Heidi is bringing Paul back to court for an increase in child support. She says he is making a lot more money doing porn videos. Will his child support increase based on his porn earnings?
I think you misspelled "reversed". He should be given sole custody for a change, and she should get to enjoy paying child support... under penalty of incarceration, just like he was. Granted he'd need to dial back on his "hustle job", but it sure would be fun to watch her get hauled off. Also, whatever happened to imputation of income? She gets free rent, free utilities, and *can* work. Depending on the nature of their housing, that could easily be worth $50k a year all-in.
It happens alot more than youd think in fact im in the middle of it now where my ex filed for child support, the kicker i have him every single day if the week while shes at work and every single weekend since hes been born excluding once i was puking on myself. I have him 95 hours a week but she still thinks i should be paying her bills.
@@TheSean89420 Stay strong, yield nothing. Good luck to you. Hopefully this is not in a current marriage, so you aren't at risk of having to pay her legal bills too.
She was taught that this was an okay way to act, and that as a mother she was entitled to that lifestyle. I pity the man for having children linked to her, and can only hope the kids at least are worth it.
@@johnhein2539 the judge should have overturned the custody to the father as soon as she revealed her laziness. Clearly not a penny is going to child care and I suspect child abuse is a daily thing in the house
@@Limitlesspower98 are you sure? I only ask because she seemed extremely shocked when the judge told her how much she was getting. Also, I’ve never heard of this show so I don’t know if it’s real or not.
Crazy cause she said that I believe right after she said “my mom pays for everything, she’s the homeowner” that shit sounds so crazy. Imagine how much hate a man would get for doing exactly what she’s doing…
She's an actress. Remember those are actors, the case is real but may have happened with different looking people. That audacity is probably for the show.
If a person is paying child support and the one receiving it ends up getting married and that person can provide for the child interestingly if it's reported to a court you will no longer have to pay child support cause all the basic needs are being meet
@@christianneikirk3723 I disagree with that. Another man shouldn't have to shoulder another man's child. That's like guy code 101, you sound like the type of guy that would fuck his homie's girlfriend & never tell him till he(homie) finds out himself or from others. Sad bro, sad.
@@dbzownz12345 dude is not saying you should have to shoulder another mans child dude literally says contact the courts so you dont have to lolol what crack are you smoking?
No. That would put any mother in the dependency child support was invented to prevent. Every parent has a responsibility. She is taking care for his child. If he does not want to see or deal with his child that puts the whole task on her shoulders. Living on 1k/month does only work because she has a free space to live in. You can not punish every single mother for the sins of some.
@@KarlSanathos that doesn't make sense. People shouldn't make a living for taking care of their own child. That's your responsibility, not a job. And if you can't even feed your own child then giving the custody to the other party who is financially stable should be the fucking right thing to do. Don't let the kid starve when there's a better option.
@@potatoes402 What the better option is depends on more factors than financial status. Forcing unwilling or endangered caretakers to stay with their partners just because they would lose custody enables all kinds of really bad situations. I do not deny that the system can be exploited. But combining custody and money while a child needs a caretaker which is at least for the first 3 years a full-time and then until the child has a job a part-time job puts the caretaker at the mercy of the money provider. Having to provide for one's offspring is an accomplishment not a burden. It gives freedom to the caretakers.
@@KarlSanathos lol, the topic is about the custody, so if there's a fight for custody, the one who can provide the best for the child should win. And clearly a mother who can't even feed her own child isn't suitable.
@@potatoes402 So the one who has a job and has the money but isn't available at least 10h/a day should win custody but the one who has the experience and time should loose? Not all caretakers are gold diggers. In my opinion no one should loose custody as long as there is no clear indication that the child is way better off without that person.
That woman did her best to try and get the Judge to look at the situation from an emotional standpoint. I was glad to see the Judge stayed on point and viewed the case from a logical standpoint, and just dealt with the facts of the case.
