Ford 302 Small Block Teardown! Why Did This Mustang 5.0 Fail A Leak Down Test?

Подписаться 329 тыс.

Просмотров 307 тыс.

50% 1

THIS ENGINE HAS SOLD!
Check out my buddy Brandon's Twin Turbo small block Ford Ranger!
/ @1stockcam
Want to see a particular engine torn down? I may have already done one! I've made over 50 other teardowns from Cummins to an LS7, and from Rotary to Ram Ecodiesels. Check them out here • Blown Up Engine Tear D...
My name is Eric and I own and run a full service auto salvage business called Importapart located in the Saint Louis MO area. Part of our model is dismantling and selling parts from rare and niche market engines. If you're interested in buying this engine or parts from the other engines I've torn down, email us at Importapartsales@gmail.com.
In this video I tear down a Small block ford 302. This is 5.0L V8 from a 1994-1995 Mustang GT. This engine is from a car with a broken odometer at 81000 miles, and I could not hear it run. The car had a rodent problem and none of the wiring was intact in the engine bay. We pulled the engine and it failed a leak down test. I take this engine complete down and discover a completely unrelated issue, as well as signs this engine sat for some time. As odd as it sounds, this is the VERY first small block Ford I've torn down! Most of the 5.0's we get in run great and we sell them complete.
As always, I love all of the feedback, comments and even the criticism.
Catch you on the next one!
-Eric

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

21 янв 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,1 тыс.

@robertwest3093 2 года назад

"Every Ford small block he gets in runs fine so he sells it"- a testament to the quality of the Windsor Ford!

@MavDude 2 года назад

My daily driver is a 95 Mustang GT I've been driving for 20 years. It has 411,000 miles on it now and still runs pretty well. The 302/351W are some of the most reliable engines ever made in my opinion.

@GuitarFreak881 11 месяцев назад

My first car was a 95' GT. My dad had it as his daily driver for about 260k miles, then I drove it another 5 years to right around 380k miles. Still ran perfectly until I was rear ended and the car was totaled.. Best car I've ever owned.

@eddiefalcon8316 10 месяцев назад

411k. Whao. You got me beat I’m at 306k on my 93 and the guide on my cam went out along with damaging my timing belt and timing belt bolt broke. Do you post pics of vids of your car?

@theodorgiosan2570 8 месяцев назад

The 5.0 blocks from 1979 and later crack when you put power to them is the only problem. 351W is a much better engine in my opinion. Stock they do last forever though. But all sorts of older simple engines can rack up miles if you take care of them. For example my friend has an 82 Toronado diesel with 500,000 or more miles on it. Not exactly known as a reliable engine but it's had it's oil changed every 3000 miles and has head studs and a water separator, so everything has lasted longer than you would expect.

@seana806 7 месяцев назад

Not a surprise, it seems like these Ford small blocks will just run forever. I wouldn’t be surprised if the ‘66 Ford Galaxie 500 I plan on picking up in the future with a 289 in it (the same thing as the 302) has 162,000 original miles on it judging by the shape the transmission is in.

@-l_T- 5 месяцев назад

I bought a '95 mustang for $700 in momo state. From a bad, shor temper gambler. Couldn't resist and sold it as is, I considered him a friend but I never was to him. He rammed a forklift in through the windows chasing his wife who was cheating right out the car raised and dropped it. Now onto the car itself.. this didn't affect it a bit. Had bad ass roll cage throughout the design custom specifically for long distance circuit racing. A 302 boss with everything you could ever do to beef it out nice heads, a cam with a monster lift, efi, 5.0 t5 trans, with a slap stick, this car was just muah a spicy meatball. But I never got to see it, thanks to my father who told the seller go ahead chop it up and bring us the parts. I think I received approx 1% of it. The engine had screws in the cylinders, froze, used a blow tourch on the heads to free it. Gasket sealer around the exhaust manifolds because it was leaking.. lol. Not the brightest but anyway, should I file a stolen vehicle report? I'm not one to be a cop caller. Got the title but he is no where to be found. So what y'all think?

@JeromeDiamond-cs7yw Год назад

Your tear down confirmed what we at the plant and everyone with a 302 knows, beast engine. The 302 block line was my primary responsibility lot of pride went into those engines! Piece of trivia for you, 1980 on 302 blocks were 12 lbs lighter than previous engines. Ford wanted 20 lbs removed but we couldn't broach the engine block w/o it coming apart in the fixture.

@craig3916 9 месяцев назад

i wonder if that goes someway to explaining the random (?) block splitting of the 8.2 deck motors running high power mods

@justincase3880 2 года назад

The old school pushrod engines were a beast for durability .. single cam, no problematic variable cam timing nor turbos …

@mann_idonotreadreplies Год назад

not all pushrods engines are durable.

@user-jx8jb1vq3y Год назад

And you could beat those old 302 to death and they would still run

@crewdawg2008 7 месяцев назад

I used to think the same way, and there's nothing wrong with that thinking, but I've become a believer in the coyote, especially as the one in my 2013 F150 recently crossed the 250k mile mark. Sure, there's a lot more complexity with the DOHC TiVVT system, but it works, it's reliable, is it as reliable as the old pushrod chuggers? Time will tell, but at a quarter million original miles, I have to say, so far so good

@Floreypottery 6 месяцев назад

Yep my done up 302 all Got better gas mileage on the highway then most cars do today but when you decided to go fast you could watch the fuel gauge go down lol

@upsidedowndog1256 2 года назад

Small block Fords are not really a marvel of engineering but absolutely in execution. They are tough, 100 lbs. lighter than a similar GM engine, and rarely fail on their own. I rebuilt 18 GM engines before I got a reason to rebuild my 289.

