandinavia. They have never heard such arguments before. Notice at 8:00, Annie Lööf does not actually address the point being discussed, but simply slips back into a very safe cookie-cutter discussion about the kind of world she wants her children to live in with regard to equality. Any Swede in a group of 2 or more people would express that opinion exactly the same was as if they had a string in the backs of their necks to pull in order to talk automatically. Swedish discussion programmes on TV that feature only Swedes speaking Swedish are constant shouting matches. The topics of discussion tend to be banal and pedestrian anyway. This particular show is very much the exception.

"Provoking" is how some people can barely conceptualize what are actually just challenging ideas.

@@FabianJacquin After "provoke" comes "offensive" then micro aggression...

@@bluejeans5770 Yes! then "hate speech" and "violent speech" which is how the extremists justify protests and getting physically violent because you are committing "violence" with your speech

He's a thought provocateur.

Same

😂😂😂👍

The Live Director is the person who chooses which camera is used in which situations and directs the Technical Director who operates the switcher. The cameraman filming the lady is assigned to film only the lady.. so yes, you are correct, he probably understood the assignment.

@@penjamipesonen You got the point anyway, but you still felt to prove something. You probably feel you have to prove everything to everyone, but you did not prove anything to you.

I believe she got to admire him, as the show progressed

i have never heard such utter nonsense in my life. He is a bully and a narcisist. And golf is silly , Graham is a silly name. I think you should shut up and listen more to your older and wiser brothers.

Anonymous that all the left have. In the centre we deal in fact.

They are hell-bent on social activism, empirical evidence is just an annoyance to them.

@@MrStuartp :: You do understand that you're talking about two different groups of one political party, yes? God, we humans are so flawed with our tribal thinking...

@@cgme7076 I think you are not getting what I am saying, bit quick to judge. I'm referring to the feminist politician. Peterson lays out how gender quotas have been done, studied and failed. Yet she still has to hold on to her ideology and simply state she 'disagrees', like that's an argument against what he is saying? Maybe watch the video again so you understand lol.

Paul Stuart :: You said “they” not “feminists”. Thanks for clarifying.

That's how you can know they aren't operating in good faith. None of this is ever really about making things better, always about implementing a belief in what they think is better. Ego and narcissism. Power. Nothing more.

@@SdotThompson I'll actually disagree on the bad faith aspect of your comment. As with all good idea you shouldn't just immediately take what makes sense in one aspect and then not carefully scrutinise it, let's not forget that these people have their own ideology and trying to rationalise both the pre existing and new idea, so of course they will try analyse what dr. JBP is saying. I believe that other than some pointed questions by the host, that this was an incredibly civilised and rational conversation compared to other talks.

To be honest, it was a better conversation because of it. I want to see how he handles these things so I can learn from it. Just agreeing wouldn't be fun.

​@@SdotThompson What governs it all is the virallity of the content. They can't let him win easily because content matters, or else you could just put a text-to-speech voice on a blank screen: no one would share it.

Also the answer for this computational problem is truth.

Exactly, a lot of women are realizing it thankfully

Hahahahaha it’s actually fucking hilarious

@HandyMan101 Thats not a true statement...

@HandyMan101 well, that's narrow-minded statement. Woman is there to provide next generations,she grows a person inside her and for this reason I hate when men say "women love men conditionally". Can you raise and educate your kids , pay your flat bills, get food without money? Just with your unconditional manly love? Then me as a woman cannot, I need food, place to live etc and if I create a family with a man I want a man to be able to support me and our children! So I find your statement humiliating..

@HandyMan101 lmao, you have nothing to support your point so instead of replying to my questions you just threw in a general bullshit, haha, thanks for proving me and the whole order of the family and life right!:))

He's just saying the most obvious, simple things in a concise way and everyone thinks it's mind-blowing. Like he says, this stuff isn't even contested amongst those who study the field.

I don't understand how it's controversial in the least.

Yeah, all of a sudden biological common sence is controversial...

