Welcome fellow dads. If I could give you a crisp high five - I would.
If you are a vendor interested in working together - I'm interested primarily in products dealing with pistols - specifically red dot pistols - both concealed carry and competition. With the direction of the channel - smaller products like holsters, etc only make sense in the context of a larger project - a pistol review or a build, etc. Always open to a conversation.
Get in touch with me via email - thehumblemarksman@gmail.com
Doesn't come in Green reticle, full disassembly from slide just to change the battery, no solar backup, stupid expensive for what it is. I want to buy America 1st products, but you have to offer competitive products.
No - they are super sonic and spin coming out of the rifling in the barrel to be stable through flight- a rifle round upon entering a 4”+ thick target can start to tumble causing massive trauma - but a 1/4” thick ear and even glancing is unlikely to induce tumbling until it goes trans sonic (slower than sound barrier) which at 140 yards this wasn’t trans sonic
Why wasn't an hollow point or a soft point also used? Might made a little difference. A FMJ would more than likely went thur a flak jacket, hollow point make you go for a head shot. Center body mass is so much of a bigger target.
Facing the shooter the ear presented a parallel silhouette . Slug ran along with more contact instead of a straight punch thru . Angle of contact seems to be neglected in this video .
Facing the shooter the ear presented a parallel silhouette . Slug ran along with more contact instead of a straight punch thru . Angle of contact seems to be neglected in this video .
You do know both the kid on roof and his rifle were planted? Real shooter was behind the bleachers, there's even a eyewitness account with video on RU-vid channel called offgrid desert farming with paul and adrienne, but looks like msm or even fbi aren't interested 🤔
M-16 and AR-15 rifles are Both rifled barrels. The M-16 can handle a round with a higher pressure and can fire full auto. Other that that, they are identical. The bullets do NOT tumble. This common misconception comes from the fact that many military rounds have a hollow cavity inside them that makes the bullet tumble once it has hit the target. This increases damage. A bullet would likely begin to tumble in the air, ONLY AFTER if hit something like an ear, or a tree branch. This likely explains why nobody directly behind him was hit with that same bullet.
With all the info on the net why did he try a headshot? I mean great if you're a good shot but even at 130 yds if you're only average you can hit the torso especially one that fat.
This "experiment" was carried out with the bullets approaching at 90 degrees from the angle in the assisination attempt. Therefore, a waste of time, producing zero useful information
Did they find all shot bullets and did they calculate their flight paths. Were all bullets shot with the same rifle and was a DNA analysis made with the bullets ? Was a medical report published about the ear injuries and was it approved by independent experts ? Trump did not react like every normal person would have done. but like an artist on a stage, who just had got his key words to make a heroic posture. We should remember, that Trump can only tell lies. Probably a genetic defect ?
It won’t blow off your ear but an AR 15 will blow your ear drum AND you would be holding your ear from the pain. A pigs ear doesn’t have an ear drum. The shots demonstrated here create no compression wave.
Too many different factors. But first question…..WTF is an AK15? Huh? Now then, just for badic BS. What type prouectile are we talking? Standard SP, HP, FMJ, ballistic tip, high frangible sintered metal…….they all react differently. But none are likely to blow an ear completely off.
Interesting what people dream up. Something that concerned me was the first report I heard. Now I don’t know about rules of engagement for protecting a US President, and I am no expert. However, I have in the past been licensed to carry firearms for both personal protection and to protect the people I was assigned to protect. The first report that I heard said, “The security neutralised and shot the shooter.” Under my rules of engagement that would be murder. Your first priority is to neutralise the threat. Once the threat is neutralised there is no threat. Which means there is no excuse for discharging a firearm. If that report is what really happened, and I doubt the reporter has even my level of knowledge, then I would be looking at life in prison for murder. Some years ago shots were fired at Queen Elizabeth, on the Mall. The guardsman who was lining the route turned and grabbed the hair of the shooter, pushed his head down and kicked him repeatedly in the face. Thus he neutralised the threat. He could have shot the man or used his bayonet. But only until the threat was neutralised. At which point crown protection ends and common law takes over. It is difficult because the lawyers love to pick over the minute details of a decision you have to take in, often, less than 1/2 a second.
