The Little Things Ending EXPLAINED - SPOILERS 

I have a page here on youtube with a friend of mine and here is our review of the film: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eDZvrWVk6es.html

They are all killers in the end!! No one is an Angel!!

It was believable and convincing when Leto's character said at the end that he had never killed anybody before.

It’s just feels like the movie had us waiting for that twist and then we don’t get the twist or like satisfying ending

I watched this movie twice and the second watching was very through. There are several possible clues to their being a serial killer with a possible accomplice. In the very first scene, the blue automobile was a 4 door Mercury with the license plate that read 2Fan321. We can see that gentleman who exits the car is a middle aged white male with short hair and glasses with an athletic build. A couple scenes later Deke drives up to LA sheriff building and parks his truck behind everyone so they can't move essentially. I found that kind of odd and a dick move, but if you look at the license plate on the back of the yellow SL550 Mercedes you will see the license plate number of 2Fan321. The license plate on the mercedes is newer than the one on the mercury but it has the same numbers so possibly owned by the same people. The Mercedes was parked in the front parking space which indicates he has been with the department for a while and is higher up. A few scenes later Deke is having a short and somewhat contentious conversation with a man named Roberts. Roberts immediately corrected Deke and told him he was detective sergeant now. Deke then asked Roberts if he was still padding his overtime. That clue alone can give pause that Roberts just had a promotion and with padded overtime he could possibly afford a nice mercedes. The same Mercedes with the same license plate in the first scene. Furthermore the scene after Deke climbs off the roof of Sparma's apartment, Detective Baxter tells Deke he has good and bad news. The bad news is Sparma did report the Harvester stolen. Who was the officer that failed to file the stolen car report. That would be detective sergeant Roberts. Seems to be me Roberts is either a terrible cop or he was just trying to cover his tracks. I think Sparma and Roberts know one another and worked together to kill these young ladys. Sparma is more into the hunt part and necrophilia while Roberts actually did the murders. Sparma would watch across the street at this dead young lady and fantasize sexually. He probably watched the killer kill her, but he couldnt do the act himself. The runner with the red barrette is interesting also. She tells her male friend that he didnt have to jog with her home and that it was only 3 blocks away. That indicated that she has plenty of energy left to continue her run. As she runs away a brown 2 door car that looks to be an older thunderbird follows behind. Couldnt see the license plate of that automobile because it was not shown. The only viable way that a young lady like that would talk to a stranger in a dark street would be some kind of law enforcement. If she sensed any danger from someone like Sparma's character she would have run way screaming which is the opposite of what a trained serial killer would want. But a law enforcement officer driving by and stopping to ask if she was ok could possibly get him close enough to drug her and place her in the back of car.

The killer was never shown in the film but rather for a brief second in the beginning through the dinner glass window where you can clearly see a clean shaven tall white male whose build and walk have no resemblance to letos limp. Letos character got off on messing with the cops. The killer hasn’t been found yet.

Also, a ladies watch amongst the newspaper clippings under the floor in Sparma's apartment. The denture was made of few teeth not a full one, just so to alter a bite mark ever so slightly hence avoiding being "caught". The doctor at the police station says "inconclusive" after examining the bite marks on the pizza slice. Why would Sparma hide the newspaper clippings under a floorboard covered by a rug if this was just a hobby. What was the content of the photo negatives hanging above the bathtub and why was the projection from the projector sideways? Was it to draw Denzel towards the area where he felt the floorboard make an odd sound so as to check under it?

denzel knew this man was obsessed with serial killings and this case, and denzel had to silence him because he was getting close to the truth of denzel being a murderer.

Just watched this film and was looking for WTF ending reviews , so checked RU-vid for "Ending Explained" and yours was the first on the list. so how you only have 408 Subs is beyond me... nice work Sir.

so why did Leto's character have the key to that gate for ? he works for a repair appliance company..

Leto character was a weirdo, but he said out his own mouth before he was killed that he never killed a person a day in his life. The car at the beginning that followed the girl didn’t match Leto car. I believe the real killer was still out there. Leto was just obsessed with murder stories.

it seems when Deke says it’s the little things that get you caught the second time he is referring to cops getting caught trying to cover their own crimes. When he says it the first time it seemed like he meant that’s how serial killers get caught but maybe he was talking about himself the first time and then both of them the second time. WHAT a crazy movie great performances all around but I just don’t like movies that leave so many unanswered questions.