@terrenceolivido741 Год назад

this is an extremely telling observation. extremely. not a marvel in engineering, but in execution. my mantra (i am old) is keep it as simple as possible, but execute correctly. in the developement of engines it is always a crap-shoot. so, my friends look to the tried and true to pull you thru.

@rosshoenke8368 5 месяцев назад

I dunno, I have both Chevy and Ford. The mustang as he stated has a broken odometer. However the car wasn't well kept. I'm the 5th owner and for what it's been through I'd say it's a good car.

@upsidedowndog1256 5 месяцев назад

@@rosshoenke8368 If you got my old Mustang it doesn't even come alive until 6000 rpm. It always needed more gears. From 6 to 8500 it screamed. 3 speed sucked. I built the top end to breathe beyond Shelby. Bottom end only needed ARP rod bolts.

@colinj5291 3 месяца назад

If anything, the transmission was the first to go on the 80s/early 90s Mustangs. The engines were solid. And even the tranny would go at least 150k miles before it started to slip.

@rosshoenke8368 3 месяца назад

Unfortunately 4 guys before me beat the snot out of the car before I had the chance. It still has decent compression, but I see sparkles in the oil when I change it. It definitely could use an overhaul

@anthonye.4999 2 года назад

I love the tactile response you get when snapping the headbolts free. And the popping audibles too. I can't be the only one, right?.

@Oddman1980 2 года назад

I'm always here for the head bolt ASMR.

@tvguy12346 2 года назад

Noise makes me cringe. Snapping sound makes to similar a noise.

@tomclark82 2 года назад

Sounds like my knees before they got fixed!

@dizzlefosho6374 2 года назад

I was just about to comment something similar. Love that sound

@bartlettj79 2 года назад

No, no you’re not

@TheProjectHelpDesk 2 года назад

Ah, the 90's. SAE bolts, Iron Everything, 2 valves per cylinder and valve covers that were 12 inches deep.

@timewa851 2 года назад

timing chain, singular, maybe, ....maybe a double-roller. good times.

@nickma71 2 года назад

The car is metric. Some engine fasteners were not. The heads were from an 85 truck.

@JohnDove 2 года назад

@@nickma71 they were E7 heads, so a 87 truck.

@nickma71 2 года назад

@@JohnDove On the 94 in the video?

@JohnDove 2 года назад

@@nickma71 yeah. 10:54 in the video you can see E7TE on the deck side of the head.

@tihspidtherekciltilc5469 2 года назад

I really respect your morals about standing behind your products. My brother in law says I'm crazy for guaranteeing the used small engine equipment I sell like snowblowers, lawn tractors and anything else I get free or cheap. It's my way of making ends meet and helping people get what they need cheap plus I love keeping stuff from the landfill or scrapyard. I donate a lot to especially window ACs because they're not cheap and I've been there sweating trying to sleep. I wish I had space and a landlord for doing cars as I've given away many before moving here in New Rustshire.

@rydplrs71 2 года назад

On small engines I used to guarantee stuff, but the majority of my returns and unhappy customers were the result of operator error, now when I get something cheap I just move it cheap, and all my adds tell people exactly what I found, did and what I may be unable to fully test. I don’t intentionally sell anything with issues, but most small engine stuff isn’t worth the cost of full rehab, let alone the time. I accept well less then top dollar and the buyers take the risk that comes with any used equipment. I’ve lost to much money to people who try to mow pastures with riding mowers, or didn’t remember to pickup their doormats before it snows.

@villedocvalle Год назад

God bless you

@craigbomer8962 2 года назад

Heck, get the heads worked over at a machine shop, dingle hone the block, replace main, rod, and cam bearings, fresh rings, and slap it back together.

@lichking3711 2 года назад

the late heads have nearly no value except for GT40 and GT40P, their specs are even worse than 60s heads. Literally not worth saving when alum and iron aftermarket heads exist, unless it's for somebody's daily driver who's on a budget to rebuild an engine Performance-wise, it's likely an e7 head. Ported and machined to the max, it will perform and flow similar to a GT40 head that is stock. Ported and polished GT40 will perform similar to an aftermarket head. If you get either for free and/or you have the facilities and tools to homeport, yeah it's worth it. Otherwise, not really. stock, unported heads are also done flowing by like 4-5k rpm, they're that bad. Low end they're ok.

@r.glenncooper8199 2 года назад

Back in the day...When engines were still easy to work on...

@artvogt8135 2 года назад

"Complete, but in pieces" call me crazy, but that makes perfect sense to me.

@btlfedgolf 2 года назад

I miss my 302 powered RX7

@johnpurdum8126 2 года назад

precursor to the Miata

@cavscout62 2 года назад

From the looks and lifelong experience with Small Block Fords I’d say you have a typical Mustang engine that was run very hard for many miles without any maintenance at all. I absolutely Love all Windsor & Cleveland’s as they are so easy to make massive power with and are reliable as stone.

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

Cleveland and 9.5" deck Windsors get most of the love, but the humble 289/302 blocks are great stock motors for what they are. Love them!

@HockeyGoon939 2 года назад

I actually thought this engine looked very good. I have pulled them apart with half the vanes gone on the water pump, several flat lifters and some very loose rods. Not to mention oil pickup screens nearly blocked with timing gear crud. No broken rings was a huge plus. When you still have cross hatching on the cylinder walls its not that worn. The only thing in questionable condition was the main bearings and rod bearings - but even they weren't that bad - for an engine that is at least 25 years old. I suspect they were subject to some high RPMs.

