The Latest Scientific Evidence of God - Fr Robert Spitzer at the Napa Institute Summer Conference 

Christians boast their lack of quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord, when voting is a quality-control? Republicans rig the voting districts. The SCOTUS writes of its own stench. Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats, suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland, based on butchered context in Roman propaganda. Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication, crucified when imperial Rome created Christians? Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country, uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch? The problem is; We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control. Christians boast having no quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. The only difference between a Republican & Democrat is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room. There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road. Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god. The ultimate vanity is declared, as they make a scene in the temple. Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing, weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones, would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together, as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland. We know a tree by the fruit. We know a man by his works. We thank God secular law & order finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.

"If you are here. You are here for a reason! " The reason I am here is because the video is titled "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God". Ignoring the fact that "The Latest Scientific Evidence of God" makes no sense because so far no scientific evidence for god has been shown, I watched to see if ANY scientific evidence for god is presented here. None is.

@@TdBone They think this improves God sales, having scientific evidence for characters only known from fiction, as if a deity who can't get everyone's attention, is worthy of the Divine title.

​@@cnault3244 Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of God's existence. What do you want, for God to pop down and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your godless pals before heading back up to heaven?

@@dannyneville1310 Why not? According to the Bible, god talks to numerous people, or pops down to see them, or wrestles with them ( god lost btw), or has them over for dinner. Let's assume the discussion was about the existence of leprechauns and rephrase your question so you can see how stupid your post was: Scientism is such a drag, and completely devoid of the more appropriate philosophical treatment of leprechauns' existence. What do you want, for a leprechaun to pop over and pose for a photograph? To say 'cheese' for you and your pals before heading back to their pot of gold? The fact is I said NOTHING about scientific evidence for god. Evidence for something does not have to be scientific. Now, what is your BEST evidence for god?

Thank you for enduring the Shame you felt ....trust me you have no reason to be shameful ....the people who laughed at you are very similar to those who laughed at Noah

Consider yourself in good company. All the visionaries have been mocked and cajoled. It's part of being a Christian.

@@Catquick1957 Ah, here we go; the old Christian persecution complex.

@@nonprogrediestregredi1711 Since when did facts become a complex? :)

@@timmoore9736 And what facts would those be?

The so-called "evidence" for the Turin shroud is only convincing for people who already believe the shroud was the burial cloth of Jesus.

@Tbone pretty lonely soul...huh? Stay healthy for the rest of your life. Denying God is eternity in hell, that's a long long time. Now be a good boy and take the garbage out like your mommy asked and do something constructive with yourself like, get a job.

The magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization. Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.

@Caleb OKAY What's a scientific ideal?

Sorry, but science has nothing to do with God. Science has nothing to do with miracles or the supernatural. It only deals with information data.

@@kalords5967 “There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.” - Albert Einstein

@@sxt4447 Albert Einstein did not believe in the personal God who rewards and punishes people based on their actions.

Yes. Thank you god for making us weak and fallible. On purpose. By your design. Making us get sick and hurt both mentally and physically by your design. Thank you for parasites that eat our eyes and all that nice stuff. Thank you for creating - by your design - a nature which is based on living things killing other living things from plants to animals just to survive in the world of your design. Thank you for creating us sick by your design and demanding us to heal ourselves while - by your design - we lack the ability to do so. Thank you for the Hell you created to punish us for being exactly like you designed us to be. Thank you.

We suck but we’re the best gods lame

"The truth is we have all we can do to get up in the morning and tie our shoes." Speak for yourself. "We are weak and fallible. Thank you God for all you have ever done. " All god has done? According to you he made weak and fallible humans.

trouble is they'll be mostly Hindu.... you're cool with that. or do you assume they'll become Christian .... for some reason...