Damn you and your pesky statistics and data. As the lady says in this video after hearing exhaustively scientifically proven facts: I disagree

k 9 9 8 . 9

seriously! It's like they already made up their mind about him and his views and so when he comes on and has completely logical answers to their "gotcha" questions that aren't extremist or mysogenistic, it doesnt even matter! It's like they don't even hear him. They just hear what they thought he was going to say lol

Its not missunderstanding. Its trying to lead the person thats hearing this to the wrong conclusions. "So what you are saying is...." and peterson has great experience in not falling for that. Once you hear his answer you realise that the question is stupid/missleading and you recognise that....hopefully.

I don’t think they could unpack his ideas fast enough to keep up. I think he loses them at times and they revert back to “everyone should be equal because that’s fair”. He has mastered patience, no doubt.

@@justwondering1967 Really? To me it's just a blowhard kind of dog paddling through any and every question with the same answer, ..." That's not what I meant".

I thought about this I think its because of the way he talks. He talks like a robot.

Ikr!!! "hm hm hm .. how old does the kid have to be for me to gtfo?"

He was already divorced at that point. That's why he was interested in the topic.

This made me laugh a lot.

Lol I read this hilarious comment right when he started to inquire lol 😂

Looked like it! It's pretty much the only subject he asked clarifications for.

I will give her respect.. I mean, you should see some of the Americans interviewing women that want to talk about Gender equality with him, oh man.. so unnecessarily rude.. She listened more than most, though she may have doubted his ideals, you can see she was trying to understand in her eyes

Yea nothing she says even has anything to do with what hes saying.

I K R? 😆 It's the "I know you are but what am I? " approach to reason.

*massive difference in intellectual capacity, she wasn't able to follow what he was saying, let alone formulate an ongoing debate...

Agreed. It seems to me that what she wants is for children to be raised gender neutral, that girls and boys can think alike ignoring DNA or whatever it is that makes the genders inherently different. She fails to comprehend that equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome. Even though girls have the opportunity to become fighter pilots they may not become fighter pilots by choice. So the outcome isn't an equal number of men vs women pilots.

I've noticed the same thing. They always ask it with such suspicion, like there's something wrong with that. So fucking annoying.

Yup so annoying

It's a pretty reasonable question....

@@trollnerd It is a reasonable question, but you need to take context into account. There's a recurring pattern among every interviewer who asked him that question. It's not a coincidence.

I am his female viewer and I am baffled by this question every time. Of course his advice is primarily for men, so it will attract more men. But he's not excluding women and any woman can learn a heck of a lot from listening to him, especially when it comes to choosing a partner for life and family. I learned what to be aware of and what to seek. I actually WANT more men listening to him and taking his advice to heart.

And Remember these are the same people who claim to believe so strongly in science. Obvious they only use when convenient, ignore when they don't like. They're the true science deniers.

yet the data on climate change or the existence of god he can ignore right?

@Jim Browski the right are wildly anti intellectual, climate change, trans (studies are out), trickle down..always wrong about everything, systemic racism, fucking wearing masks and corona virus, election fraud. You have to be partially lobotomized to be on the right

@@RawMaterialENT Nothing here has anything to do with "The Right" or "The Left". Forcing people to be either with you or against you is a great way to push people away from you.

@@RawMaterialENT your tribalism is on full blast.

Ben Shapiro enters

@@reznovnata3889 shapiro is a controlled RINO, he is glenn becks little jew

@@balazamon what?????

@@reznovnata3889 ben shapiro is controlled opposition, he is glenn becks clone and is part of the never trump opposition. he lied about lewandowski and is nothing more than a shill

The Three Fs of female speech: Feel, Felt, and Feeling. "I just feel so...", "And it made me feel like...", "I'm feeling...", "I felt so..." Who needs Logic & Reason when you have feelings & emotions?

I mean, this is probably more of a show where if they speak out of turn they have to leave. Also Jordans more out of whack discussions have been with the host who controls the conversation.

I agree. But it's also because they are incapable to interject, and seemingly having a hard time digesting the facts Jordan brought on them.

they had some humility. indoctrinated likely, but in the face of competence had the strength of character to entertain the possibility that they were wrong, or at least they could improve. this is NOT an example of a leftist. this is an example of a liberal, commendable work.