Why did the first victim (blonde girl ) want to see Leto after they’ve already crossed paths ?? 👀

I watched it twice - great movie. I think I understand what happened. Leto's character is not the killer, he is someone who would like to be a cop, a "crime buff" as he describes himself. And he loves to troll people. He doesn't have souvenirs from any killings - he has newspaper clippings which are valuable to him so he keeps them in a safe place. The mile maker - 467 - that plays a key role in one scene in the middle of the movie was not publicly announced, but it did go out over the scanner. Every indication is that Leto's character knows what anyone who follows the police scanner and newspaper stories closely would know. The flaw that the two detectives have is also their greatest virtue - they simply get wrapped up in their jobs. Finding the killer is so important, it is hard for them to live the other portions of their lives knowing the killer is out there. They are dedicated. And they are haunted.

The wire on the girls hand in the apartment was the same wire in the shop you first see Leto. So I think it was him. He was always going to be one step ahead. He’s expecting cops to be cops and loved the dance and wasn’t expecting to be hit with a shovel that’s what changed the outcome, you’re expecting the bad guy monologue and instead got hit. he was going to kill the cop he does the finger gun and it was clear he was exhausting the cop by digging all those holes. He was probably going to get the gun from him and kill him and leave him out there which is why he didn’t want Denzel to tag along. He wanted to be famous and wanted this to keep going.

Deke's character said history repeats itself and it did. Two highly obsessive detectives killed an "innocent " person because of their ego. Thus the No Angels theme. Even as they spend their lives trying to bring peace to these women's souls they have a dark side. I think Swarma's character was the killer, but he was too good to get caught. He had become too refined as a killer over the years. He said the killings would go on and ultimately his own ego got him killed too.

Jared had a weird walk, in the beginning the killer wasn’t walking weird

I feel like I did get an ending. It was really good though.. this is a type of movie I feel like you gotta watch at home with no disruptions so you can put all the half pieces together

Just watched this , I totally agree Denzel was trying to keep the other detective from living a life of regret! I do not think Denzel was the killer !

I think the ambiguous ending is deliberate in the sense that not all stories have a punchline. For me this film is more about the blurring of obsession. Each man has an interest in understanding more of the story and all three share similarities in the way they collect information and dwell on the small details. Leto even says to Malik in another life we could have been friends. It is also apparent that we understand by the end of the film that the only person we don't know is a killer for certain is Leto's character. For me this is one of the most subtle and thought provoking endings ever.

Cops taking care of cops is a real thing that happens in REAL LIFE...🤦🏾‍♀️🤷🏾‍♀️

So at the end of the movie, Denzel leaves the pictures in the hotel he was in and they were mugshots of the women. They were not the dead pictures of the women seen earlier. Also, left on the bed were a pair of boots, which the woman in the beginning of the movie said was the only thing she could remember in very specific detail. So.... it could have been Denzel.

THE BOOTS!!! Washington?? 🤔

It's in the details. The 12guage guy is the killer. He knows one got away...

At the end why did Malek react with shock when Denzel hugged him and said, "That's my boy?" I rewatched the movie and couldn't figure it out.

I think there are two killers. The guy at the beginning had short hair and walked normally. Sparma had a distinct walk. I think Sparma could be Deacon’s killer but not Rami Malik’s.

I’m looking for the answer here, now I’m more confused 🤭

Missing woman's body or red clip was never found. So how did Denzel know what the red clip looked like in order to go purchase the "exact" same clip to mail to the detective?

Very interesting and suspenseful movie...Denzel is the best to me...i just wish there would of payed off some of the clues that was talked about and scenes....just like the beginning of the movie....The girl showed up at the police station...but she really didn't do or have any impact in the movie...this movie is open to interpretation.......there is no clear idea about what actually Happened.....just wanted more clear evidence and pay offs of scenes.....Still was good a movie........i wonder why the last girl wasn't found though.....that really wasn't the killers m.o.

First comment: Leto was the killer Second comment: there’s no way Leto was the killer Me: 😫

Leto was the killer. This wasn't really a mystery movie and it was clearly obvious from 30 minutes into it. Leto had a direct connection to the first murder victim that was shown. He worked at an appliance repair shop where the dead girl's appointment for the broken refridgerator was "cancelled". Leto obviously used his job to gain easy access into her apartment. (Fridge never got fixed either). He knew Denzel was onto him and no more murders took place after that. (The body found by lake was from prior because she was tossed into water and it awhile to find her).