Their not together so it’s not cheating and so what if he making porn movies doesn’t mean he’s profiting off and he’s paying his child support she needs to get a job
@@WizardsBastard but the reference was to her reaction when the judge lowered the payment by $110 (even though she's still getting a lot more money out of it)
The state of Texas is so lucky to have you, Your Honor! Thank you for being fair-minded. No idea how you hold your tongue in some of these cases and maintain your professionalism. Congrats on being a RU-vid sensation and the NEXT Judge Judy :D
In this type of situation, watching the man coming out the courtroom being the victor is a real breath of fresh air... I could see the tiny dim light of hope slowly approaching
1. Refusing to get a job 2. Demanding for more child support 3. Complaining about her bedroom issues 🥴 WHO IN THE RIGHT FN MIND GET INVOLVED WITH THIS LUNATIC? Moral of the story: Being SINGLE might be a blessing for some.
Dad supporting the kid 100 percent and probably only seeing him every other weekend while good for nothing mother does nothing all day but talk shit on the dad. Basically family court in a nutshell
@@MrKentakie it's all depends on the cost of live, here where i live the cost to raise (with all of the better, like private school and top brand food and formula) for the children will cost around 2.500 of our currency, or 1.250 per parent, so the ideal cap here should be 1.250 per month
She straight up just said “I can get a job but I’m not going to..” While he has to bust his ass working everyday while being a dad when he has the child and still has to pay that cow who is open about not wanting to work at all. Something HAS to be done about these child support laws.
The fact that women actually go for money shows how weak some are. Here’s a suggestion, the relationship didn’t work. Move on, seek therapy, leave men alone especially if you have a child/children with a man. Be the strong and independent woman you are. Or be like this crab basket seeking money 🤦🏿♂️
He really needs a lawyer for this because it doesn't matter if his income has gone up she admitted while in court that she's misappropriating the child support funds for her own use as none of them are used to pay for the child combine that with her willful unemployment and she should absolutely not get a penny
Just imagine how supportive and dedicated this woman would be to supporting her husband if child support only meant that the money was to be spent on the child and being divorced actually meant being homeless on the street with nothing.
Love the fact that she cam in for an increase and it actually got reduced. HaHa. The judges face when she said I live for free why would I work. Priceless.
@@michaelchapin1976 It didn't get reduced unfortunately. It got increased by $400, she reduced $120 from the new value which was double what it was before.
@@jirenthegray no you understood wrong. He was giving her 600 a month. His responsibility was increased to 1200 - 200 from the healthcare roughly he did not win.
If they're separated -- IE, *not together* -- then why is it her business if he's seeing someone else, or simply viewing pornography? She thinks she can retroactively control his life?
@@Kiriali If he actually was, I'd commend him on getting away with it. Because that all would have done, is prevent true legalized theft. Where they press a man for more of his money, to give to a throughly irresponsible woman, who should be getting nothing from him. This is why marriage and cohabitation has started dying in the US. It takes a lot to completely fck over the value people see in romantic relationships, but CG, you managed.
@@Kiriali It depends on the laws of your state. I don't know where this is and don't care enough to look into it, but in MOST states they get ONLY money based on ONE job, at whatever it works out as for a 40 hour work week. You could have 7 other jobs, and they are not eligible for one extra single dime beyond that one job, at that one rate.
@@Kiriali It's not illegal to lie about making money to someone you're dating (which they were). It's illegal to lie to a COURT about your income. But see, we have no reason to believe he has lied to anyone besides possibly his ex (and even here it depends on the exact words he used and she's interpreting). He said he's getting 90 on a GOOD year. Meaning that's not a normal case. This is still the sum the judge issues on and notes that it's a very slight increase over reported. So, based on that, for him to have lied, you'd have to prove that his previous actual income was a good year but reported as average.
@@danieljonsson8095 I also note that the "very slight increase" amounted to changing the situation from $600 a month plus the $100 for health insurance to $1100 a month, after deducting the $100 in health insurance. That's going from a total cost of about $700 to about $1200.