Well, i agree, they let him talk. What else could they do? They at least understood that they had nothing to say at the level of Peterson.

@@orangswiss8946 there's people like cethey newman who just spits bullshit eventhough she knows none

we all went through the same the first time we met peterson

shez more nuts than our resident squirrels

@@sanchitverma8687 my entire world isnt a shhammmm. I have had to learn and change.

@Eric Miret good for you

@@davidturner1641 obviously it was a joke. we all found enlightening insights when we first heard what peterson had to say.

I agree. I could understand someone subscribing to different data and forming a different opinion but as he says, he is simply telling the truth as he sees it.

because he speaks truth to power....the culture today does not care about truth they care about irrational emotional behaviour and giving into those feelings to the detrement of the individual or society...it will create more grievances and more authoritarian behaviours...in extreme cases, persecutions!

Never underestimate people's capacity for ignoring/denying uncomfortable truths.

Arrogance. Narcissism. Watch her face as the interview goes on. From about the 15 min mark every time the camera cuts to her, her smirk is growing, as she's retreating into what she believes and building and submitting to her own confirmation bias of "this pos". Now what I want to see is her watch this back, with a body language expert breaking it down to her. Doesn't even consider his points, which are backed by between 25 and 100 years of psychological study.

@@SamohtNox and often they are such miserable people that when they force people to also think the way they do, it is satisfying. Either the power over others or their own feeling of moral superiority drives them. No facts can tell them they shouldn't believe these things. The people in power either have ulterior motives or honestly feel they know what is best for us better than we know what is best for us.

mate, spot on. I was trying to come up with a better word than scary, but I couldn't!

Maybe it also have somthing to do with the fact that many people want what they wrongly consider a "fair" world, where nobody schould be better then the next person, many people have a hard time grasping, that some are born with a higher IQ and some just higher and some are more beautiful and others seem`s to have all the luck or are born in to a family who made a lot of good choices in the past and get a advantages that way Etc. Etc. Etc. insted of playing the hand they where giving and get the most out of it, they whine about a unfair world. "There have always been and always will be those who are driven by hate and want to blame those who are happy, creative and productive for their misery." --Terry Goodkind.

one of the biggest factors in the destruction of the west

@Skitzofrenix "Education is not merely neglected in many of our schools today, but is replaced to a great extent by ideological indoctrination."--Thomas Sowell. "Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity." --Thomas Sowell.

Equality of opportunity is a myth as long as "Inheritance" is in play. Inheritance of both assets and liabilities. Ban inheritance and then we'll talk equality of opportunity.

So simple and so true. He's the only one that came into the conversation to have a conversation, the rest came to score points and profess their virtue.

That'd be true if he wouldn't base his ideology on religious dogmas

@@sacryss I understand why you would presume that because on a surface level, it certainly seems that way. But in listening to his lectures on Genisis and his talks with Bret Weinstein and Sam Harris, he’s no religious nut. He isn’t a biblical literalist. He draws a lot of fundamental truths from religious texts without accrediting them with any scientific recognition. From an atheists perspective, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

@@sacryss only certain fundamentals. I was raised Christian. Got away from church early. Never enjoyed it. However I am also morally based in certain Christian fundamentals. Not all of course.

You can't even call it an ideology really. It should be common sense.

Common Sense how does that come into play here at all? Please explain

Common Sense trump derangement syndrome is real...you are my example.

I watched a TED talk about this feminist who was making a documentary about mens rights activists, and she goes on to say how she wasnt actually listening to them but just waiting for them to say something offensive, ect. She realised that what was the piont if they didnt listen, people's veiws may differ, but that doesnt mean we cant LISTEN.

@@rbike3032 That was most interesting to watch to see her explain how she didn't understand what she had been doing. How it took her a long time to see herself and the other side and break free of her ideology. It had so much power of her.

Its more like: "I don't feel that is true." That is the irony .

Yeah, Finally!

