Union boss says privatisation has decimated Universities 

Because if they do it'll mean they lost. Even though they're already losing. It's only a matter of time before this crisis destroys the Tories

@J C the problem that creates paranoia. If they think they'll be disposed the moment they're no longer able to work, that creates mistrust and fear. That snowballs very quickly.

@@frankieseward8667 unfortunately "the man on the street" isn't very smart, he doesn't realise that all of these unions are directly affiliated with the labour party, and this is a staged coup, it's not really a crisis, it's a half arsed awakening, people will flock to labour, and the process will repeat, but worse, people forget that tony blair setup EVERYTHING that the tories now take advantage of, and vice-versa, they could vote for a third party, but world war 2 psy-op's ensured no one ever voted for a third party ever again, stuck, is the term i would use, the common folk are stuck, and i can assure you, those labour based union workers going on strike, is not the common folk, in fact, i have a parlimaentary ombudsmans investigation into the NHS, and i'll gladly spit on any medical staff i ever speak to again, got nothing to do with politics, they all gladly peddle big pharma, the doctors, not the politicians, where's my representation? do you even know how many lives these "doctors and nurses" have ruined?

They are all liars paid by the rich to keep you poor and powerless they way they like it.

Dan Wootton? Or any journalist on GB News.

so you’re saying the government are crap at running things. but you want to make it state controlled. that’s some serious doublethink!

@@danh5637 state controlled and ran well as it should be shouldnt be difficult to understand

Did you not look into what you could earn with your 2 degrees?

@@Believe-you-me- I can earn 60k+ as a medical genomicist or a data analyst, Im saying if you want to do research at a university, there's highly educated people getting paid 18-22k and it's wrong.

@@caspar_gomez You are not forced to take that job. Maybe raise tuition fees even more to facilitate that huge pay??

@@Believe-you-me- and this is why science is in the sorry state it is and why the pandemic was the shitshow it was. Academia, education, healthcare, energy, water etc should not be run for profit. It doesnt work. And *you* will pay the price, you just wont realise until its too late to fix. Problem is youre taking us with you

@@Believe-you-me- and I didnt take that job, I don't work in research... doesnt mean those people should be on 20k. It always takes 2 mins to get to the core of you peoples mentality, selfish.

good luck without a house and electricity.

More socalism policy will soon kill it

@@coopsnz1 aw,poor you,you really dont have the capacity to understand do you

Having one got us this far 🤣🤣🤣🤪

@@andrewneil6027 Working people putting in graft got us this far Andrew! ✊

Disgusting 😡😡😡

Jo sometimes makes that point.

@Kent cyclist they all do it, not like any of you can remember though, less than 5 years, is your memory span,

@left_blank No thanks, we dont necessarily know what degrees we need in the future, and we will stop human progress and just be an employee trainer for companies, that is horrifyingly unambitious! And not what a university should be, i think people creating the curriciulum for universities are the most knowledgeable and in the best position and instead we would have the public and politicians decide what is good or not, everything that becomes politically contested risks being taken of and our knowledge and human progress would suffer. I bet that a lot of history courses would be eradicated just because the contentious, we already see people disparingly talking about womens studies and gender studies and also many more soft science topics, by people that hasnt read a line of it but has seen a few youtube videos about it. Women and Mens history is one of the most significant cultural expressions in society, but we shouldnt have people looking in to it.? Do you or these people know a single line of it. NO they don't. Philosophy is taken away, we had one obligatory course at my first education as an engineer, and i feel that is a huge lapse that we no longer have that, there so much inspiration in that field in how to think about things and i think we should introduce that again. (I mentioned some of the fields that i heard people talk about most disparagingly without knowing a cent of what it contains)

@left_blank yeah that would be single persons doing some work that will down out instead of we as a society standing for progress. To bad you only think of one type of value in there here and now and don't like to be in an innovating society. We support those things that are not popular right now with the things that are easy and and earns a lot of money, you call it in demand to try and day that is an absolutely positive word that we should derive and base our decisions on, we will not progress much if we only focus on what is the rage, the hype in demand right now. That now how you drive a diverse interesting innovating society. That's just consumerism uber alles. Where new ideas are taking very long to be researched and looked into. It's and utterly poor and destute way to build our society. And also makes it slower to move to new things because people are afraid to let go of what is the current driver o growth amd will try to keep that demand high "artificially ".

@left_blank no the poor is thay because of exploitation and the taking away of abundance of resources, not just a lot but resources are actually stripped away making even more poor people, a pipeline of wealth is extracted not just away from people but whole communities.l making it harder to prosper for people in whole regions. When there is poor people and we fix the system to be less exploitable there are fewer poor people. When your enterprise costs others in form of resources, money and health so much that they are more destitute you are not productive, you are extractive. With systems in place there are less poor people more people being productive more people you can make agreements with. Your idea sound like a 3. World country emerging I don't know why you would put that forward as something to strive for. For prejudice of poor people sounds an awful lot like people talk about people in lower castes in cast based societies. We know how damaging that is. Is that what modern capitalism is to you or modern conservative libertarianism?

@left_blank are you saying the tories are implementing and using left wing policies?

@left_blank OK I believe you are serious wrong and we have tons of data from a massive amount of countries that are highly productive. So in my mind you are extremely and obviously wrong by even the most immediate glance. But how would you change it to make it a good system a what is a good system to you? And I must admit I'm almost afraid to hear it " 😬

Pipe down Baron Von Gammonly Tory, and learn English.Who do you think believes your lies?