-"i will get more if i get a job ?" -"no it would be more for the child" shows she doesn t give a shit about the kid, she s just here cuz she wants to get money and not have to work for shit
Because "Child Support" isn't child support in the USA. It is long term alimony, which is slavery. Real child support is much different. It is a fraction of the cost and shared equally between the parents.
Don’t forget a lot of people like to steal from the rich too in retail be like they make plenty of money not my problem. Lol or tax the rich more because they make so much money lol
I feel you, it’s so sad…This woman all she wanted was his money, like he owe her. TF…she tried everything to destroy him. She kept lying making up stories just to get his money. Her story didn’t add up, He’s a pornographer but then his thing ain’t working, she said that to destroy him just incase people see the show…This type woman can kill you. She gat some dark dark personality and 16yr old mind stupid AF!
The judge should have said something like ... You know this is Child support and not alimony, right? You should not be spending as much as a cent on yourself or your needs using your SONs money.
this is exactly the problem with "child" support only the "dad" is supporting the child. the court should order her to get a job and offset the payments. she is a sponge and a leach. I could work but I don't want to if this was the father, he would be in jail.
Exactly. There should be a set cost that is a generalization based on factual evidence of raising a child and that amount should be split. Any amount more than that should be clearly proven the need for. If both parents are capable and fit they should have equal custody rights.
@@ashleybuster7386 well really its a situational thing not everyone is fit to raise a child and some people dont want rights and pay fully. because its so different on the case by case bases their cant be a set standard.
@@owenmckoy1202 your mother did not put him in jail, if she did there would be no chance of them getting back together, people are fools. I have an ex and I know we won't be getting back together but I have fun poking the bear. lol
And if she has no expenses, why would she need more money? I would have given her ZERO increase, in fact I might have decreased it until she came back to court and proved that she had worked at least six months in some full time job.
Isn't the point of child support to help pay expenses for the child? Like why is dad paying for all of his son's and his ex wife's expenses? This is wild. The mom's mom should kick her ass out until she gets a job.
@@maryannanderson2213 what the 'mom' in this case didn't grasp, is that the 'child' support is for the 'child'. Not for the mom.. especially when the mom has no expenses of her own. Her ex isn't required to continue to support her (the mom) after the divorce. She needs to grow up.
Free food and free rent the dad is paying the insurance for the kid I don't know what you need to buy so bad but I think the kids needs are met without paying you a dime
@Mexicanus Prime i agree and with this cost for health issuance should be split 50-50 between the parents for the child no money should be going to the mother or what she wants
In Theory I agree but the reality is (though not in the fake case presented as she lived with family) is for most single parents man or woman receiving child support its very easy to justify it going towards rent alone. Dude was paying 600 a month. Im guessing they would be in Houston or DFW area if this case was real. 600 is approximately half the rent expected on an apartment with the child having their own bedroom. She upped his support to just over 1000. That kid almost certainly eats more than 200 a month in food and 200 in incidentals like hygiene products and growing out of clothing etc. What you want is an itemized receipt. News flash. you do that then someone in the government has to audit it. Guess what that means? Your support is going to go up for overhead costs or our taxes are. Are there deadbeat moms who go get free clothes at the church and salvation army cheese etc so they can spend that support check on themselves? Yep. Its not going to be most of them for the same reason most people follow other social norms. So what you want is to raise my taxes because you stuck your dipstick in crazy? No thanks.
The fact his child support was increased is CRAZY, the mother refused to work to provide for HER SON, she admitted the Rent and Food was FREE so it's just school and medical right? Plus clothes? That mother is spending all that cash on herself
She came there with every intention to make this man look bad! Her best interest was not of the child. It’s primarily about her getting her money! This is sad!
But instead made him look good. It showed him having more money. And also having way more sex. The way the judge sipped the cup when she mentioned it 😁.
and that's what she got 400 extra for a bum that sit's around collecting money from the dad that should have the child in the first place. when she said she doesn't work nor did she want to the judge should have put in a order for the dad to get the child. let a dad do that and see how fast the child get's rip from the dad lol.