@@vakhtangi24 no they tried

I think the host asked because he geniunely didn't understand. Trying to live by leftist media ideology gets confusing I'm sure.

I do not think they even understood the point of ( outcome ) or preferences, men and women are equal but they obviously have different preferences ( at least in certain areas of life ) , that is normal, why are they being skeptical about it?!

I was thinking the exact same thing, made me reflect.

I do understand him 🙂 Love being a woman, love hid message. I find it to be true.

I think you answered your own question.

They just hear the labels that other biased individuals place on him to fit their own agendas, i.e. "Jewish shill" vs "nazi". It breaks my heart that people don't actually hear his message. So much good to get out of it for people of any gender or color. Be the best you can be, take on the responsibilities that frighten you and meet those challenges, and thereby create a meaningful life. So many people are looking for meaning these days. It's easy, it's within you.

Because many people are incompetent.....that's why people like him exist in the first place

Because they are biased. They are emotionally invested in their own world view and resent that the facts don't agree with what they already believe to be true. It can't be that they are wrong, so it must be him.

Hahaha that's what I was thinking. When he said "Go back to the divorce question" I knew he wanted some therapy lol

Yeah balled guy legit red pilled in front of our eyes

🤣🤣🤣🤣

HAHAHAHA

Hairist :)

And he gave all of us a great lecture :)... I really wish him the best

good point.

Sure as hell wasn't free, tho🤣 likely one of the most expensive sessions he's ever given lol

I legit thought the bearded lad was actually there for therapy hahaha

😹😹😹😹😹 so true 🤘🏾🤘🏾

Many Scandinavians I have met have shown this kind of politeness. I think it is a cultural thing.

@@buellterrier3596 It is a cultural thing. We learn it, at least I did, from a young age not to interrupt, else it turns into chaos.

@@andreasaa2000 And that is one of the reasons why I love Scandinavian people and their culture. I met some of my best friends from there. I hope you never change and stay a good example for the world.

I agree, Scandanavian people are extremely polite.

watch any Indian Debate and you will lose your mind. no kidding, just try

He’s the one where there is an attempt at being “provoked” - he simply chooses not to be.

What about the people who dislike him and DO understand him ?

@@palmereldritch7777 There are plenty of those people, and many of the things they say are worth listening to, but I've never seen or heard him be interviewed by someone like that.

@@erichaynes4049 Interviewed or debated ? As an interviewer you hopefully give your interviewee the space to make his own statements. You just ask a question, and you can ask a tricky question, but you don't engage in criticism - cause hey if you're not gonna fight it, then you are having a debate, not an interview. Seeing more and more debates with Peterson, with people who do understand him and see where he's getting at ....and simply don't agree with his premises and the stuff he just assumes to be true. For example his analysis of Bible stories, going deeper and deeper, is for him a proof of Judeo Christian tradition being on a higher level than other religions. Uhmmm, Really? why ? Just because he can look deeper and deeper nd see more meaning? Hell, you can look at any work of art worth it's salt and find deeper and deeper meaning in infinite layers. You can look at the stars and find infinite meaning. (and people did and do- even Judeo Christians). so does that make the Bible a "special book above all others" ? Mweeeh, no, not from where i'm standing. And his analysis itself seems to be on somewhat shaky ground- projecting his own ideas into the book. (for the record i think the Bible was more or less designed that way - hence you have 100 and counting different varieties of bible interpretation and which one is the correct one? Jordan Peterson's ?). so is it the book, the stories as Peterson himself claims? Or the interpreter?. Personally i'd say it usually falls somewhere in between. There are a few scientists and artists who can communicate exactly what they want. but even then it is what people get out of it - or not. Butin the end that doesn't make the Bible a "special" book. just A book. (with some interminable boring passages between some good yarns. And a couple that make no sense whatsoever- you know the one)

@@XFR18 yup, and if he can't get his message across that well, maybe he has a problem in communicating. On the whole I'd say it's quite clear though and the more I listen to him the more holes appear in his narrative.