@irishmclass2042, Unfortunately, the world media is totally against God. They withhold gems of information of discoveries about the most astonishing facts already in the Bible. We can only rely on experts like Fr. Spitzer to spread the newfound realities of the Holy Book in Archeology , Science, and with the help of technology. As you say, our hope for the future lies in young scientists-to-be and a revival.

@@ecysmith6652 If only there were organizations with billions of dollars in assets that would stand up for the bible....

Me too

Haha amen

I've just listened to part of his talk and I am actually a scientist. He has the complete opposite effect on me, because I can easily identify bad logic and misunderstood science in his talk. My other comments here explain what I mean with examples in the talk.

You're not dumber than rocks,. I th8nk I know less now as a percentage than when I was young and only one year younger than Fr Spitzer. You ask 9ne question, then you find an answer, that leads to two more questions, then those answers lead to four ans so it goes on.

Amazing how smart you seem to a room full of people that know less than you. Now, try that in a room full of people that are more educated than you.

He wasn't ever a scientist.

Myself as well.

Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.

He seen that it was the only choice to explain the miraculous universe.

Unfortunately that's not true...I'll I say is that the truth regarding that is easily obtainable out there.

@@espojespo5 I am not going to argue with you. Your religion is atheism, mine is Christianity. Think how you like but allow me to think like great minds such as Isaac Newton, Hobble, Boyle, Lavoisier, to cite just a few. So, I am in good company.

@@TdBone That’s your opinion and I am not going to argue with you. I just feel sad that you think this way.

Did you mean Fr. Stephen Hawking ( not Hawkins)? Why are you bearing false witness against Stephen Hawking?

All priests are exorcists, technically speaking. But I've never heard that Fr. Spitzer ever delved into that. I'll have to ask some search algorithms now.

Fairytales can be comforting.

@@downenout8705 Okay Thomas

@@hoponpop3330 "One of" as if the existence of your mythagog did anything done make another evidential excuses for your tyrannical deity, mythelot. Watch it again on a lense of a outsider of such faith and you'll see how deceptive it is...

@@hoponpop3330 Yep, but the problem with that story is that when Thomas asked for empirical evidence he was provided it. Today however when an atheist asks for empirical evidence of the truth of 1 Corinthians 15: 14 all you get is apologetic excuses.

@@hoponpop3330 Should we start a Church of Later Day Thomas's

Christians have no quality-control. Christians boast their lack of quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. Why would anyone confess Jesus Christ as Lord, when voting is a quality-control? Republicans rig the voting districts. The SCOTUS writes of its own stench. Christians are avoided like the old woman with too many cats, suggesting we travel best with one foot in fantasyland, based on butchered context in Roman propaganda. Who do you think licensed temples, controlled publication, crucified when imperial Rome created Christians? Why do you think every Alex Jones in the country, uses Jesus-lingo in the sales-pitch? The problem is; We depend on the fiction of government being better than no government, actually working, with voting as a quality-control. Christians boast having no quality-control. The same god we know for a perfect record of doing nothing, is their servant for an unmeasurable number of prayers. The only difference between a Republican & Democrat is how fast the knee hits the floor when a donor walks in the room. There is no plan, not for greenhouse gases, as long as energy is needed to keep the show on the road. Christians demand ownership of the narrative: We are all gods, children of the highest god. The ultimate vanity is declared, as they make a scene in the temple. Christians are the wolves in sheep's clothing, weighing in on whatnot as if Earth had gravity-free zones, would-be dictators suggesting we must all travel together, as if we all prefer leadership with one foot in fantasyland. We know a tree by the fruit. We know a man by his works. We thank God secular law & order finally ended the witch-killings & inquisitions.

One should note that the magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization. Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.

yet he's following and promoting sin - since he's catholic. Bible is clear on this, Tom.

@@johnhammond6423 Science of course points to God. What part of 10^10 ^123 : 1 are you missing. Scientism is naive and unscientific. Look up final causality. Most scientists don't study philosophy of science and say really dumb things.