@PotatoeJoe69 2 года назад

I'd take just about anything over a Ford engine if I want too make power.

@trentdaddydolla647 2 года назад

You won't be making massive power with a 302 that's for sure lol

@mattgaynor1847 Год назад

302s are definitely tough as nails indestructible love them

@trentonwage7486 2 года назад

Flashbacks to pulling GT40 heads off of an Explorer 302. As fast as I could 😂 They were crushing that row of cars at the time but set it aside for me so I could finish getting the heads.

@lichking3711 2 года назад

Some notes from my sbf build/nightmares for any of y'all that might put these sbfs back together (kind of an info dump): 1) the headgaskets CAN be installed backwards. If they are, the engine will have an unsolvable overheating problem (well, solved only by putting the gasket on the right way) so pay close attention to the arrows (this mostly applies to novice builders) 2) The oil pump driveshaft has a washer that does not slide. It's there for a reason, that washer faces UP towards the dizzy. The shaft goes in when the bottom end is assembled and putting the oil pump on will sandwich it slightly. This is important because if the dizzy is disturbed or when you go to prime the oil pump (turn the shaft CCW), the driveshaft will not be able to fall out of the oil pump. Putting the shaft washer down, towards the pump, will make that a guarantee and then you need to drop the oil pan to fish it out and it becomes a nightmare. 3) For sbfs with eccentrics for mech fuel pumps, always, always make sure to get the right length cam dowel (1.375 is the longest made and Summit racing carries it). If it does not go through the eccentric which rides over the cam gear, the eccentric will spin out, and the cam gear bolt WILL strip and come out. 4) Roller spiders can be retrofitted to older sbfs by drilling and threading their mounting holes. 5) Stock rods are forged for the entire production run of SBFs and they are quite beefy. The cranks, even the cast ones, can be spun high/hold power and live if in good shape and balanced. The 60s sbfs used nodular cast cranks in the hipos that spun to 6-7k rpm, for example, stock and on the race track. 6) There are two different harmonic balancers to balance the rotating assembly and thus two different flywheels/flexplates. Be very wary of which one your engine came with, or just balance the rotating assy internally and use a neutral balancer/plate 7) There are several styles of timing covers and 3 different pointer locations. The older engines put the dipstick in the timing cover, newer put it in the block; timing pointers are another deal that you must research for yourself 8) There are LH and RH side outlet water pumps, they need to match the rads in the car and the rest of the build. Pumps and covers are interchangeable between 302s, the mounting is the same but you'll likely need different bolt kits to secure them. Use RTV in addition to the gasket or else... also, if the pump has a metal cover on the back, it will have a gasket there, too, and I really recommend using some rtv on it as well. 9) The threads in the timing cover really, really like to strip when you put the water pump on. It would be a good idea to invest into thread inserts and do them all when the cover is off. 10) The intakes are wet and contain coolant. Drain the block before removing, there are 2 3/8 drain plugs with one on each side at the bottom of the water jacket - one by the passenger side near the alt and one on the driver side near the exit of the exhaust manifold. Also, use rtv around the water ports in addition to the intake gasket, and don't try to replace the front and rear cork seals with RTV - it will most likely leak, just use the cork and put a dab of RTV in the corners where the gaskets join. 11) Head bolts and main bolts are not torque to yield and on *stock* rebuilds can be reused, though checking for stretch is still necessary. Use motor oil on all threads when installing

@byrosonline5876 Год назад

Thanks for the insight, it's really useful when approaching a rebuild.

@mann_idonotreadreplies Год назад

cool story bro

@ronnieb7408 2 года назад

When I rebuilt my dads 5.0 from his truck that had over 500000 miles on it, yes half a million miles, it only had one thousanth of a ring groove . Went back with a hone ,std rings and std bearings,E303 cam,ported the heads and put in a 94 Ranger.It makes around 325hp and is a blast to drive. 5.0 Fords are one of the best ones ever made,along with the 460 big blocks

@Floreypottery 6 месяцев назад

And they got really good mpg especially in the lighter ranger mine got damn near 40mpg highway with a 750 carb it just got really thrirsty when you drove it hard lol

@robertfray7737 2 года назад

One of the best bang for the bucks engines ever made … created the bolt-on era of the 1990s

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

Lots of people don't realize this. The Chevy small block best this to market by 7 years, but itself shows its age (shared center exhaust port). The SBF is a very light block with just the bare minimum of iron used where needed, saving Ford millions over its production life. It isn't the sturdiest motor ever made, but a stock cam/block motor cam make easy 300hp with just heads and intake. Unsurprising that the LS motor has lots, and I mean lots of similarities to the SBF. If nobody believes me, just note that the LS shares the same bore spacing and headbolt pattern as the SBF. You can literally bolt LS heads to a SBF without mods. Not saying it will work, but interesting that a motor designed over 3 decades later uses very similar architecture.