They cannot grasp the concept that to admit vulnerability is courageous, while vulnerabilities within themselves are in no way virtuous or automatically 'brave'.

Admitting vulnerability is like saying: "I have a weak spot, right here, see? You can strike it if you want. I can handle that. It won't destroy me." Nothing's weak about it, as long as that is true. If you can survive when your vulnerability is exploited you can survive anything. Pretending there is no vulnerability is to be afraid that you can't, in fact, survive that.

Facts!

@@MrRavellon Actually, what Dr. Peterson meant is that to admit vulnerability is to accept that there's something wrong with you and that you've gotta fix that. And to fix that, you often have to "go into the unknown". Pretending that there is nothing wrong with you is to avoid facing the facts/truth about yourself in order to avoid having to do anything about it, which means you can stay in your little comfort zone.

@@justinkim7202 no, that's weakness you're talking about. Weakness is a flaw. Vulnerability is not. Anything you care about deeply enough creates vulnerability in you. To "fix" those vulnerabilities you would have to stop caring. That's not a good thing.

Its all about common sense. Glad to hear your point cheers me up.

I am woman too and I agree your points

Exactly! Thank you.

I'm a 16 year old girl and I totally agree.

Peterson is basically saying what? That rich white men are badly oppressed.

Your characterisation of this interaction is very insightful. Thank for sharing!

He does that to everyone that tries to denounce him and his message. They end up getting a free session from the best clinical psychologist in the world. #LongLiveDrP

YES! LOVE JP! 😃

@@Orson2u What do you mean? They attempted many times to compartmentalize his arguments for a "win" and misrepresent his arguments in order to get a "win". The consistent looks they give him during the interview are smirking smugness and doubt, just waiting for a logical slip to pounce on. You're out of your damn mind of you think this panel wasn't in most parts hostile towards his position.

@@krislynn5965 just because they were hostile doesn’t mean they weren’t getting a therapy session. They were subconsciously receiving therapy. Go watch again.

watch JP and a british legend Russell Brand conversations, they are really good

Yes! The Questions Were Amazing.

Well that's American Televsision for you, since your best Interviewers are either Dead or in Prison.

YES

@@joethomas8640 british legend ?

In their minds difference = bad

@@MattieK09 Sorry to bother you mate but are you saying that the same people that support multiculturalism and LGBT rights consider differences to be bad? I mean you're probably not saying that but in that case your comment is an oversimplification that doesn't give credit to the swedes when it's due.

​@@henriklybeck579 Well that's not a accurate way to frame them. But, YES, those in the cult of intersectionality do not like any facts that are adverse to their narrative. Literally 1000s of YT vids you can watch.

@@MattieK09 I mistook you to be making a generalised statement about swedes, which you obviously weren't, so I did the same. I agree with you though so thanks for opening up your comment.

Yeah, but the weird thing is, I think the lady really truly believed it when she shared her thoughts around 12:30 in such a striking way.. Peterson has mentioned the swedish situation before, but these people are treating him like he just dropped off of mars.. look at how silent they are.. She really believes that a person is plastic, that parenting/culture can shape a person.. and what if she's actually right.. As for Peterson from the Americas, where the push for individuality, personality, loudness, and selection for elevated testosterone actually occurs more naturally, perhaps he is mistaken that this translates easily to areas of the world that are perhaps on a different course.. maybe Scandinavia is actually a few generations away from real ambivalence of outcome.. (science may observe, but perhaps doesn't entirely know where humans are heading).. Perhaps toward the historically murky territory of pre-christian european culture, which I haven't heard peterson really speak on, which contained a variety of queens and powerful priestesses, and perhaps more equality in the hierarchy at times.. some of these dark web intellectuals should maybe talk about the social structures of pre-christian europe (edited for my poor grammar that I don't want to remain here forever)

Maybe but Americans (and more specifically those living in the north of the US) tend to more blunt/straight forward than people in the EU about everything so it may seem that way when they are really just as angry (if your talking about the crazy activists). There are radical and rude people for every opinion that exists.