@@tommore3263 _'Most scientists don't study philosophy of science'_ That's right, most scientists do 'science'

He is lying while wearing a collar. He knows this is not real evidence, yet he is willing to make that claim anyway.

A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD. Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply. Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.

@@bitmasricco5699 Jesus answers this very question in the gospels when it is given to him by the Sadducees.

@@bitmasricco5699 I think a much bigger question is this: according to God's supposedly perfect law, David was guilty of two capital crimes. Bathsheba is either rape victim or guilty of one capital crime (adultery) - we don't know since, like most women in the bible, her views don't matter. The only certainly innocent party is the baby she gives birth to. The outcome? David goes on to be Israel's great king and the model for the coming messiah. Bathsheba goes on to be queen mother. The baby gets executed by slow torture. The question is: what does this say about the justice of God?

@@njhoepner well said, Ok! come to the question is: if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? Note : Every reference to angels in Scripture is in the masculine gender. Angels are never referred to in any gender other than masculine. • In Matthew 22:30 Jesus says that there will be no marriage in heaven because we “will be like the angels in heaven.” This verse states that angels do not marry, but it stops short of commenting on their “gender.” Nothing in Jesus’ statement can be taken to imply that angels are masculine, feminine, or neuter.

@@bitmasricco5699 Well, if one presumes such things as the existence of heaven, and presumes as well that Jesus is in fact god, then one has to go with what he says as ultimate authority, since nothing in the Hebrew bible answers the question. The Hebrew Bible and its marriage laws were written without belief in resurrection and afterlife, so the premise of laws is purely about family continuity and procreation in this world, for the purpose of maintaining family lines and therefore property claims. The ONLY pronouncement in scripture on the subject of marriage laws and resurrection, therefore, is that of Jesus. Under the above premises, that means in heaven marriage is irrelevant. Going further would be speculation, but my speculation would be that even those married for a lifetime on earth are not married in heaven, because it is pointless.

THIS HAS STRENGTGEN MY FAITH

apart from those times when he killed everyone.....

Yes mythelot keep praising the fraudeist...

Hmm...volcanos....hurricanes...asteroids...tornadoes... earthquakes...plagues...I don't know about all that gentle stuff

@@richardlawson6787 Or more specifically - declaring descendants guilty because of the "sin" of an ancestor and therefore shoveling them into "hell"; ordering the killing of anyone who doesn't follow exactly the right religion with exactly the right rituals; insisting that murder is wrong and then ordering genocide; destroying a person's entire life just to make points in a game (story of Job); we don't even need to get to natural disasters before the whole "gentle" thing flies out the window.

I'd like to know: Who am I? Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.

We have mathematical constructs that explain a universes creation. Of course hard to run an experiment. But we don't have to retort to miracles.

@@russellmiles2861 So what created the laws of physics?

@@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone that is a fascinating question. I guess wed have to start we the use of the term laws regarding natural philosophy is not the same as the term when referring to, say road traffic management. You assuming agency in something you observe. This would be like wondering why a golf ball landed on a particular turf of grass. We don't assume the golf ball was guided. And we don't assume mathematics is more than some phenomenon we observe. I would stress: as I said: we can't conduct an experiment. So who knows the Universe may have been created by a God. That presents a more interesting question as why would a God bother?

​@@russellmiles2861 From Wikipedia: "Scientific laws are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.". I'm sure you're familiar with the laws of physics - gravity for example. They are "constants" in nature and they describe certain limits of physical reality. I didn't assume agency, I simply asked if you had a better explanation for what created these laws? You said "We have mathematical constructs that explain a universes creation." and I'm arguing that you don't have a mathematical construct for the *first cause* We know that golf balls are guided by golf players and both road traffic management and golf ball striking are conscious, deliberate actions of human beings. Why do you think the laws of physics are perfectly expressed through the language of mathematics? Eugene Paul Wigner once said "The unreasonable efficiency of mathematics in science is a gift we neither understand nor deserve." This is a scientist making a mystical statement about how we are able to understand creation through rational thought. You can't conduct a physical experiment on the creation of the universe but you can conduct thought experiments and there are many hypotheses such as M-theory. When you find a plausible explanation, you can either take a leap of faith that there is some high power/intelligence behind everything (theist), suspend judgement, remain skeptical and live in ignorance (agnostic) or deny any/all supernatural intervention and rely on a materialist, anthropocentric explanation (atheist). As to why God would bother - are you aware that in the Bible it states that "man is created in the likeness and image of God"? I would argue that God bothered so that you and I could experience the gift of life.