All Soldiers in the military need you as a child support judge. From what I've seen with 23 years in the service, the single father usually gets raked over the coals.
There's two things that are wrong here! One is that child support is not a game as this judge constantly portrays in these videos it actually affects children and is the cause of many suicides and broken homes! Two child support is fundamentally and morally wrong in most case anyway because it is not based on actual necessity its just based on who makes more money which is not justice! These type of video do nothing to educate people its just gives low charactered people like the women in the video more vigor and confidence to continue being vindictive and spiteful!
As much as I am amazed and loves the entire video... Let me point out... Where are these videos? Please... Send me the link... Lol... I'd buy his video lol
@@matthewhummel1572 I got called less of a man the other day for not wanting to date a single mom at 23 years old. People that shame me for that are fucking delusional.
I tell all women I date long term that if you're expecting marriage than you'd best abadon ship now cause that'll never happen. I don't care if I have 2 dollars to my name, that's my fucking 2 dollars!
What is she thinking? What is going through her head? The whole point is to find a solution for the better to the child, not your own beneficial. This needs to come from both Mom and Dad
@@MikePurdue-ky9pm nah, some may pretend call themselves empowering, buy rest assured the rest of us knows it's not the case. It's time to call them out on it, so it get shamed away. There's a good reason to use shame. I remember having disagreement with a very good friend on that subject. I was frustrated that everyone thought she was exaggerating, but no one said it out loud, preferring to say, yes he's an ass. He wasn't she still doesn't realize it, but she did accept that her need for higher amount was her unwillingness to do the annoying job we all have to do. She worked but as a freelance and not sufficiently sustainable for the life style she wanted.
At the end the lady tried to insult the man's performance, yet it's clear he's performing just fine with *thousands* of people... except her. Guess she just doesn't have what it takes to recharge the batteries.
Fair?? How his child support increased because h is making more money. Why would he seek to further increase his income if he is going to get punished for it because let’s be honest she not using that child support for the kid she using it for herself that’s obvious but the court don’t care. The mom is lazy good for nothing and don’t want a job to take care of the kid so why do she have custody? Really think about it if he were to make himself a millionaire he would be paying thousands in child support and I bet you gunna see the ex wife driving a Mercedes.
@@davidtrojanowski1861 I agree with you and disagree because that same judge saw and literally heard from the ex wife mouth that she don’t want to get a job even if it’s for her kid. She is using her kid to get free money basically from the father. She showed what her plan was and it was scummy if the judge was really fair she wouldn’t have increased the child support and or just gave the father custody of the child he seem like a way better parent. In my opinion that would be rational and fair to both the kid and husband. Imagine that kid growing up with that mother and seeing her use him to get more and more money from the father.
@@Prec1sion-Aim I understand your point and agree with your stance. The problem is a judge cannot choose which laws to follow or ignore, especially laws that are clear cut like child support. Even if this judge denied an increase in child support, the woman would appeal to another judge and her request would be granted. These laws need to be changed.
He couldn't be - he has dead batteries ;) And don't you love how HER EX-HUSBAND was cheating on her in HER/THEIR bed? When that D was finalized, there was no cheating and it wasn't HER?THEIR bed...Let it go...LOL
So what is she gonna do when the child ages out where he no longer has to pay support? And what if her mother dies, what is she going to do? If she has no means to care for her kid outside of child support she could lose custody.
This is very irritating.. women who can physically work and refuse to work still get child support increased.. the system is broken and shame on this so called mother who takes advantage of her mother and her kids father and doesn't have her own place.
Yes, If I had the chance I would make the child support upper limit to still be a percentage of the dads income, but to also be based on the moms income. Say up to 50% of the moms income, not to exceed 30% of the dads kind of thing(numbers are just an example). Then, mothers would have to work to receive support and if they don't, they should risk losing custody.