@GeoffTheGiraffe 2 года назад

@@DSHPerotecH someone on youtube made a 351 with LS heads. Very interesting series

@MoctezumasRevenge1 2 года назад

@@GeoffTheGiraffe well yeah, if you add a distributor to the LS, you get a SBF

@jarvislarson6864 2 года назад

@@DSHPerotecH yeah only you left out the inferior sbf vs sbc oil pump & timing cover & waterpump and bore to stroke ratio . The sbc has held the title winningest engine in all motorsports to date

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

@@jarvislarson6864 Never said the Windsor was a better performance platform than the SBC. Simply stating that it had very modern design elements, even for the 1960s, and was a very efficient design in terms of iron material used in block construction. Always has to be that one Chevy guy 😂

@bobmarker6812 2 года назад

Refreshing to see the old technology. Actually, the small block Ford started off as a 221.

@Paul1958R 2 года назад

Correct, in 1962.

@johnnyk6666 2 года назад

Same size as the original 1932 flathead !

@johnkizziah108 2 года назад

I have a sweet little 221 in the corner waiting for a falcon or cool pinto.

@garysuper5338 2 года назад

@@johnkizziah108 I raced a 63 fairlane with that 221 engine years ago. I was 63/3 until the bottom went out. The only competition I had were 6 cyl. due the cubic inch limit for that class. The thin wall casting small block fords were quite a bit lighter than the bigger 6 cyl. also. And they just couldn’t keep up with the high winding little ford. Soon, hydroplane racers caught on to the same advantages. Nothing could touch them in that class. That little 221 would scream a beautiful sound out on the water. There was a high demand for that engine in those days. Thanks for bringing back memories.

@johnkizziah108 2 года назад

@@garysuper5338 this is a fresh little 221 had one in a 63 falcon wagon when I was a kid..real low gears and a 4 speed I was he'll light to light..been savein this one..hopin for another falcon wagon

@toddbob55 2 года назад

The 302 Ford is probably one of the best engine ever Designed

@VikingDudee 2 года назад

I agree, and im not ford guy. I just wished they made all their other engines easy, thank god they don't make them 5.4 3v anymore, I was tired of doing cam phasers on our shop trucks...

@seandrake7534 2 года назад

I’m going to say that the 300 I6 was better

@tomwinkle5536 2 года назад

Power nation took the 300 6 banger and turboed it and got 500 hp.

@darylmorse 2 года назад

No, that would be the small block chev or the big block chev. :)

@seandrake7534 2 года назад

@@tomwinkle5536 are you talking about the ones with the midfield boss head

@gapratt4955 2 года назад

What you have there is a typical high mileage, drove hard, put up wet Ford small block. A previous owner probably drove it like a racecar but did not treat it like one.

@joeblow5037 2 года назад

always a GM guy.......but I always appreciated those Fox bodied Mustangs with the 5.0 and ground effects.

@toddbob55 2 года назад

GM products are junk

@elliottbutts153 2 года назад

Probably my favorite engine. Used for so many years as you stated. Good reliable power. Got one in my 91 Fox and another on a engine stand. Thanks for some SBF love.

@wtice4632 2 года назад

Theyre great. Only engine known for splitting its block in half lmao.

@elliottbutts153 2 года назад

@@wtice4632 Yes it’s said it can only handle 500 horsepower. But there is plenty of evidence out there of it not splitting with 500 plus horsepower. People running a 150 shot of nitrous on a stock bottom end with 200k miles on it. With hundreds of passes. Much better options out there for making power though. I agree with that. Like I stated it is a good reliable engine. For a street car. It has none of the piston ring, lifters, camshaft, etc.etc. issues that some of the more modern engines can have. The 351W is also in the same class. GM and Mopar SB and BB engines are great too. Old school push rod technology that is reliable

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

I will always defend the 8.2" deck Windsor, SBF, Challenger V8. Is it the absolute king of performance engine? Nope. However, for an engine from 1962, its extremely, extremely tight on clearances and amount of iron used for the displacement. A very light weight iron block for 302/5.0 displacement, and the amount of iron Ford saved over 40 years of manufacture probably saved them millions. So enjoy it for what it is, a tight, light, engineering masterpiece.

@donreinke5863 2 года назад

The earliest Ford engine of this family was NOT the 260. A 221 ci variant preceded the 260 which became available in 1962

@donreinke5863 2 года назад

@@wtice4632 Then do what everyone else did and use the Boss 302 block.

@duggydo 2 года назад

4 inch bore x 3 inch stroke. Love the 302’s.

@macgyver77777 2 года назад

"Shoo... That coulda been NOT good. Which is ALSO bad..." LMBO! That was worth the watch all by itself!

@albertthomas7295 2 года назад

'69 mustang with a factory 4 speed and Boss 302 was an awesome ride and I loved the sound... I sure miss that car now... bought it after I came home from 'Nam..

@peterarthur2530 2 года назад

"...no signs of malice in the combustion palace." You have a way with words! I have three Mustangs and I can't get enough of your teardowns. Keep up the great work!

@MATTER767 9 месяцев назад

the 302 and the 351 are some of Fords best engines for the small block !!!

@metalted6128 11 месяцев назад

Something to be said, still Mr. Fords signature, on the emblem, even to this day!! Yep I’m a Ford man!!! Proudly!!!

@chrisp3231 2 года назад

Hey, I cut my own hair too! 😁🤣

@SMOBY44 2 года назад

A technique I use to check valve seal on a head that has been removed is to position the head so the ports are pointing straight up then fill the runner with gasoline and look for seepage around the valve.

@mbspoobah Год назад

I had a 289 in a Galaxie, had an overheat situation in a snowstorm (themostat as i recall), drove it till it quit on the edge of town (it got me home). Fixed the thermostat next day, it started right up, and no follow on issues. Typical of this great engine family.

@alanrlocklear 2 года назад

A little old school V8 teardown. Side note: you sound better than the last video. Hopefully your nose is getting better.

