I think it's a good idea, it can build a new bridge connection bklyn with manhattan to release that gridlock traffic on the manhattan bridge and bklyn bridge on the BQE.
Paris 1992 olympic bid 🇨🇵 1986 lost Barcelona 1992 olympic 🇪🇦 win Paris 2008 olympic bid 🇨🇵 2001 lost Beijing 2008 olympic 🇨🇳 win Paris 2012 olympic bid 🇨🇵 2005 lost London 2012 olympic 🇬🇧 win
Saudi art to excavate a huge salt water lake, lined eith india rubber sheets tit disable diffusion, inorder to encourage evaporation during day and rains by night?
My grandmother used to live in that area back in the 80s. I remember visiting her and there was a McDonalds at the corner of 34th St. and 10th Ave. I think it was the only McD in Manhattan with a huge parking lot. Hudson Yards used to be a desolate area with lots of old buildings built in early 1900s, some late 1800s.
Anstatt soviel Geld zum Fensterheraus zu werfen hätte die Afghanische Regierung gescheiter Atombomben und Raketen in Russland gekauft das wäre tausendmal gescheiter gewrsen als eon völlig überflüssigen und wertlosen "Kanal" zu bauen VÖLLIG SCHWACHSINNIG!!!!!!!@@
If you have watched Peter Zeihan, these countries have no choice but to develop agriculture in the face of both Russia and Ukraine dropping out of the market.
As long as Sudan is slow filling the dam with Egypt getting its share as the project fills up, things should be cool. I think Egypt is making sure they are not going to lose their share trough lack of complaining about the possible problem. Better to make it clear and prevent issues by being vocal than have issues that have to be fixed with tanks. I wonder if Egypt might be buying Turkish tanks in lieu of Russian ones?
The fact that Afghanistan cares about an overall economy is a massive change. I guess all those years of misery and destroyed treasure might be worth something as long as Afghanistan remains a decent neighbor for everyone. I hope the current Taliban is not the barbarians that their granddaddies were.
I could understand this kind of projects in Singapore or Monaco, but USA? I mean having absurdly lots of land in other directions. This is for retarded
A bill of goods sold to the public by government and the utilities amounted to a false promise of cheap energy and unlimited recreation. But, at what cost? Dams are dangerous and destructive and it's about time that we as Americans say no to pork barrel projects that are ruining our fisheries and the environment.
As far back as I can remember I have seen pushes to un-dam the Klamath.
21 день назад
So, Pacific Corporation the owners of the dams in this video. Had to update these structures to meet EPA standards. That would have required Millions of dollars of shareholders money. So, it was in their best interest to remove them with grants totaling 430 million dollars of taxpayer supplied money. Sounds all "Green" and warm and fuzzy. Too bad the overwhelming amount of sediment that had been building up since the dams were built, was released too fast and suffocated the fish the say they were trying to save. Now Foster Lake is a brown mucky mess. Hopefully in five or ten years it will be Beautiful again.
There have been some very bad outcomes lately with dam removal. Usually story that has a predicted outcome of rainbows and unicorns. But then after the gact the reality hits.
Gas and oil: EVIL, and bad for the environment, but they meet our needs. Hydro: EVIL, and bad for the environment, but they meet our needs. Nukes: EVIL, and not bad for the environment, but they meet our needs. Solar and wind: We love them, even though only an uneducated idiot thinks they can possibly ever meet our needs, so we still need gas, oil, and nukes to meet our our needs. Also, it turns out, bad for the environment.
How do they plan on dealing with the flow of water through the East River/estuary? They're looking to cut down the space for it by about 95%. Where do they think that water will go when it hits this new bottleneck? My guess is it'll flood Brooklyn and Manhattan
I think it is a big mistake to destroy existing hydroelectric dams. Fish habitats have stabilized, and we are not going to have any salmon going extinct in the next 100 years. However, if we do not switch to clean energy, that will have a far greater impact on humans and fish. Hydroelectric is some of the cleanest power we have. I am not saying build more dams but rather keep what we have until we get our collective heads out of our bums and build more nuclear.
2:00 Ummmm question: if you create this land to help create more housing, wouldn’t that endure more activity to a point where more people will come and you will still have a lack of housing? 3:20 even the evidence you use to create more land still has us at a point where we still need more housing. It just endures more demand especially if you have an open boarder allowing people to enter without hinderance to come in.
