Mazda 3 Turbo Dyno Runs, DRtuned OEM+ validation runs 

Thank you

Hello what about low RPM, does it launch better?

Its an overall improvement across the entire RPM range. Can't wait to install the CS Midpipe and fully finish the tune.

@@fokingking Thank you. How long did it take to finish your tune? What model do you have? I'm really worried if I will get any significant improvement compared to Racechip which I already have...

@@xemprino I have it on pause for now waiting for the Corksport Downpipe install. Racechip vs DrTune will be a no brainer

How did you instal it? I’m be hit a wall and the drtune company takes awhile to respond

I’m sure the engine would be able to support it. The trans would probably do fine too. The place I would throw the most concern is everything aft of the transmission. The rear drive daft, diff, and half shafts are, well, dainty to say the least.

This first tune is not really pushing the car very hard as it doesn't touch max boost, just cleans it up a bit. It was also made so people can use the available bolt-ons without running into torque limiters in the ecu. These cars can be difficult to dyno. They can figure out they aren't moving and shut the fun down prematurely. Lots of aborted runs on the first trip, this one went better. It was already 90* out and we were seeing coolant and intercooler temps well above what we see on the street. There were a few runs that had higher numbers on both tq and whp(I did have one run hit 250whp), but the car either shifted into 5th or suddenly pulled power because it was getting hot. We felt these numbers best represented attainable numbers if someone else dynod their own vehicle. With tier 2 tune bigger numbers are the goal. Not sure if we'll hit that without going bigger turbo or not. There is someone on reddit that claims 27lbs of boost and "well over 300whp" but nothing to back that up.

Yes, acceleration is quite a bit different. Pulls to redline, both my 0-60 and my 1/4 are around a second quicker than stock.

@@21mazda3turbo3debating between the JB4 and this. Whadya say man?

@@yousjuice3198what did you decide? This remaps the ecu but the jb4 doesnt map the ecu which is good if u wanna sell the car to a dealer with no trace of tune

I've got a '22 with intake and exhaust, and TBH it's very quiet unless it's under decent load. the 63.5 exhaust from cork sport is enough and sounds good for a 4 banger.

This is the website to hit up www.drtuned.com/tuning/p/25t-skyactiv-tuning-kit

Yes we have tested with a Dragy. With a DA of around 3500-4000ft with a 1ft rollout(like a magazine does) Its 4.9 to 60, 13.6 @102.

Is that stock and just the tune or do you have an intake and exhaust?

@@Zbone09 At the time the Dyno and acceleration numbers were run it was the tune, short ram and CS 63.5mm exhaust.

that's not bad at all! My 330i 2019 rwd with catless downpipe runs a 4.77 0-60, I want to get into low 4's by practicing my launch. (For reference I'm at 314whp and 380wtq and 3582 curb weight lbs)@@21mazda3turbo3

Not a ton of support, unsure of what that will look like over the years. Stock turbo is a Mitsubishi TD04LR4-04H*12HE1T-5, I know of two larger turbos currently being developed for it.

@@21mazda3turbo3 well that is good news

​@21mazda3turbo3 who are developing the torbos? planning to mod my Mazda 3 in the coming few months

The car takes a bit to adjust to octane, simply ran out of dyno time. There is no 93 available where I live. 100 is where the dyno was performed. Getting the car to behave on the dyno is the hard part, real-world acceleration times show its making more on the street power.

It'll hold up just fine. There is some headroom in the transmission.

@21mazda3turbo3 that's good to know. I have a 2023 Turbo that I've had a few months now. Just run JB4 with Map 2 & Corksport short ram intake. Eventually, I would like to do a proper tune, but I didn't know if the transmission would be able to handle it. Thanks

@@StgVirus1 A proper tune will be safer than the JB4 long term. With the tune you're not spoofing any data and the TCM will be receiving the correct information from the ECM to operate correctly.

That’s crank not wheel

Dynos are simply a tool. Some will read high and some will read low. The purpose is to be able to measure an increase or decrease when you make changes to a vehicle.

@@21mazda3turbo3 I’ve heard this a lot especially for AWD cars different dynos will read different numbers

@@anthonydigiorgio9240 correct also take into account AWD has a higher parasitic loss when you get to WHP

So theoretically this car makes close to 300 crank

Check out 2022Mazda3Turbomods

I guess to rephrase my question, is this parasitic loss or just showing that the ecu is relearning?

Mazda rates the 250hp at the crankshaft before any drivetrain loss. A dyno is simply a tool to measure changes made to the car to see if they've added a benefit. The tune being run against the factory tune in this video is cleaning up the factory calibration and isnt meant to push boost up. This is the base file that all of Drtuned basemaps are then built from. With this tune I've hit under 5 seconds to 60 with the 1 ft rollout vs the 5.8 and mid 13s in the 1/4 vs 14s stock measured with a Dragy.

@21mazda3turbo3 right but Dr tune advertises 60hp and 50lbs of torque increase. This looks like its nowhere near that.

@astrocent peak power vs under the curve power. Peak is around 20hp gained, those other numbers are always under the curve power gained.

@21mazda3turbo3 I see. Very interested to see more. I'm looking into this tune as well, thats why I'm being so nitpicky. Thanks.