@@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone thank you for your considered reply. Although I couldn't help feel we are in agreement; ie, laws of physics are observations and as you state repeatable and verifiable. We don't set them. They even change or can be fluid. Eg, you mention Gravity. This is a most useful law for predicting movement of planets, space craft, footballs, etc. It doesn't matter that a subatomic level it doesn't work. We also don't really know what Gravity is: a strange weak force that is intentions across the universe. Much more work to be done there Re: first cause latter

Good one, and he didn't even mention all the sites and evidence from Arabia around Mt Sinai. From ancient Hebrew inscriptions saying, "died Amelekite" to the Golden Calf Altar, it matches the Biblical story over and over. Too much correlating evidence.

Yeah I saw one person's estimate of the Earth's volume being 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003% of the universe. Well that's the _entire_ Earth, but only 1% is crust, and only 29% of _that_ is land, and only a portion of the land is suitable to human life. So the idea of "fine tuning" with respect to humans is ridiculous.

Our universe has a unique way of thinning the inhabitants off the map. Simply defined

😂😂

That he is

contradiction in terms - like 'military intelligence' - both catholicism/jesuitism and military are based on control and evil.

There are no good jesuites!

The bad ones are those Jesuits who are funding the invasion at our Southern border.

We like the numbers.

@@marcosgonzalez4525 What do you like about them?

It could also be that the current and/or newly considered evidence - as Father Spitzer laid out - when considered makes it more difficult to not believe in God for individuals open to considering evidence. In the past there were potential explanations other than God for the existence of the Universe, but these potential explanations are falling by the wayside. I would be curious to see what is considered a “scientist” in the polling. In past studies individuals in the hard sciences (chemistry, physics and medicine) had a higher level of believers than those in the soft sciences (psychology, sociology, etc.). One study I read found that 3% of psychologists believed in God, whereas more than 50% of physicians believed. I say all this because the percentage of people in the hard sciences may actually believe at a higher level.

I like your third explanation. Because he doesn't say they are dominantly Christian at all. More and more scientists are coming out of strongly religious societies like India, which would explain why more scientists are religious. Ofc, what scientists think doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the evidence and logical arguments that scientists create.

They r attempting to claim a statistic (that we cannot verify) as evidence, but its barely anecdotal. This man provides no real evidence. That should tell u something. If there was evidence of God, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from every available platform.

This is flawed logic being dished out in this video. You are getting your science from the wrong person. Expand your knowledge and think for yourself more.

Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.

Jesus the Died God according Christians teachings and a God who become human being

The essence of religious dogma

The statistics and probabilities don’t matter to you?

Unfortunately it always is. Theists wonder why we find it so frustrating that their proof is always simply an assertion.

100% probably as God is the creator of mathematics and logic. Thinking about an infinite God that never didn't exist does get your brain twisted in a knot. If you added a zero for every atom in the universe to the number of years God existed before today, you wouldn't even come close. Mind boggling.

Not all humanity. I firmly believe we live among people from OTHER gods who are evil at heart.

@@mommaknos1136 The Bible says just as all died in Adam, all shall be made alive in Christ. So all are saved. Some immediately, others after being purged of their sins and evil in hell.

each cell in the human body is capable of generation 1.4 volts but at a very low amperage. a person about 200 pounds in weight will look like a 100 watt firefly.

