LIVE! Real Lawyer Reacts: Chad Daybell Trial FINALLY Begins 

I wouldn't think a bailiff counts, aren't they just like..security guards? Unrelated to the case?

They specifically included court personnel, including the deputies.

Interesting as I know several people who work at our county courthouse and wondered about that. When I was in the courthouse to report for jury duty, I saw 2 people in the hallway that I knew, and one juror I knew. The two people in the hallway ended up not being part of that case (part of a case in a different courtroom) and the other juror was dismissed during the questioning, so none of those issues came up. I ended up as a juror. If the other juror had been seated, I would have mentioned that I knew him (former teacher at my school). I'd assume they wouldn't want us both on the same jury.

Wild that this all came out 4 years ago and he’s only now going to trial!

Good for you....on all of that!

You were the “x” factor in that case! A lifetime of good decision making serves you well. It’s enlightening hearing about youth making a positive impact on their community!

I've never even been summoned. I'm 47 years old lol. I would love to be a juror! Hubby tells me I could never be a juror because I watch too much true crime but I could because I'm too busy watching national trials to pay too much attention to local stuff. I see the news headlines but never where the investigations go. Also, I'm a door dash driver so I set my own schedule, no kids at home and have a hubby who makes good money. I'd be ideal, Iowa please pick me! LOL

I would love it too but not on a boring case. The only problem I would have is with my dog. He wouldn’t want me to be out of the house all day.

Sometimes the court doesn't want to just take their word for it .

Great points! And yeah the chat has been good lately, even with larger numbers watching! I’ve noticed us ALL flat out ignoring trolls that pick and pick and prod and try to get a reaction.. they got NADA the entire time and it was hilarious to watch😂

@@Vegas_Mel Right? That's another thing I like a lot about this group, whenever trolls come in, sometimes even directing comments towards other subs, they usually get polite answer (if they're not obvious the first time) but once they start throwing jabs, the chat either openly discuss like: Oh, it's a troll, don't mind them or as you said they're being ignored flat out. :) That's why there are no mods aside from the auto chat bot reminding us to like and subscribe. There are no even set ups for the bot to tell us behave or some specific rules, because Peter is welcoming respectful disagreements and opinions. It all comes down to an energy imo, this channel attracts people who like the unique way in which the trials are covered, but also with similar behavioral traits. So the trolls just are easy recognizable and they can't find them selves in this group. And it is both funny but also magical to see how over 31K people spend the first 30 minutes greeting each other during an hour long stream. :) Hope you're having a great week, see you in the chat...:)

Nope

Me too.

Let’s gooooo

Me three!! ❤

Same

Me too……work ran late

Michigan here also👋👋👋👋

@@barbarabannasch3458 hello Barbara!!! 👊🏼

You can be against the death penalty and still do your legal obligation to vote for it in sentencing.

You can be against the death penalty and still do your legal obligation to vote for it in sentencing.

It’s a mystery. 😂

I'm partial to it but only for cases where there is clear cut proof that person committed the crime - video, DNA, etc evidence. I wouldn't necessarily for cases relying strictly on eye witnesses as they can be unreliable.

It means that the lawyer is qualified to handle a death penalty case. There are some extra potential challenges in a death penalty case, so the government is inclined to provide lawyers to a defendant that are experienced in those matters.

@@aliceiscalling Thank you for answering

Same here. 🙂