@@dr.martinlroberts1908 I find Europeans (especially Germans and Scandinavians ) to be shockingly blunt :P

there was a massive level of passive/agressive going on. levels of which should not be possible.

American liberals like Sam Harris? You participate in the same identity politics that Peterson was criticizing yet are completely unaware. You should listen to his ideas more closely.

I don't think they understood what he was saying. The blonde said that women in her culture should be able to go into whatever job, right after Peterson said that was fine.

Absolutely, and one other point, which imo has to Top that list - figure all of that shit out BEFORE marrying.

5.) Buy her A HUGE 💍💎

6. Never leave any bruises It's a JOKE

@@Xfranman no man Diamonds are a scam only for people to spend money thats BS.. create something on your own and gift it to your special one ..

Simpler alternative..............do not get married. Do not let her start moving her things in. Do not let yourself be guilted or otherwise coerced into taking the relationship any further then you are comfortable with. If at some point you start thinking about marriage, buy your house and anything of any real value that you dont want to loose at least a year before you get married. Do not let her move in till after you are married. If she doesnt like that idea and starts in with "but sweetheart, I want us to buy a house together" then she is not after your love. She is securing her retirement and pre-buying her boarding tickets on the cock carousel all at your expense. I'm not telling anyone what to do. Just offering a few helpful hints to avoid what so many of my friends went through. Oh, and above all, when it comes to lawyers, retain yours first and spare no expense. Good luck.

I love Jordan. Such a wise man.

Pretty much... exactly!!

Does anyone notice the sheer height of his forehead?

@@PianoGesang it's called a fivehead

He's too smart to be in a bar Maybe in a coffee shop

lol

Brungus No many questions are framed in a negative way.

鄭茂廷 I guess it’s better to say that they were critical rather than hostile, which is preferable

Bald guy was already divorced before this. He got insight of how he should of done it better

The problem is people have been and are being brainwashed. Forcing "equality" on people isn't about equality, it's about disruption of natural harmony and keeping us bickering among ourselves about bs whilst letting the "elite" destroy us and our offspring.

Also: Peterson: “it’s awesome that all people, men and women, have equal opportunities” Female politician: “I don’t agree with that because I want my daughter to have the same opportunities”

Peterson: You have to deal with problems as they arise Also Peterson: *Eats all the Klonopin*

@@charlestruppi7793 I think she was aggreeing on that regard

@@jackcottington9970 It's obvious watching his older videos that he was on Xannies,

@@stehfreejesseah7893 The best parts of Peterson is always the stuff he chooses to leave out. Like the idea that the just like the wise king is the counterpart to the tyrant, the adaptable citizenry(in the form of a stable democracy) is the counterpart of chaos. And just as order is associated with the masculine and therefore strength; chaos the feminine and therefore care. I really hope that it has occurred to him at this point that the thing he is railing against in the modern world is the thing that he missed in himself. I say that not because I dislike the man, on the contrary, I hope he recovers with inside and is able to help others.

Sound s good but its plain stupid !

:)

@@jellyrun1 *Almost* as stupid as your comment.

Yes it is the same..ask anyone who is coming after you, challenging you in a sport or for a job....

It's actually strength.

That's a problem because he is expecting us to follow, people like you and me often look up the words we don't understand or even screenshot the quotes that really resonate with us but to people who don't strive for betterment it comes off as condescending and think of him as the guy who uses big words because he's full of shit.

@@joshdunham7167 well depending on your level of literacy, what hes saying isnt necessarily difficult to follow, you just have to listen carefully. Besides that, i think the biggest problem is his explanations are very accurate but not very concise, for someone who doesnt speak English as a first language it can be hard to follow in that case. I really dont know how to deal with this from Mr. Peterson's position; if he is more concise, they twist his words and force him to explain with more depth, and if he is very careful about his words, he says too much and they dont know how to respond. His examples help, but if im being honest, you cant force someone to listen to you carefully, ESPECIALLY if they think youre wrong. This leads to difficulty communicating because you're left with the question, do they want to hear your answer? or do they just want to hear you parrot what they already believe... I agree that it comes off as condescending though, and for people that arent very emotionally mature, they get defensive almost immediately. I really hate that though, it is so dumb that people get defensive just because the vocabulary he chooses, he wouldn't be forced to be so meticulous in his wording if it weren't for people constantly trying to twist his words and misrepresent him. But i believe at the end of the day because of these videos and the people that truly do decide to listen to him, his message will get out to people it resonates with, like you and I.