@@gfujigo Hi Doctor, I hope and pray that hell is not eternal, but everyone I know, in my church, believes that it is. Can you give me some information of why you think that some people, who end up in hell, are there till their sins are purged? I struggle with doubts about God and how weak my faith is I think. I keep repeating the same cycle of sinning and repenting and I can't help feeling because of that I will end up in hell for all eternity. Thank you.

@@bmm9095 Check out the RU-vid channel “The Total Victory of Christ”. Check out David Bentley Hart’s book “That All Shall Be Saved”. Also check out father Aiden Kimmel, David Bentley Hart, Ilaria Ramelli and Robin Parry on the topic of the salvation of all beings through Jesus Christ. Edit: The correct name is Aiden Kimmel not Alfred Kimmel. My apologies.

You won't find anything, because "father" is lying.

Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.

A question to all?? I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply.?? Moved by lust at the sight of her, King David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her. David committed adultery with a married woman called Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. what's more, David murdered Uriah by proxy by ordering all of Uriah's comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. The Prophet Nathan was sent by God and warned King David. well, Torah verses clearly say that both URIAH and DAVID Blessed by GOD. Well, the question is, if Uriah, David and Bathsheba go to heaven. To whom will Bathsheba be given? This question is ready to test the wisdom of all of you: The Bible [ Torah]: God promised that God had already chosen all three humans for heaven: David, Uriah and Bathsheba. I’m Looking forward to an intelligent reply. Note: God said through Nathan the prophet that King David was rich. Uriah was poor and had nothing but Bathsheba, a little lamb. Therefore, God here assured that the couple was chosen through the parable. David's prayer sought forgiveness and Later King David has been forgiven too. no doubt all three will go to heaven. If So, to whom will Bathsheba be given? Note: Matthew 22/23-30: There will be no right answer. The question raised by the Sadducees was about the impossible situation of a widow having seven husbands, all brothers. If Abraham goes to heaven, Sarah will be his wife in heaven. just as Mary will be Joseph's wife. Matthew 22:23-33/ It has a different meaning. You and your spouse love each other, live together on earth, and are true believers in Christ. If they go to heaven, they don't need to remarry. They don't need to create new babies.

Thank you Fr Spitzer for a very interesting presentation. We now know that atheism is based purely on faith. A blind belief that God does not exist, for which there is absolutely no evidence. We can safely deduct that if there was any proof that God does not exist it would have been shoved up our throats in every school for decades! Around 16min 50sec you showed us a slide ''Peer-reviewed medical studies of a transcendent soul'' stating, ''that peer-reviewed studies show the high likelihood that we have a transcendent soul capable of surviving bodily death.'' A question: Who is the ''we'' (that has/possesses the soul) that the slide/research refers to? Am I the body that has a transcendent soul? Or, maybe, I am the eternal, transcendent soul? A particle of undying spirit in a temporary body? My material body is subject to death, that's obvious, but once the body is gone (buried, eaten by worms, cremated etc) who owns the soul? Maybe a different question: Who am I? Am I the body or am I the soul? Logic points to the latter, I think. We commonly say: my legs, my hands & my body. I cannot be my body having an eternal soul inside because during an NDE, when my soul gets out of my body and then I look at my body.... Who is doing the looking? My soul, my body... but who owns my soul and my body? Using logic I conclude that I AM the soul and I have a body. I, the soul, am looking at my body during an NDE, I think. But please feel free to accept the version that fits you. Thank you for your attention. God bless you. Salaam Aleikum. Sat Sri Akaal. Hare Krishna. Namaskar.

I think dark energy could account for that without the laws of physics needing to change.

I'm not so sure. "Fractal multiverse" and "God" are hardly the only alternatives. Multiple universes independent of each other is another. A single universe with an inanimate origin/source is yet another. Successive universes is yet another. Universes generated from quantum space is yet another. And of course, the possibility of this being the only universe and the laws of physics (and thus "fine tuning") being a happy accident - if only because "improbable" (assuming he has a valid calculation behind the number he posted) is not the same as "impossible."