I actually thought Denzel was the killer at first but I love that they leave it ambiguous. I do not believe the killer was anyone we meet in the film. This was a lot like The Pledge starring Jack Nicholson (amazing film)

How about there are 3 killers in the movie, each in a different place and different times.

Quit over-analyzing! Leto’s character didn’t kill anyone. The main take-away is that Denzel’s character “paid it forward”: Denzel’s character was “helped” by his work friends, now its time to “pay it forward” and help cover for Rami’s character, and also allow him to avoid living a life of self-torment, buy giving him the red hair clip. If leto’s character was the killer, they would’ve had denzel’s character find a red hair clip in his apartment!

It wasn’t a crime drama, everyone is talking about who the killer was. It’s actually irrelevant to the story. This was always about Denzels character trying to save himself. And by burning the box at the end showed he was on that path. The box clearly alluded to the tell tell heart. Which housed his guilty conscience even hidden under the floor boards.

At the end Am I the only one that noticed the nice boots on the bed at the motel bezel stayed at. They talked about a witness saying the killer had on some Really nice boots and that’s all she could Remember.

I'm surprised nobody saw it, it was so obvious. the Killer is the dog in the earlier scenes right before Denzel's character leaves to go pick up the boots, there's a dog that approaches Denzel, that dog was the Killer.

I don’t believe he was the killer. When he told Rami’s character that he’d never killed anyone in his life, I believed him. I do think he was a manipulator, cruel and damaged in some way but not the killer they wanted. Definitely open for debate. It’s a richer film for not knowing ultimately.

Idk it was the same car denzel was driving later on in the movie following the girl when she was jogging back

There are two working together, sparma knows about the murders and acts like the decoy while the real killer is out doing the murders. The scene at the beginning the guy hunting the girl has short hair then sparma mention a buddy having a hunting lease for the land he gets buried later so the real killer still out there. sparma reported the car stolen but the other cop covered up so maybe there are 3 and not just two👀

How come nobody talks about those cowboy boots on the hotel room bed?! Until we know why someone put that on bed we won’t know who is the actual killer. The boots is the key .

In the opening scene, I believe they had Denzel play the Driver with the Boots. Deacon was complimented for wearing nice boots and the witness report mentioned the boots. Deacon proved he is adept at thinking like a stalker by discovering the room across the LA murder scene. Sparma said getting rid of a car and a body is hard work. Deacon did both in a 10 second movie montage. The driver passed out of sight then stopped on the road to wait for the woman to pass. Deacon passed , went out of sight then stopped on the road. When Deacon say a group of girls on the road listening to music, he drove up beside them. The Driver pulled up beside the girl while she was singing to music. Deacon had a powerful flashlight similar to the Driver Deacon had tin can object similar to the Driver. The Driver used duct tape. The LA murder scene had no signs of duct tape. Police men are trained to restrain and would have the skill to restrain with duct tape. The movie gave all the "90's thriller clues" necessary to demonstrate that Deacon was the Driver with the Boots. Deacon took the keys out of the car in the same "style" as the Driver with Boots removes keys. Denzel gets Oscars for mastering mannerisms and making them look casual.

What we know for sure is that both Denzel and Malik’s characters are both killers. While Leto’s character didn’t kill anybody. He was just crazy and lied about killing someone in the past. The Killers are the Cops and those girls are just another unsolved case. That’s it!

Awesome review brotha, subscribed!!!

This film does reveal who the real killer was, I'm surprised that no one figured it out. The real killer is Sergeant Rogers. I froze framed the film in the beginning and the killer was a short white man with short hair and no facial hair. So that eliminates Denzel and Leto. I looked at the license plate that the killer was driving in the beginning when he was going after the witness and it read 2FAN321. As Denzel was driving into the precinct in which he used to work at there was a little Mercedes in a corner spot with a license plate which read (Any Guesses Here) 2FAN321. Rogers was just promoted, so he could afford that car being second in command at the precinct. Denzel quipped that Rogers loved money, he padded his overtimes. So he would be the type to drive a flashy car and take advantage of a perk, by parking his car in a corner spot. Furthermore, Rogers wanted Sparma to be the fall guy, so he he didn't file Sparma's stolen car report. Why would a killer risk possibly incriminating himself. Rogers thought that that certainly pointed away from Sparma as being the killer. So, he framed him by neglecting to file Leto's stolen car report. Also, the jogger was a mere three blocks from her home, how could Leto have chased her down? It had to be a cop, who stoped to talk to her and abducted her. That is why it was shown that Sparma had a noticeable limp. Now Rogers will just change his M.O., as like Detroit, Los Angeles is a big city too.

how could Deke have known what the barrette looked like? That doesn't fit.

