Awesome great update thanks that you keep working on the normal version also, and the price tag for the pro version is just fine, I have to play with the new version but out of the video i would say the different motor over time anlytic screen is absolute insane!
If you would add some sort of paypal'ish form of payment, I would be happy to pay way more than a one off patreon "fee". This is a valuable product, I just don't like subscriptions.
Great improve would be a Pidtoolbox that read your log and tells you what ideal type of filter and cut off frequencies to use to tune your kuad to perfection.keap the great work 😊
Brian, in the intro you sound a little embarrased of having to charge for your work and you need to justify it. Absolutely no reason to feel like that. You have done an awesome work and I hope you can continue working with this an get a great reward. Thanks.
If possible, can you provide a Chinese payment interface? For well-known reasons, we cannot pay in foreign currency in China, or it is difficult to make foreign currency payments.
Support this man and other devs (BF, elrs, bluejay...), you get the most eazy way to tune your quad to fly as it should "for free" just with hardware costs. If you enjoy this hobby, contribute to making it even better for fraction of costs (one casual takeaway coffee).
I’ve been flying for almost 6 years and never really bothered with “black box”. I recently built a 7” AOS I couldn’t tune myself. Someone online had been gracious enough to help tune via black box recordings. Can you do a video on what settings should be set up on black box. I’m using Inav black box for this build but all my other quads are BF, I’d like to delve more into black box. Shame on me for not doing this sooner! 😢
Amazing the quad did not freak out on the first test. How does the wobble script keep that quad on one spot? I would not trust anything in house like that besides my own control. It sure looks nice!
So maybe if you are prone to bashing props you could tune 250q with 50 weight so rpm filter would have wider target area to be able to handle the noise of chewed up props?
i think it's the opposite. if you bang up your props you need rpm filters more. If your quad is clean enough and doesn't need as much filtering, you can ease up on the filtering as described here.
@TimeFadesMemoryLasts yes but you can widen the q to hit the areas thst might not have been there with clean props. And have some delay by lowering the % attenuation. Idk?
@@JLfpv unbalance in the prop always sits right at the RPM number (and its harmonics). If you cut off a blade, the noise will still be at the same values of a pristine prop, it's just that the noise peak will be a lot higher but it should not be broader. But on second thought: In practice, because of the changed aerodynamics, maybe you have additional vibrations in the bent/broken prop that's coming from the additional turbulences which is causing broader RPM peaks...
These videos are pure gold. I REALLY appreciate the time you put into making this make sense. It's also great to see you back making videos again. With the release of 4.5 it would probably help a lot of folks if you could make a single step-by-step video of your process tuning a normal 5 inch racing or freestyle rig. I know there's a lot of information in your older videos but I can't find a video from the last few years where actually take a regular 5" rig and demonstrate from start-to-finish how you tune it from defaults. Love all your videos, and the PID toolbox tool is a genuine community blessing. Thanks for everything you do for us mortals.