Book of Genesis is FACT. Please find below scientific/cosmological/archaeological/historical proof & explanation behind the Book of Genesis. The actual scientific explanation for the 7 days of creation is something like this; The universe is 7 days old at the point of creation( looking forward) and 13.8 billion years old (looking backwards at the point of creation). This is called space time dilation - the further you get from the point of creation - the older the age of the universe. Cross section of the universe is as per NASA WMAP diagram. map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/060915/060915_CMB_Timeline600.jpg Gerald Schroeder PhD and Hugh Ross - Phd Astrophysicists have explained this further. a)Gerald Schroeder has even given the rough mathematical formula for the age of the universe. (and also the each day = x billion years long) (+/- factor of 10 error) geraldschroeder.com/wordpress/?page_id=53 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GjtHqxhwNgk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_RuIVCm7pNc.html (diff between HughRoss & GeraldS is minimal. The differences - GS used Olam(modern Hebrew) vs yom ) b) Hugh Ross gives very detailed explanations on the frames of reference God is talking from in i) Gen 1.1 - at the point of creation(1st day/2nd day/3rd day), ii) Gen 1.2 from the surface of the earth iii) Gen 1.3 - Let there be light - the atmosphere become transparent iv) Age of man decreased from 1000 years to 120 years - Hugh Ross explains in his video how the explosion of the supernova about 100k years ago ( monoserotis ??) and that the cosmic radiation from this caused genetic degradation. this is why the age of the patriarchs decreased from 1000 years (adam to noah/shem) to 120ish around abraham. This radiation was x light years away and would have hit earth around the time of noah. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JlGVqUZo83s.html - Did God create earth before the sun and moon ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SwNypNs0lW4.html - testing genesis with science Jeremiah 33 - Gods laws of physics do not change God created the universe in the divine Hebrew language. When all the numerical values of Hebrew names of the elements/planets/etc are graphed against their properties - it consistently produces a straight line. By Prof Haim Shore. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-noW-yHjaMVY.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QvKlP7hEo-Q.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VYlKkIoavnA.html (hidden codes in the books of moses) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AB1_dJpN-9s.html (hidden codes in the books of moses) The creation of Adam & Eve After creation of Adam & eve, God entered the Sabbath/7th day ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UfAyRixVfmE.html Garden of Eden located at the head of the Persian gulf. Now fully submerged. Prof Juris Zarins work as per History channel ( see online) www.ldolphin.org/eden/ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-av7xVGrz3D4.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-76PWWNDaMb4.html Noahs Flood proof Heres the physical proof of Noahs flood : 12k years ago a meteorite hit the Greenland Hiawatha Glacier and created a crater 30km in diameter. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zfapz2F8Vz0.html It flooded the Americas to Middle east. It was regional flood & not global flood. The sea level rose about 150m feet and low lying places settlements like sundaland(asia), black sea, Mediterranean basin were swallowed up by the sea. Africa was minimally affected. Thats why you find wooly mammoths remains from Americas to Siberia frozen in ice and mud with partially digested food in its stomach. American megafauna was wiped out (camelops, lions, cheetahs) Mammoth bones in Mexico - buried under 30feet of mud www.geologyin.com/2019/12/over-800-mammoth-bones-discovered-in.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qMVhR26NRsk.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YWZgfPGtQEs.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-A2PzfWur6pY.html ( US landscape carved out by noahs flood) Thats why Africa has wider genetic diversity than rest of the world. African genes stretch from Africa to India to Sentinelese ( andaman islands) to Papua new guinea + Australia & Japan(ainu). But you dont find indigenous black population in Americas or Europe. The Clovis people of the Americas suddenly went extinct. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vTr3VdGlFr8.html ( crater for impact site at greenland ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hMTTFLiOwX0.html www.sciencealert.com/ancient-carvings-in-turkey-show-a-comet-hitting-earth-changing-civilisation-forever?fbclid=IwAR31PrxiKk1I3tl_ZPZ06sued-ApIEnaXPW--AyGvc-ptSiyWo8vG9XWlAw Triggers for Noahs flood & 13k years of climate stability The detailed science/data that documents the climate change over the last few million years. God truly tweaked the planet to enable us to live here. Tectonics, asteriod impacts etc that made the climate stable for the last 13k years for us to live in. The world we currently live in is a drop of stability in an otherwise highly unstable planet. Also, 13k years ago...an asteroid impact at Greenland ( Hiawatha glacier) triggered noahs flood. Noah got advance warning ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-siKSz1GRUUU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xOMKINuzbdE.html Noahs Ark by ron wyatt ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TXGqIP0716Q.html (1985 news report) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_XZBZTgmIS0.html Ron Wyatt on CNN ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oQwfU7DvUyE.html (ark location ) documents.theblackvault.com/documents/cia/noahsark-CIA.pdf ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1O8wGjwyS7o.html ( anchor stones found ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_zsqxjqS8hg.html ( aerial overview) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vfBfCkH49D8.