@bassiclymike 2 года назад

SBF's are solid motors. I've had a '65 289 and an '86 5.0. Amazing how similar they are outside of the fuel delivery. IMO, they're one of the all-time classic blocks.

@petervanderwaart1138 7 месяцев назад

Our family had one in our 1964 Ford wagon.

@infernoking7504 2 года назад

I HAVE A 302 IN MY Lincoln Town Car I love it.

@bigdogpete43 2 года назад

Amazing engine. So many years of reliable service in all types of applications. Might be the most versatile engine ever built.

@jtjones4727 2 года назад

Yes. I have 3 302 engines in my garage. 2 of them were made in '68 not sure about the third one. I also have 2 original 351 Windsor engines from the same time period. One of them still has the 4 barrel carb I think it came from a truck. Also have a small assortment of old Ford inline 6 engines. A couple of the 2xx cubic inch (can't remember the exact displacement) one came from a '66 Mustang and the other from about a 72 or so Maverick. Those old Ford straight 6s will run forever, it's pretty amazing. You can find some that have sat for 10 or 15 years inside a barn. And as long as the motor isn't locked up and will spin over, you can usually get them to crank up and run within a few minutes.

@ChrisBrown-pz2gu 2 года назад

@@voterfraudisreals8612 lol, c'mon man, just no

@MavDude 2 года назад

@@voterfraudisreals8612 Absolute truth.

@bradkay4794 2 года назад

Since you didn't limit the cars I'm going to have to say the most versatile engine is the Detroit 6-71. If you were referring to the small block Ford instead of just a 302 I'll vote for the entire Detroit 71 series.

@kennywhiddon1497 2 года назад

@@voterfraudisreals8612 Not. 350 blocks don't split in half.

@bad74maverick1 2 года назад

That engine with that wear had another 150K left on it. You can't hardly kill the small block ford. I have tried in my Maverick Grabber...... Several times!

@trevormyrus7981 2 года назад

More old school engines please.

@willybill4530 2 года назад

So glad you don't sell questionable engines and waste people's time absolutely loved hearing that after being a mechanic for over 20 years my time has been wasted a lot lol enjoy watching the videos man 👍

@austincjett 2 года назад

I remember back in the days when the lifter valley, valve covers and oil pan would have been full of sludge. The cam sprocket was made out of plastic and all 8 pistons would have cracked skirts. I still love small block fords, they kept me in work and made me a master at removing frozen and broke off water pump bolts.

@randr10 2 года назад

Brings back memories of building my hot rod 302 Fairlane years ago. It was my first time doing any internal engine work, but I completely tore it down, had the whole thing gone through at the machine shop, put a shift kit in the trans, entire aluminum top end, cam, roller rockers and 4-barrel carb, aftermarket radiator, etc. I had a few hiccups, like some bent pushrods from using cheapo ones, and a poorly adapted throttle linkage that didn't work right at first, but I was proud that after I got it dialed I was able to run it for 40k miles before I sold it without any major issues, and I ran it to redline at least once every time I drove it. My current grocery getter would probably give it a run, but it felt like the fastest car I've ever been in, and let me tell you, there's not a whole lot that sounds better than one of these singing at 7000 rpm through magnaflows.

@grevberg 2 года назад

Wonderful to see an engine with no sensors no electronics no weird stuff. All you have to worry about is fuel spark and compression and hit the road.

@nathangreer8219 2 года назад

Missed one! In addition to the 260, 289, 302, and 351W, there was the original size: 221.

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

351W was a different (but similar) block. Higher deck height, not much if anything else different though.

@young11984 2 года назад

SBF is my pride and joys, i have an 85 mustang with basically a stock 88 5.0 long block a single turbo and a hint of nitrous. Only makes 585hp 620tq at the wheels but its a blast for a street cruiser, glad you finally tore one down and cant wait till you come across one with a split block so i can read all the thoughts about why it split in the comments lol

@jefftaylor1247 2 года назад

“I win! I WIN!” 😂😂😂 Loved the tear down! Old school American Iron!

@bassmasterbill 2 года назад

I've torn down at least a dozen of these engines, but I still watched the entire video! Thanks!

@mbrewer57 2 года назад

This small block actually started as a 221 before the 260. Ford Motor Company Windsor V8 1961-2002 221 cu in (3.6 L) 255 cu in (4.2 L) 260 cu in (4.3 L) 289 cu in (4.7 L) 302 cu in (5.0 L) 351 cu in (5.8 L) Cylinder bore 4.000" (289, 302, 351W) 3.800" (260) 3.680" (255) 3.500" (221) Piston stroke 3.500" (351W) 3.000" (302 & 255) 2.870" (221, 260, 289)

@Discretesignals 2 года назад

The first thing I thought before you even started taking the engine apart was I wonder how many water pump bolts were going to break off. I'm without words and disappointed.

@eduardobaez1599 2 года назад

Same. Four of those fuckers snapped when I took mine apart.

@barryaiello3127 2 года назад

@@eduardobaez1599 Whats the workaround for that?, drill them out and use a helicoil?

@Discretesignals 2 года назад

@@barryaiello3127 they usually break off at the timing cover cause of the corrosion where the stud portion goes through the cover. Once you get the cover pried off you can usually unscrew the rest of the bolt with vise grips and a fire wrench if needed.