We cant say that he(the suspect) was the killer. In fact it was portrayed in the film that what mistake Denzel has made , can be made by anybody else too. In fact it doesnt matter who was the killer, what mattered was that these kind of mistakes are part of life .and how you move on afterwards ..that was the agenda of the movie.

Can't stop looking at the Multiverse Figures lol

Tbh I think there were two killers in this movie specifically in the beginning when one guy was running after the girl and the truck stopped for the girl.

The killer was drinking coffee next to leto when he opens the curtain.

For people saying that denzel is allowing rami to move on with his life without letting this case eat away at him is silly in my opinion, if denzel is actually a cop and not the killer and Jared Leto was not actually the killer either, then the killings will continue and not allow him to move on with his life. Decent movie but definitely lacked a pay off, not the kind of movie where I’m ok with the ending being an interpretation, I’d like to know who the killer is

First off, Denzel asks Malek if he thinks it’s worth it to keep waiting. I think Denzel was at the point to where he just wanted these scum bags killed. Then If you remember that SUV was abandoned with 22,000 miles, no clues or fingerprints. Move ahead. After Malek kills Leto’s character, Denzel takes Leto’s car and throws the keys to some guys who strip it. Then Denzel burns everything in Leto’s house. He can’t find the Red Barrett and so he buys one. I think Denzel kind of planned this whole thing. He walked to that store so Leto could see him. He then spent too much time getting two cups of coffee. I think Denzel wanted Malek to snap and kill Leto who really was the serial killer. Then Denzel wanted to protect Malek. I think Denzel is going to just start killing these serial killers.

What if Deacon was the killer? Think about it- he kills the witness then leaves town , then after chasing the girl that escaped returns to make sure no one will point to him.

What about the boots in his room with all the pictures in the bed??

Did you guys notice in the end the lady that gave denzel that keychain was the same keychain she pulled out from the dead body of that girl's chest who was missing. Does that make denzel the killer? or was he just covering up for rami ?

I guess , you didn't get the point of the movie? The movie is about cops can get away with murder. Period!!!

the movie is sooo deep and very high performence from actors

I dont think Denzel was the killer but I liked how at the end he bought a beret and sent him a msg & said no angels

well at the beginning of the movie we kinda see how killer looks like,he is not black and he does not have long hair funny thing is,he is wearing glasses! this other fella,lets call him mr.x he's got 8 identifiers only three less than sparma :) and he wore fking glasses

I think Denzel believed/knew Leto wasn’t the killer. That’s why he gave Rami the red barrette too easy his nerves so that he didn’t go down the same path of stressing over it and losing his family etc. Leto had a police radio in his house and followed the crimes closely. He “falsely” confessed to the double/triple homicide where Denzels killed character someone. But they may have let him off because he obviously didn’t kill one of the girls and a trial and investigation would reveal what Denzel and the department did. I believe he did the double homicide years ago and probably others as well and that’s why Denzels character was okay with him dying and why he helped cover it up and justify it. The fact that he makes Rami dig hole (even tho nothing is there) points to me that he is better at covering up his crimes, meaning little to no evidence. As for the main murder of the girl in the apartment. I think the guy who swollen the 12 gauge did it, and killed himself because he was going to be pinned for a lot more murders. That or Leto really killed him because he was getting credit for a murder he did. I do think Leto went to the apartment afterward and moved the body and shaved the legs. He may have even been the one looking through the window across the street while the murder was happening. He gets off on this type of stuff which the movie made clear. I think the point of the movie was that Letos character was “no angel” and even if he didn’t do any of the crimes, he was just as sick as someone who would.