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Sodom and Gomorrah. ( see Ron wyatts videos) The chemical analysis of the brimstone ( sulphur balls) @ near 98% purity ( white) vs volcanic sulphur which is only 45% purity (yellow) A meteorite with high purity sulpur content vapourised/ionised the structures here. Theres melted sand, bone fragments and other proof ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tZKBHyIBrHA.html www.lifesitenews.com/news/archeologists-sodom-and-gomorrah-literally-destroyed-by-fire-and-brimstone? www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3? Joseph, Moses and red sea crossing ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n_VQ7rG638w.html (all points summary) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aBDbDeepyS4.html (Josephs granary) The santorini volcano was the trigger for the 10 biblical plagues. (explained in the movie Exodus Decoded by James Cameron. Disregard the crossing site/mountain) Theres archaeological &video proof of coral encrusted chariot wheels & bone in the Red Sea @ Nurweiba crossing between Egypt and Saudi Arabia. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lSf0rOqJaSU.html (Red sea crossing overview & land bridge topography) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QeX966OVxwU.html (red sea crossing site) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Lzb4ekyX1kc.html (Coral encrusted chariots wheel) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-d90NM9tgDQE.html Coral encrusted chariots wheel) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vaN2acVMGC8.html (Solomons pillar marking crossing sites 3k yrs old) The parting of the red sea happened due to a strong easterly wind blowing @40mph + low tidal effect possibly due to tsunami & lunar position. Dr Gerald Schroeder quotes some studies done. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8y-uiccIiSY.html (Forbidden footage of actual location of Red Sea Crossing & Mt. Sinai - (melted sand at nurweiba beach 21:45) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vfBfCkH49D8.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Footage of Mount Sinai The top of Mount Sinai/Mount Horeb ( Jebel al Lawz) in saudi arabia has melted & blackened rock. when you break it...the inside is red. Its the only mountain in the area to be black...rest are reddish. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n_VQ7rG638w.html (all points summary ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PE1W6sz24Dw.html (Top of Sinai, altars,12 pillars, Elijahs cave) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VgdUoNrwkxk.html (overview ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-A2widAV9wiE.html ( drone footage @ Sinai - split rock) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TwCd4WQbSXM.html&pbjreload=10 aerial view ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K-eSRcr9CWw.html (Ron Wyatt) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9ubKUip6pz0.html Dr Kim pt 1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-52DKSvcZMPw.html Dr Kim pt2 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vfBfCkH49D8.html ( artifacts from Noahs ark/Sinai/Sodom) Eucharistic miracle.. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-soCkftBBsBo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oogJ-cdi7yI.html (Rome Reports) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-whbzLYi7cyc.html (Lanciano) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6PJ8BORx1p8.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bd16tBRbLXw.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PvxTDAVypxs.html (levitating eucharist) Incorruptible bodies of saints due to the Eucharist - only happens in the Catholic church. No other religion has this miracle ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GSCk0qs-2-M.html (Padre Pio) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9ZEa5bjBB78.html (catholic incorrupt Bodies pics/videos ) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jN4SvtRje2I.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--TrR1CEWdbc.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XCDBekAQ-FI.html (Carlo Acutis) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-33vlkJh2iJc.html Apparition of Virgin Mary ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GQnKS7YUE7Q.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Ivory Coast) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0PPGuMmn6TQ.html (Virgin Mary statue moving) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tVU8bhbQInw.html (Virgin Mary apparition in Egypt) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nMEWxRB-1dc.html 1968 Egypt ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8YR6INkTK7Q.html (Miracle of the sun) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yF0_ysUivxE.html (Miracle of the sun) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-76qAMB3qUpA.html Sun miracle in Medjugorje in Easter Sunday