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

@@barryaiello3127 Having broken down about a half dozen myself, the answer is heat. Give each bolt about a minute, aiming where the threads sit in the block, and being careful to move the flame around so as not to bubble the aluminum timing cover. Give it 15 seconds to cool, then try removing. Takes a bit of patience, as if it doesn't come, you just do the same heat cycle again until she's free. For any rusty bolts I'd also recommend unthreading a few turns, then running the bolt/but back down, then reversing and unthreading again. Helps to keep the threads from galling with rust, which can snap bolts.

@colinj5291 3 месяца назад

My first car was a '94 GT. It was 10 years old when I bought it. Absolutely loved that car.

@nathanpendleton9733 2 года назад

Ya gotta love the simplicity of the good ol' 302! Upgrade to gt40 heads and B303 cam and you can put at least 300hp + to the wheels! Not bad for early 90's technology!

@HAL-dm1eh Год назад

And that was in a Fox body you could order from Ford as light as 2800-2900 lbs (as a base coupe) with a 5 speed. Mine would rev to 6K rpm's all day and sounded beautiful.

@Treonline1 Год назад

You can get GT40 heads from a ford explorer? Am I correct

@beaversareinsane726 2 года назад

My first car was a '94 Mustang GT convertible. You're right, it DOES sound great, especially out on the highway with the throttle wide open and the top down on a summer evening. 😊

@KacerRex 2 года назад

I still own a 94 GT convertible, and it's sound makes everyone want one whenever they hear it. With 240k on the odo, I'm betting my bearings are starting to look like this one's though. :(

@willybill4530 2 года назад

I'm a Chevy guy all the way but have to admit that nothing could ever compare to the ol 5.0 and a set of Flowmasters 👍

@monikhushalpuri 2 года назад

I got a few Vids on my channel with my former 1994 gt, stock headers, high flow cats, muffler delete...I miss that car looking for another sn95 now

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

I had an '82 GT - but along the way it got a pair of Headman headers, Sonic Turbo header mufflers, and 2.5" dual pipes to a couple of tips. Serious overkill, but it sounded kinda "hollow" neat 'till I hammered the throttle.

@crypticrage99 2 года назад

Ive been watching for around 6 months now and let me tell you these are my favorite videos to watch! The amount of knowledge I have gained from you is amazing. And of course theres nothing quite like seeing what is inside some of these rattle cans lol Thanks for the awesome content!

@alphasheepdog9683 2 года назад

5.0s weren’t the highest output motors ever but damn they were fun to work on

@16v15 2 года назад

Not meeting as shipped Fed emissions, but they're easy to get decent HP/TQ out of.

@rustybritches6747 2 года назад

another One bites the dust! rest in peace little 302 you were a faithful steed! edit: after watching the entire video she was a runner, just needed to get rid of those e7 heads!

@stevewesley8187 2 года назад

First in current small block Ford line was the 221 , then 260 , 289 ,302 , 351 . It started in 1962 Fairlanes and Mercury Meteors .

@Slane583 2 года назад

A mechanic friend of my bubby and I had a fox body Mustang he was going to give to his step-son a while back that had an uncommon 255 v8 in it. The car was in fairly decent shape for its' age. Sadly the kid didn't want anything to do with it. Then after that the guy himself thought it was probably for the best and sold it because the kid would end up killing himself in it.

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

351 had a different block height. 221/260/289/302 were all the same block design except for bore changes, 'til they came out with the 4-bolt version (and that was a minor change).

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

@@Slane583 255 was a VERY short lived engine. 1980 and 1981, possibly 1979, ONLY. It was intended to be a "more economical" version of the 302 - but died when horsepower started returning to engines.

@Slane583 2 года назад

@@bricefleckenstein9666 My fathers 79 Firebird had an engine in it that was also short lived. The loved by no-one 301. It was enough to make the car drivable and that was about it. He always told me how people hated them because they had thin cylinder walls and a tiny crank shaft. So you couldn't do anything to them without fear of it wanting to give out in one spot or another.

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

@@Slane583 Sounds like an early attempt to create the 305.

@michaelgrant6003 2 года назад

Great to see you closing in on 100K subscribers.

@Mittencarpentry 2 года назад

Wow! Been a while since I saw a distributor gear on a cam.

@et76039 2 года назад

The first small block Ford was the 221, offered in the newly mid-sized 1962 Fairlane.

@fitfogey 2 года назад

1:10 “I know you guys may be rooting for damage.” You know your viewers well!

@Viperman200221 2 года назад

Nothing like an Ol' School cast iron V8 teardown!

@bg3160 2 года назад

love the teardown videos. This one in particular. Always wanted a 302, but life happened and never got my project car. Great info to an old man.

@jerrydninja 2 года назад

I just knew the water pump bolt was going to break. That one is the worst. I was really surprised when you got it out in one piece.

@Siroggel 2 года назад

It’s amazing how much more complex modern day engines are when compared with this thing. I saw this thumbnail on a different video I watched and I knew what type of engine it was without reading the text. And you’re right, these are definitely one of the best sounding engines out there. Great channel!

@jonclark8155 2 года назад

The 74 F150s with the three on the tree had a 302 in them

@Meatpipeify 2 года назад

Such great little engines. Very torquey for their size and love to rev. And as you said, they sound amazing.

@rposton919 2 года назад

Had one of those engines in a 1988 Mustang. Unkillable.

@alonsomora5773 2 года назад

Not true. I’ve killed a few. But definitely rebuildable. Easy and fun

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

@@alonsomora5773 They will wear out .... eventually. Had one that reached that point in a '69 Custom once, but it was an old high-miles CHEAP car I bought when I was in the Navy just to have something to drive around in.

