I love how “motivational” channels are willing to make fun of and call out the guy whose content they clearly were inspired by. I love it please let this continue.
Adum's reaction to the AI Dhar Mann voce really drives home the strange new world dawning upon us. AI is recreating people's voices, and yet the reaction to it isn't "holy shit, voices are being recreated, it's "you really could have made the AI do a better job at the voice recreation." Buckle up, bois - it's starting to get real crazy, real fast. Also, Sameer likes farts.
The only thing that could’ve saved this is if the Sameer script they were all praising was for the same video we’re watching, in some kind of infinite regression.
Lol, working for Sameer is a downgrade compared to working for Dhar. Not like that was any better. That’s like living in a poor apartment in Russia, then getting kicked out and living in a poor apartment in North Korea.
Wait! The video ended without solving the conflict. I mean, yeah, the actors got a new job, but what about Dhar? Considering how these videos aren't afraid to be over-the-top when it comes to resolutions and making villains suffer and/or learn a lesson, why not write a scene like that with Dhar? It wouldn't matter it it were historically innacurate, since Sameer is already taking liberties with the real story. By the way, why do the subtitles look like meme captions? And why does the English-dubbed version have English subtitles but the Portuguese version doesn't? Shouldn't it be the other way around?
300 dollars is already really low in Brazil (a bit over minimum wage) but the original voice over says 300 Reais, which is like 50 dollars a month, there's physically no way you can raise a family with that much
If I had a nickle for every high-production video coming from a middle eastern guy, I'd have two nickles, which isn't alot but it's weird it happened twice
What if the guy just lives in Brazil? Not defending the man but people can be from other places than the US and English voiceover just reaches the largest audience.
The actors' family is super upset he got fired at a shitty job where he only made $300 a month. That's why tons of people do food delivery between acting jobs. There's no real living wages in work like this. You want to take as many acting roles as you can get not just rely on youtubers like Dhar. I know James Nguyen films pay better and are probably more fulfilling
Casting, directing, writing, and especially the dubbing all done by A.I., I guarantee it. You just know that Sameer would do even worse things than Dhar to get to his level of success.
@@goosegas2087 I wasn’t claiming Sameer is worse than Dhar Man only because he uses AI. Using AI so he can pay less people is merely on the list of his many scummy practices.
@@goosegas2087 You seem to be reading my comments in strange ways, so let me clearly state that it seems to me that Sameer is extremely shitty because he is most likely not above exploiting his actors in the same ways that Dhar Mann does since he seems to exploits AI, the Dhar Mann controversy, and even his own daughter to get views, likes, subs, and comments. In my opinion, Dhar Mann is awful and Sameer is possibly even worse. That’s all.
so many americans are sourcing jobs to poorer countries because they have to pay less than hiring an American, but it still makes them feel good because the "less pay" is still considerably high for the person they are paying
Come to think of it, it wouldn't surprise me if Dhar Mann actually turned out to be an AI and not a real human being. His content really feels like some computer-generated absurdity. Not to mention his way of speaking.
It's almost like voluntary trade is voluntary. That means both parties involved view the transaction as beneficial to them. The other argument that ppl like to imply is that trading with poor places somehow drives down their whole economy and that is why they are so desperate for even terrible work. I have never heard anyone say that out loud because of how stupid that is but that is the implication of acting like trading with a poor place is hurting them. Free trade is good. It is what has risen the most ppl out of poverty and hunger. It has saved countless lives and allowed countless more to live in the first place. Voluntary cooperation is economically and ethically the superior route to take over authoritarian force (government interference). If two parties want to cooperate and no third party is being harmed then the government should stay out of it. There is nothing unethical about that situation. In fact, you could say its more ethical to trade with a poor place. The ppl are more in need and giving them more options (more demand for labor) allows them to earn more. More demand without changing the supply drives up the price. Of course you drive down the labor demand from where the jobs originally were but if that was a wealthier place then the ppl are less in need. It's a tradeoff with a net benefit if your concern is addressing needy ppl first.
