*WRONG* Right at the beginning this guy says, when looking at Freesync "48 to 120Hz" (and 48 to 144Hz etc) monitors that "if you go down to 30FPS you won't get the benefit of GSYNC." That's 100% false. To oversimplify, what happens is if you are BELOW the VRR range such as "30FPS" then the computer sends the same frame TWICE so the monitor changes to 60Hz and you still get the tear-free, no VSYNC experience you are looking for. If you're at 20FPS then each frame is sent 3x instead so the monitor changes to 60Hz again. This is only really an issue if the monitor range has a max/min ratio less than roughly 2.5x (i.e. 120/48 = 2.5 is good) . So, for example if there was a 48 to 90Hz range then 47FPS can't be sent twice as "94FPS" and stay in the VRR range. This ability is called "LFC" aka "Low Framerate Compensation." (2.5x not 2x I guess because there's some small DELAY to sort this out in software). With "GSync Ultimate" having a GSync module there are some theoretical advantages (i.e. overdrive can likely be less of an issue as the module would contain the latency lookup for every refresh rate, though some Freesync monitors do a great job now of this) but LFC isn't much of an issue anymore provided the monitor, again, has a 2.5x+ ratio.
Dude you are a god send, I just started modding skyrim again and I was having a ton of micro tears when I was walking around and this fixed it right away
i can't even start a new save: i got mods with vortex for example.. it always worked.. and now i just start fallout 4 with vortex and i get infinite loading on the main menu lol
I think dynamic foveated rendering requires a fair to be implemented as well as titles like NMS. Can't remember which developer interview I read where they were discussing how PSVR2's use of atypical features, combined with it's relatively small market, made it simply not commercially viable to do anything more than quick and dirty Quest/PCVR ports. I know the Rec Room developers made similar comments about why they weren't doing a PSVR2 version.
bigscreen beyond at 90hz is 1920x1920 and psvr2 2000x 2042 at 120hz. supersampling psvr 2 should look good. pimax makes a comparison with psvr 2 because it will be. when bigscreen beyond looked better than the pimax crytal light but the fov was small
@@martinlazonieto Even using a Quest 3 on PC at native resolution looks blurry. I have to supersample for it to start looking properly sharp. I feel like the PS5 is what is holding back the PSVR2 the most. Once we get a smooth native 120hz supersampled image on the PSVR2 it will look amazing even with its mura.
The USB C cable included in the package was shorter and looked better, it's designed to be connected on the left side of the Anker battery, not on the top as in the video. Users are suggested to charge the headset and the battery separately, it's indeed not as convenient but better for the protection of the battery. The mind behind of product is comfort, safety, and rest of mind first, not convenience first. That's also the reason we did not provide a magnetic battery as the Bobo because the Anker battery is simply better quality and more rest of mind for something put on the head.
Cool gameplay but games with realistic damage and movement cannot be compared to COD. They are mechanically entirely different. Even the way matches flow aren't similar at all. I would sooner call it a Battlefield alternative than a COD alternative but even then it would need some massive functional changes
@@Peluceus Understood but I don’t think I ever called this a call of duty alternative. I’m just trying to open some minds to some new experiences because I know a lot of people are burned out with call of duty and it’s gameplay loop.
Good Video, I shared my opinion on the Adapter and i'm more positive like yourself which is refreshing. I think a lot of people are missing the point as this will give PSVR2 owners access to a larger library along with getting SOny to sell more headsets overall. The world is so quick to point out the negatives in this word, but im like yourself, if anything, features such as my head virbrating or HDR are redundant as only a handful of developers use these features. When the adapter releases, its will have teething issues for sure, updated software, firmware updates, its a progressive thing. 12-24 month in the future, we will be applauding Sony and Steam, ATM and nVidia for opening the doors to VR even more.
Hey, cheers for the great and concise info ^^ Do I double stack these with the new 'App' in the graphics/global settings? I have the same settings in both atm just in case. I have no clue about these things lmao.
You should bring this to Zulubo Productions’ attention. @ZuluboProductions, or Zach, is the main indie dev behind Vertigo 2. I know bug fixing is pain, but perhaps he might do something about it.
While I used 1070ti, all the games worked perfectly. 4090? Nope. Games are crashing. The PC is heating up when I put it on the Maximum performance. How do you plug a graphic card directly into a wall? We don't have that option in Europe.
HDR would be nice, and regardless if there isnt a headset that supports this stuff, nobody is gonna implement it. Self fulfilling prophecy, that would have at least a small push to change if Sony could be bothered to allow access to those features.
@@alfiegordon9013 I really dont think sony is going to lock down any feature now they have made the PCVR adaptor. I think they will leave it open for modders to do the job for them.
@@linzkirk yeah I phrased that badly, I meant more just giving some kind of explicit way to use the features. Hopefully modders will, if there's one thing about the vr community it's that they don't give up lol
Been trucking through the game past few weeks after sitting on it for a while. It really is super disappointing all the issues with the game still and seems that nothing is gonna get updated.
Yeah.... you are spot on. I'm glad you found those excellent Reddit comments, a fantastic source to quote. Great place to go for authoritative information. Eye tracking and dynamic foveated rendering definitely isn't used in major titles besides just VRSS either. Noone that enjoys PCVR uses VRchat or MS Flight Simulator, DCS or Asetto Corsa Competizione anyway. Also absolutely correct that haptic feedback and controllers need to be supported from the outset. That's why all the haptic accessories like the Bhaptic suits didn't work at all when they were released, they definitely didn't incorporate user defined feedback, nor did support get added later for any games as the creators promoted it. Nor does anyone care about HDR. It's not as if high contrast is a primary feature of OLED displays, or having OLED screens was an important feature of PSVR2. Thankfully the PSVR2 has fantastic fresnel lenses, and not pancake lenses or aspherical lenses, uses cables and not wifi and doesn't feature any sort of passthrough, so it definitely doesn't need any of those included PSVR2 features to provide a competitive option in the current market and to expand the VR user base.
It's not just the issues you mention in your video.. There are still game breaking bugs like falling through the scenery.. When these happen I find it not even possible to load the previous save without the bug still being present and the only solution is to start the game from scratch again.. Sadly at this point it seems Perp Games don't care about PSVR2 Vertigo 2 anymore and have abandoned it
Luckily I was able to return the game to Best Buy before encountering any such issues. Sucks that the dev don’t care to optimize it correctly. Either way looks like I’ll be buying on steam.
@@FilledWithChi11 Exactly, I'm not too worried about it. Just look at the Quest 3, this last update made things a lot better, especially in the pass through. Give it time I'm sure someone will make it work.
No eye tracking is a deal breaker for me. Was hoping to 3d print a mount for an htc face tracker and pop it on there for full face tracking in VR as soon as a furry makes the software for it.