A large majority of my life consisted of literacy so I cant say that I can sympathize with people that don't understand what he says. Literacy is an acquired skill, it's not inherited. Context can help you understand the words that he uses.

@@six_waterbottles6wb129 I don't know where you are from, but in Scandinavia virtually everyone is fluent in English and are familiar with English academic nomenclature. I know this because I am a Dane. Generally people under the age of 35 are nearly as proficient in English as in their native language. Scandinavians are able to understand him perfectly well... If they want to.

@William Leonard I thought that was one of Duke Nukem's catchphrases.

@Michael Halligan I would agree lol

Very true.. even the questioner hasn't thought about their question in the depth that Dr P answers it

@@nemishasharma5737 True 💯

I love it. I’ve only recently discovered him and he is such a pleasure to watch. I hope he gets well soon

The reality behind that is work. That guy is relatively smart and worked as hell during decades. This is a great example. What he thinks, what is says, is backed up

That really makes sense, even someone like me whose first language is English needs to look up words he uses. One thing I would push back on though is communication is a two way street. Peterson can try to talk in a way that's easier to comprehend but the listener must also give him the benefit of the doubt. If they don't fully understand don't fill in the gaps with the worst possible ideas.

@@matts6139 You see many clips of JP saying things like Men and Women are not the same, and we should accept that.. and that there really isnt any pay gap between Men and Women.. that creates a first impression of JP that make it that much harder for some people, mainly women, to understand what he is really saying.. So if these people are not told what he really is saying, in a way they can understand, their mind will never change.. that is not the fault of JP, but just a fact of life, and if JP want to help people, he need to speak so they can understand.. Its like when i want to talk computer programming with my mom who is 77, i need to change everything to normal life examples.. :D But i get what you say, i just wanted to share what i feel is a problem with amazing people like JP, not a problem with JP, but a problem for JP.. :S Have an amazing day.

Lol that was so unbelievable

When a politician meets science.... www.enbartpolitik.com

Hahaha well put

Your evidence appalls me.I'm switching to another study.

This. Like wtf.

Her: "But if I make my son play with Barbie dolls and wear pink and push my daughter into running for Prime Minister, won't that make the world a better place?"

Lmao

Some people think that they can create any outcome simply by deciding on a goal and working to make it happen. Our children don't turn out a specific way just because we have a goal for them.

@@halcooper6059 No truer words were ever spoken.

That's called cognitive dissonance

Hahahaaa

His eyes twiching the whole time I hate my wife can’t wait till my kids are 45.

@@travisbrantley9694 lolol

Dead 😂😂😂

Profound statement on existentialism from JP....Bald guy-“Can I get back to the divorce question?” 😂😂

So true... he is thinking about his own future. He looks so sad.

you cant just point out the problems and try solve them, people are too irrational, thats not how the world works

I could say it was better for me to have my mom and dad divorced bc they could not be civil around each other. But it would have been far better if I were not the child of a broken home. I think people have trouble understanding that sometimes things go awfully wrong, but it doesn’t mean we need to advocate for the most drastic solution at the least sign of trouble.

@@heinzorse6007 that doesn’t mean you give up. It’s a process, that’s what JP has been preaching this whole time.

@@julianowilliams3263 yea man, i was just quoting the bald guy^^

That or he's capable of rational thought and doesn't bend the facts to suit an agenda.

This is one of the best analogies I have ever read

I’m going to use that analogy but substitute caviar for a food that’s obviously perfect in taste AND texture.

Or a world class chef feeding caviar to a hobo and expecting a well thought review about said caviar. Pardon for the hyperbole.

@@TheGalacticEmperorOfLabels But that's just it isn't it? Lefties and rational thought don't mix together well