@@mithicash1444 That is honeslty a great idea. I mean 30% is kind of big amount still ( depending on place but here you get 3k per month and renting a flat (even 20 m square ) is taking about half of that up to two thirds. So I guess it should be just additional tax that get's taken out of ammounts you actually can save. Or simply do Salomon judgement. If both of them can't take care of kid then country will in orphanage. I guess that would cool some people a bit when it's not you that's gonna be getting cash.
Something seriously needs to be done about these child support laws. It's just insane how a person can come into a courtroom and right in front of a judge and the world to see and say I'm not doing anything and he's/she's going to pay for it. That should be unacceptable.
If child support is absolutely necessary, I think it should be enough for half for the care child, if the mother can work and chooses not to. But I understand if the mother CAN'T work and she needs help with the child then I'm all for a higher child support, so long as she can care for her child.
@@farewelljupiter I mean it's both parents' responsibility to provide for the child they created so yes they do. I just think the parent providing child support should only give enough to help the child, not the parent with custody. After all, sometimes custody isn't super easy. Saying no one should pay child support is pretty deadbeat material if I gotta be honest.
@@heedmywarning2792 that's actually a pretty good idea. And if you need to spend it on the kid for an emergency you gotta submit a receipt to ether Social Services of the IRS which ever is more appropriate.
This is straight sad that she is allowed to basically sit around all day and able to work but chooses not to get a job while still collecting child support.
Well, first of all, this is scripted and these are actors. But let's assume this case is real: First of all, even though she is being portrayed as incompetent and arrogant, being a full time parent is not an "I do nothing" job. A stay home mom is celebrated when she's married. Why is she not when she's divorced? Most women do wanna have a career and a baby and people always assume they can't/shouldn't or even accuse them that they will be bad/ neglectful mothers. And that's when they actually do have a partner to share the house chores and parenting. But when they're completely on their own, with full custody, then the world expects them to pursue a career, cause otherwise they're taking advantage of men? I don't get it. Also, when a parent, regardless of gender, is making more money, they would want to spend more on their child as well, exactly because they can afford it. Why is it that divorce parents view child support as "giving my ex a salary" and try to avoid paying it? These are money they should be gladly spending for their child. Besides (again this is scripted, but for the sake of the argument), he couldn't have his career and shoot those thousands of porn videos, while being a real full time father to his own child. Thus his ex being a stay home mom and having full custody is actually helping him to make more money. Personally I believe both men and women should be independent financially and pursuing careers but, still, they should get child support if they have full custody. Child support exists for the children, not for the adults. Whoever gets full custody should always get it.
@@gk9546the problem is that she probably isn't even spending it on the child. She doesn't need to, her mommy is doing everything financially for him and her. That's why she was mad it was so low. Being a single mom is awesome if you have a s/o that makes enough so you don't have to and can be with your child. She's choosing to not do anything and is grossed out by the word job ffs. I guess because her mommy is paying for everything, that's okay. She should be showing her son what adults should be doing
Just sad af she want that man to take care of her not the child she don’t want no money if she don’t wanna work and your bills free already she want everything free in life 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
If she has no rent, the child has no rent If she gets free food, the child has free food What is she gonna spend the money on, herself???? Wtf If y’all not together, get a damn job and stop being lazy, your teaching your child wrong habits
Soooo she is saying he is bad in bed..... but also saying he is so good in bed, he is making bank off the 1000's of porn shoots he is doing in the house with 100's of women.
Well I know of a woman who had three kids and their father died and she lived off of their money they got from their father who worked for along time his security went to those kids and their mother never worked she used their money to live off right up till her last 3rd child graduated from high school just last year and dang woman never took care of herself health wise and she got too sick has heart problems and diabetic and she went on ssi.and here's the kicker the dumb woman won't try to improve her health its terrible that she is abusing alot ok f stuff..
@@insertname9581 obviously there are circumstances but that lazy woman is contributing nothing to the upbringing of that child. Financial responsibility works both ways.
Nope thats not good for the child at all and wouldnt work out for perents at all as well magine a perents working fulltime and now they also have a child fulltime with no one to look after it? they would also lose their job and then no one would ahve custody, you need to leanr to put some thought into your ideas