@09corvettezr1 2 года назад

I laughed when it started peeing coolant out of the head bolt hole. I love the variety on this channel.

@kurtb3606 2 года назад

I had this engine in my 82 mustang and 99 mountaineer..after watching thiis video i miss those vehicles all over again. Great video as always!

@loftsatsympaticodotc 2 года назад

Clear diction and organized process, well explained and visible. No wonder he has a large following. Congrats to your production values

@mrjamesbonney 2 года назад

Very nice old school motor, THANK YOU!

@thomaszdanowicz1643 2 года назад

Happy New Year Eric!!! That is a nice tear down of that 5.0 engine! You do great engine dismantling!! You have the skill to dismantle all of the unknown engines! By the way, the blowing the bolt trick was cool and safer than using a torch in your shop!

@xXxDETZxXx 2 года назад

Yes!!! I have been asking for this. Thank you so much for this. I am going to check this ranger out next.

@EricTheGreat508 2 года назад

😂 at the coolant coming out of the headbolt

@senior_ranger 2 года назад

Nostalgic for my '66 Mustang 289. I'd LOVE to rebuild this engine and do something fun with it. Hope it gets a good home!!! Let us know.

@djwhiz03 2 года назад

I was so made when I had to get rid of my explorer with the 302 in it. It was a literal f@#$$& tank. You still see alot of them on the road for a reason.

@JohnDove 2 года назад

Thanks for the tear down. It makes me want to build another Windsor. They really are a great, simple engines to work on.

@notme8121 Год назад

What a nice simple little motor. I never tore down a 302 either. Thanks

@crazieman 2 года назад

Ahh the dipstick, Eric's mortal enemy. Completely lost it when the headbolt came out and it started peeing coolant.

@randystegemann9990 2 года назад

I was reminded of the Dutch boy holding his finger in the leaking dike.

@prevost8686 2 года назад

Having been an old Ford technician from that time period I’ve seen countless SBF engines that the rod/ main bearings looked like that. It’s normal for them. Ford was still using old design tri-metal bearings in Windsor engines. They were very soft . With the advent of the modular concept they switched to high silicone aluminum bearings which were very hard and very durable. The LS design was also released with high silicone aluminum bearings in them which is why they look great even after many miles.

@c.d.7742 2 года назад

Interesting. Thanks for sharing. So you don't think this engine has been run hard without regular oil changes? I am not even close to being a mechanic of any shape or form, but I'm always interested in hearing what others with experience have to say about these teardowns.

@prevost8686 2 года назад

@@c.d.7742 Nope. The proof is in the crank journals. I bet every one of them is perfect.

@c.d.7742 2 года назад

@@prevost8686 Thanks. The reason I am curious about this is that I have a 5 L Windsor engine in a 1990 Grand Marquis that I only drive in nice weather. It has around 150,000 km on it. As those crank bearings wear through the layers like that, at what point will it damage the crank journals and will there be something to warn before damage is done to the crank?

@jimmyschmidt14 2 года назад

the rod/ main bearings looked like that. It’s normal for them.

@tylerfranx4286 Год назад

I have a 302 in my f150 and I’m starting to think my bearings might look like this… 110k miles and the oil pressures starting to be a tad on the low side… how much time do I have 🥲

@geoffreyanderson2285 2 года назад

This reminds me of when I was in high school, and we rebuilt the mid 60's vintage 283 SBC in my Nova wagon. Simple, effective, and "easy" Great vid!

@ScaldingHotCatsup 2 года назад

I have a 99 explorer and it has this engine. Main reason I keep it, still runs perfect.

@blignell 2 года назад

Next time you do a Ford you can remove the balancer bolt, remove the washer rethread the bolt to use as spacer to avoid thread damage to the end of the crank by your puller shaft

@johnscheffler1514 2 года назад

I do not understand how ford went from this to the 4.6 5 4 modular motors where you can never get an exhaust stud out of them! Lol. The modular motors are superior in many ways but...... The 302 was or is a great motor i agree probably one of the best sounding motors. Great video

@prevost8686 2 года назад

I’ve heard one past Ford employee say that they had the basic LS design before GM did but chose to pass on it for the modular design. If that’s true and who knows if it is, I’m sure Ford has privately regretted that decision more times than once.

@haroldbenton979 2 года назад

More than likely emissions control had a major impact on the change.

@HAL-dm1eh Год назад

It was for "emissions" which I don't understand seeings how Chevy kept going with big pushrod LS's in their cars. I had a 5.0L pushrod and 2 4.6s. While the 4.6s make decent power for their size and they sound beautiful, I otherwise missed my SBF dearly.

@steve390gold 2 года назад

I LOVE the "I breathed on it really well!! No open flames in here....lol"

@controlledaccess3138 2 года назад

Love the commentary, in all your videos, cracks me up

@lesross4442 2 года назад

I think that is the same engine as is in my 2000 Mountaineer. My car still runs great. I wish I needed your engine. It looks like a good, fun project that will result in a very nice engine.

@nbrowser 2 года назад

Coolant from a headbolt hole on a Ford small block is normal...the bolts pass into the water jacket as you said...you have to use thread sealant on those.

@highwayman1218 2 года назад

Thanks for showing some mid school stuff. 👍👍 Was a tech during the late 80s till early 00s. Very familiar with these and bring a smile to my face. ALOT of great motors (90s Ford and GM V8s) with ALOT of miles still left got put down during the whole "cash 4 clunkers" BS.... This was one of the lucky ones.