I don’t think Sparma was the killer but I do believe he knew who the killer was and followed/helped him. First off, the man chasing the woman in the beginning was driving a different car than what Sparma was driving. The short glimps we get of the guy chasing the woman didn’t have long hair and a beard. We know Sparma is a crime buff. He commented on the photos at the police station mentioning that the photos are “no Weegee” the nickname of a Arthur Felling, a famous 1930’s/40’s crime photographer. Sparma even had a darkroom in his apartment. Sparma also had a bunch of books about serial killers in his apartment as well. I believe that Sparma watched the murder of the woman in her apartment from the empty building across the street. When the killer left that’s when Sparma went into the apartment with groceries and moved the body into a different position to photograph her. At the end, the FBI describes what kind of person the killer is most likely going to be. A loner with a job that he can pick up and go without much fuss and most likely had two cars. Yet the car in the beginning was blue and the car following the female jogger was a Tan/brown car. Neither matches Sparma’s two vehicles. Overall, Sparma was a wacko but not the killer. That’s why I think Sparma didn’t mind taunting the detectives. He got off on them thinking he was the killer. Deacon cleaned out his apartment and was visibly distraught that he didn’t find any evidence but to give Baxter some piece of mind and free him of the burden that he held for so long when he accidentally murdered the woman, he decided to send Baxter the red hair clip which at the end you see he bought.

Great video! I actually loved this film. i would have preferred a more direct ending, But im on the fence about Leto being the killer. All signs point to him. But not concrete evidence. Maybe he was just a NUTBALL.. Im going to say that he is not the killer. Because the FBI agent at the end is describing a suspect that doesn't match Letos character at all.

I really loved the performances of all these actors, first movie I have gone back and watched a second time in forever. I believe if you wanted a mystery this is more a story of detectives digging for the truth and the frustrations they endure. They protect their own and never even looked at Sgt. Roberts as a suspect. He was the killer. Maybe there will be a sequel?? (9/10)

Letos character isn’t the killer. He’s been trying to take the fall since he confessed. Remember that body they found in the apartment. It had been moved two days after she was killed. I think Leto moved the body realizing that this would finally allow the cops to look into him. He was supposed to go fix her fridge, so he could have found the dead body first and not report it. Anyhow I don’t think he is the killer and maybe Denzel is the killer. He did kill that girl after all. What if he knew she was loose in that place and it was convenient to kill her while everyone would see it as a mistake.

When he opened the floor the first time, I swore I saw something red in it. And, I thought he said no barrette to the other cop to hide something..weird.

Leto was not guilty. All the evidence that you talked about was circumstantial.

What’s the connection between the boots that the CO talks about and the boots that Denzel wears at the end? If that’s the connection that Denzel was the killer, sounds like a far reach!

This movie was unbelievable. There is no way a coroner is going to change cause of death from a single gun shot to multiple stab wounds. Also, a detective would never get into a car with a murder suspect and then let the suspect make him dig holes to look for the victim.

Did you know that your audio is only in the left channel?

I definitely agree and lerma fit the FBI profile and that stuck out to me most of all, & the fact the girl from the beginning had that eerie feeling about him...but that profile from FBI was dead on 25 to 40...2 cars...keeping up with cases from the clippings to the police scanner in lerma home..its almost like lerma was taunting his to kill him when he spoke about his family....man I can go on forever lol... I truly enjoyed the movie!!!

What about the Boots at the end? They where in Washington's hotel room don't you think there is a connection.

It was the guy who committed suicide. They mention that people who confess the crime usually aren't the killers and there weren't anymore murders after he died

I have a feeling that Washington’s character was the killer

For a minute I thought it was jimmy

Im jus curious at the almost ending, when Malek was at the pool with his daughters and he had a memory of a lady saying"Daddy... " wonder who she is ? 🤔

Seems just too convenient for Leto's character to be the killer...

Same license plate of different killers car I think there's a killer cop.

The killer is detective Roberts. The brown car used to pick up the jogger was Roberts car, we see it in the car park at the cop shop a few times. Leto I believe went to fix the fridge broke in and found his play toy dead.The other victims where drugged moved stabbed and left to die. The victim in the unit was moved n tied up after death with the TV cable we see at Leto's work. Robert n Leto may have been working together. It's the little things

I think Leto is not the killer. Remember the opening scene the girl was chased by a car that is different than Leto car and the guy is not long hair. He could be watching the girl suffering siting at the chair.

hi Ive watched this movie last night , Im sure Leto is the killer but Im not getting that Washington killed someone years ago, would u plz explain more about him thanks

my left ear really enjoyed this video

Denzel Character: Hey, she was a vegetarian what did she have to eat before she died? Ramis Character: roast beef Denzel’s Character: It’s the little things that get you caught... (drives away) They only mentioned she had meat in her system a specific plate was never named.