@Raverraver9999 That's some list you have there. Put all that aside... the point is - the bible isn't a science book. If anyone reads it like that, they're being distracted from the intention behind it. Wouldn't you agree?

@@pdworld3421 the point is that it isnt a fairy tale

@Raverraver9999 Agreed but Fairy Tales have gotten a bad rap

One should note that the magis center where this man is getting his statistics from is a highly biased Christion organization. Science does not point to God. Don't believe me? Go ask any real scientist.

@@johnhammond6423 Science points to what then?

@@loganblackwood2922 To reality.

There is no evidence of God. If there was, there would b no shortage of churches blasting it from their platforms. This fella wouldnt talk for 5+ minutes saying nothing if he had any evidence at all.

@@friedricengravy6646 there's a ton of evidence. Everything is evidence fir God. And most of the world sees it. There's onky a small, tiny, insignificant number of people who think they know better.

@@pdworld3421 So u think that how many people believe something is an indication of truth?? That is completely unsound. Second, u r implying that its arrogant to think we ‘know better’. When a person or institution makes a supernatural claim, its they who claim to know better. As well, the burden of proof falls on their shoulders. Lets look at the question ‘What comes before the Big Bang?’. Science is ok with saying ‘We dont know.’ They only speak on what we know based on what the evidence presents, nothing more….nothing less. Yet, its u & other followers of, lets say in this case, the Christian Bible who say that u know better than science. U know what ever came before was brought by a God of ur description. Science is humbled by nature. U have it all backwards. Ur Bible & ur holy men claim to know more & they demand that u believe this as fact without any evidence.

@@pdworld3421 Awesome answer.... just awesome.

@friedricengravy I think that when there is a vast majority of people that believe something is true, that one should consider that they could be correct. Why do you think a tiny minority, and I mean tiny, are correct and everyone else is wrong?

Yep Magic.....

"In "the beginning" God created the heavens and the earth". Yes the universe had a beginning.

@@maxamahnken7325 In the beginning of what though? Rather ambiguous isn't it. Could be the beginning of a chapter. a story, a world, a universe..... What it can't be though on face value is the beginning of everything because before the 'beginning' there was apparently something. So your conundrum is to explain what that something was/is. Call it god if that suits you but a name for an unknown is nothing but a name.

@@roscius6204 There was nothing before the beginning. Other ---- than ---- God Himself. God as the Creator bringing ---- all things into existence.

@@roscius6204 Before the beginning there was nothing. Other than God.

you seem a little ......Spaced Out

No it isn't.

@@SMacCuUladh ! Which is a problem!

@@j.whisper2379 It's a little more complex than that but I think I know what you're getting at.

Humans a prone to fantasy. There will always be an audience for this rubbish...

@@roscius6204 ! Noproblem, as long as they keep their rubbish in their own yard~