@troyrosenbaugh9935 11 месяцев назад

That motor has been hammered on dor quite a while. Great vid!

@tedjones450 2 года назад

It was leaking coolant from the lower head bolt because it's not a blind hole in the block, when those bolts are installed, sealant is used to seal the threads.

@CJColvin 2 года назад

Hey brother I have a 1996 Ford F150 with a 5.0L (302) Windsor V8 with 210,000 miles and still going strong 💪. The only things I replaced on my truck was the starter, the rear fuel pump, and the power steering megunisum but other than that mostly was just simple maintenance, took out the transmission fluid just to get rid of the shuttering it was making and it hasn't had a problem ever since.

@CJColvin 2 года назад

@Self Made Auto Thanks brother

@andrewpapay471 2 года назад

AWSOME CHANNEL BNROTHER!!! love all the vids. and thats rare for me.. keep it up, love the hard work.

@jkrende 2 года назад

Woooow... two bolt non-cross-bolted mains...

@tomnekuda3818 2 года назад

When I saw what shape the bores were in (very good) I would like to have known if the block was made in Mexico. The iron mines in Mexico have nickel in them which makes the blocks harder and more durable. I have one in my '86 Bronco 302 and with 65K+ and he bores look like new with clearly visible cross-hatching still there. The 302's were super little engines. I have a chip, cam, recurve distributor, headers, etc and it runs perfectly without a drop of oil consumption (and I've always leaned on this engine very hard).

@ohger1 2 года назад

The Mexico block metallurgy theory was discounted many years ago.

@tomnekuda3818 2 года назад

@@ohger1 That's interesting.....thanks for commenting. That said, what makes those blocks so hard then? Again, Thanks. Tom

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

@@tomnekuda3818 From what I recall about the debunking, it's that there is no higher nickel content/no proof of the blocks being stronger/harder in anyway. Sounds like somebody way back in the day started the rumour they were more desirable, and it's just persisted since. Wouldn't doubt somebody had a bunch of Mexico blocks that people wouldn't buy because they weren't "Made in USA", so he started talking them up for being premium and the legend was born.

@tomnekuda3818 2 года назад

@@DSHPerotecH Maybe so.

@DSHPerotecH 2 года назад

@@tomnekuda3818 Just what I heard, could still be true, but I had heard recently it wasn't. Could be a half-truth, maybe some were harder some weren't. Similar to the Shelby 289 Hipo cranks. They were standard cranks that just happened to be harder, and were tested by Shelby to prove as much.

@johnfranklin5277 2 года назад

The 289 in my 68 Mustang I bought in 1977 has never been touched except for a timing chain replacement in 1979. Car is in beautiful condition, lifelong Southern California car, and engine still runs very nice. Probably put about 500 miles a year on it. Car had just under 70.000 thousand miles on it when purchased, was my daily for 2 years. Smokes a little bit on cold startup, definitely needs valve guide seals.

@jefferykaighin7039 Год назад

Your a good honest parts seller and that's hard to come by these days. So be proud of yourself and don't change anything and you will do good. 👍

@93Cobra792 2 года назад

windsors are solid reliable designs.... they take neglect and abuse, they can even make twice the power they were designed to make and live. This one sat too long and had dry cylinders......a little oil in the spark plug holes and it would run just fine.

@VikingDudee 2 года назад

Yeah I just wonder what happened with Ford, especially in their commercial vehicles, Like the 4.6s and 5.4s suck to tear apart and rebuild, the 3v ones I hated... The v10s were alright when they ran but gas hogs and annoying to work on, especially while int he vehicle, I'd take a 302 any day of the week, even a y block lol.

@chicagomodzz 2 года назад

Malice in the palace. I get your 3 stooges reference. I wish more people did too. They're missing out.

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

Malice in the Palace is better known as a Basketball reference. I am STILL ticked at Ron Artist for starting that disaster.

@chicagomodzz 2 года назад

@@bricefleckenstein9666 What? I wish my comment dislike showed on here. What you just typed hurt my eye. Blasphemy and Moe just rolled over in his grave. Keep your monkey ball references to yourself please.

@bricefleckenstein9666 2 года назад

@@chicagomodzz Moe, Curly Joe, Shemp, and Larry can roll over all they like, I'm 60+ and *I* don't remember "Malice in the Palace" having anything with the Stooges, while the "Malice in the Palace" incident between the Pistons and the Pacers is known by almost ALL that pay any attention to Basketball (which was better known when it happened than the Stooges ever were, they can argue the point in the USA but they were never a WORLD WIDE well known act). You can take your "monkey ball" insult and return it to the defecation orifice it originated from.

@ltsgarage7780 2 года назад

I have gone through more small block 327 & 350 motors than I can count. But that was a good long time ago. Now I’ve purchased a 1973 F100 short bed. I’ve stuck all Jaguar independent front and rear suspension on it with air-ride. It goes pretty low now. But I’ve never torn down a ford motor. I have cam, lifters, new heads, intake and a new carburetor with a single wire distributor. But I’ve been kind of nervous about tearing into it. So I guess this is where I say thank you for taring this one down. It looks really easy. I’m not going into the lower end. I’ve pulled a couple of rod caps off and they look brand new. I purchased it from a customer. He had said the motor died with 98K on it so he went out a bought anew motor for it. He says it only had just over 20K on the motor and all of that lines up with the odometer. Now I’m pretty comfortable in taring it down and sticking all the parts I have sitting on my shelves in my shop. Thanks again