What’s up with the rabbits foot? Was the clippings in the hidden box of the Denzel murder and he was getting close to solving it?

I loved the movie, you can see the movie from so many different birds' eyes

Leto and Denzel. Leto stated the pizza toppings during the interrogation and Denzel was the only cop that didn’t jump when the power came back on in the apartment but jumped when the girl walked out the bushes? He shot to keep her from talking and Leto was Denzel’s coverup. Funny how both left LA for 5 years and started back up as they both returned 🧐 plus guy in the beginning didn’t do anything but chase so it was something to throw the viewers off.

Leto was not the big bad killer in the film in the very beginning the killer (who chase's the girl with the car) has short hair and no beard... Leto never drives any of the cars we see the "killer" driver... However Leto may have killed that one girl that was found in her own apartment... We'll never know

Just finished watching it and for some reason I think denzel didnt want the new det living like him but idk who damn killer was lol

Leto wouldn't even get to trial with the lack of physical evidence. Everything was circumstantial

Letos Character threatened Maleks Family....

The latest victims looked like Jimmy's wife

I do a break down on who the killer really is... I love your channel credit to your review. Would love to exchange ideas

I think the fact that the film went out of its way to show Deacon mailing the red pin (or whatever it’s called) to Jimmy to ease his conscious is a sign that Sparma wasn’t the killer. To me it doesn’t make much sense for Sparma to be the killer, Jimmy killing the killer, and then Deacon faking the truth for Jimmy’s sake when in fact it is the truth. At least that’s the way I read it. It’s a movie about how cases affect people, and that’s what we got, not a story of a killer being brought to justice. That’s my view anyways, I liked the film quite a bit.

It doesn't make sense......if the killer keeps killing then they know they killed an innocent(yet crazy) guy

How do u hv 16k view's on this but only 471 subscribers thats crazy lol

Your mic is broken the voice comes in left ear😐

Great movie. Loved it

So the main reason that I believe that Deac wasn't the killer is because that girl in the beginning was already stabbed several times before he shot her. And I think that was Deacon's way of making amends and making peace by not resting until he put the killer in the ground or away. Since he was the deciding factor as to why she died.

The question is not about whether or not Sparma was guilty. The question is about how questionable perception is. Do we still perceive Deek and Baxter as the good guys even though they may have killed an innocent person and just give them a pass? Is it okay that Sparma was the focus of an investigation for no concrete reason? Is it okay to not care that Sparma was killed by Baxter? People who are not considered attractive, and/or are not like most people in terms of personality /behaviour, and/or are not affluent tend to be unfairly treated by society... that includes law enforcement. These people have longer sentences, and there is a higher amount of importance and credibility placed on circumstantial evidence than people who are attractive, have money, and have professions that society think imply integrity. Sparma was basically a "loser", likely always had trouble getting a date, and a loner... I think a lot of that was because he was on the spectrum. What is overlooked is that there was a carousel projector aimed at an empty frame on the wall and the lone chair next to it where he can look at photographs... Deek turned it on and it showed a photo of two older people... likely Sparma's parents. Basically I think Sparma's false confession and baiting was more based on his need to matter to somebody - whatever form that may come in.

A theory but it could be true baxter was the serial killer and denzel was innocent he probably thought baxter was innocent but i dont think he did Washington was a good cop the clues kept leading to baxter the wife asked if he had put the security system on which he seemed hesitant because he couldnt leave as easily as needed, he always kept a eye on washington, he always had a look of guilt and denzel basically told him how to avoids flaws in his story because “the little things” he said clued washington in that he was his suspect baxter also told him in order to solve his case he would need to solve the present case first which would mean denzel would get caught and everyone who helped as well also the man seen abducting in the beginning seemed small white and only had a small amount of facial hair leto couldnt have grown a full face in such a short time but if they didnt pend it on someone then the feds would keep investigating and going deeper into the case and he just wants his life back with nothing hanging over him

This is the kind of Movie that leaves the ending up in the air and wondering🤔. I enjoyed it.